If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
Just had it installed about an hour ago (took about 90 minutes to DL and
install over my wifi connection). Seems a lot slower than the previous preview, and has added a major problem for me: if I click on Start, All Apps, and then try to run any non-Win10 program, it won't start. I have to go back, right-click on the app, and select Run as Admin. But, if I click on Start, then type the name of the app I want to run, select it from the list, then it starts just fine. None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. If I had the .iso for this version, I'd do a wipe and reinstall, but I don't really feel like wiping and reinstalling 10049, then re-updating :-( Maybe I'll try Classic Shell again and see if that fixes it. If not, I'll roll back to 10049; I don't need the aggravation of this release that much LOL! -- SC Tom |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
On 04/24/2015 08:56 AM, SC Tom wrote:
I don't really feel like wiping and reinstalling 10049, then re-updating I wiped and reinstalled 10041. Fast Track jumped me straight to 10061 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
On 24 Apr 2015, "SC Tom" wrote in
alt.comp.os.windows-10: Just had it installed about an hour ago (took about 90 minutes to DL and install over my wifi connection). Seems a lot slower than the previous preview, and has added a major problem for me: if I click on Start, All Apps, and then try to run any non-Win10 program, it won't start. I have to go back, right-click on the app, and select Run as Admin. But, if I click on Start, then type the name of the app I want to run, select it from the list, then it starts just fine. None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. If I had the .iso for this version, I'd do a wipe and reinstall, but I don't really feel like wiping and reinstalling 10049, then re-updating I was having big problems with 10049. Instead of reinstalling from scratch, I did a "Reset" from the Advanced Troubleshooting startup menu. I'm not sure what that does exactly, but it seems to do something like rebuild my profile. It removed all the programs I had installed, but it finally worked properly. I guess my profile had become corrupt or had some problem. I then let it update to 10061 and re-installed my few programs, and it seems to be working pretty well now. And a bit faster than 10041 and way faster than 10049 on my VirtualBox VM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
On 04/24/2015 08:56 AM, SC Tom wrote:
Just had it installed about an hour ago (took about 90 minutes to DL and install over my wifi connection). Seems a lot slower than the previous preview, and has added a major problem for me: if I click on Start, All Apps, and then try to run any non-Win10 program, it won't start. I have to go back, right-click on the app, and select Run as Admin. But, if I click on Start, then type the name of the app I want to run, select it from the list, then it starts just fine. None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. If I had the .iso for this version, I'd do a wipe and reinstall, but I don't really feel like wiping and reinstalling 10049, then re-updating :-( Maybe I'll try Classic Shell again and see if that fixes it. If not, I'll roll back to 10049; I don't need the aggravation of this release that much LOL! I think it is time to wipe and reinstall 10041 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
"T" wrote in message ... On 04/24/2015 08:56 AM, SC Tom wrote: Just had it installed about an hour ago (took about 90 minutes to DL and install over my wifi connection). Seems a lot slower than the previous preview, and has added a major problem for me: if I click on Start, All Apps, and then try to run any non-Win10 program, it won't start. I have to go back, right-click on the app, and select Run as Admin. But, if I click on Start, then type the name of the app I want to run, select it from the list, then it starts just fine. None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. If I had the .iso for this version, I'd do a wipe and reinstall, but I don't really feel like wiping and reinstalling 10049, then re-updating :-( Maybe I'll try Classic Shell again and see if that fixes it. If not, I'll roll back to 10049; I don't need the aggravation of this release that much LOL! I think it is time to wipe and reinstall 10041 I did a "Refresh" from the Settings/Recovery menu. It of course uninstalled all of the non-native programs, but then the Start menu started doing what Marti and John posted- going away after ~3 clicks. I installed the latest Classic Shell, and it cured that problem (and my original one), but "All Apps" is empty. You may be right about wiping and starting over. I may just load an image I have of it and let that one fast track to 10061. -- SC Tom |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
