A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows 8 » Windows 8 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old March 1st 14, 10:14 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Shadow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,638
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?


Hi little soft thing,
Thanks, but no thanks. I'll pass. If you decide to give
Windows 7 away, WITHOUT the spyware bundles, just mail me at my
HOTMAIL address with the download link and serial number.
TIA
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Ads
  #17  
Old March 2nd 14, 10:31 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
...winston‫
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,128
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

Blue wrote:
"...winston‫" wrote:
Stef wrote:
Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle

http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment



What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't like
the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS has
already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and give
their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop, mouse and
keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

Stef



Not going to happen...the OEM's are in the driver seat..and want to
maintain margins by using current hardware.

The future market is smart devices, not desktop pcs.


For consumers, maybe. I doubt anyone that has to do heavy work with a
keyboard is going want to use their thumbs.


Look to the east to understand the who the target market is...it might
have been you and I yesterday...it won't be us ever again.


In the east they don't do spreadsheets, word processing, data base
building? No authors? Philosophers? Etc?


Adapt or realize later that what you continue to use (if Windows) will
cease to be supported on hardware and software.

Reality bites...



And all the businesses that use desktops and laptops? I suppose they
could put some ports on a smart phone and so you could hook up a
keyboard, mouse and monitor. How long do you think it will be before
"reality bites"?

That bite has already been digested. The seminal change occurred a few
year ago with the advent of wifi and portable devices at a variety of
levels of management asking the good-old-boy IT departments why can't I
do this at work when I can do it at home. That also included the
management with enough horsepower (btdt) that don't ask why just
instruct to make it happen and if not done just outsource the entire IT
to someone who can.

That bite will have bigger teeth marks in the future...workstations will
replace desktops with cloud storage and tablets replacing
laptops...won't happen overnight but it will happen.

Desktop users just like usenet will continue to become a smaller subset
of the entire user base.

--
....winston
msft mvp consumer apps
  #18  
Old March 2nd 14, 10:33 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
...winston‫
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,128
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

CRNG wrote:

The problem is that many users, particularly businesses, have found
that they can't afford the upgrade process as described above, and
that their current "outdated" systems work perfectly fine and do all
that they want from them. The very smart owners of current systems
have started to stock spare parts from "outdated" systems to extend
the life of their current systems.


Not practical and with diminishing return.
The 'smart owners' aren't as insightful as you portray or perceive.

--
....winston
msft mvp consumer apps
  #19  
Old March 2nd 14, 12:59 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Blue[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 148
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

"...winston‫" wrote:
Blue wrote:
"...winston‫" wrote:
Stef wrote:
Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle

http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment




What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't like
the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS has
already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and give
their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop, mouse and
keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

Stef



Not going to happen...the OEM's are in the driver seat..and want to
maintain margins by using current hardware.

The future market is smart devices, not desktop pcs.


For consumers, maybe. I doubt anyone that has to do heavy work with a
keyboard is going want to use their thumbs.


Look to the east to understand the who the target market is...it might
have been you and I yesterday...it won't be us ever again.


In the east they don't do spreadsheets, word processing, data base
building? No authors? Philosophers? Etc?


Adapt or realize later that what you continue to use (if Windows) will
cease to be supported on hardware and software.

Reality bites...



And all the businesses that use desktops and laptops? I suppose they
could put some ports on a smart phone and so you could hook up a
keyboard, mouse and monitor. How long do you think it will be before
"reality bites"?

That bite has already been digested. The seminal change occurred a few
year ago with the advent of wifi and portable devices at a variety of
levels of management asking the good-old-boy IT departments why can't I
do this at work when I can do it at home. That also included the
management with enough horsepower (btdt) that don't ask why just
instruct to make it happen and if not done just outsource the entire IT
to someone who can.

That bite will have bigger teeth marks in the future...workstations will
replace desktops with cloud storage


And the cloud storage is on a smart phone? Tablet?

and tablets replacing
laptops...won't happen overnight but it will happen.


Tablets can already be the same as a desktop if you hook a mouse,
keyboard and monitor to it.


