(OT) Error message when using Safari

On 19/12/2019 22:32, Wolffan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2019, David wrote
(in article ):

On 19/12/2019 14:49, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David wrote:

Or am I doing something wrong? I'm intrigued by such things!

How does one get "intrigued" by stalking?

It's a different URL this evening:
https://web.archive.org/web/*/tekrider.net

Your malicious cross-posting is noted.

I don't do malicious things, nor post malicious links.

BWA-HA-HAA-HAAA!!!!


It's certainly no laughing matter. :-(

You have *NEVER* identified *ANY* link which I have *EVER* posted which
has contained a malicious payload.

The only one I have ever found is shown right here for all to see:-

https://i.imgur.com/HfpggDn.png

Where did it come from?

He- https://i.imgur.com/JCa39b8.jpg

I don't make up these things.

THE TRUTH *WILL* OUT - *ALWAYS*! :-D

On 19 Dec 2019, David wrote
(in article ):

On 19/12/2019 22:32, Wolffan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2019, David wrote
(in article ):

On 19/12/2019 14:49, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David wrote:

Or am I doing something wrong? I'm intrigued by such things!

How does one get "intrigued" by stalking?

It's a different URL this evening:
https://web.archive.org/web/*/tekrider.net

Your malicious cross-posting is noted.

I don't do malicious things, nor post malicious links.

BWA-HA-HAA-HAAA!!!!

It's certainly no laughing matter. :-(

oh, it is. You’re the single most mendacious poster I have ever encountered
on usenet.

David the Despicable Deviant of Devon wrote:

On 19/12/2019 22:32, Wolffan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2019, David wrote (in article ):
On 19/12/2019 14:49, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David wrote:
Or am I doing something wrong? I'm intrigued by such things!

How does one get "intrigued" by stalking?

It's a different URL this evening:
https://web.archive.org/web/*/more/stalking

Your malicious cross-posting is noted.

I don't do malicious things, nor post malicious links.

BWA-HA-HAA-HAAA!!!!

It's certainly no laughing matter. :-(

You have *NEVER* identified *ANY* link which I have *EVER* posted which
has contained a malicious payload.

The only one I have ever found is shown right here for all to see:-

(If I may borrow a quote
BWA-HA-HAA-HAAA!!!!

THE TRUTH *WILL* OUT - *ALWAYS*! :-D

It's been out for years; you are a scumbag stalker.

--
-bts

"David" wrote in message ...

On 19/12/2019 21:06, Andrew Taylor wrote:
"David" wrote in message ...
On 19/12/2019 12:49, David wrote:
Hello

When attempting to review a website this afternoon I received this error
message:-

Still stalking the poor man David when you already know the answers?

He's a RICH man, Andrew! :-)

That's good, hard work, enterprise and due diligence pays off in most cases!

What was the name of the Usenet group you used here in SW England. The one
where you were demonised?

uk.local.southwest

I wasn't 'demonised', I was libelled by David Tilley who said things about
me and my business that were downright lies, pretty much like your hinky
feelings with people in this forum. Fortunately David Tilley is banged up
for kiddy fiddling over many years and is unlikely to ever see the light of
day. Co-incidentally, or rather ironically, he accused John Bunt aka 'Guy
Fawkes' of similar offences with his partners daughter which we also untrue.

On 20/12/2019 20:25, Andrew Taylor wrote:
"David"Â* wrote in message ...

On 19/12/2019 21:06, Andrew Taylor wrote:
"David"Â* wrote in message ...
On 19/12/2019 12:49, David wrote:
Hello

When attempting to review a website this afternoon I received this
error message:-

Still stalking the poor man David when you already know the answers?

He's a RICH man, Andrew! :-)

That's good, hard work, enterprise and due diligence pays off in most
cases!

Absolutely! :-)

What was the name of the Usenet group you used here in SW England. The
one where you were demonised?

uk.local.southwest

Thank you. I did /eventually/ find it yesterday.

I wasn't 'demonised', I was libelled by David Tilley who said things
about me and my business that were downright lies, pretty much like your
hinky feelings with people in this forum. Fortunately David Tilley is
banged up for kiddy fiddling over many years and is unlikely to ever see
the light of day. Co-incidentally, or rather ironically, he accused John
Bunt aka 'Guy Fawkes' of similar offences with his partners daughter
which we also untrue.

WHICH people in /this/ 'forum' are you referring to, Andrew?

Can YOU explain why there are no recent captures of this website?

https://web.archive.org/web/20180204170032/

OR

https://web.archive.org/web/*/www.tekrider.net

If you look up the main website now www.tekrider.net it looks as if it
has been completely hacked. Who on earth would do such a thing?

Here's an image for you to compare with what YOU may see from Canadaland:-

https://imgur.com/gallery/xdJtMNQ

*No smoke without fire*. Remember that expression?!!!

