A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Windows XP Help and Support
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 11th 09, 10:35 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
No_Name
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35
Default Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review


I am sure most people are aware of the fact that whenever you install
a new software application or program to your computer, windows will
add the information to its registry. The registry contains important
information about the hardware and software installed in your computer
as well as the associated configurations. The more programs you add
the larger the registry becomes, thus making your computer slower and
possibly more problematic as time progresses. So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will do
all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.
You need to understand that having a damaged registry can ultimately
result in corruption of you entire operating system, which can then
sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you need to make use of
a good quality registry cleaner which can perform regular system
checks to make sure that any potential problems are repaired....

Registry Repair: http://groups.google.com/group/regrepairsbv
Ads
  #2  
Old April 11th 09, 03:36 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Ken Blake, MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,402
Default Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:


I am sure most people are aware of the fact that whenever you install
a new software application or program to your computer, windows will
add the information to its registry.



Except for the word "whenever," this is largely true. Installation of
*most* programs adds entries to the registry.


The registry contains important
information about the hardware and software installed in your computer
as well as the associated configurations. The more programs you add
the larger the registry becomes,



Generally true, as above.


thus making your computer slower and



Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.


possibly more problematic as time progresses.



Also false.


So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will do
all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.




Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning programs
are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is
dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry
cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry
cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry
entries doesn't really hurt you.

The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously
removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit
it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html



You need to understand that having a damaged registry can ultimately
result in corruption of you entire operating system, which can then
sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you need to make use of
a good quality registry cleaner which can perform regular system
checks to make sure that any potential problems are repaired....



Completely false, as above.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
  #3  
Old April 11th 09, 03:48 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
John John (MVP)[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review

Welcome back, Ken!

John

Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:


I am sure most people are aware of the fact that whenever you install
a new software application or program to your computer, windows will
add the information to its registry.



Except for the word "whenever," this is largely true. Installation of
*most* programs adds entries to the registry.


The registry contains important
information about the hardware and software installed in your computer
as well as the associated configurations. The more programs you add
the larger the registry becomes,



Generally true, as above.


thus making your computer slower and



Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.


possibly more problematic as time progresses.



Also false.


So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will do
all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.




Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning programs
are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is
dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry
cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry
cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry
entries doesn't really hurt you.

The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously
removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit
it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html



You need to understand that having a damaged registry can ultimately
result in corruption of you entire operating system, which can then
sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you need to make use of
a good quality registry cleaner which can perform regular system
checks to make sure that any potential problems are repaired....



Completely false, as above.

  #4  
Old April 11th 09, 04:20 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Peter Foldes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,444
Default Multiposted SPAM

multiposted SPAM

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

  #5  
Old April 11th 09, 04:27 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review

Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

....


thus making your computer slower and



Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.


Having to read so much as one singly byte of data takes time and if that
byte is new, it will require more cpu cycles and thus more time. When
you consider some programs can add tens of thousands of entries to a
registry, it certain can slow things down.

Haven't you EVER noticed how a virgin XP system is fast to boot and run,
but with each additional suite, etc., it boots slower and runs a tad
slower each time? Aren't you the MVP here who also says that boot times
in excess of 5 minutes are OK without having any idea what's loaded on a
system?



possibly more problematic as time progresses.



Also false.


No, actually very much possible.



So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will do
all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.


On the rare occasions where it boils down to an unknown registry
problem, or the registry needs to be eiminated (or not) as the culprit,
a good cleaner is a very valuable tool.




Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning programs
are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is
dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry
cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry
cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry
entries doesn't really hurt you.


At least you have it right that time. It's blatant spam and the only
correct response to it would have been to report it as such. But you
chose to drag out your ignorance and once again display it to the world
for all posterity to see. You have an engine out and cannot sustain
flight on the one that's left.


The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously
removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit
it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html


Oh, here you go, another self serving spew to another unknown URL that
may or may not be safe and almost certainly contains misinformation
since it came from you. You have no credibility as it is; that sure
won't help you.



You need to understand that having a damaged registry can ultimately
result in corruption of you entire operating system, which can then
sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you need to make use
of a good quality registry cleaner which can perform regular system
checks to make sure that any potential problems are repaired...



Completely false, as above.