Desktop users just like usenet will continue to become a smaller subset
of the entire user base.


Not me. I'm going to buy a new one. Smart phones, tablets and laptops
have screens that are just too small for my taste.

AOL killed Usenet a long time ago. MS drove in the nails.

--
Blue
  #20  
Old March 2nd 14, 01:41 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Blue[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 148
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

Neil Gould wrote:
Blue wrote:
Neil Gould wrote:
Blue wrote:
"...winston‫" wrote:
Stef wrote:
Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle



http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment


What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't
like the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS
has already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible
results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and
give their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop,
mouse and keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

Stef



Not going to happen...the OEM's are in the driver seat..and want to
maintain margins by using current hardware.

The future market is smart devices, not desktop pcs.

For consumers, maybe. I doubt anyone that has to do heavy work with
a keyboard is going want to use their thumbs.

With the possible exception of the '80s, that is a constantly
diminishing population. Watson, Siri and their ilk will be the
"keyboards" of the future, accessed by Google glass and smart
watches. People just don't need to work the ways they did in the
last century.


I can see it now. "Hey Siri, make me a web site. I sell widgets, make
it groovy. While you're at it, being as you're a multitasking broad,
make me a new OS without Metro".

If what you say is true, I wonder why Apple made this:

I certainly didn't suggest that there won't be computers with keyboards,
just that the masses don't need them. The masses don't create web sites,
they don't write code of any kind, and with better voice recognition, they
don't even need to do their "typing" a la texting to send messages.


I just tried that with Chrome. The question is how many times can you
click on "try again" before you wish you had a keyboard?

The
rapid growth of tablets and smart phones correlated with the constantly
shrinking market for desktops makes that path pretty clear.


Many people have all three: a pc, a tablet and a smartphone because each
can be used in different ways.

Apple (more
specifically, the late Steve Jobs) was one to recognize this trend years
ago, which is why iOS UI has long been shared by the various iStuff.
Google's Android OS is also gaining ground, mostly on devices without
keyboards. M$ simply joined the club with the introduction of Win8. The only
marketing question left is whether Win8.x is a better solution than Android
or iStuff.


Yet Apple just released their newest desktop:

http://www.apple.com/mac-pro/

Again, why?

--
Blue
  #21  
Old March 2nd 14, 02:38 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Neil Gould[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 167
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

Blue wrote:
Neil Gould wrote:
Blue wrote:
"...winston‫" wrote:
Stef wrote:
Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle



http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment


What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't
like the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS
has already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible
results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and
give their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop,
mouse and keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

Stef



Not going to happen...the OEM's are in the driver seat..and want to
maintain margins by using current hardware.

The future market is smart devices, not desktop pcs.

For consumers, maybe. I doubt anyone that has to do heavy work with
a keyboard is going want to use their thumbs.

With the possible exception of the '80s, that is a constantly
diminishing population. Watson, Siri and their ilk will be the
"keyboards" of the future, accessed by Google glass and smart
watches. People just don't need to work the ways they did in the
last century.


I can see it now. "Hey Siri, make me a web site. I sell widgets, make
it groovy. While you're at it, being as you're a multitasking broad,
make me a new OS without Metro".

If what you say is true, I wonder why Apple made this:

I certainly didn't suggest that there won't be computers with keyboards,
just that the masses don't need them. The masses don't create web sites,
they don't write code of any kind, and with better voice recognition, they
don't even need to do their "typing" a la texting to send messages. The
rapid growth of tablets and smart phones correlated with the constantly
shrinking market for desktops makes that path pretty clear. Apple (more
specifically, the late Steve Jobs) was one to recognize this trend years
ago, which is why iOS UI has long been shared by the various iStuff.
Google's Android OS is also gaining ground, mostly on devices without
keyboards. M$ simply joined the club with the introduction of Win8. The only
marketing question left is whether Win8.x is a better solution than Android
or iStuff.
--
best regards,

Neil




  #22  
Old March 2nd 14, 05:17 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Dominique
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 343
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

Blue écrivait :

"...winston‫" wrote:
Stef wrote:
Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle

http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...8-1-with-bing-

experiment


What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't like
the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS has
already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and give
their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop, mouse and
keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

Stef



Not going to happen...the OEM's are in the driver seat..and want to
maintain margins by using current hardware.

