Ha! Ads be gone!

On 2020-08-19 5:58 p.m., nospam wrote:
In article , Snit
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

Rene

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:21:11 -0500, Rene Lamontagne
wrote:

On 2020-08-19 5:58 p.m., nospam wrote:
In article , Snit
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

Rene

I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense.
It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into
a corner.
Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from
both corners of his mouth.
More fun!
--

Ron Gilmore
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html

Rene Lamontagne wrote:
On 2020-08-19 5:58 p.m., nospam wrote:
In article , Snit
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

Rene



I am pretty good at letting those who troll “trap� themselves. It is quite
amusing.

But I prefer to talk about tech.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

In article , Snit
wrote:


apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your
notation incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can1t see
that or disagree then whatever.

Nospam avoided this.

there's nothing to avoid.

the above stability fix has *nothing* to do with windows. full stop.

you are avoiding what the bug is actually about, which was explained in
simple terms.

you are intentionally avoiding that explanation, as well as how
something that does not mention windows can be about windows.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

Nospam avoided this.

another false claim of yours, solely to avoid admitting your errors.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

Specific to? You made that up.

nothing is made up.

you claimed the fix is for windows, despite no mention of windows.

i'm sure you will avoid explaining how that can be.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

They are used to run Windows. Sorry, I figured that was common knowledge. Did
not realize I needed to explain that to you. My mistake.

your mistake is claiming knowledge you do not have, a mistake you
continue to make and never learn from.

vm apps are used for much more than running windows.

many people do not use them for windows guests at all, particularly mac
users and app developers, who frequently use a vm app to virtualize
older versions of mac os.

https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-Fu...sion.using.doc
/GUID-FF41B265-79D1-4AD8-822B-95A86A05DE8B.html
Fusion supports more than 100 guest operating systems, including most
versions of Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, OS X, and macOS.



do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate you:

lose the attitude.

Nothing wrong with you learning. If you can.

nothing wrong with losing the attitude and not being combative.

however, it does appear that it is impossible for you to learn anything.

And below you throw a tantrum. Not interested. I prefer to talk about tech.

no you very definitely don't.

any time anyone talks 'tech' you either do not understand it and refuse
to learn why, or you simply ignore it outright.

what you call 'tech' includes an explanation of the bug in easy to
understand terms, at which point you replied with
Not interested.



https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

In article , Rene Lamontagne
wrote:


apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can1t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

not at all. i'm well aware of his antics.

he's *so* over his head he doesn't even know what he's saying.

In article , Snit
wrote:


I am pretty good at letting those who troll ³trap² themselves. It is quite
amusing.

thereby proving you are nothing more than a troll.

and apparently you're not that good, since you trapped yourself, big
time.

But I prefer to talk about tech.

no you don't, since any time anyone does so, you ignore it because it
shows how little you actually know.

In article , Ron
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your
notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

Rene

I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense.

exactly.

It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into
a corner.
Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from
both corners of his mouth.
More fun!

some of gremlin's posts are crossposted here.

Snit wrote:
nospam wrote:
In article , Snit
wrote:


apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can’t see
that or disagree then whatever.

Nospam responded to this by bragging he knows other OSs can be run in
virtualization as if that was surprising to him.

At least he is learning.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. Here, to help educate
you:

https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing. Not interested.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.







--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

nospam wrote:
In article , Rene Lamontagne
wrote:


apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can1t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

not at all. i'm well aware of his antics.

he's *so* over his head he doesn't even know what he's saying.


I am saying I agree with Apple about what Apple is doing with Silicon.

And you keep insisting I am wrong. It is rather funny. But, hey, you did
some research and found other OSs can be run in virtualization — something
that was never in contention. Well done.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

nospam wrote:
In article , Snit
wrote:


I am pretty good at letting those who troll ³trap² themselves. It is quite
amusing.

thereby proving you are nothing more than a troll.

and apparently you're not that good, since you trapped yourself, big
time.

But I prefer to talk about tech.

no you don't, since any time anyone does so, you ignore it because it
shows how little you actually know.


I respond to your trolling and you call me names. Oh well.

Anyway, back to tech: I still agree with Apple about their Silicon and how
it will not support the virtualization of x86 Windows.

How about you?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

nospam wrote:
In article , Ron
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your
notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

Rene

I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense.

exactly.

It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into
a corner.
Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from
both corners of his mouth.
More fun!

some of gremlin's posts are crossposted here.


Anyway, back to tech: I still agree with Apple about their Silicon and how
it will not support the virtualization of x86 Windows.

How about you?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:08:30 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Snit
wrote:


I am pretty good at letting those who troll ³trap² themselves. It is quite
amusing.

thereby proving you are nothing more than a troll.

and apparently you're not that good, since you trapped yourself, big
time.

But I prefer to talk about tech.

no you don't, since any time anyone does so, you ignore it because it
shows how little you actually know.

Snit's a terrible troll, in the classic sense, and much like
everything else in life, he is inept at trolling as well because his
socks always get outed.

Ask snit about his tmelmosfire sock puppet.

That one is rather interesting because it was posting the same style
of gibberish posts long before snit's flood bot was unleashed.

Then there was his Houston Starterpad sock puppet which was short
lived because he was outed right away.

The one thing snit is good at is disruption and causing chaos. When
snit joins a group it won't be long before the group turns into a
gigantic food fight.

And that is snit's goal.
He doesn't want to talk tech anymore than he wants to find a job.
To him both are like a crucifix in the morning sun to a vampire.



--

Ron Gilmore
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:08:28 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Rene Lamontagne
wrote:


apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can1t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

not at all. i'm well aware of his antics.

he's *so* over his head he doesn't even know what he's saying.

Snit's probably mixing his medications with booze again. It's a little
early in the week for him but since he's really screwed up in ACW he
might need to take the edge off if you get my drift.
--

Ron Gilmore
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:08:31 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Ron
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your
notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

Rene

I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense.

exactly.

It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into
a corner.
Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from
both corners of his mouth.
More fun!

some of gremlin's posts are crossposted here.

Thanks.
I just realized that.
Duh!!!
My bad.
--

Ron Gilmore
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html

On 20 Aug 2020 00:26:09 GMT, Snit
wrote:

nospam wrote:
In article , Ron
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your
notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

Rene

I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense.

exactly.

It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into
a corner.
Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from
both corners of his mouth.
More fun!

some of gremlin's posts are crossposted here.


Anyway, back to tech:

That's "snit speak" for my snit circus is running out of steam and I
want to keep my snit circus alive.

Face it snit, you have really let the genie out of the bottle this
time. And besides, it's impossible to talk tech with you because other
than the basics that you have Googled up, you are an idiot.
And that applies to any topic.
Tech or otherwise.


--

Ron Gilmore
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html