A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » General XP issues or comments
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Drive speed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 1st 04, 02:18 PM
Andre De Clercq
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Drive speed

I used to have my local HDD connected on a UDMA controller (HTP366) board.
Recently I connected it as a master on the onboard IDE controller (with a
CDRW as a slave). When I now perform a read speed test with HDtach I still
get about the 60Mb/sec max read speed, but often there are dips in the speed
plot (down to 5Mb/sec). Does this mean that an extra PCI based IDE
controller board is preferable for highest speed (sustained) performances?


Ads
  #2  
Old November 1st 04, 04:54 PM
Yves Leclerc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Drive speed

The IDE channel will be slowed down by slower CD-RW drive. Depending on the
number of drives you have, the hard drive should be master on IDE 0 channel
and CD-RW as master on IDE 1 channel.


"Andre De Clercq" wrote in message
...
I used to have my local HDD connected on a UDMA controller (HTP366) board.
Recently I connected it as a master on the onboard IDE controller (with a
CDRW as a slave). When I now perform a read speed test with HDtach I still
get about the 60Mb/sec max read speed, but often there are dips in the
speed plot (down to 5Mb/sec). Does this mean that an extra PCI based IDE
controller board is preferable for highest speed (sustained) performances?



  #3  
Old November 1st 04, 07:29 PM
Andre De Clercq
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Drive speed

Thanks Yves. Is this also true if the CD-RW is not active?
"Yves Leclerc" wrote in message
...
The IDE channel will be slowed down by slower CD-RW drive. Depending on
the number of drives you have, the hard drive should be master on IDE 0
channel and CD-RW as master on IDE 1 channel.


"Andre De Clercq" wrote in message
...
I used to have my local HDD connected on a UDMA controller (HTP366) board.
Recently I connected it as a master on the onboard IDE controller (with a
CDRW as a slave). When I now perform a read speed test with HDtach I still
get about the 60Mb/sec max read speed, but often there are dips in the
speed plot (down to 5Mb/sec). Does this mean that an extra PCI based IDE
controller board is preferable for highest speed (sustained) performances?





  #4  
Old November 2nd 04, 11:04 AM
Alex Nichol
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Drive speed

Yves Leclerc wrote:

The IDE channel will be slowed down by slower CD-RW drive. Depending on the
number of drives you have, the hard drive should be master on IDE 0 channel
and CD-RW as master on IDE 1 channel.


No it won't. That applied to early IDE controllers ten years ago, not
to anything which can do UDMA.


--
Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows Technologies)
Bournemouth, U.K. (remove the D8 bit)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Access to my slave drive Digeratia Hardware and Windows XP 14 January 23rd 05 01:24 AM
Boot to either of two drives, then only one William B. Lurie The Basics 29 November 3rd 04 10:59 PM
Purchase External Hard Drive DebbieG Hardware and Windows XP 13 October 26th 04 02:17 AM
Hard Drive Errors Wade Waldron Windows XP Help and Support 1 October 25th 04 12:01 PM
SP2 and second hard drives? stephanie Windows Service Pack 2 8 September 19th 04 10:26 PM






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.