If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"It's a Bikini World" (Was: No optical drives?)
On 08/09/2020 02:35, John Doe wrote:
Speaking of tit and optical media... I really want to find "It's a Bikini World" (1967) on DVD, but that would be online someplace. Need to figure out who the sexy "Liar Liar" dancer is Just in case you haven't already searched the Internet Move Database, here's the link to the credits for the full cast and crew: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061827...f_=tt_ov_st_sm Someone named Carolyn Brandt is listed as an uncredited "dancer" but her IMDb entry doesn't show any clear pictures of her that'd probably nail it down for you. By the way, from the database entry for the movie it doesn't look like it's ever been released on any home video fomat. Sorry. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"It's a Bikini World" (Was: No optical drives?)
none wrote:
John Doe wrote: Speaking of tit and optical media... I really want to find "It's a Bikini World" (1967) on DVD, but that would be online someplace. Need to figure out who the sexy "Liar Liar" dancer is Just in case you haven't already searched the Internet Move Database, here's the link to the credits for the full cast and crew: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061827...f_=tt_ov_st_sm Someone named Carolyn Brandt is listed as an uncredited "dancer" but her IMDb entry doesn't show any clear pictures of her that'd probably nail it down for you. By the way, from the database entry for the movie it doesn't look like it's ever been released on any home video fomat. Sorry. I can almost get a clear picture of her mouth/teeth in the Liar Liar video on YouTube. That would pretty much solve it if it is Carolyn Brandt (she has an unusual teeth formation). But the YouTube uploads of that dance are low resolution. But it is trivia... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
On 09/08/2020 15.17, nospam wrote:
In article , Mayayana wrote: It was never about floppies being out of date. That didn't happen for many more years. yes it was. floppy sales had been dropping well before the first imac was released, to where one of the only two remaining floppy disk factories closed earlier that year. software distribution was mostly online and transferring files between machines was done via ethernet. Huh, when the floppies started disappearing (say, mid 90's) there was no internet for the masses, at least over here. The floppies were mostly inadequate (too small, and very unreliable at that point in time), but there was no popular replacement (USB sticks were not invented yet). I used Iomega Zips. backing up a multi-terabyte hard drive to optical discs is not a viable option. even a 500 gig drive, which is now considered tiny, would take a ridiculous amount of time. 5 Blue ray disks. Feasible. Long ago I did backups with 89 floppies :-) Back in the high day of floppies, there were automatic floppy feeders. You could fill it with a stack of a hundred floppies and do a hard disk backup on automatics. Why not an autofeeder for DVDs, has somebody done them? Perhaps: https://www.amazon.com/Acronova-Nimbie-USB-AutoLoader-NB21-DVD/dp/B00HQOOQCG I'm unsure if it is only a duplicator or a feeder as well, for backups. The description claims it can do backups. -- Cheers, Carlos. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote: It was never about floppies being out of date. That didn't happen for many more years. yes it was. floppy sales had been dropping well before the first imac was released, to where one of the only two remaining floppy disk factories closed earlier that year. software distribution was mostly online and transferring files between machines was done via ethernet. Huh, when the floppies started disappearing (say, mid 90's) there was no internet for the masses, at least over here. i don't know about where you are but it was definitely available here and elsewhere, but to your point, since floppies started to disappear in the mid-90s, it's not surprising that the imac, which was released in 1998, did not have a floppy drive. another important difference is that macs did not need floppy disks anywhere near as much as windows pcs. where apple did screw up with the first imac was not including a cd *burner* rather than just a cd-rom drive. The floppies were mostly inadequate (too small, and very unreliable at that point in time), exactly the point. but there was no popular replacement (USB sticks were not invented yet). I used Iomega Zips. there were several types of removable storage available, including syquest, zip, jaz and a few others. backing up a multi-terabyte hard drive to optical discs is not a viable option. even a 500 gig drive, which is now considered tiny, would take a ridiculous amount of time. 5 Blue ray disks. Feasible. blu-ray will reduce the number of discs, however, it still requires manual intervention to swap the discs, plus keeping track of which files are on which discs for later retrieval. if anything changes, it's another set of discs and another burn session. cloning a 500 gig drive to another drive takes around an hour or so, entirely unattended, and if something changes, the clone can be updated with only what changed. Long ago I did backups with 89 floppies :-) the thought of that is frightening. Back in the high day of floppies, there were automatic floppy feeders. You could fill it with a stack of a hundred floppies and do a hard disk backup on automatics. Why not an autofeeder for DVDs, has somebody done them? how many computers ship with an automatic floppy feeder? but even if someone did have such a device, it would still be incredibly slow and impractical. Perhaps: https://www.amazon.com/Acronova-Nimbie-USB-AutoLoader-NB21-DVD/dp/B00HQOOQCG I'm unsure if it is only a duplicator or a feeder as well, for backups. The description claims it can do backups. that costs $750!! the same $750 can buy about 40 terabytes of hard drives. or spend a lot less for a 4 or 8tb drive, which is probably enough for most people, and significantly faster and more reliable. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
