A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Performance and Maintainance of XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Strategy to Remote Desktop multiple users simultanously



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 1st 10, 08:28 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Rahul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 49
Default Strategy to Remote Desktop multiple users simultanously

I have a about 10 quite old WinXP PC's whose owners now moved offsite but
still access documents and applications remotely using Remote Desktop (RDP)
from their Laptops. Pretty infrequent access. I wanted to consolidate all
this data on a single server where each person could now login using RDP.
What's the best solution? Unfortunaltely WinXP wont allow multiple users to
login at the same time.

What server type should I be looking at? I have max 10 users and not more
than 3 RDP at the same time.

I installed Win Small Business Server but could only RDP to it as admin.
User account RDP always failed for lack of sufficient privilages. After
lots of debugging I suspect that Win SBS is wrong for me. It does too many
other things: e.g. runs IIS, dhcp, and other stuff. I believe it set itself
as a Domain Controller too.

What seems the best way to go? Is Win Home Server going to do what I need ,
maybe? Unfortunately I can't find a spec. on how many simultanous RDP users
it supports. What'd be nice is a server that's an end in itself. A lot of
SBS stuff looks like a gateway to other PCs.

I'm only used to doing Remote Dsktop; but SBS seemed to be trying to do
VLAN's, Remote Services and a bunch of stuff I am doubtful I need.

--
Rahul
Ads
  #2  
Old February 4th 10, 09:24 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
ruic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 46
Default Strategy to Remote Desktop multiple users simultanously

You want some sort of Terminal Server is you are going to be using RDP.

There are other solutions such as VPN.

"Rahul" wrote in message
3.245...
I have a about 10 quite old WinXP PC's whose owners now moved offsite but
still access documents and applications remotely using Remote Desktop
(RDP)
from their Laptops. Pretty infrequent access. I wanted to consolidate all
this data on a single server where each person could now login using RDP.
What's the best solution? Unfortunaltely WinXP wont allow multiple users
to
login at the same time.

What server type should I be looking at? I have max 10 users and not more
than 3 RDP at the same time.

I installed Win Small Business Server but could only RDP to it as admin.
User account RDP always failed for lack of sufficient privilages. After
lots of debugging I suspect that Win SBS is wrong for me. It does too many
other things: e.g. runs IIS, dhcp, and other stuff. I believe it set
itself
as a Domain Controller too.

What seems the best way to go? Is Win Home Server going to do what I need
,
maybe? Unfortunately I can't find a spec. on how many simultanous RDP
users
it supports. What'd be nice is a server that's an end in itself. A lot of
SBS stuff looks like a gateway to other PCs.

I'm only used to doing Remote Dsktop; but SBS seemed to be trying to do
VLAN's, Remote Services and a bunch of stuff I am doubtful I need.

--
Rahul



  #3  
Old February 4th 10, 09:24 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
ruic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 46
Default Strategy to Remote Desktop multiple users simultanously

You want some sort of Terminal Server is you are going to be using RDP.

There are other solutions such as VPN.

"Rahul" wrote in message
3.245...
I have a about 10 quite old WinXP PC's whose owners now moved offsite but
still access documents and applications remotely using Remote Desktop
(RDP)
from their Laptops. Pretty infrequent access. I wanted to consolidate all
this data on a single server where each person could now login using RDP.
What's the best solution? Unfortunaltely WinXP wont allow multiple users
to
login at the same time.

What server type should I be looking at? I have max 10 users and not more
than 3 RDP at the same time.

I installed Win Small Business Server but could only RDP to it as admin.
User account RDP always failed for lack of sufficient privilages. After
lots of debugging I suspect that Win SBS is wrong for me. It does too many
other things: e.g. runs IIS, dhcp, and other stuff. I believe it set
itself
as a Domain Controller too.

What seems the best way to go? Is Win Home Server going to do what I need
,
maybe? Unfortunately I can't find a spec. on how many simultanous RDP
users
it supports. What'd be nice is a server that's an end in itself. A lot of
SBS stuff looks like a gateway to other PCs.

I'm only used to doing Remote Dsktop; but SBS seemed to be trying to do
VLAN's, Remote Services and a bunch of stuff I am doubtful I need.