On 04/24/2015 05:24 PM, SC Tom wrote:
"T" wrote in message ... On 04/24/2015 08:56 AM, SC Tom wrote: Just had it installed about an hour ago (took about 90 minutes to DL and install over my wifi connection). Seems a lot slower than the previous preview, and has added a major problem for me: if I click on Start, All Apps, and then try to run any non-Win10 program, it won't start. I have to go back, right-click on the app, and select Run as Admin. But, if I click on Start, then type the name of the app I want to run, select it from the list, then it starts just fine. None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. If I had the .iso for this version, I'd do a wipe and reinstall, but I don't really feel like wiping and reinstalling 10049, then re-updating :-( Maybe I'll try Classic Shell again and see if that fixes it. If not, I'll roll back to 10049; I don't need the aggravation of this release that much LOL! I think it is time to wipe and reinstall 10041 I did a "Refresh" from the Settings/Recovery menu. It of course uninstalled all of the non-native programs, but then the Start menu started doing what Marti and John posted- going away after ~3 clicks. I installed the latest Classic Shell, and it cured that problem (and my original one), but "All Apps" is empty. You may be right about wiping and starting over. I may just load an image I have of it and let that one fast track to 10061. Hi Tom, Originally, I started with a 20 GB virtual drive. Then all the new releases clogged to works. They even leave a Windows.old directory kicking about. This last wipe, I moved it up to 40 GB. After installing 10041 and fast tracking 10061. I am now up to, oh poop, it was suppose to dynamically expand and it took the whole 40 GB. Windows Explorer says I have used 20.7 GB. What a waste of space! Windows.old is taking up 10.2 GB. Last time I tried to get rid of Windows.old, I had to boot into Xfce Linux Live CD. M$ ... mumble ... mumble ... mumble Every so often Windows need to be reinstalled. It is what it is. I solve the issue by making a copy of my gold virtual drive so I can revert back whenever I want. -T Never once in my 20 years of doing this have I had to reinstall Linux. As I said, Windows is what it is. I just have to not let it get to me. (Not doing too good a job at that ...) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
In message , SC Tom writes
None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. It's weird. If I click on a non-10 program that I've put into the start menu ( a good example is Control Panel), nothing happens. If I look at the start menu entry, it points to a shortcut to Control Panel. If I click the shortcut, Control Panel appears as normal. So there seems to be a disconnect between the start menu and what it points to. I've still not seen a clear and definitive answer anywhere about whether the release version is going to have selective updating enabled. That's my "line in the mud". -- Bill |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
"T" wrote in message ... On 04/24/2015 05:24 PM, SC Tom wrote: "T" wrote in message ... On 04/24/2015 08:56 AM, SC Tom wrote: Just had it installed about an hour ago (took about 90 minutes to DL and install over my wifi connection). Seems a lot slower than the previous preview, and has added a major problem for me: if I click on Start, All Apps, and then try to run any non-Win10 program, it won't start. I have to go back, right-click on the app, and select Run as Admin. But, if I click on Start, then type the name of the app I want to run, select it from the list, then it starts just fine. None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. If I had the .iso for this version, I'd do a wipe and reinstall, but I don't really feel like wiping and reinstalling 10049, then re-updating :-( Maybe I'll try Classic Shell again and see if that fixes it. If not, I'll roll back to 10049; I don't need the aggravation of this release that much LOL! I think it is time to wipe and reinstall 10041 I did a "Refresh" from the Settings/Recovery menu. It of course uninstalled all of the non-native programs, but then the Start menu started doing what Marti and John posted- going away after ~3 clicks. I installed the latest Classic Shell, and it cured that problem (and my original one), but "All Apps" is empty. You may be right about wiping and starting over. I may just load an image I have of it and let that one fast track to 10061. Hi Tom, Originally, I