(OT) Error message when using Safari

David Thu, 19
Dec 2019 21:11:30 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 19/12/2019 21:06, Andrew Taylor wrote:
"David"Â* wrote in message
... On 19/12/2019 12:49,
David wrote:
Hello

When attempting to review a website this afternoon I received
this error message:-

Still stalking the poor man David when you already know the
answers?

He's a RICH man, Andrew! :-)

No denial concerning the stalking though. How telling.



--
Caution: Contents under pressure.

On 24/12/2019 05:42, Diesel wrote:
David ! Sun,
22 Dec 2019 23:29:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/12/2019 16:51, Wolffan wrote:
On 22 Dec 2019, David wrote
(in article3124575415@77b390117e7f403f92b4a94569e4076 c.local):

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:41:01 -0500, Paul wrote:

Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 09:04:13 +0000,
wrote:

https://social.answers.microsoft.com...sescan/thread/
87058857-d181 -4019-a723-efd9a49d9275

I picked it more-or-less at random after a Google search for
the late

[NOT a moderator - never *BANNED* me from the Forum.

Aha!

I didn't know that.

I didn't think PA was a mod.

Paul

Shadow is lying again. :-(

unlikely

But he is! He's lying through his teeth!

Cite!

Almost any of his posts. I don't drink alcohol. None.

PABear was never a moderator on the Microsoft forums.

so... you admit that all the rest is true, eh? and why should
anyone believe you when you contradict Shadow, anyway?

Can YOU solve the puzzle, Wolffan?

What can YOU tell me/us about
https://social.answers.microsoft.com/

I DID work, back-along:-
https://web.archive.org/web/20140825...cial.answers.m
icrosoft.com/en-US/

What changed and when?

You quote and ignore it all? Do you really think this goes over well
for you David?

You've probably not investigated, but *the links are active* he-

https://web.archive.org/web/20140619...us/page/forums

There IS a Microsoft sub-domain called 'social' and I have no trouble
reaching the Technet Forums, even today. I can sign in too! :-)

Other folk may not be aware that MANY things have now changed. Details
may be found he-

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/welcome-to-docs

HTH

David

On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 11:39:52 +0000, David wrote:

On 24/12/2019 05:42, Diesel wrote:
David ! Sun,
22 Dec 2019 23:29:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/12/2019 16:51, Wolffan wrote:
On 22 Dec 2019, David wrote
(in article3124575415@77b390117e7f403f92b4a94569e4076 c.local):

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:41:01 -0500, Paul wrote:

Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 09:04:13 +0000,
wrote:

https://social.answers.microsoft.com...sescan/thread/
87058857-d181 -4019-a723-efd9a49d9275

I picked it more-or-less at random after a Google search for
the late

[NOT a moderator - never *BANNED* me from the Forum.

Aha!

I didn't know that.

I didn't think PA was a mod.

Paul

Shadow is lying again. :-(

unlikely

But he is! He's lying through his teeth!

Cite!

Almost any of his posts. I don't drink alcohol. None.

PABear was never a moderator on the Microsoft forums.

so... you admit that all the rest is true, eh? and why should
anyone believe you when you contradict Shadow, anyway?

Can YOU solve the puzzle, Wolffan?

What can YOU tell me/us about
https://social.answers.microsoft.com/

It DID work, back-along:-
https://web.archive.org/web/20140825...cial.answers.m
icrosoft.com/en-US/

What changed and when?

You quote and ignore it all? Do you really think this goes over well
for you David?

You've probably not investigated, but *the links are active* he-

https://web.archive.org/web/20140619...us/page/forums

There IS a Microsoft sub-domain called 'social' and I have no trouble
reaching the Technet Forums, even today. I can sign in too! :-)

Other folk may not be aware that MANY things have now changed. Details
may be found he-

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/welcome-to-docs

HTH

David

Hmmm.

THIS URL ....

https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/pr...m=winservergen

Ends up informing me that ......

"The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable."

D.

--
David

On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 11:39:52 +0000, David
wrote:

There IS a Microsoft sub-domain called 'social' and I have no trouble
reaching the Technet Forums, even today. I can sign in too!

And post?
Let's see how long before you are *BANNED*. What's the
#FAKE_NYM this time, "Miss Parsnip"?

---------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

64 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On 2019-12-27 06:39, David wrote:
On 24/12/2019 05:42, Diesel wrote:
David ! Sun,
22 Dec 2019 23:29:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/12/2019 16:51, Wolffan wrote:
On 22 Dec 2019, David wrote
(in article3124575415@77b390117e7f403f92b4a94569e4076 c.local):

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:41:01 -0500, Paul wrote:

Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 09:04:13 +0000,
wrote:

https://social.answers.microsoft.com...sescan/thread/
87058857-d181 -4019-a723-efd9a49d9275

I picked it more-or-less at random after a Google search for
the late

[NOT a moderator - never *BANNED* me from the Forum.