No, it's not "completely false", but it is definitely unlikely. It's a
simple "grab" for the ensuing spam and nothing more. Of no more
importance than your saying and spamming your MVP status, which is
untraceable.

I thank you once more for the opportunity to read your entertaining
fish-leavings and to expose you for the ignorant, closed minded idiot
that you are.

Spam duly reported, something you are surely too lazy to bother with.

Twayne


  #6  
Old April 11th 09, 04:29 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review

John John (MVP) wrote:
Welcome back, Ken!


Another untraceable MVP. Prove you're on the list.


John

Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:


I am sure most people are aware of the fact that whenever you
install a new software application or program to your computer,
windows will add the information to its registry.



Except for the word "whenever," this is largely true. Installation of
*most* programs adds entries to the registry.


The registry contains important
information about the hardware and software installed in your
computer as well as the associated configurations. The more
programs you add the larger the registry becomes,



Generally true, as above.


thus making your computer slower and



Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.


possibly more problematic as time progresses.



Also false.


So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will
do all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.




Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning
programs are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed
and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry
cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry
cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry
entries doesn't really hurt you.

The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner
erroneously removing an entry you need is far greater than any
potential benefit it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html



You need to understand that having a damaged registry can ultimately
result in corruption of you entire operating system, which can then
sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you need to make use
of a good quality registry cleaner which can perform regular system
checks to make sure that any potential problems are repaired....



Completely false, as above.




  #7  
Old April 11th 09, 04:37 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Unknown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,007
Default Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review

Your thinking is faulty. If a program indexes though a file, it doesn't run
any slower if the file is ten bytes or ten million bytes.
"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

...


thus making your computer slower and



Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.


Having to read so much as one singly byte of data takes time and if that
byte is new, it will require more cpu cycles and thus more time. When you
consider some programs can add tens of thousands of entries to a registry,
it certain can slow things down.

Haven't you EVER noticed how a virgin XP system is fast to boot and run,
but with each additional suite, etc., it boots slower and runs a tad
slower each time? Aren't you the MVP here who also says that boot times
in excess of 5 minutes are OK without having any idea what's loaded on a
system?



possibly more problematic as time progresses.



Also false.


No, actually very much possible.



So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will do
all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.


On the rare occasions where it boils down to an unknown registry problem,
or the registry needs to be eiminated (or not) as the culprit, a good
cleaner is a very valuable tool.




Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning programs
are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is
dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry
cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry
cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry
entries doesn't really hurt you.


At least you have it right that time. It's blatant spam and the only
correct response to it would have been to report it as such. But you
chose to drag out your ignorance and once again display it to the world
for all posterity to see. You have an engine out and cannot sustain
flight on the one that's left.


The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously
removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit
it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html


Oh, here you go, another self serving spew to another unknown URL that may
or may not be safe and almost certainly contains misinformation since it
came from you. You have no credibility as it is; that sure won't help you.



You need to understand that having a damaged registry can ultimately
result in corruption of you entire operating system, which can then
sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you need to make use
of a good quality registry cleaner which can perform regular system
checks to make sure that any potential problems are repaired...



Completely false, as above.


No, it's not "completely false", but it is definitely unlikely. It's a
simple "grab" for the ensuing spam and nothing more. Of no more
importance than your saying and spamming your MVP status, which is
untraceable.

I thank you once more for the opportunity to read your entertaining
fish-leavings and to expose you for the ignorant, closed minded idiot that
you are.

Spam duly reported, something you are surely too lazy to bother with.

Twayne




  #8  
Old April 11th 09, 05:48 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
nass
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,474
Default Multiposted SPAM



LOL Peter, don't encourage him/her to post in the same group.

Multi or in a single NG it is SPAM

"Peter Foldes" wrote:

multiposted SPAM

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.


  #9  
Old April 11th 09, 06:03 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Ken Blake, MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,402
Default Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:48:49 -0300, "John John (MVP)"
wrote:

Welcome back, Ken!



Thanks, John. We had a great vacation.




Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:


I am sure most people are aware of the fact that whenever you install
a new software application or program to your computer, windows will
add the information to its registry.



Except for the word "whenever," this is largely true. Installation of
*most* programs adds entries to the registry.


