For those considering Linux...

On 2017-12-25 6:54 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 01:54:47 -0600, Char Jackson
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 20:19:56 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 11:32:13 -0600, Char Jackson
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 11:34:23 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 22:02:20 -0500, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2017-12-23 21:20, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:15:13 -0500, Wolffan
wrote:

snip for cleanliness

Post a link to Roy Moore admitting that he broke the law by having
sexual relations with an underage girl. I want to hear it from Roy
Moore's own mouth, not someone's interpretation.

sigh... the kiddie fiddler admitted to asking the mothers of assorted girls
for permission prior to ‘dating’ them.

So because he's respectful toward the parents, he's a pedophile. Your
liberal logic astounds me.

If you really claim to believe that you arrived at that conclusion by
reason and logic, you're not only deluded, you're [fill in with one of
the words you like to use about "liberals"].

When I asked my wife to marry me, it was clear from very early on that
in the same way that I essentially had to present myself to her father
for his approval to date her, I would also need his approval to marry
her. Some cultures still have a certain sense of respect even though
you as an individual and your culture don't.

1. No one's talking about marriage. Dating and marriage are two
different kettles of fish.

Read the paragraph again, dumbass. I made it clear that I needed
permission to date her as well.

Good point, sorry. I didn't realize that she was under age when you
started dating. Good for you! Get'em young and break'em in right, right?
That seems to be about your speed.

She was 19 and we were already dating for about eight months when I
insisted on doing the right thing and introducing myself to her
parents to essentially ask for their blessing for our relationship.
It's a matter of respect to say the least.

So you lied twice in your earlier statement.

You dated for 8 months BEFORE you "presented yourself"...

....AND you didn't "HAVE to" present yourself: you CHOSE to present yourself.

Thank you.

:-)

On 2017-12-25 2:25 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:44:19 -0500, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2017-12-25 06:44, Brick wrote:
[...]
If you don't marry them young, you're marrying an ejaculation bucket.
If that turns you on, then you are the wierd one.
All men prefer young virgins.
Old virgins are also acceptable, just rare.

Ah, I see, you're one of those who's afraid that an experienced woman
will rate you based on the quality of your, erm, technique.

No, she won't.

She'll rate you on the quality of your character.

Yours would rate close to zero.

While I can't speak for Brick, the reality is that _no_ honest man
would find an "experienced" woman to be more attractive than a young
virgin around the age of 18 or 19.


Wow.

You're a disgusting human being in yet MORE ways!

On 2017-12-25 4:03 PM, Brick wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 14:47:47 -0800, Bob F, thunk thusly:
On 12/25/2017 3:44 AM, Brick wrote:

If you don't marry them young, you're marrying an ejaculation bucket.
If that turns you on, then you are the wierd one.
All men prefer young virgins.
Old virgins are also acceptable, just rare.


Uugh! Your attitude about women is disgusting.

So, given a choice between an 18 year old virgin, and a 21 year old
that's been with 8 men, you'd *prefer* the 21 year old as a prospective
wife?

I wouldn't be rating them on that scale at all, myself.


I'm talking when you are under 30 and those are perfectly valid options.
If you are already 45, then you're gonna get a used one.

I'd of thunk men would take the 18 year old.

My wife was 17 when we met.
I was 20.

I was looking for a mate, not a break from masterbating.

On 2017-12-26 9:03 AM, Brick wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:53:35 -0500, Wolf K, thunk thusly:
On 2017-12-25 19:07, Brick wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:44:19 -0500, Wolf K, thunk thusly:
On 2017-12-25 06:44, Brick wrote:
[...]
If you don't marry them young, you're marrying an ejaculation bucket.
If that turns you on, then you are the wierd one.
All men prefer young virgins.
Old virgins are also acceptable, just rare.

Ah, I see, you're one of those who's afraid that an experienced woman
will rate you based on the quality of your, erm, technique.

No, she won't.

She'll rate you on the quality of your character.

Yours would rate close to zero.

I've been with my wife for a long time.
Our son is already in his mid thirties.

If you want a used woman for a mate, knock yourself out.
Perhaps your options were limited.


It's the phrase "used woman" that signals a, shall we say _problematic_
attitude.


I am well aware men end up with divorcees and other prior relationship
women. They can and do end up in semi-life-long relationships. People make
mistakes.