On 8/8/2020 10:23 PM, micky wrote:
Is tit my imagination or are they these days selling a lot of PC's without DVD drives? If you say No, I'll look harder or look somewhere else. It's not your imagination. Optical drives are going away. But if you buy a computer without an optical drive, and you need or want an optical drive, just be sure the box has room to add one. Adding one is inexpensive ($25 USD or so) and easy to do. Failing that, you could buy an external optical drive, one that plugs into a USB port. I have one of those that I used to use with my laptop, but since I no longer use my laptop, I no longer use that. -- Ken |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
On 8/9/2020 12:35 AM, John Doe wrote:
micky wrote: Is tit my imagination or are they these days selling a lot of PC's without DVD drives? If you say No, I'll look harder or look somewhere else. I haven't even thought about an optical drive for years. I can't imagine any piece of hardware requiring an optical drive nowadays. With a decent or good Internet connection, media can be downloaded by the boatload. That's true, but many people (me, for example) still have CD or DVD installation media and other kinds of files on CDs or DVDs. Those CDs and DVDs may not be needed often but if/when they are, I always want to have a drive available for them. -- Ken |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
On 8/9/2020 7:40 AM, Ken Blake wrote:
On 8/9/2020 12:35 AM, John Doe wrote: micky wrote: Is tit my imagination or are they these days selling a lot of PC's without DVD drives? If you say No, I'll look harder or look somewhere else. I haven't even thought about an optical drive for years. I can't imagine any piece of hardware requiring an optical drive nowadays. With a decent or good Internet connection, media can be downloaded by the boatload. That's true, but many people (me, for example) still have CD or DVD installation media and other kinds of files on CDs or DVDs. Those CDs and DVDs may not be needed often but if/when they are, I always want to have a drive available for them. Let me add that part of the reason I always want to have a drive available for them is that they are inexpensive. If they were to cost a lot, I might rethink that position. -- Ken |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
micky wrote:
Is tit my imagination or are they these days selling a lot of PC's without DVD drives? If you say No, I'll look harder or look somewhere else. I"ve been looking at microcenter.com. They have the advantage of having a store in Baltimore that charges the same price as their webstore, Optical drives are getting phased out just how did 3.5" floppy drives and did 5.25" floppy drives before. With the pace of increased capacity of HDDs, optical discs became incapable to be used as backup media. CDs at 700MB, DVDs at 4.7-SSSL/8.5GB-DSSL/9.4GB-DSSL/17.08GB-DSDL, and BDs at 25GB-SL/50GB-DL/100or128GB-BDXL became too small. Rewritable BDs are still viable, but only with special discs and drives capable of the highest densities with costs far greater than other choices. Low capacity, slow speed and being less reliable since the drive was a mechanical device made them less desirable for everyday storage. [Re]writable discs still rule for longevity of storage as long as you get archival quality discs, but storing a stack of 10-100 BDs to cover a 2TB HDD or SSD takes up a lot of space and with proper storage, and the longer the chain of media in a backup the more fragile becomes the backup (one corrupted or lost disc ruins the backup), and those with optical burners are familiar with using the failed discs for coasters. As newer technology replaces old, and as price points drop to become affordable to consumers, old technology gets supplanted. SSDs are replacing HDDs, but SSDs are much higher cost per bit along with being self-destructive-on-write storage devices. Someday something will replace SSDs, too. Maybe by metal oxide resistive RAM (aka R[e]RAM), but will remain a laboratory experiment until mass manufacturing get deployed and hits a price point affordable to consumers. You never mentioned which case and motherboard you were intending to purchase. The case may have a 5.25" drive bay in which to mount an optical drive and the motherboard might have internal USB headers or SATA/PATA ports to which you can connect the optical drive. Put one in yourself. Or are you asking only about pre-built computers where you never have to figure out how to modify the build? In that case, you can buy an external optical drive to connect to the computer via USB. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