started with a 20 GB virtual drive. Then all the new releases clogged to works. They even leave a Windows.old directory kicking about. This last wipe, I moved it up to 40 GB. After installing 10041 and fast tracking 10061. I am now up to, oh poop, it was suppose to dynamically expand and it took the whole 40 GB. Windows Explorer says I have used 20.7 GB. What a waste of space! Windows.old is taking up 10.2 GB. Last time I tried to get rid of Windows.old, I had to boot into Xfce Linux Live CD. M$ ... mumble ... mumble ... mumble Every so often Windows need to be reinstalled. It is what it is. I solve the issue by making a copy of my gold virtual drive so I can revert back whenever I want. -T Never once in my 20 years of doing this have I had to reinstall Linux. As I said, Windows is what it is. I just have to not let it get to me. (Not doing too good a job at that ...) What are the parameters for the fast track update to start? Does the PC have to be idle for x minutes/hours, or some other trigger? I restored my image of 10049, booted up, and a download immediately started for a total of 4.5GB*. That was over 90 minutes ago, and the only thing I've been doing is streaming a tennis match. I have a file, "10061.0.150410-2039.fbl_impressive_CLIENTPRO_RET_x64fre_en-us.esd", that's 2.5GB, which I assume is the update/upgrade file. Any way to make it run/install, or do I have to wait for some arbitrary signal for it to start? * I think it's 4.5GB instead of 2.5GB because of a network interruption. -- SC Tom |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
"SC Tom" wrote in message ... "T" wrote in message ... On 04/24/2015 05:24 PM, SC Tom wrote: "T" wrote in message ... On 04/24/2015 08:56 AM, SC Tom wrote: Just had it installed about an hour ago (took about 90 minutes to DL and install over my wifi connection). Seems a lot slower than the previous preview, and has added a major problem for me: if I click on Start, All Apps, and then try to run any non-Win10 program, it won't start. I have to go back, right-click on the app, and select Run as Admin. But, if I click on Start, then type the name of the app I want to run, select it from the list, then it starts just fine. None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. If I had the .iso for this version, I'd do a wipe and reinstall, but I don't really feel like wiping and reinstalling 10049, then re-updating :-( Maybe I'll try Classic Shell again and see if that fixes it. If not, I'll roll back to 10049; I don't need the aggravation of this release that much LOL! I think it is time to wipe and reinstall 10041 I did a "Refresh" from the Settings/Recovery menu. It of course uninstalled all of the non-native programs, but then the Start menu started doing what Marti and John posted- going away after ~3 clicks. I installed the latest Classic Shell, and it cured that problem (and my original one), but "All Apps" is empty. You may be right about wiping and starting over. I may just load an image I have of it and let that one fast track to 10061. Hi Tom, Originally, I started with a 20 GB virtual drive. Then all the new releases clogged to works. They even leave a Windows.old directory kicking about. This last wipe, I moved it up to 40 GB. After installing 10041 and fast tracking 10061. I am now up to, oh poop, it was suppose to dynamically expand and it took the whole 40 GB. Windows Explorer says I have used 20.7 GB. What a waste of space! Windows.old is taking up 10.2 GB. Last time I tried to get rid of Windows.old, I had to boot into Xfce Linux Live CD. M$ ... mumble ... mumble ... mumble Every so often Windows need to be reinstalled. It is what it is. I solve the issue by making a copy of my gold virtual drive so I can revert back whenever I want. -T Never once in my 20 years of doing this have I had to reinstall Linux. As I said, Windows is what it is. I just have to not let it get to me. (Not doing too good a job at that ...) What are the parameters for the fast track update to start? Does the PC have to be idle for x minutes/hours, or some other trigger? I restored my image of 10049, booted up, and a download immediately started for a total of 4.5GB*. That was over 90 minutes ago, and the only thing I've been doing is streaming a tennis match. I have a file, "10061.0.150410-2039.fbl_impressive_CLIENTPRO_RET_x64fre_en-us.esd", that's 2.5GB, which I assume is the update/upgrade file. Any way to make it run/install, or do I have to wait for some arbitrary signal for it to start? * I think it's 4.5GB instead of 2.5GB because of a network interruption. Never mind. I "checked for updates" and now it's starting to install. Oh boy, I can't hardly wait for it to finish wink wink. -- SC Tom |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