Aha!

I didn't know that.

I didn't think PA was a mod.

Paul

Shadow is lying again. :-(

unlikely

But he is! He's lying through his teeth!

Cite!

Almost any of his posts. I don't drink alcohol. None.

Your problem is that as you have totally destroyed your credibility
no-one believes you. In addition, many of your posts appear to have been
made while intoxicated with something. It may or may not have been
alcohol. It may even be merely the aftereffects of prolonged alcohol
ingestion, causing brain damage. It does look remarkably as though you
were posting while drunk, and Occam's Razor suggests using the simple
rather than the complex solution. The simple solution is that you're
still ingesting alcohol in large quantity and are lying about it.

You can act to rectify this impression. You can stop posting in a way
which suggests that you are intoxicated. You can repair your credibility
so that people will believe your statements; this can be done by not
making obvious lies, and by not trolling and stalking, and you might
also want to stop the excessive cross-posting. I predict that you will
never stop lying, trolling, and stalking, and will never, ever, stop
cross-posting. This means that your credibility will fall further into
the negative range. As it is, if you make a statement and that statement
is contradicted by anyone else, most or all others on these newsgroups
believe the other person. Your future is in your hands. I predict that
you will continue to make things worse for yourself.

On 2019-12-24 00:42, Diesel wrote:
David Thu, 19
Dec 2019 21:11:30 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 19/12/2019 21:06, Andrew Taylor wrote:
"David"ÂÂ* wrote in message
... On 19/12/2019 12:49,
David wrote:
Hello

When attempting to review a website this afternoon I received
this error message:-

Still stalking the poor man David when you already know the
answers?

He's a RICH man, Andrew! :-)

No denial concerning the stalking though. How telling.

Even he knows that no-one will believe such an obvious lie.

On 27/12/2019 15:38, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-12-27 06:39, David wrote:
On 24/12/2019 05:42, Diesel wrote:
David ! Sun,
22 Dec 2019 23:29:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/12/2019 16:51, Wolffan wrote:
On 22 Dec 2019, David wrote
(in article3124575415@77b390117e7f403f92b4a94569e4076 c.local):

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:41:01 -0500, Paul wrote:

Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 09:04:13 +0000,
wrote:

https://social.answers.microsoft.com...sescan/thread/
87058857-d181 -4019-a723-efd9a49d9275

I picked it more-or-less at random after a Google search for
the late

[NOT a moderator - never *BANNED* me from the Forum.

Aha!

I didn't know that.

I didn't think PA was a mod.

Paul

Shadow is lying again. :-(

unlikely

But he is! He's lying through his teeth!

Cite!

Almost any of his posts. I don't drink alcohol. None.

Your problem is that as you have totally destroyed your credibility
no-one believes you. In addition, many of your posts appear to have been
made while intoxicated with something. It may or may not have been
alcohol. It may even be merely the aftereffects of prolonged alcohol
ingestion, causing brain damage. It does look remarkably as though you
were posting while drunk, and Occam's Razor suggests using the simple
rather than the complex solution. The simple solution is that you're
still ingesting alcohol in large quantity and are lying about it.

You can act to rectify this impression. You can stop posting in a way
which suggests that you are intoxicated. You can repair your credibility
so that people will believe your statements; this can be done by not
making obvious lies, and by not trolling and stalking, and you might
also want to stop the excessive cross-posting. I predict that you will
never stop lying, trolling, and stalking, and will never, ever, stop
cross-posting. This means that your credibility will fall further into
the negative range. As it is, if you make a statement and that statement
is contradicted by anyone else, most or all others on these newsgroups
believe the other person. Your future is in your hands.

Only one hand as the other has his penis in it.

On 2019-12-27 10:48, Richard Soul wrote:
On 27/12/2019 15:38, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-12-27 06:39, David wrote:
On 24/12/2019 05:42, Diesel wrote:
David ! Sun,
22 Dec 2019 23:29:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/12/2019 16:51, Wolffan wrote:
On 22 Dec 2019, David wrote
(in article3124575415@77b390117e7f403f92b4a94569e4076 c.local):

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:41:01 -0500, Paul wrote:

Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 09:04:13 +0000,
wrote:

https://social.answers.microsoft.com...sescan/thread/
87058857-d181 -4019-a723-efd9a49d9275

I picked it more-or-less at random after a Google search for
the late

[NOT a moderator - never *BANNED* me from the Forum.

Aha!