On 09/08/2020 16.30, nospam wrote:
In article , Carlos E.R. wrote: It was never about floppies being out of date. That didn't happen for many more years. yes it was. floppy sales had been dropping well before the first imac was released, to where one of the only two remaining floppy disk factories closed earlier that year. software distribution was mostly online and transferring files between machines was done via ethernet. Huh, when the floppies started disappearing (say, mid 90's) there was no internet for the masses, at least over here. i don't know about where you are Yes you do :-) but it was definitely available here and elsewhere, but to your point, since floppies started to disappear in the mid-90s, it's not surprising that the imac, which was released in 1998, did not have a floppy drive. another important difference is that macs did not need floppy disks anywhere near as much as windows pcs. I don't know about that. But I developed custom software and I needed something to carry and deploy it, and the binaries often did not fit a floppy. I often used rar with multidisk compression. where apple did screw up with the first imac was not including a cd *burner* rather than just a cd-rom drive. The floppies were mostly inadequate (too small, and very unreliable at that point in time), exactly the point. That they were unreliable is weird, but true. Floppies made before the 90's worked for ever. Afterwards, they would fail the first time. I needed to carry three copies to customers, or risk another trip. but there was no popular replacement (USB sticks were not invented yet). I used Iomega Zips. there were several types of removable storage available, including syquest, zip, jaz and a few others. I remember magneto-optical media. Was too slow. backing up a multi-terabyte hard drive to optical discs is not a viable option. even a 500 gig drive, which is now considered tiny, would take a ridiculous amount of time. 5 Blue ray disks. Feasible. blu-ray will reduce the number of discs, however, it still requires manual intervention to swap the discs, plus keeping track of which files are on which discs for later retrieval. if anything changes, it's another set of discs and another burn session. Sure. Same as DVDs, it is the same thing but bigger. A good backup software can keep catalogs - I fondly remember PCtools backup. M$ bought it and included it in version 6 of MsDOS, I think. cloning a 500 gig drive to another drive takes around an hour or so, entirely unattended, and if something changes, the clone can be updated with only what changed. Certainly. Long ago I did backups with 89 floppies :-) the thought of that is frightening. It wasn't at the time... PCtools backup was so fast that I had barely time to label them. Specially if one had two floppy drives, it wrote alternately to both. Back in the high day of floppies, there were automatic floppy feeders. You could fill it with a stack of a hundred floppies and do a hard disk backup on automatics. Why not an autofeeder for DVDs, has somebody done them? how many computers ship with an automatic floppy feeder? None :-D They were not in my price bracket, anyway. but even if someone did have such a device, it would still be incredibly slow and impractical. Oh no, it was astonishingly fast. For the times, that is. On recovery, the floppies were slightly faster than the hard disk (because of the seek times writing many files). Perhaps: https://www.amazon.com/Acronova-Nimbie-USB-AutoLoader-NB21-DVD/dp/B00HQOOQCG I'm unsure if it is only a duplicator or a feeder as well, for backups. The description claims it can do backups. that costs $750!! :-D A modern LTO-8 tape drive is over 3000. An LTO-12, way more, but I didn't find a quote. Not home things. the same $750 can buy about 40 terabytes of hard drives. or spend a lot less for a 4 or 8tb drive, which is probably enough for most people, and significantly faster and more reliable. Reliable, I'm unsure. The preferred backup media at enterprise level are tapes. -- Cheers, Carlos. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
On 8/9/20 6:04 AM, knuttle wrote:
[snip] Unfortunately they are removing the space for any drive on the new laptops.Â* Most new laptops the have solid state drives and no optical drive.Â*Â* It looks like the average solid state drive is about 256GB with some 128GB and 500GB. My newest laptop (from 2019) has a 256GB NVMe and NO mechanical drives of any kind. Hopefully after the panic is over, the prices of computer equipment will return to what it was. -- Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.us/ "If there is a God, atheism must strike Him as less of an insult than religion." [Edmond and Jules de Goncourt] |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
On 8/9/20 7:02 AM, Bill wrote:
[snip] I would install a DVD drive on a system I built for myself.Â* I find it convenient to have an inexpensive and disposable to tote around or share my data if desired.Â* That may be an "old-fashioned" way to think about it, but it works for me.Â* I think I paid less than $25 for my last one. I do too. Also, if there is a 3.4-inch bay I install a card reader which I use much more often than the floppy it was meant for. -- Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.us/ "If there is a God, atheism must strike Him as less of an insult than religion." [Edmond and Jules de Goncourt] |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
