A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows 8 » Windows 8 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Did Windows 8 Eat My Cameras?



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 15th 12, 08:29 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
BillW50
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,556
Default Did Windows 8 Eat My Cameras?

Maybe just a coincidence. But I purchased two Dell Latitude ST tablets.
They came with Windows 7 Pro SP1. The original plan was to run Windows 7
on one and Windows 8 on the other. Although I was going to purchase
licenses for both to run Windows 8. Just in case the future of Windows 7
becomes obsolete.

Those that have done so before me has stated some problems running
Windows 8. Mainly they are a tad slower than Windows 7, WiFi problems,
and camera problems (these has two cameras). I never seen the WiFi
problems, but the other two I have experienced this too.

Anyway I did get the cameras working somewhat under Windows 8. I backed
up Windows 7 on one machine and installed Windows 8 fresh (as most
people said they had the best luck going this route). Well what I had
working with the cameras went downhill. Now Windows 8 didn't complain,
but nothing showed at all, totally blank.

Ok, backed up Windows 8 and restored Windows 7. Dang, the Dell utility
(which doesn't work under Windows 8) says that something is using the
camera(s). Nonsense! All of my fancy utilities says nothing is using the
camera(s). Even Zentimo would complain if something was using it if I
tried to remove it and it never did.

I really dislike dual booting systems, but this was driving me nuts. So
I copied one Windows 7 backup with one Windows 8 on the same drive in
different partitions. I did this many times before and it isn't that
hard to get both of them bootable. And I used BCD as a third party boot
manager in this fashion. Although that Windows 8 secure boot threw up a
fit. PIA to get around that problem. And like others, booting in Windows
7 after Windows 8 was booted caused Windows 7 to run chkdsk on the
Windows 8 partition. Although still no help. So I abandoned
dualbooting... thank goodness.

So what it looks like to me is everything can see the cameras are truly
there, but nothing can communicate with either of them. Maybe this whole
thing is just a coincidence and that there is just a lost connection
somewhere. But is it? So far the second slate tablet is working
wonderfully under Windows 7. I don't know if I would try Windows 8 just
yet on it. I even cloned the working Windows 7 one over to the
non-functioning camera one and still no dice. So that pretty much
eliminates software as the problem.

--
Bill
Dell Latitute Slate Tablet 128GB SSD ('12 era) - Thunderbird v12
Intel Atom Z670 1.5GHz - 2GB - Windows 7 SP1 and Windows 8
Ads
  #2  
Old December 15th 12, 08:59 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,275
Default Did Windows 8 Eat My Cameras?

BillW50 wrote:
Maybe just a coincidence. But I purchased two Dell Latitude ST tablets.
They came with Windows 7 Pro SP1. The original plan was to run Windows 7
on one and Windows 8 on the other. Although I was going to purchase
licenses for both to run Windows 8. Just in case the future of Windows 7
becomes obsolete.

Those that have done so before me has stated some problems running
Windows 8. Mainly they are a tad slower than Windows 7, WiFi problems,
and camera problems (these has two cameras). I never seen the WiFi
problems, but the other two I have experienced this too.

Anyway I did get the cameras working somewhat under Windows 8. I backed
up Windows 7 on one machine and installed Windows 8 fresh (as most
people said they had the best luck going this route). Well what I had
working with the cameras went downhill. Now Windows 8 didn't complain,
but nothing showed at all, totally blank.

Ok, backed up Windows 8 and restored Windows 7. Dang, the Dell utility
(which doesn't work under Windows 8) says that something is using the
camera(s). Nonsense! All of my fancy utilities says nothing is using the
camera(s). Even Zentimo would complain if something was using it if I
tried to remove it and it never did.

I really dislike dual booting systems, but this was driving me nuts. So
I copied one Windows 7 backup with one Windows 8 on the same drive in
different partitions. I did this many times before and it isn't that
hard to get both of them bootable. And I used BCD as a third party boot
manager in this fashion. Although that Windows 8 secure boot threw up a
fit. PIA to get around that problem. And like others, booting in Windows
7 after Windows 8 was booted caused Windows 7 to run chkdsk on the
Windows 8 partition. Although still no help. So I abandoned
dualbooting... thank goodness.

So what it looks like to me is everything can see the cameras are truly
there, but nothing can communicate with either of them. Maybe this whole
thing is just a coincidence and that there is just a lost connection
somewhere. But is it? So far the second slate tablet is working
wonderfully under Windows 7. I don't know if I would try Windows 8 just
yet on it. I even cloned the working Windows 7 one over to the
non-functioning camera one and still no dice. So that pretty much
eliminates software as the problem.


To learn something about cameras, I like to read articles
on using Linux with them. Sometimes, you learn something
technical about the cameras, that explains potential gotchas
with Windows. Like, maybe the camera uses runtime "firmware"
that is loaded by the driver. And it's not communicating,
because the firmware didn't get loaded for some reason.