I didn't know that.

I didn't think PA was a mod.

Paul

Shadow is lying again. :-(

unlikely

But he is! He's lying through his teeth!

Cite!

Almost any of his posts. I don't drink alcohol. None.

Your problem is that as you have totally destroyed your credibility
no-one believes you. In addition, many of your posts appear to have
been made while intoxicated with something. It may or may not have
been alcohol. It may even be merely the aftereffects of prolonged
alcohol ingestion, causing brain damage. It does look remarkably as
though you were posting while drunk, and Occam's Razor suggests using
the simple rather than the complex solution. The simple solution is
that you're still ingesting alcohol in large quantity and are lying
about it.

You can act to rectify this impression. You can stop posting in a way
which suggests that you are intoxicated. You can repair your
credibility so that people will believe your statements; this can be
done by not making obvious lies, and by not trolling and stalking, and
you might also want to stop the excessive cross-posting. I predict
that you will never stop lying, trolling, and stalking, and will
never, ever, stop cross-posting. This means that your credibility will
fall further into the negative range. As it is, if you make a
statement and that statement is contradicted by anyone else, most or
all others on these newsgroups believe the other person. Your future
is in your hands.

Only one hand as the other has his penis in it.



Are you sure about that? So far as can be determined, 'he' _is_ a prick,
though he may not have one. He certainly lacks balls.

On 27/12/2019 20:18, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-12-27 10:48, Richard Soul wrote:
On 27/12/2019 15:38, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-12-27 06:39, David wrote:
On 24/12/2019 05:42, Diesel wrote:
David ! Sun,
22 Dec 2019 23:29:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/12/2019 16:51, Wolffan wrote:
On 22 Dec 2019, David wrote
(in article3124575415@77b390117e7f403f92b4a94569e4076 c.local):

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:41:01 -0500, Paul wrote:

Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 09:04:13 +0000,
wrote:

https://social.answers.microsoft.com...sescan/thread/
87058857-d181 -4019-a723-efd9a49d9275

I picked it more-or-less at random after a Google search for
the late Robear Dyer (aka PABear)

[NOT a moderator - never *BANNED* me from the Forum.

Aha!

I didn't know that.

I didn't think PA was a mod.

Paul

Shadow is lying again. :-(

unlikely

But he is! Shadow is lying through his teeth!

Cite!

Almost any of his posts. I don't drink alcohol. None.

Your problem is that as you have totally destroyed your credibility
no-one believes you.
Snip

The whole defamatory ‘article’ about me was put on line for spite - in
retaliation for me finding malware on the Tekrider site.

I took this screenshot as evidence:- https://i.imgur.com/JCa39b8.jpg

If you review the ’script’ described in that image you’ll no doubt
recognise that there’s something definitely amiss there. Here’s a
screenshot of what my ISP, BT, says about it *today*:-

https://imgur.com/gallery/XDCltQw

HTH
HAND

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:47:04 +0000, David
wrote:

The whole defamatory ‘article’ about me was put on line for spite - in
retaliation for me finding malware on the STALKING_TARGET site.

Malware is not described in "screenshots". AV software will
give it a NAME.
Just post the NAME and explain IN YOUR OWN WORDS how it works.
Just the technical details. No need for any more STALKING links.

I took this screenshot as evidence:

...... altered it and posted it on a tracking/datamining site.
Yes, we know. Nobody's going to click on it.

Meanwhile, this public service site is safe(check the source
code):

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

No malicious scripting at all.

I recommend everyone read it before replying to BD.
PS BD claims he's sober when he phishes, stalks and
cross-posts.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On 12/28/2019 3:21 AM, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:47:04 +0000, David
wrote:

The whole defamatory ‘article’ about me was put on line for spite - in
retaliation for me finding malware on the STALKING_TARGET site.

Malware is not described in "screenshots". AV software will
give it a NAME.
Just post the NAME and explain IN YOUR OWN WORDS how it works.
Just the technical details. No need for any more STALKING links.

I took this screenshot as evidence:

...... altered it and posted it on a tracking/datamining site.
Yes, we know. Nobody's going to click on it.

Meanwhile, this public service site is safe(check the source
code):

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

No malicious scripting at all.

I recommend everyone read it before replying to BD.
PS BD claims he's sober when he phishes, stalks and
cross-posts.


I recommend that everyone read whatever they want to read, and *not*
reply to BD. He's a troll; trolls should be killfiled, not replied to.

He's killfiled here, so I don't have to read his junk unless someone
replies to him and quotes him.