Even women often call the previous relationship a mistake.

None of that changes the fact that men prefer virgins.
Once one is above the mid-thirties, it ain't likely to happen, so they
settle.

Used woman seems much kinder than slut, but if slut is the preferred word,
that's fine.


That you equate a woman who's had sex before you with "slut" says
everything we need to know...

....about you.

Regular troll...

--
Char Jackson none none.invalid wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp. giganews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news. xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!fx35.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Char Jackson none none.invalid
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: For those considering Linux...
Message-ID: s5e54dhafampgm8vdmi6smaai2a0ibkfjc 4ax.com
References: lsov3ddmnpibj5mck1jmt4jpbnek4mfmvb 4ax.com cfk04dt9oc7s6atqiqbk5j7925nod613j2 4ax.com fib14d9mekusgr88ktrkiqiibne847cekq 4ax.com p1qoa0$qnr$1 dont-email.me ZNa0C.106920$4Z6.777 fx41.iad hlu24dlu73b7hn8nmd5i8l96le621cp556 4ax.com p1rvc1$dle$2 dont-email.me oq034d9tc1o1ld1umg9k0pga1toftgheot 4ax.com p1s0er$mq2$1 dont-email.me c4734dhgrp9ma9vu016d401tk9scnsc943 4ax.com p1s6pk$lbs$1 dont-email.me kqv0C.123339$Wq7.80117 fx44.iad p1u07k$i81$6 dont-email.me
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 70
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 21:06:17 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:06:22 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 3916
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3703056279
X-Original-Bytes: 3854
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.os.linux.advocacy:677367 alt.comp.os.windows-10:59991 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:228155

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 17:17:40 -0000 (UTC), Brick brick mortar.invalid
wrote:

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 12:12:44 -0500, Wolf K, thunk thusly:
On 2017-12-25 19:57, Brick wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 19:50:18 -0500, Doomsdrzej, thunk thusly:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 15:08:35 -0800, Bob F bobnospam gmail.com wrote:

On 12/25/2017 3:01 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 14:50:03 -0800, Bob F bobnospam gmail.com wrote:

On 12/25/2017 2:25 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:44:19 -0500, Wolf K wolfmac sympatico.ca
wrote:

On 2017-12-25 06:44, Brick wrote:
[...]
If you don't marry them young, you're marrying an ejaculation bucket.
If that turns you on, then you are the wierd one.
All men prefer young virgins.
Old virgins are also acceptable, just rare.

Ah, I see, you're one of those who's afraid that an experienced woman
will rate you based on the quality of your, erm, technique.

No, she won't.

She'll rate you on the quality of your character.

Yours would rate close to zero.

While I can't speak for Brick, the reality is that _no_ honest man
would find an "experienced" woman to be more attractive than a young
virgin around the age of 18 or 19.

Wow! Speak for yourself, or grow up. There are some really screwed up
men here.

Then you're a liar.

You are an idiot child! Scary, that a grown man could think to say such
a thing. There may be a few warped children like you, but certainly not
everyone among grownup men.

Any other of you grownup men out there find silver streaks in a women's
hair to be sexy?

ROFL.

Yes, men. Wouldn't you rather date someone who's sagging everywhere
than someone at their prime? You're all horrible if not.


I find it hard to believe.

I don't. 50-year-old adolescent males are a dime a dozen. There's very
little pressure on them to grow up, quite the contrary in fact. Sad.

Brick has revealed himself as one of those men who are afraid that an
experienced woman will compare his equipment, and his use of it, to
other men's. And he is afraid that by comparison he will fail.

Sorry to hear yours was used.

Yours wasn't "used?" Why, because she said so? What about after the
relationship was consummated? Was she "used" then? Do they not have
baths and showers where you come from?

Whatever your problem is, I'm glad I don't have it.

On 12/25/2017 4:50 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 15:08:35 -0800, Bob F wrote:

On 12/25/2017 3:01 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 14:50:03 -0800, Bob F wrote:

On 12/25/2017 2:25 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:44:19 -0500, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2017-12-25 06:44, Brick wrote:
[...]
If you don't marry them young, you're marrying an ejaculation bucket.
If that turns you on, then you are the wierd one.
All men prefer young virgins.
Old virgins are also acceptable, just rare.