The future market is smart devices, not desktop pcs.


For consumers, maybe. I doubt anyone that has to do heavy work with a
keyboard is going want to use their thumbs.


Look to the east to understand the who the target market is...it might
have been you and I yesterday...it won't be us ever again.


In the east they don't do spreadsheets, word processing, data base
building? No authors? Philosophers? Etc?


Adapt or realize later that what you continue to use (if Windows) will
cease to be supported on hardware and software.

Reality bites...



And all the businesses that use desktops and laptops? I suppose they
could put some ports on a smart phone and so you could hook up a
keyboard, mouse and monitor. How long do you think it will be before
"reality bites"?


FWIW you can certainly do spreadsheets, word processing, database, CAD,
music, videos, arts, etc. in Windows8, just install the programs you need
and use them; they will work the same as in Win7 and maybe Vista and XP.
BTW, it can be done with a desktop with mouse and keyboard.

You don't do anything usefull with an OS, you do that with specialized
applications.
  #23  
Old March 2nd 14, 05:52 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Blue[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 148
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

Dominique wrote:
Blue écrivait :

"...winston‫" wrote:
Stef wrote:
Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle

http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...8-1-with-bing-

experiment


What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't like
the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS has
already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and give
their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop, mouse and
keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

Stef



Not going to happen...the OEM's are in the driver seat..and want to
maintain margins by using current hardware.

The future market is smart devices, not desktop pcs.


For consumers, maybe. I doubt anyone that has to do heavy work with a
keyboard is going want to use their thumbs.


Look to the east to understand the who the target market is...it might
have been you and I yesterday...it won't be us ever again.


In the east they don't do spreadsheets, word processing, data base
building? No authors? Philosophers? Etc?


Adapt or realize later that what you continue to use (if Windows) will
cease to be supported on hardware and software.

Reality bites...



And all the businesses that use desktops and laptops? I suppose they
could put some ports on a smart phone and so you could hook up a
keyboard, mouse and monitor. How long do you think it will be before
"reality bites"?


FWIW you can certainly do spreadsheets, word processing, database, CAD,
music, videos, arts, etc. in Windows8, just install the programs you need
and use them; they will work the same as in Win7 and maybe Vista and XP.
BTW, it can be done with a desktop with mouse and keyboard.


I know.


You don't do anything usefull with an OS, you do that with specialized
applications.


I know. Read the rest of the thread.

--
Blue
  #24  
Old March 2nd 14, 06:07 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Neil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 714
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

On 3/1/2014 9:20 AM, Glenn wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2014 10:02:44 -0500, "Neil Gould"
wrote:

Stef wrote:
DevilsPGD wrote:

In the last episode of , Stef
said:

Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle


http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment

What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't
like the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS has
already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and give
their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop, mouse and
keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

That's pretty much what Windows 8.1 is; the polish it has over
Windows 8 is primarily to enable desktop users. It runs surprisingly
well on low-resource systems, new hardware is far from needed if
your hardware could handle any moderately recent version of Windows.

Even so, 8 or 8.1 are really designed to run on a tablet. No
keyboard. No mouse. It takes third-party utilities to turn either
into a traditional desktop which is what the majority of Windows
users want.

My Windows 8.1 notebook does not have a touch screen, and I have no problem
using its interface unmodified by any third-party utilities. The computer is
stable, faster than the Vista or Windows 7 equivalents, and provides access
to more apps via Metro.

I suspect that there are some who just don't want to change, which makes me
wonder why they did in the first place? I'm posting this from one of my
Win2k machines, which is the OS I prefer over XP, Vista or Win7. Nobody is
forcing folks to "upgrade", but I think it behooves those who do to learn
the benefits of the new OS as well as the hardware that it supports, because
time doesn't move in reverse in this neck of the universe. 8-D


I tried upgrading win 8.0 twice. The first time image copy was used
to go back to 8.0, the second time the 8.0 install disc (and image
copy) was needed. I require a physical backup to blu-ray discs, it's
no longer possible with 8.1, perhaps the cloud is deemed sufficient
for a safe backup.