--
Ken

On 2019-12-28 9:17 a.m., Ken Blake wrote:
On 12/28/2019 3:21 AM, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:47:04 +0000, David
wrote:

The whole defamatory ‘article’ about me was put on line for spite -
in retaliation for me finding malware on the STALKING_TARGET site.

Â*Â*Â*Â*Malware is not described in "screenshots". AV software will
give it a NAME.
Â*Â*Â*Â*Just post the NAME and explain IN YOUR OWN WORDS how it works.
Just the technical details. No need for any more STALKING links.

I took this screenshot as evidence:

Â*Â*Â*Â*...... altered it and posted it on a tracking/datamining site.
Â*Â*Â*Â*Yes, we know. Nobody's going to click on it.

Â*Â*Â*Â*Meanwhile, this public service site is safe(check the source
code):

Â*Â*Â*Â*http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Â*Â*Â*Â*No malicious scripting at all.

Â*Â*Â*Â*I recommend everyone read it before replying to BD.
Â*Â*Â*Â*PS BD claims he's sober when he phishes, stalks and
cross-posts.


I recommend that everyone read whatever they want to read, and *not*
reply to BD. He's a troll; trolls should be killfiled, not replied to.

He's killfiled here, so I don't have to read his junk unless someone
replies to him and quotes him.



I agree with you Ken, just ****can these useless assholes, Do not reply
to their crap.

Rene

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 08:17:33 -0700, Ken Blake
wrote:

On 12/28/2019 3:21 AM, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:47:04 +0000, David
wrote:

The whole defamatory ‘article’ about me was put on line for spite - in
retaliation for me finding malware on the STALKING_TARGET site.

Malware is not described in "screenshots". AV software will
give it a NAME.
Just post the NAME and explain IN YOUR OWN WORDS how it works.
Just the technical details. No need for any more STALKING links.

I took this screenshot as evidence:

...... altered it and posted it on a tracking/datamining site.
Yes, we know. Nobody's going to click on it.

Meanwhile, this public service site is safe(check the source
code):

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

No malicious scripting at all.

I recommend everyone read it before replying to BD.
PS BD claims he's sober when he phishes, stalks and
cross-posts.


I recommend that everyone read whatever they want to read, and *not*
reply to BD. He's a troll; trolls should be killfiled, not replied to.

He's killfiled here, so I don't have to read his junk unless someone
replies to him and quotes him.

Filter on [OT].
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On 28/12/2019 18:30, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 08:17:33 -0700, Ken Blake
wrote:

On 12/28/2019 3:21 AM, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:47:04 +0000, David
wrote:

The whole defamatory ‘article’ about me was put on line for spite - in
retaliation for me finding malware on the STALKING_TARGET site.

Malware is not described in "screenshots". AV software will
give it a NAME.
Just post the NAME and explain IN YOUR OWN WORDS how it works.
Just the technical details. No need for any more STALKING links.

I took this screenshot as evidence:

...... altered it and posted it on a tracking/datamining site.
Yes, we know. Nobody's going to click on it.

Meanwhile, this public service site is safe(check the source
code):

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

No malicious scripting at all.

I recommend everyone read it before replying to BD.
PS BD claims he's sober when he phishes, stalks and
cross-posts.


I recommend that everyone read whatever they want to read, and *not*
reply to BD. He's a troll; trolls should be killfiled, not replied to.

He's killfiled here, so I don't have to read his junk unless someone
replies to him and quotes him.

Filter on [OT].
[]'s

Ken Blake already *KNOWS* what to do!

He *WAS* a Microsoft MVP until I exposed him for what he *really* is!

Ref: https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/p...-blake.345784/

FWIW, I've always trusted his advice.

--
David

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:09:25 +0000, David
wrote:

On 28/12/2019 18:30, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 08:17:33 -0700, Ken Blake
wrote:

On 12/28/2019 3:21 AM, Shadow wrote:

Malware is not described in "screenshots". AV software will
give it a NAME.
Just post the NAME and explain IN YOUR OWN WORDS how it works.
Just the technical details. No need for any more STALKING links.


Meanwhile, this public service site is safe(check the source
code):

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

No malicious scripting at all.

I recommend everyone read it before replying to BD.
PS BD claims he's sober when he phishes, stalks and
cross-posts.


I recommend that everyone read whatever they want to read, and *not*
reply to BD. He's a troll; trolls should be killfiled, not replied to.

He's killfiled here, so I don't have to read his junk unless someone
replies to him and quotes him.

Filter on [OT].
[]'s

redacted already *KNOWS* what to do!

He *WAS* a Microsoft MVP until I exposed him for what he *really* is!

Ref: https://CUT_STALKING_URL

WTF?
Are you on a week-long binge?
Want to know BD better?
Oh wait, you posted the link. Up there. TY.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012