The registry contains important
information about the hardware and software installed in your computer
as well as the associated configurations. The more programs you add
the larger the registry becomes,



Generally true, as above.


thus making your computer slower and



Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.


possibly more problematic as time progresses.



Also false.


So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will do
all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.




Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning programs
are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is
dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry
cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry
cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry
entries doesn't really hurt you.

The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously
removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit
it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html



You need to understand that having a damaged registry can ultimately
result in corruption of you entire operating system, which can then
sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you need to make use of
a good quality registry cleaner which can perform regular system
checks to make sure that any potential problems are repaired....



Completely false, as above.


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
  #10  
Old April 11th 09, 06:48 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
John John (MVP)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,010
Default Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review

What is your problem today?

John

"Twayne" wrote:

John John (MVP) wrote:
Welcome back, Ken!


Another untraceable MVP. Prove you're on the list.


John

Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:


I am sure most people are aware of the fact that whenever you
install a new software application or program to your computer,
windows will add the information to its registry.


Except for the word "whenever," this is largely true. Installation of
*most* programs adds entries to the registry.


The registry contains important
information about the hardware and software installed in your
computer as well as the associated configurations. The more
programs you add the larger the registry becomes,


Generally true, as above.


thus making your computer slower and


Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.


possibly more problematic as time progresses.


Also false.


So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will
do all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.



Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning
programs are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed
and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry
cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry
cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry
entries doesn't really hurt you.

The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner
erroneously removing an entry you need is far greater than any
potential benefit it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html



You need to understand that having a damaged registry can ultimately
result in corruption of you entire operating system, which can then
sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you need to make use
of a good quality registry cleaner which can perform regular system
checks to make sure that any potential problems are repaired....


Completely false, as above.





  #11  
Old April 11th 09, 06:54 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review

Unknown wrote:
Your thinking is faulty. If a program indexes though a file, it
doesn't run any slower if the file is ten bytes or ten million bytes.


reading one byte takes x time. Reading ten million bytes takes
x,000,000 units. I said nothing about indexing through a file, knothead.
That's your own attempt to confuse with facts.

If an index marker goes through one byte, it takes x time. To index
through ten million bytes takes x,000,000 times. The actual time
required depends on the algorithm/s but in no way is ten vs a million
going to require the same number of machine cycles, straight slot.

How come you dropped the MVP you stuck after your name a few posts back?
Did I strike a nerve? Or wasn't I supposed to tie those together?
Phillips Head.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

...


thus making your computer slower and


Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.


Having to read so much as one singly byte of data takes time and if
that byte is new, it will require more cpu cycles and thus more
time. When you consider some programs can add tens of thousands of
entries to a registry, it certain can slow things down.

Haven't you EVER noticed how a virgin XP system is fast to boot and
run, but with each additional suite, etc., it boots slower and runs
a tad slower each time? Aren't you the MVP here who also says that
boot times in excess of 5 minutes are OK without having any idea
what's loaded on a system?



possibly more problematic as time progresses.


Also false.


No, actually very much possible.



So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will
do all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.


On the rare occasions where it boils down to an unknown registry
problem, or the registry needs to be eiminated (or not) as the
culprit, a good cleaner is a very valuable tool.




Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning
programs are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed
and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any
registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors
of registry cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused
registry entries doesn't really hurt you.


At least you have it right that time. It's blatant spam and the only
correct response to it would have been to report it as such. But you
chose to drag out your ignorance and once again display it to the
world for all posterity to see. You have an engine out and cannot
sustain flight on the one that's left.


The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner
erroneously removing an entry you need is far greater than any
potential benefit it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html


Oh, here you go, another self serving spew to another unknown URL
that may or may not be safe and almost certainly contains
misinformation since it came from you. You have no credibility as it
is; that sure won't help you.



You need to understand that having a damaged registry can
ultimately result in corruption of you entire operating system,
which can then sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you
need to make use of a good quality registry cleaner which can
perform regular system checks to make sure that any potential
problems are repaired...


Completely false, as above.


No, it's not "completely false", but it is definitely unlikely. It's
a simple "grab" for the ensuing spam and nothing more. Of no more
importance than your saying and spamming your MVP status, which is
untraceable.

I thank you once more for the opportunity to read your entertaining
fish-leavings and to expose you for the ignorant, closed minded
idiot that you are.