I don't do external "clouds" for anything. It's easy enough to have an
in-house server or network HDDs to back up all of one's systems.
--
best regards,

Neil

  #25  
Old March 2nd 14, 06:23 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Neil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 714
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

On 3/2/2014 7:41 AM, Blue wrote:
Neil Gould wrote:
Blue wrote:
Neil Gould wrote:
Blue wrote:
"...winston‫" wrote:
Stef wrote:
Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle



http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment



What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't
like the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS
has already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible
results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and
give their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop,
mouse and keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

Stef



Not going to happen...the OEM's are in the driver seat..and want to
maintain margins by using current hardware.

The future market is smart devices, not desktop pcs.

For consumers, maybe. I doubt anyone that has to do heavy work with
a keyboard is going want to use their thumbs.

With the possible exception of the '80s, that is a constantly
diminishing population. Watson, Siri and their ilk will be the
"keyboards" of the future, accessed by Google glass and smart
watches. People just don't need to work the ways they did in the
last century.


I can see it now. "Hey Siri, make me a web site. I sell widgets, make
it groovy. While you're at it, being as you're a multitasking broad,
make me a new OS without Metro".

If what you say is true, I wonder why Apple made this:

I certainly didn't suggest that there won't be computers with keyboards,
just that the masses don't need them. The masses don't create web sites,
they don't write code of any kind, and with better voice recognition,
they
don't even need to do their "typing" a la texting to send messages.


I just tried that with Chrome. The question is how many times can you
click on "try again" before you wish you had a keyboard?

Voice recognition is a lot better now than it was in the versions I
tried a couple of decades ago, and it's likely to be significantly
better a decade from now. So, the question becomes, when voice
recognition is better than people's typing, what will users be doing?

The
rapid growth of tablets and smart phones correlated with the constantly
shrinking market for desktops makes that path pretty clear.


Many people have all three: a pc, a tablet and a smartphone because each
can be used in different ways.

The question is not whether that has been the case in the past, but
whether that will be the case in the not-too-distant future?

Apple (more
specifically, the late Steve Jobs) was one to recognize this trend years
ago, which is why iOS UI has long been shared by the various iStuff.
Google's Android OS is also gaining ground, mostly on devices without
keyboards. M$ simply joined the club with the introduction of Win8.
The only
marketing question left is whether Win8.x is a better solution than
Android
or iStuff.


Yet Apple just released their newest desktop:

http://www.apple.com/mac-pro/

Again, why?

What do _you_ think that implies? Do you see a significant growth
pattern for mac-pro computers? I don't. Considering that Macs have never
had a significant market share, a new Mac is just a present-day product
offered to a continually shrinking user base (as are other desktops).
--
best regards,

Neil
  #26  
Old March 2nd 14, 06:48 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Blue[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 148
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

Neil wrote:
On 3/2/2014 7:41 AM, Blue wrote:
Neil Gould wrote:
Blue wrote:
Neil Gould wrote:
Blue wrote:
"...winston‫" wrote:
Stef wrote:
Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle



http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment




What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't
like the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS
has already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible
results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and
give their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop,
mouse and keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

Stef



Not going to happen...the OEM's are in the driver seat..and want to
maintain margins by using current hardware.

The future market is smart devices, not desktop pcs.

For consumers, maybe. I doubt anyone that has to do heavy work with
a keyboard is going want to use their thumbs.

With the possible exception of the '80s, that is a constantly
diminishing population. Watson, Siri and their ilk will be the
"keyboards" of the future, accessed by Google glass and smart
watches. People just don't need to work the ways they did in the
last century.


I can see it now. "Hey Siri, make me a web site. I sell widgets, make
it groovy. While you're at it, being as you're a multitasking broad,
make me a new OS without Metro".

If what you say is true, I wonder why Apple made this:

I certainly didn't suggest that there won't be computers with keyboards,
just that the masses don't need them. The masses don't create web sites,
they don't write code of any kind, and with better voice recognition,
they
don't even need to do their "typing" a la texting to send messages.