But searching for details from the Linux world, can tell you
what other cameras are similar, what special features they
might have (loadable firmware) and so on. You don't have to
run Linux, just learn from the experiences of others, getting
Linux to use those particular cameras. Then, once you know what
the special requirements might be, use keywords of such, in
some Windows related searches.

Webcams come in "UVC compliant" and "custom". A UVC compliant
one is supposed to work with the built-in UVC driver (so it works
right away). On my webcam, the top resolution of the camera is
not available via UVC. If I want all the pixels it's got to offer,
I still have to install the manufacturer driver. If all I want
is guaranteed 320x240, UVC will give me that :-( Some cameras
are strange enough, they really need the manufacturer driver,
or nothing is going to happen.

Paul
  #3  
Old December 16th 12, 11:53 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Ed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Did Windows 8 Eat My Cameras?

On 2012-12-15, Paul wrote:
To learn something about cameras, I like to read articles
on using Linux with them. Sometimes, you learn something
technical about the cameras, that explains potential gotchas
with Windows. Like, maybe the camera uses runtime "firmware"
that is loaded by the driver. And it's not communicating,
because the firmware didn't get loaded for some reason.


Well said. Linux and digital imaging is quite straight forward in
itself, there's a neat little app called gphoto2 which does nothing more
than capture the current image from a device. So, for example, if you
want to take a set of images throughout the day, you can just put this
in cron or leave it running in a loop with a few minutes delay. Perhaps
you'd like to see what your pets get up to whilst you're out of the
house? To be honest, this is the sort of thing that I'd do with a SLR
and a wide angle lens.

--
Regards, Ed http://www.usenix.org.uk/
  #4  
Old December 16th 12, 02:58 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
BillW50
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,556
Default Did Windows 8 Eat My Cameras?

On 12/15/2012 2:59 PM, Paul wrote:
BillW50 wrote:
Maybe just a coincidence. But I purchased two Dell Latitude ST
tablets. They came with Windows 7 Pro SP1. The original plan was to
run Windows 7 on one and Windows 8 on the other. Although I was going
to purchase licenses for both to run Windows 8. Just in case the
future of Windows 7 becomes obsolete.

Those that have done so before me has stated some problems running
Windows 8. Mainly they are a tad slower than Windows 7, WiFi problems,
and camera problems (these has two cameras). I never seen the WiFi
problems, but the other two I have experienced this too.

Anyway I did get the cameras working somewhat under Windows 8. I
backed up Windows 7 on one machine and installed Windows 8 fresh (as
most people said they had the best luck going this route). Well what I
had working with the cameras went downhill. Now Windows 8 didn't
complain, but nothing showed at all, totally blank.

Ok, backed up Windows 8 and restored Windows 7. Dang, the Dell utility
(which doesn't work under Windows 8) says that something is using the
camera(s). Nonsense! All of my fancy utilities says nothing is using
the camera(s). Even Zentimo would complain if something was using it
if I tried to remove it and it never did.

I really dislike dual booting systems, but this was driving me nuts.
So I copied one Windows 7 backup with one Windows 8 on the same drive
in different partitions. I did this many times before and it isn't
that hard to get both of them bootable. And I used BCD as a third
party boot manager in this fashion. Although that Windows 8 secure
boot threw up a fit. PIA to get around that problem. And like others,
booting in Windows 7 after Windows 8 was booted caused Windows 7 to
run chkdsk on the Windows 8 partition. Although still no help. So I
abandoned dualbooting... thank goodness.

So what it looks like to me is everything can see the cameras are
truly there, but nothing can communicate with either of them. Maybe
this whole thing is just a coincidence and that there is just a lost
connection somewhere. But is it? So far the second slate tablet is
working wonderfully under Windows 7. I don't know if I would try
Windows 8 just yet on it. I even cloned the working Windows 7 one over
to the non-functioning camera one and still no dice. So that pretty
much eliminates software as the problem.


To learn something about cameras, I like to read articles
on using Linux with them. Sometimes, you learn something
technical about the cameras, that explains potential gotchas
with Windows. Like, maybe the camera uses runtime "firmware"
that is loaded by the driver. And it's not communicating,
because the firmware didn't get loaded for some reason.

But searching for details from the Linux world, can tell you
what other cameras are similar, what special features they
might have (loadable firmware) and so on. You don't have to
run Linux, just learn from the experiences of others, getting
Linux to use those particular cameras. Then, once you know what
the special requirements might be, use keywords of such, in
some Windows related searches.

Webcams come in "UVC compliant" and "custom". A UVC compliant
one is supposed to work with the built-in UVC driver (so it works
right away). On my webcam, the top resolution of the camera is
not available via UVC. If I want all the pixels it's got to offer,
I still have to install the manufacturer driver. If all I want
is guaranteed 320x240, UVC will give me that :-( Some cameras
are strange enough, they really need the manufacturer driver,
or nothing is going to happen.

Paul


So true Paul. ;-)

--
Bill
Dell Latitute Slate Tablet 128GB SSD ('12 era) - Thunderbird v12
Intel Atom Z670 1.5GHz - 2GB - Windows 7 SP1 and Windows 8
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.