--
Rahul



  #4  
Old February 7th 10, 09:29 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Anteaus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,330
Default Strategy to Remote Desktop multiple users simultanously

The proper answer is a terminal server, but licensing is costly and it's
fairly complex to set-up.

Other option might be a virtual-machine host with three copies of XP
running. This way you might be able to re-use your existing XP licences,
depending on licence type. A reasonable spec processor (say dualcore 3GHz or
better) will support 3-5 virtual machines at acceptable speed for most
purposes.

Options for a host are Linux or Windows (XP or standard server) running
VMWare Server (Free) or VMWare ESX on bare metal. Or VirtualBox. Microsoft's
Virtual PC is useable, and easier to set-up, but its performance falls-off
rapidly if you launch multiple VM's. I find that VMWare Server 1.x is still
hard to beat for performance.

Unfortunately SBS is not ideal for this kind of setup, you want a host with
the bare minimum of overheads.

"Rahul" wrote:

I have a about 10 quite old WinXP PC's whose owners now moved offsite but
still access documents and applications remotely using Remote Desktop (RDP)
from their Laptops. Pretty infrequent access. I wanted to consolidate all
this data on a single server where each person could now login using RDP.
What's the best solution? Unfortunaltely WinXP wont allow multiple users to
login at the same time.

What server type should I be looking at? I have max 10 users and not more
than 3 RDP at the same time.

I installed Win Small Business Server but could only RDP to it as admin.
User account RDP always failed for lack of sufficient privilages. After
lots of debugging I suspect that Win SBS is wrong for me. It does too many
other things: e.g. runs IIS, dhcp, and other stuff. I believe it set itself
as a Domain Controller too.

What seems the best way to go? Is Win Home Server going to do what I need ,
maybe? Unfortunately I can't find a spec. on how many simultanous RDP users
it supports. What'd be nice is a server that's an end in itself. A lot of
SBS stuff looks like a gateway to other PCs.

I'm only used to doing Remote Dsktop; but SBS seemed to be trying to do
VLAN's, Remote Services and a bunch of stuff I am doubtful I need.

--
Rahul
.

  #5  
Old February 7th 10, 09:29 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Anteaus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,330
Default Strategy to Remote Desktop multiple users simultanously

The proper answer is a terminal server, but licensing is costly and it's
fairly complex to set-up.

Other option might be a virtual-machine host with three copies of XP
running. This way you might be able to re-use your existing XP licences,
depending on licence type. A reasonable spec processor (say dualcore 3GHz or
better) will support 3-5 virtual machines at acceptable speed for most
purposes.

Options for a host are Linux or Windows (XP or standard server) running
VMWare Server (Free) or VMWare ESX on bare metal. Or VirtualBox. Microsoft's
Virtual PC is useable, and easier to set-up, but its performance falls-off
rapidly if you launch multiple VM's. I find that VMWare Server 1.x is still
hard to beat for performance.

Unfortunately SBS is not ideal for this kind of setup, you want a host with
the bare minimum of overheads.

"Rahul" wrote:

I have a about 10 quite old WinXP PC's whose owners now moved offsite but
still access documents and applications remotely using Remote Desktop (RDP)
from their Laptops. Pretty infrequent access. I wanted to consolidate all
this data on a single server where each person could now login using RDP.
What's the best solution? Unfortunaltely WinXP wont allow multiple users to
login at the same time.

What server type should I be looking at? I have max 10 users and not more
than 3 RDP at the same time.

I installed Win Small Business Server but could only RDP to it as admin.
User account RDP always failed for lack of sufficient privilages. After
lots of debugging I suspect that Win SBS is wrong for me. It does too many
other things: e.g. runs IIS, dhcp, and other stuff. I believe it set itself
as a Domain Controller too.

What seems the best way to go? Is Win Home Server going to do what I need ,
maybe? Unfortunately I can't find a spec. on how many simultanous RDP users
it supports. What'd be nice is a server that's an end in itself. A lot of
SBS stuff looks like a gateway to other PCs.

I'm only used to doing Remote Dsktop; but SBS seemed to be trying to do
VLAN's, Remote Services and a bunch of stuff I am doubtful I need.

--
Rahul
.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.