I just tried that with Chrome. The question is how many times can you
click on "try again" before you wish you had a keyboard?

Voice recognition is a lot better now than it was in the versions I
tried a couple of decades ago, and it's likely to be significantly
better a decade from now. So, the question becomes, when voice
recognition is better than people's typing, what will users be doing?

The
rapid growth of tablets and smart phones correlated with the constantly
shrinking market for desktops makes that path pretty clear.


Many people have all three: a pc, a tablet and a smartphone because each
can be used in different ways.

The question is not whether that has been the case in the past, but
whether that will be the case in the not-too-distant future?

Apple (more
specifically, the late Steve Jobs) was one to recognize this trend years
ago, which is why iOS UI has long been shared by the various iStuff.
Google's Android OS is also gaining ground, mostly on devices without
keyboards. M$ simply joined the club with the introduction of Win8.
The only
marketing question left is whether Win8.x is a better solution than
Android
or iStuff.


Yet Apple just released their newest desktop:

http://www.apple.com/mac-pro/

Again, why?

What do _you_ think that implies? Do you see a significant growth
pattern for mac-pro computers? I don't. Considering that Macs have never
had a significant market share, a new Mac is just a present-day product
offered to a continually shrinking user base (as are other desktops).


Time will tell.

--
Blue
  #27  
Old March 3rd 14, 12:05 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Stef
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 364
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

....winston‫ wrote:

Stef wrote:
Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle

http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment

What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't like
the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS has
already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and give
their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop, mouse and
keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

Stef



Not going to happen...the OEM's are in the driver seat..and want to
maintain margins by using current hardware.


And Microsoft is riding shotgun with the gun pointed directly at the
driver's head. And the ammunition? MS software licenses. Many times
that license, the life blood of the PC & laptop business, and now
tablets, too; has been used by threat of modification or outright
revocation to coerce manufacturers to produce what MS wants to improve
their marketability. And profits.

If by "current hardware," you mean the latest stuff hitting the market,
I agree. Manufacturers generate income by selling "new and improved"
hardware. No one's going to buy new, 5 year old or even 2 year old
hardware. I meant by "current hardware," the hardware the user
currently owns, not what is currently being sold. Big difference.
And as far as the Windows OS, unrealistic. Every major release of
Windows has required hardware upgrades, sometimes, an entirely new
system. The exception might be W7 to 8. The W7 hardware should run
W8/8.1. Of course, there are caveats.

The future market is smart devices, not desktop pcs.


You make it sound as does the press like no one's making desktops
and laptops anymore. Desktop sales were only down 3% last year. And a
lot of that was caused by the economy -- can't afford to buy a new PC
-- and the dislike of Windows 8 -- not going to buy an OS I hate; I'll
wait for 9; or buy a Mac.

And FYI: smart devices are just part of the market. Yes, sales are
through the roof, but it's the new toy, new status symbol, and teen and
20-somethings have just GOT TO HAVE ONE! It'll settle down as soon as
the newness of it wears off, and they realize you can't easily write a
term paper or thesis or business report on your cellphone or tablet. I
would've hated to write this reply on my cellphone with just my thumbs.
;-)

Look to the east to understand the who the target market is...it might
have been you and I yesterday...it won't be us ever again.


A look to the past and common sense decerns the future better.

Adapt or realize later that what you continue to use (if Windows) will
cease to be supported on hardware and software.


I have adapted. Long before there was a Windows and it was just
DOS, I chose the Amiga. And when that died, I switched to Linux.
Windows isn't and never has been my primary OS. I have to use it at
times. I have to repeatedly repair it for clients. But I don't use it
much. It wouldn't bother me in the least if Windows crashed and burned,
and Microsoft went out of business. I never much cared for their
Draconian business model anyway.

Reality bites...


Ain't it the truth!