"SC Tom" wrote in message ... "SC Tom" wrote in message ... "T" wrote in message ... On 04/24/2015 05:24 PM, SC Tom wrote: "T" wrote in message ... On 04/24/2015 08:56 AM, SC Tom wrote: Just had it installed about an hour ago (took about 90 minutes to DL and install over my wifi connection). Seems a lot slower than the previous preview, and has added a major problem for me: if I click on Start, All Apps, and then try to run any non-Win10 program, it won't start. I have to go back, right-click on the app, and select Run as Admin. But, if I click on Start, then type the name of the app I want to run, select it from the list, then it starts just fine. None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. If I had the .iso for this version, I'd do a wipe and reinstall, but I don't really feel like wiping and reinstalling 10049, then re-updating :-( Maybe I'll try Classic Shell again and see if that fixes it. If not, I'll roll back to 10049; I don't need the aggravation of this release that much LOL! I think it is time to wipe and reinstall 10041 I did a "Refresh" from the Settings/Recovery menu. It of course uninstalled all of the non-native programs, but then the Start menu started doing what Marti and John posted- going away after ~3 clicks. I installed the latest Classic Shell, and it cured that problem (and my original one), but "All Apps" is empty. You may be right about wiping and starting over. I may just load an image I have of it and let that one fast track to 10061. Hi Tom, Originally, I started with a 20 GB virtual drive. Then all the new releases clogged to works. They even leave a Windows.old directory kicking about. This last wipe, I moved it up to 40 GB. After installing 10041 and fast tracking 10061. I am now up to, oh poop, it was suppose to dynamically expand and it took the whole 40 GB. Windows Explorer says I have used 20.7 GB. What a waste of space! Windows.old is taking up 10.2 GB. Last time I tried to get rid of Windows.old, I had to boot into Xfce Linux Live CD. M$ ... mumble ... mumble ... mumble Every so often Windows need to be reinstalled. It is what it is. I solve the issue by making a copy of my gold virtual drive so I can revert back whenever I want. -T Never once in my 20 years of doing this have I had to reinstall Linux. As I said, Windows is what it is. I just have to not let it get to me. (Not doing too good a job at that ...) What are the parameters for the fast track update to start? Does the PC have to be idle for x minutes/hours, or some other trigger? I restored my image of 10049, booted up, and a download immediately started for a total of 4.5GB*. That was over 90 minutes ago, and the only thing I've been doing is streaming a tennis match. I have a file, "10061.0.150410-2039.fbl_impressive_CLIENTPRO_RET_x64fre_en-us.esd", that's 2.5GB, which I assume is the update/upgrade file. Any way to make it run/install, or do I have to wait for some arbitrary signal for it to start? * I think it's 4.5GB instead of 2.5GB because of a network interruption. Never mind. I "checked for updates" and now it's starting to install. Oh boy, I can't hardly wait for it to finish wink wink. No change. Apps and Start menu are still screwed up. Guess I'll wait until there's an update to fix it. Since it's just a screw-around-with PC, it's no big deal for now. -- SC Tom |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
On 04/25/2015 11:46 AM, SC Tom wrote:
"SC Tom" wrote in message ... "SC Tom" wrote in message ... "T" wrote in message ... On 04/24/2015 05:24 PM, SC Tom wrote: "T" wrote in message ... On 04/24/2015 08:56 AM, SC Tom wrote: Just had it installed about an hour ago (took about 90 minutes to DL and install over my wifi connection). Seems a lot slower than the previous preview, and has added a major problem for me: if I click on Start, All Apps, and then try to run any non-Win10 program, it won't start. I have to go back, right-click on the app, and select Run as Admin. But, if I click on Start, then type the name of the app I want to run, select it from the list, then it starts just fine. None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. If I had the .iso for this version, I'd do a wipe and reinstall, but I don't really feel like wiping and reinstalling 10049, then re-updating :-( Maybe I'll try Classic Shell again and see if that fixes it. If not, I'll roll back to 10049; I don't need the aggravation of this release that much LOL! I think it is time to wipe and reinstall 10041 I did a "Refresh" from the Settings/Recovery menu. It of course uninstalled all of the non-native programs, but then the Start menu started doing what