|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
April 28th 15, 12:09 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
10041
Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle?
|
| Ads |
|
#2
April 28th 15, 01:19 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
On 04/27/2015 06:09 PM, Dino wrote:
Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle? I believe so. I'm at 10041 slow cycle and as of a few days ago there were no updates
|
|
#3
April 28th 15, 01:27 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
On 27 Apr 2015 19:09, Dino wrote:
Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle? MS are evaluating how build 10061 goes in the fast ring, then they'll decide what is eventually to be sent to the slow ring.
|
|
#4
April 28th 15, 02:25 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
On 04/27/2015 04:09 PM, Dino wrote:
Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle? Hi Dino, As far as I can tell and as others have said, 10041 is the last slow cycle as M$ doesn't release ISOs until they release to the slow cycle. (Causes all kinds of havoc.) If you want 10061, you should switch to the fast cycle. Start a new thread and I will tell you how (if others don't beat me to it). -T
|
|
#5
April 28th 15, 03:52 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
T wrote on 4/27/2015 9:25 PM:
On 04/27/2015 04:09 PM, Dino wrote: Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle? Hi Dino, As far as I can tell and as others have said, 10041 is the last slow cycle as M$ doesn't release ISOs until they release to the slow cycle. (Causes all kinds of havoc.) If you want 10061, you should switch to the fast cycle. Start a new thread and I will tell you how (if others don't beat me to it). -T Too many problems with 61. I'd advise against it. IMHO
|
|
#6
April 28th 15, 04:30 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
Big_Al wrote:
T wrote on 4/27/2015 9:25 PM: On 04/27/2015 04:09 PM, Dino wrote: Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle? Hi Dino, As far as I can tell and as others have said, 10041 is the last slow cycle as M$ doesn't release ISOs until they release to the slow cycle. (Causes all kinds of havoc.) If you want 10061, you should switch to the fast cycle. Start a new thread and I will tell you how (if others don't beat me to it). -T Too many problems with 61. I'd advise against it. IMHO I'm not even booting my Win10 test hard drive, "until you guys tell me it's safe" :-) I don't wanna download 3.5GB so I can look at a "segfault" or "misbehavior". I can write my own code to make segfaults :-) I'm good at that. Paul
|
|
#7
April 28th 15, 04:31 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
On 04/27/2015 07:52 PM, Big_Al wrote:
T wrote on 4/27/2015 9:25 PM: On 04/27/2015 04:09 PM, Dino wrote: Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle? Hi Dino, As far as I can tell and as others have said, 10041 is the last slow cycle as M$ doesn't release ISOs until they release to the slow cycle. (Causes all kinds of havoc.) If you want 10061, you should switch to the fast cycle. Start a new thread and I will tell you how (if others don't beat me to it). -T Too many problems with 61. I'd advise against it. IMHO Hi Al, I want those problems! This is how I learn to deal with them. Would you mind picking out one or two of your most obnoxious ones so I can have a whack at them? Many thanks, -T Whenever they do a new release, M$ should publish the ISOs so we can wipe and reinstall. But, I lost that argument.
|
|
#8
April 28th 15, 07:46 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:31:10 -0700, T wrote:
Too many problems with 61. I'd advise against it. IMHO Hi Al, I want those problems! This is how I learn to deal with them. But it's a technical preview, those problems won't be in the release version. When I was able to work I had better things to do with my time than play around with temporary issues. -- Faster, cheaper, quieter than HS2 and built in 5 years; UKUltraspeed http://www.500kmh.com/
|
|
#9
April 28th 15, 10:28 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:31:10 -0700, T wrote:
On 04/27/2015 07:52 PM, Big_Al wrote: T wrote on 4/27/2015 9:25 PM: On 04/27/2015 04:09 PM, Dino wrote: Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle? Hi Dino, As far as I can tell and as others have said, 10041 is the last slow cycle as M$ doesn't release ISOs until they release to the slow cycle. (Causes all kinds of havoc.) If you want 10061, you should switch to the fast cycle. Start a new thread and I will tell you how (if others don't beat me to it). -T Too many problems with 61. I'd advise against it. IMHO Hi Al, I want those problems! This is how I learn to deal with them. Would you mind picking out one or two of your most obnoxious ones so I can have a whack at them? Many thanks, -T Whenever they do a new release, M$ should publish the ISOs so we can wipe and reinstall. But, I lost that argument. Did you provide feedback?
|
|
#10
April 28th 15, 01:52 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
On 28/04/2015 04:30, Paul wrote:
Big_Al wrote: T wrote on 4/27/2015 9:25 PM: On 04/27/2015 04:09 PM, Dino wrote: Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle? Hi Dino, As far as I can tell and as others have said, 10041 is the last slow cycle as M$ doesn't release ISOs until they release to the slow cycle. (Causes all kinds of havoc.) If you want 10061, you should switch to the fast cycle. Start a new thread and I will tell you how (if others don't beat me to it). -T Too many problems with 61. I'd advise against it. IMHO I'm not even booting my Win10 test hard drive, "until you guys tell me it's safe" :-) I don't wanna download 3.5GB so I can look at a "segfault" or "misbehavior". I can write my own code to make segfaults :-) I'm good at that. Paul 10061 is working well here. I installed the first release shortly after it was released in to a VirtualBox VM with an 80GB virtual C: drive and it's neatly upgraded itself all the way to 10061 with few problems. Most trouble I had was because VirtualBox didn't cope well with Win 10 in the beginning. -- Brian Gregory (in the UK). To email me please remove all the letter vee from my email address.
|
|
#11
April 28th 15, 08:37 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
On 04/27/2015 11:46 PM, Rodney Pont wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:31:10 -0700, T wrote: Too many problems with 61. I'd advise against it. IMHO Hi Al, I want those problems! This is how I learn to deal with them. But it's a technical preview, those problems won't be in the release version. When I was able to work I had better things to do with my time than play around with temporary issues. Sometimes M$ fixes them; sometimes M$ does not. And, it is all about learning the culture of the OS so as to be able to handle other things as well
|
|
#12
April 28th 15, 08:45 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
On 04/28/2015 02:28 AM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:31:10 -0700, T wrote: On 04/27/2015 07:52 PM, Big_Al wrote: T wrote on 4/27/2015 9:25 PM: On 04/27/2015 04:09 PM, Dino wrote: Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle? Hi Dino, As far as I can tell and as others have said, 10041 is the last slow cycle as M$ doesn't release ISOs until they release to the slow cycle. (Causes all kinds of havoc.) If you want 10061, you should switch to the fast cycle. Start a new thread and I will tell you how (if others don't beat me to it). -T Too many problems with 61. I'd advise against it. IMHO Hi Al, I want those problems! This is how I learn to deal with them. Would you mind picking out one or two of your most obnoxious ones so I can have a whack at them? Many thanks, -T Whenever they do a new release, M$ should publish the ISOs so we can wipe and reinstall. But, I lost that argument. Did you provide feedback? You are a funny bunny!
|
|
#13
April 29th 15, 01:38 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
10041
Big_Al wrote:
T wrote on 4/27/2015 9:25 PM: On 04/27/2015 04:09 PM, Dino wrote: Is 10041 the latest release on the slow cycle? Hi Dino, As far as I can tell and as others have said, 10041 is the last slow cycle as M$ doesn't release ISOs until they release to the slow cycle. (Causes all kinds of havoc.) If you want 10061, you should switch to the fast cycle. Start a new thread and I will tell you how (if others don't beat me to it). -T Too many problems with 61. I'd advise against it. IMHO Although I have a few problems on 10061, I can honestly say that I have far less problems than I was having on 10041 and 10049.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