Stef


  #28  
Old March 3rd 14, 12:05 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Stef
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 364
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

BillW50 wrote:

On 3/1/2014 12:26 AM, Stef wrote:
DevilsPGD wrote:

In the last episode of , Stef
said:

Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle

http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment

What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't like
the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS has
already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and give
their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop, mouse and
keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

That's pretty much what Windows 8.1 is; the polish it has over Windows 8
is primarily to enable desktop users. It runs surprisingly well on
low-resource systems, new hardware is far from needed if your hardware
could handle any moderately recent version of Windows.


Even so, 8 or 8.1 are really designed to run on a tablet. No keyboard.
No mouse. It takes third-party utilities to turn either into a
traditional desktop which is what the majority of Windows users want.
Why MS is responding so slowly to that is anybody's guess. My guess is
MS wants "in" on the big profits of the tablet market, and are trying to
force users in that direction. It matters not that 90% of the Windows
users out there use desktops whether it is a box under the desk or a
laptop. It's what they need. Why can't MS admit that? Pride?


Wow! What version of Windows 8 are you running? As mine isn't like that
at all. This one is Windows 8 on a laptop. No touch screen and I have it
docked so I am using an external monitor, keyboard, and mouse. And
Windows 8 is super easy with a keyboard/mouse. And this is my preferred
method of using Windows 8.


You as well as others misunderstood my statement. I didn't mean W8
wouldn't work with a keyboard and mouse, or run on a laptop or PC. I
merely stated that it was designed for a tablet, which has no
keyboard or mouse.

MS wanted "in" on that market, once it had proven itself lucrative
enough. So, a day late and a dollar short, MS developed a new OS, W8,
and a tablet to go with it, The Surface, and alienated all their
desktop/laptop users with the Metro GUI. Why there wasn't the option to
choose either GUIs, I don't know. Probably, saved MS a nickel an OS.
Pennywise, but pound foolish.

I do have two Windows tablets that is also running Windows 8. One
doesn't have touch, but just pen enabled and that is all. The other one
has both touch and pen enabled. So I have them all covered. And even for
both of them, I still prefer to have them docked and using an external
monitor, keyboard, and mouse too. But I don't have to, as I could use
them as a tablet too.

I have no complaints about the OS itself. It's the GUI that's the
"problem." And MS' stubborn arrogance.

Moderately recent hardware? I'll assume that means a W7 machine.
How many XP users out there with hardware that is 5 or more years old?
Millions! W8/8.1 won't run on it. Many businesses in that group. Would
cost millions to upgrade: new hardware, new apps, retraining, etc.
Business can't afford that right now. Neither can the average user.


Wow! What kind of hardware do you buy? This machine is eight years old
and runs XP, Vista, 7, and 8. Yes and I have all of the drivers for all
of them too. Plus it is a business class machine. Windows 8 upgrade
costs me $39.95 plus $9.95 for the Media Center.


Consider yourself lucky. I've read some older systems that will run 8,
but not 8.1, And it seems that both 8 and 8.1 have problems with AMD
CPUs. Sometimes. 8 didn't in my case. I ran the 32-bit pre-release 8
in a Virtualbox VM on a 64-bit Debian 7 (Wheezy) box with both a
3.0 GHz Ahtlon X2 Dual Core and, later, 3.0 GHz Phenom Quad Core (I
upgraded) with 8GB RAM. The VM has direct access to the CPU. So, CPU
is not virtual. I assigned a single core to the W8 VM. W8 had no
problems with either CPU. I tested it with 1, 2 and 3GB RAM.
Performances was hesistent only with 1 Gig, but still worked. Tested it
for several weeks, running continuously 24/7 in its own workspace.
Never crashed. Also, tested Classic Shell. I never tested 8.1. I'm
not sold on 8/8.X. Going to wait and see what W9 looks like.

Currently, for my Windows needs, I have 32-bit XP running in a VM with
3GB RAM assigned and 1 CPU Core. And W2k on an old Thinkpad 240X which
I hardly ever use.

Let's face it: Microsoft dropped the ball with W8. Of course, it's not
the first time. Remember Vista?


Let's face it, you have a different Windows 8 than I do.


You may like 8, but I and over 50% of the Windows users out there
don't. And I'm willing to wait for something I prefer. As others are.