--
David

David wrote:


WHICH people in /this/ 'forum' are you referring to, Andrew?

Can YOU explain why there are no recent captures of this website?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

"when presented with competing hypotheses that make the same predictions,
one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions"

What would the fewest assumptions be in this situation ?

Pretend this was a computer problem, and something like this
didn't work properly. What would you check ?

Paul

On 20/12/2019 21:29, Paul wrote:
David wrote:


WHICH people in /this/ 'forum' are you referring to, Andrew?

Can YOU explain why there are no recent captures of this website?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

Â*Â* "when presented with competing hypotheses that make the same
predictions,
Â*Â*Â* one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions"

What would the fewest assumptions be in this situation ?

Pretend this was a computer problem, and something like this
didn't work properly. What would you check ?

Â*Â* Paul

Somehow I curtailed the link, Paul. I apologise for that.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180204...ages/about.php

I had first asked THIS question:-

When attempting to review a website this afternoon I received this error
message:-

https://imgur.com/gallery/lQyRpZy

Can anyone suggest what may have triggered same?

=

It was that link which I've just quoted in full that generated the
error. It's not doing so now. sigh

On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:10:14 +0000, David
wrote:

On 20/12/2019 21:29, Paul wrote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

** "when presented with competing hypotheses that make the same
predictions,
*** one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions"

What would the fewest assumptions be in this situation ?

Pretend this was a computer problem, and something like this
didn't work properly. What would you check ?

** Paul

I apologise for that.

Paul was kind enough to answer your inevitable question(s)
before you asked it(them) *AGAIN*.
Read his advice. Slowly, this time.

CUT_STALKING

https://web.archive.org/web/20191209135823/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

David wrote:
On 20/12/2019 21:29, Paul wrote:
David wrote:


WHICH people in /this/ 'forum' are you referring to, Andrew?

Can YOU explain why there are no recent captures of this website?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

"when presented with competing hypotheses that make the same
predictions,
one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions"

What would the fewest assumptions be in this situation ?

Pretend this was a computer problem, and something like this
didn't work properly. What would you check ?

Paul

Somehow I curtailed the link, Paul. I apologise for that.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180204...ages/about.php


I had first asked THIS question:-

When attempting to review a website this afternoon I received this error
message:-

https://imgur.com/gallery/lQyRpZy

Can anyone suggest what may have triggered same?

=

It was that link which I've just quoted in full that generated the
error. It's not doing so now. sigh

It's a Safari specific error.
The #1 section makes more sense than the #2 section of the answer.

https://macreports.com/safari-kcferr...lank-page-fix/

It stands for "Core Foundation Network", although the info pages
refuse to expand the acronyms in a useful way.

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/cfnetwork

https://developer.apple.com/document...omaincfnetwork

(then this link gives a hint)

https://developer.apple.com/document...ation/cfstring

The "k" would stand for "kernel". That doesn't make much sense
in this case. The Safari application seems to be the part with
indigestion, not the networking stack itself.

I like the suggestion of starting a Private Browsing window
someone suggested here, as that might mean less information
collected in advance of the page view.

https://apple.stackexchange.com/ques...isiting-a-site

Back when I used my Mac G4, nobody then would have been
using Safari. It was a half-baked cake (not many sites
rendered properly). I used Firefox instead.

Paul

On 20/12/2019 23:38, Paul wrote:
David wrote:
On 20/12/2019 21:29, Paul wrote:
David wrote:


WHICH people in /this/ 'forum' are you referring to, Andrew?

Can YOU explain why there are no recent captures of this website?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

Â*Â*Â* "when presented with competing hypotheses that make the same
predictions,
Â*Â*Â*Â* one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions"

What would the fewest assumptions be in this situation ?

Pretend this was a computer problem, and something like this
didn't work properly. What would you check ?

Â*Â*Â* Paul

Somehow I curtailed the link, Paul. I apologise for that.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180204...ages/about.php


I had first asked THIS question:-

When attempting to review a website this afternoon I received this
error message:-

https://imgur.com/gallery/lQyRpZy

Can anyone suggest what may have triggered same?

=

It was that link which I've just quoted in full that generated the
error. It's not doing so now. sigh

*It's a Safari specific error*.
The #1 section makes more sense than the #2 section of the answer.

https://macreports.com/safari-kcferr...lank-page-fix/

It stands for "Core Foundation Network", although the info pages
refuse to expand the acronyms in a useful way.

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/cfnetwork

https://developer.apple.com/document...omaincfnetwork

(then this link gives a hint)

https://developer.apple.com/document...ation/cfstring

The "k" would stand for "kernel". That doesn't make much sense
in this case. The Safari application seems to be the part with
indigestion, not the networking stack itself.

I like the suggestion of starting a Private Browsing window
someone suggested here, as that might mean less information
collected in advance of the page view.

https://apple.stackexchange.com/ques...isiting-a-site


Back when I used my Mac G4, nobody then would have been
using Safari. It was a half-baked cake (not many sites
rendered properly). I used Firefox instead.