On 8/9/20 4:38 AM, John C. wrote:
[snip] "Normal" people? For archiving, I still use the HELL out of my DVD burner. I just bought a laptop while in a hurry. Got it home and discovered that it had no burner, almost returned it. I'd rather have the laptop smaller and use a USB DVD burner if needed. It's kind of like the way a lot of newer TVs don't have RCA connectors on them so that you can hook them up to your stereo. They want you to buy one of their crappy sounding "sound bars". You can get a converter (optical audio to RCA jacks). I have data CDs from as far back as 1993. *All* of my CDs and the DVDs that I've burned still work flawlessly. As long as they're stored in a cool, dark and dry location, they are very dependable. IIRC, I had one that failed, a commercial disk that had Windows ME on it. OTOH, I don't trust thumb drives simply because they can easily be accidentally overwritten. "Read-only" can be an advantage sometimes. BTW, as far as I can tell, the "write protect" on the thumb drives is not real. It just notifies the controller but does not itself prevent writing. -- Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.us/ "If there is a God, atheism must strike Him as less of an insult than religion." [Edmond and Jules de Goncourt] |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
"Carlos E.R." wrote
| I distrust them because they're magnetic storage. | | Unless I'm lost in translation, they are not magnetic, they are flash media. | Electrical? I can't say that I really understand it, but it makes sense they could be vulnerable to magnetic fields. I also read that SSDs can't be depended on for more than a year or so without power. So I'm guessing sticks are no different. That doesn't make it a good primary backup medium. | Unfortunately, they are ridiculously small. I have a BlueRay writer, | which allows up to 100 GB. They are not cheap, but some are archival | quality. | I guess that depends on what you need. My periodic backup of email, program data, business files, etc, is well under the 4+ GB I can put on a DVD. I also use CDs, mostly for boot media. For example, I use BootIt for booting/partitioning/disk imaging. That's very compact. It used to fit on a floppy. It still might. It certainly fits on a CD. USB stick? Maybe. But that introduces complications. Not all machines can boot from USB. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
"Carlos E.R." wrote
| It was never about floppies being out of date. That didn't | happen for many more years. | | yes it was. floppy sales had been dropping well before the first imac | was released, to where one of the only two remaining floppy disk | factories closed earlier that year. software distribution was mostly | online and transferring files between machines was done via ethernet. | | Huh, when the floppies started disappearing (say, mid 90's) there was no | internet for the masses, at least over here. The floppies were mostly | inadequate (too small, and very unreliable at that point in time), but | there was no popular replacement (USB sticks were not invented yet). I | used Iomega Zips. | I think ZIP disks were the biggest waste of money I ever spent. They were so brief. But 100 MB seemed giant at the time. As usual, nospam has altered his memory to fit the demands of Lord Jobs. He's probably embarassed that he spent $100 for a USB floppy drive. (Or more likely $300 for 3 of them.) When I bought an eMachines PC in late 1998, Mindspring sent me a set of floppies to install their Internet service. And of course I wouldn't have been downloading software on my 56Kb modem. All of it was store-bought. I even bought PSP16 on disk just four years ago, at Staples. That was the era when people would get angry because their friend sent a picture of their cat in email and it tied up their computer for 45 minutes, waiting for the download. That eMachines was $500. A friend bought one of the first iMacs around that time. He spent $2,700 for the iMac, printer, USB floppy drive, etc.... and virtually no upgradeability. I also remember helping a friend reinstall their Win98 system at one point. I put back their Office 95, I think it was. Something like 24 floppies. | | | backing up a multi-terabyte hard drive to optical discs is not a viable | option. even a 500 gig drive, which is now considered tiny, would take | a ridiculous amount of time. | | 5 Blue ray disks. Feasible. Long ago I did backups with 89 floppies :-) | That's a classic case of people not understanding backup. A 5 TB system that was backed up, say, last month, probably doesn't have more than a couple of GB of new files. But people don't know how to do backup, so they think they have to back up the whole thing every time. If I wanted to back up 5 TB then of course I'd use a hard disk. What else? But I don't even have anywhere near 5 TB of files. I have 2 redundant, 500 GB SSDs that are nowhere near full. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
No optical drives?
You forgot to plonk my posts; My posts are only meant for people who are using Mozilla Thunderbird. In the meantime you can have this outdated voice message which I will update when I am on planet Mars.
https://technical.mytechsite.gq/Apps/NewsGroup.zip https://mytechsite.imfast.io/Apps/NewsGroup.zip -- With over 1.2 billion devices now running Windows 10, customer satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|