Stef

  #29  
Old March 3rd 14, 12:05 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
Stef
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 364
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

Neil Gould wrote:

Stef wrote:
DevilsPGD wrote:

In the last episode of , Stef
said:

Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle


http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment

What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't
like the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS has
already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and give
their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop, mouse and
keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

That's pretty much what Windows 8.1 is; the polish it has over
Windows 8 is primarily to enable desktop users. It runs surprisingly
well on low-resource systems, new hardware is far from needed if
your hardware could handle any moderately recent version of Windows.


Even so, 8 or 8.1 are really designed to run on a tablet. No
keyboard. No mouse. It takes third-party utilities to turn either
into a traditional desktop which is what the majority of Windows
users want.

My Windows 8.1 notebook does not have a touch screen, and I have no problem
using its interface unmodified by any third-party utilities. The computer is
stable, faster than the Vista or Windows 7 equivalents, and provides access
to more apps via Metro.


I never said W8 wouldn't work on a traditional laptop or PC, I just said
it was designed to run on a tablet -- The Surface specifically.. Its
sales have been dismal as well. Wonder why?

W8 is faster than W7 on the same hardware. That's because it was
designed to run on a tablet which has lower specs that traditional
laptops or PCs. What MS had to do, what features had to be abandoned,
etc. to achieve this, I don't know. But only being able to run and
display two apps at a time is a pain.


I suspect that there are some who just don't want to change, which makes me
wonder why they did in the first place? I'm posting this from one of my


Before computers? People used paper and pen, and typewriters, and their
brains.

Win2k machines, which is the OS I prefer over XP, Vista or Win7. Nobody is
forcing folks to "upgrade", but I think it behooves those who do to learn


Wrong! MS does. It has to to stay profitable. That's how it makes its
money: Selling OSes and software. I read that 90% of MS' gross income
comes from the sale of software. Now, that model is failing. So,
MS is following Abobe's lead, and switching to leasing software instead
of selling it. And, then there's the Cloud. How long before
Windows becomes a Chrome-like OS?


the benefits of the new OS as well as the hardware that it supports, because
time doesn't move in reverse in this neck of the universe. 8-D


To many people, and businesses as well, the philosphy is: "If it works,
and works to my satisfaction, why upgrade?" It's a variation of the
adage: "if it ain't broke, why fix it?"


Stef



  #30  
Old March 3rd 14, 01:03 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-8
BillW50
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,556
Default Microsoft Giving Away Windows 8.1?

On 3/2/2014 5:05 PM, Stef wrote:
BillW50 wrote:

On 3/1/2014 12:26 AM, Stef wrote:
DevilsPGD wrote:

In the last episode of , Stef
said:

Came across this little blurb. chuckle, chuckle

http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/28/54...ing-experiment

What a joke as a marketing ploy. When half your customers don't like
the product, giving it away won't change that consensus. MS has
already reduced licensing frees with little or no tangible results.

MS is in denial. It needs to get its head out of the sand, and give
their desktop customers what they want: A true desktop, mouse and
keyboard version.

It would also be nice if it ran on users' current hardware and
a totally new system purchase wasn't necessary. But perhaps, I'm
dreaming, and asking too much. This IS Windows after all.

That's pretty much what Windows 8.1 is; the polish it has over Windows 8
is primarily to enable desktop users. It runs surprisingly well on
low-resource systems, new hardware is far from needed if your hardware
could handle any moderately recent version of Windows.

Even so, 8 or 8.1 are really designed to run on a tablet. No keyboard.
No mouse. It takes third-party utilities to turn either into a
traditional desktop which is what the majority of Windows users want.
Why MS is responding so slowly to that is anybody's guess. My guess is
MS wants "in" on the big profits of the tablet market, and are trying to
force users in that direction. It matters not that 90% of the Windows
users out there use desktops whether it is a box under the desk or a
laptop. It's what they need. Why can't MS admit that? Pride?


Wow! What version of Windows 8 are you running? As mine isn't like that
at all. This one is Windows 8 on a laptop. No touch screen and I have it
docked so I am using an external monitor, keyboard, and mouse. And
Windows 8 is super easy with a keyboard/mouse. And this is my preferred
method of using Windows 8.