Marti and John posted- going away after ~3 clicks. I installed the latest Classic Shell, and it cured that problem (and my original one), but "All Apps" is empty. You may be right about wiping and starting over. I may just load an image I have of it and let that one fast track to 10061. Hi Tom, Originally, I started with a 20 GB virtual drive. Then all the new releases clogged to works. They even leave a Windows.old directory kicking about. This last wipe, I moved it up to 40 GB. After installing 10041 and fast tracking 10061. I am now up to, oh poop, it was suppose to dynamically expand and it took the whole 40 GB. Windows Explorer says I have used 20.7 GB. What a waste of space! Windows.old is taking up 10.2 GB. Last time I tried to get rid of Windows.old, I had to boot into Xfce Linux Live CD. M$ ... mumble ... mumble ... mumble Every so often Windows need to be reinstalled. It is what it is. I solve the issue by making a copy of my gold virtual drive so I can revert back whenever I want. -T Never once in my 20 years of doing this have I had to reinstall Linux. As I said, Windows is what it is. I just have to not let it get to me. (Not doing too good a job at that ...) What are the parameters for the fast track update to start? Does the PC have to be idle for x minutes/hours, or some other trigger? I restored my image of 10049, booted up, and a download immediately started for a total of 4.5GB*. That was over 90 minutes ago, and the only thing I've been doing is streaming a tennis match. I have a file, "10061.0.150410-2039.fbl_impressive_CLIENTPRO_RET_x64fre_en-us.esd", that's 2.5GB, which I assume is the update/upgrade file. Any way to make it run/install, or do I have to wait for some arbitrary signal for it to start? * I think it's 4.5GB instead of 2.5GB because of a network interruption. Never mind. I "checked for updates" and now it's starting to install. Oh boy, I can't hardly wait for it to finish wink wink. No change. Apps and Start menu are still screwed up. Guess I'll wait until there's an update to fix it. Since it's just a screw-around-with PC, it's no big deal for now. Hi Tom, I like to put a shortcut to "wuapp.exe" (Windows Updates) on my desktop. I can usually get it to start doing things if I press the check for updates button. Sometimes I have to press it twice. -T |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
On 04/25/2015 03:30 AM, Bill wrote:
In message , SC Tom writes None of the apps pinned to the Start menu work either, unless they're native Win10 apps. It's weird. If I click on a non-10 program that I've put into the start menu ( a good example is Control Panel), nothing happens. If I look at the start menu entry, it points to a shortcut to Control Panel. If I click the shortcut, Control Panel appears as normal. So there seems to be a disconnect between the start menu and what it points to. I've still not seen a clear and definitive answer anywhere about whether the release version is going to have selective updating enabled. That's my "line in the mud". Hi Bill, My non-authoritative source says that updates will be mandatory. But it is non-authoritative, so don't quote me. My technical opinion is that mandatory updates are a huge mistake given M$'s track record on updates. (W7 had another botched one last week.) -T |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
On 04/25/2015 06:43 PM, Marti van Lin wrote:
Therefore kudos to Microsoft for implementing the shiny new "Progress Screen" including the "Progress Circle". It's a big step forward IMHO. 1+ |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 16:19:01 -0700, T wrote:
My non-authoritative source says that updates will be mandatory. But it is non-authoritative, so don't quote me. My technical opinion is that mandatory updates are a huge mistake given M$'s track record on updates. (W7 had another botched one last week.) Mandatory updates will be a huge mistake unless the provision of adequately fast internet with huge download allowances for the entire world can be made mandatory too, which it almost certainly can't. Rod. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
10061 Problems
On 26 Apr 2015, Roderick Stewart wrote in
alt.comp.os.windows-10: Mandatory updates will be a huge mistake unless the provision of adequately fast internet with huge download allowances for the entire world can be made mandatory too, which it almost certainly can't. I would certainly be upset if the computer decided to install a large update at a time when it wasn't convenient for me, say if I was rendering a large video file, or when the cab was at the door waiting to take me to the airport. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|