Spam duly reported, something you are surely too lazy to bother with.

Twayne




  #12  
Old April 11th 09, 06:55 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Multiposted SPAM

nass wrote:
LOL Peter, don't encourage him/her to post in the same group.

Multi or in a single NG it is SPAM

"Peter Foldes" wrote:

multiposted SPAM

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be
acknowledged.


Besides, isn't the second rule of spam that spammers are stupid? If it
wasn't reported, it wasn't worth the ether to point out the obvious.


  #13  
Old April 11th 09, 07:25 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Unknown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,007
Default Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review

You most certainly are confused. I have NEVER had an MVP after my name. AND,
you do NOT have to read THROUGH
hundreds of bytes if you add hundreds of bytes in a registry. Geeeeeeese
you're dense!
"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
Your thinking is faulty. If a program indexes though a file, it
doesn't run any slower if the file is ten bytes or ten million bytes.


reading one byte takes x time. Reading ten million bytes takes x,000,000
units. I said nothing about indexing through a file, knothead. That's your
own attempt to confuse with facts.

If an index marker goes through one byte, it takes x time. To index
through ten million bytes takes x,000,000 times. The actual time required
depends on the algorithm/s but in no way is ten vs a million going to
require the same number of machine cycles, straight slot.

How come you dropped the MVP you stuck after your name a few posts back?
Did I strike a nerve? Or wasn't I supposed to tie those together?
Phillips Head.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:
...


thus making your computer slower and


Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.

Having to read so much as one singly byte of data takes time and if
that byte is new, it will require more cpu cycles and thus more
time. When you consider some programs can add tens of thousands of
entries to a registry, it certain can slow things down.

Haven't you EVER noticed how a virgin XP system is fast to boot and
run, but with each additional suite, etc., it boots slower and runs
a tad slower each time? Aren't you the MVP here who also says that
boot times in excess of 5 minutes are OK without having any idea
what's loaded on a system?



possibly more problematic as time progresses.


Also false.

No, actually very much possible.



So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will
do all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.

On the rare occasions where it boils down to an unknown registry
problem, or the registry needs to be eiminated (or not) as the
culprit, a good cleaner is a very valuable tool.




Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning
programs are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed
and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any
registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors
of registry cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused
registry entries doesn't really hurt you.

At least you have it right that time. It's blatant spam and the only
correct response to it would have been to report it as such. But you
chose to drag out your ignorance and once again display it to the
world for all posterity to see. You have an engine out and cannot
sustain flight on the one that's left.


The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner
erroneously removing an entry you need is far greater than any
potential benefit it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html

Oh, here you go, another self serving spew to another unknown URL
that may or may not be safe and almost certainly contains
misinformation since it came from you. You have no credibility as it
is; that sure won't help you.



You need to understand that having a damaged registry can
ultimately result in corruption of you entire operating system,
which can then sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you
need to make use of a good quality registry cleaner which can
perform regular system checks to make sure that any potential
problems are repaired...


Completely false, as above.

No, it's not "completely false", but it is definitely unlikely. It's
a simple "grab" for the ensuing spam and nothing more. Of no more
importance than your saying and spamming your MVP status, which is
untraceable.

I thank you once more for the opportunity to read your entertaining
fish-leavings and to expose you for the ignorant, closed minded
idiot that you are.

Spam duly reported, something you are surely too lazy to bother with.

Twayne






  #14  
Old April 12th 09, 12:07 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
mikeyhsd[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default Multiposted SPAM

NO ONE is impressed by your FEEBLE attempt to classify postings.

least of all the original poser who will NEVER come back to check.

all you do is waste bandwidth and people's time.


GROW UP.





"Peter Foldes" wrote in message ...
multiposted SPAM

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

  #15  
Old April 12th 09, 06:40 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Unknown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,007
Default Multiposted SPAM

NO ONE is impressed by your FEEBLE attempt to classify Peters posts as a waste of bandwidth and peoples time..
"mikeyhsd" wrote in message ...
NO ONE is impressed by your FEEBLE attempt to classify postings.

least of all the original poser who will NEVER come back to check.

all you do is waste bandwidth and people's time.


GROW UP.





"Peter Foldes" wrote in message ...
multiposted SPAM

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.