You as well as others misunderstood my statement. I didn't mean W8
wouldn't work with a keyboard and mouse, or run on a laptop or PC. I
merely stated that it was designed for a tablet, which has no
keyboard or mouse.


No I got that, you miss understood me. Windows 8 works perfectly fine
with a keyboard and mouse. There should be no complaints about this at
all. Although Windows does have the Start Screen and Metro that not only
works well with the keyboard and mouse, but with touch too.

MS wanted "in" on that market, once it had proven itself lucrative
enough. So, a day late and a dollar short, MS developed a new OS, W8,
and a tablet to go with it, The Surface, and alienated all their
desktop/laptop users with the Metro GUI. Why there wasn't the option to
choose either GUIs, I don't know. Probably, saved MS a nickel an OS.
Pennywise, but pound foolish.


Oh come on! It is like Windows 8 has two virtual desktops. Ever use
virtual desktops before? If you want to live only on the desktop side,
nothing is stopping you. Maybe later versions will, but not Windows 8.

I do have two Windows tablets that is also running Windows 8. One
doesn't have touch, but just pen enabled and that is all. The other one
has both touch and pen enabled. So I have them all covered. And even for
both of them, I still prefer to have them docked and using an external
monitor, keyboard, and mouse too. But I don't have to, as I could use
them as a tablet too.

I have no complaints about the OS itself. It's the GUI that's the
"problem." And MS' stubborn arrogance.

Moderately recent hardware? I'll assume that means a W7 machine.
How many XP users out there with hardware that is 5 or more years old?
Millions! W8/8.1 won't run on it. Many businesses in that group. Would
cost millions to upgrade: new hardware, new apps, retraining, etc.
Business can't afford that right now. Neither can the average user.


Wow! What kind of hardware do you buy? This machine is eight years old
and runs XP, Vista, 7, and 8. Yes and I have all of the drivers for all
of them too. Plus it is a business class machine. Windows 8 upgrade
costs me $39.95 plus $9.95 for the Media Center.


Consider yourself lucky. I've read some older systems that will run 8,
but not 8.1, And it seems that both 8 and 8.1 have problems with AMD
CPUs. Sometimes. 8 didn't in my case. I ran the 32-bit pre-release 8
in a Virtualbox VM on a 64-bit Debian 7 (Wheezy) box with both a
3.0 GHz Ahtlon X2 Dual Core and, later, 3.0 GHz Phenom Quad Core (I
upgraded) with 8GB RAM. The VM has direct access to the CPU. So, CPU
is not virtual. I assigned a single core to the W8 VM. W8 had no
problems with either CPU. I tested it with 1, 2 and 3GB RAM.
Performances was hesistent only with 1 Gig, but still worked. Tested it
for several weeks, running continuously 24/7 in its own workspace.
Never crashed. Also, tested Classic Shell. I never tested 8.1. I'm
not sold on 8/8.X. Going to wait and see what W9 looks like.


Whoa, whoa, whoa! AMD processors? They always was the underdog and they
always have had problems. Sure you buy a machine with an AMD and it
works just fine. Yes I have ADMs just like that. But if you upgrade the
OS or anything, all bets are off. That is just life with AMD.

Currently, for my Windows needs, I have 32-bit XP running in a VM with
3GB RAM assigned and 1 CPU Core. And W2k on an old Thinkpad 240X which
I hardly ever use.


Sounds fine with me.

Let's face it: Microsoft dropped the ball with W8. Of course, it's not
the first time. Remember Vista?


Let's face it, you have a different Windows 8 than I do.


You may like 8, but I and over 50% of the Windows users out there
don't. And I'm willing to wait for something I prefer. As others are.


No, I think both Windows 7 and 8 are ok. I love XP the most out of any
OS as far. Although I think most Windows 8 complaints are bogus. It is
still fine, but it is just different. And some people can't deal with it.

--
Bill
Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Thunderbird v24.3.0
Centrino Core2 Duo T7400 2.16 GHz - 4GB - Windows 7 Home SP1
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.