Â*Â* Paul

What a splendid fellow you are! :-D

*THANK YOU* for providing a PERFECT solution to my question.

You garner my utmost respect. There is ALWAYS a reason for everything
and you have a distinct knack of being able to identify many of those
reasons.

*MERRY CHRISTMAS*!

"David" wrote in message news

On 20/12/2019 23:38, Paul wrote:
David wrote:
On 20/12/2019 21:29, Paul wrote:
David wrote:


WHICH people in /this/ 'forum' are you referring to, Andrew?

Can YOU explain why there are no recent captures of this website?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

"when presented with competing hypotheses that make the same
predictions,
one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions"

What would the fewest assumptions be in this situation ?

Pretend this was a computer problem, and something like this
didn't work properly. What would you check ?

Paul

Somehow I curtailed the link, Paul. I apologise for that.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180204...ages/about.php

I had first asked THIS question:-

When attempting to review a website this afternoon I received this error
message:-

https://imgur.com/gallery/lQyRpZy

Can anyone suggest what may have triggered same?

=

It was that link which I've just quoted in full that generated the
error. It's not doing so now. sigh

*It's a Safari specific error*.
The #1 section makes more sense than the #2 section of the answer.

https://macreports.com/safari-kcferr...lank-page-fix/

It stands for "Core Foundation Network", although the info pages
refuse to expand the acronyms in a useful way.

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/cfnetwork

https://developer.apple.com/document...omaincfnetwork

(then this link gives a hint)

https://developer.apple.com/document...ation/cfstring

The "k" would stand for "kernel". That doesn't make much sense
in this case. The Safari application seems to be the part with
indigestion, not the networking stack itself.

I like the suggestion of starting a Private Browsing window
someone suggested here, as that might mean less information
collected in advance of the page view.

https://apple.stackexchange.com/ques...isiting-a-site
Back when I used my Mac G4, nobody then would have been
using Safari. It was a half-baked cake (not many sites
rendered properly). I used Firefox instead.

Paul

What a splendid fellow you are! :-D

*THANK YOU* for providing a PERFECT solution to my question.

You garner my utmost respect. There is ALWAYS a reason for everything and
you have a distinct knack of being able to identify many of those reasons.

*MERRY CHRISTMAS*!
Overall, Paul is about the best in this forum (Win10), IMHO.
--
Buffalo

On 21/12/2019 19:57, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:38:26 +0000, David
wrote:

What a splendid fellow you are! :-D

*THANK YOU* for providing a PERFECT solution to my question.

I'm sorry for admitting my absolute ignorance, but I don't
understand how that solved your problem with a server error.

Could you EXPLAIN IN YOUR OWN WORDS what you did to fix it?
TIA

I removed the Cookies loaded/stored by Safari.

PS Don't bother crossposting, the error was NOT Win 10
related.

Paul needs to be kept in the loop, so the Windows 10 group has been
reinstated.

TIA again.
[]'s

"The problem is a result of Safari holding too much local data for the
site in question and failing to deal with that correctly. I use
archive.org a lot so I had lots of Local Storage and Cookie data for
that site. The fact that this data is only in Safari, and none of my
other browsers explains why they could browse the site just fine."

So, the solution:

Go into Safari Preferences Privacy
Search for "archive.org"
Click Remove
The problem goes away

Here's a video showing the problem before and after:
https://imgur.com/gallery/d1P1FCi


Source:-

https://apple.stackexchange.com/ques...isiting-a-site

On 21/12/2019 19:18, Buffalo wrote:
[....]
Overall, Paul is about the best in this forum (Win10), IMHO.

IAWTP :-D

On 20/12/2019 21:29, Paul wrote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

Â*Â* "when presented with competing hypotheses that make the same
predictions,
Â*Â*Â* one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions"

What would the fewest assumptions be in this situation ?

Pretend this was a computer problem, and something like this
didn't work properly. What would you check ?

Â*Â* Paul


Paul

Can you reach *this* URL?

https://social.answers.microsoft.com...3-efd9a49d9275

This is what Safari shows to me:-

https://imgur.com/a/PE22HjE

TIA

On 22/12/2019 00:50, David wrote:
On 20/12/2019 21:29, Paul wrote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

Â*Â*Â* "when presented with competing hypotheses that make the same
predictions,
Â*Â*Â*Â* one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions"

What would the fewest assumptions be in this situation ?

Pretend this was a computer problem, and something like this
didn't work properly. What would you check ?

Â*Â*Â* Paul


Paul

Can you reach *this* URL?

https://social.answers.microsoft.com...3-efd9a49d9275


This is what Safari shows to me:-

https://imgur.com/a/PE22HjE

TIA


The source of the link may be found he-

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/...8-3dae406e9c01

HTH

D.