Ah, I see, you're one of those who's afraid that an experienced woman
will rate you based on the quality of your, erm, technique.

No, she won't.

She'll rate you on the quality of your character.

Yours would rate close to zero.

While I can't speak for Brick, the reality is that _no_ honest man
would find an "experienced" woman to be more attractive than a young
virgin around the age of 18 or 19.

Wow! Speak for yourself, or grow up. There are some really screwed up
men here.

Then you're a liar.

You are an idiot child! Scary, that a grown man could think to say such
a thing. There may be a few warped children like you, but certainly not
everyone among grownup men.

Any other of you grownup men out there find silver streaks in a women's
hair to be sexy?

ROFL.

Yes, men. Wouldn't you rather date someone who's sagging everywhere
than someone at their prime? You're all horrible if not.


I'd much rather be with a woman who has life experience. I have
absolutely no interest in any woman 1/2 or 1/3 of my age. That would be
absolutely boring.

Must be the difference between me and a child diddler.

On 12/26/2017 9:06 AM, Brick wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:54:57 -0500, Wolf K, thunk thusly:
On 2017-12-25 19:11, Brick wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 09:56:26 -0500, Doomsdrzej, thunk thusly:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:44:01 -0000 (UTC), Brick
wrote:

On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 01:54:47 -0600, Char Jackson, thunk thusly:
On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 20:19:56 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 11:32:13 -0600, Char Jackson
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 11:34:23 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 22:02:20 -0500, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2017-12-23 21:20, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:15:13 -0500, Wolffan
wrote:

snip for cleanliness

Post a link to Roy Moore admitting that he broke the law by having
sexual relations with an underage girl. I want to hear it from Roy
Moore's own mouth, not someone's interpretation.

sigh... the kiddie fiddler admitted to asking the mothers of assorted girls
for permission prior to ?dating? them.

So because he's respectful toward the parents, he's a pedophile. Your
liberal logic astounds me.

If you really claim to believe that you arrived at that conclusion by
reason and logic, you're not only deluded, you're [fill in with one of
the words you like to use about "liberals"].

When I asked my wife to marry me, it was clear from very early on that
in the same way that I essentially had to present myself to her father
for his approval to date her, I would also need his approval to marry
her. Some cultures still have a certain sense of respect even though
you as an individual and your culture don't.

1. No one's talking about marriage. Dating and marriage are two
different kettles of fish.

Read the paragraph again, dumbass. I made it clear that I needed
permission to date her as well.

Good point, sorry. I didn't realize that she was under age when you
started dating. Good for you! Get'em young and break'em in right, right?
That seems to be about your speed.


If you don't marry them young, you're marrying an ejaculation bucket.
If that turns you on, then you are the wierd one.
All men prefer young virgins.
Old virgins are also acceptable, just rare.

I know a couple... but I'd still rather they not be pushing 40.

Men *prefer* virgins for a mate.
Plain, and simple.
What they end up with may be perfectly acceptable, but the preferred mate
is one that only you have been with.

That makes her truly "your one true love".

Bull****.

Perhaps you suffer from a performance issue?

What all of you are saying is men don't prefer virgins, they prefer them to get
laid as often as possible and from many different individuals?

LOL.... wtf


Wouldn't those men be in bad shape if women enforced those rules. Funny
what OK for those men is not for their women.

I can't ever remember thinking whether a woman I was interested in was a
virgin. It just doesn't matter. It would be silly if it did.

On 12/25/2017 4:27 PM, Brick wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 15:08:35 -0800, Bob F, thunk thusly:
On 12/25/2017 3:01 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 14:50:03 -0800, Bob F wrote:

On 12/25/2017 2:25 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:44:19 -0500, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2017-12-25 06:44, Brick wrote:
[...]
If you don't marry them young, you're marrying an ejaculation bucket.
If that turns you on, then you are the wierd one.
All men prefer young virgins.
Old virgins are also acceptable, just rare.

Ah, I see, you're one of those who's afraid that an experienced woman
will rate you based on the quality of your, erm, technique.

No, she won't.

She'll rate you on the quality of your character.

Yours would rate close to zero.

While I can't speak for Brick, the reality is that _no_ honest man
would find an "experienced" woman to be more attractive than a young
virgin around the age of 18 or 19.

Wow! Speak for yourself, or grow up. There are some really screwed up
men here.

Then you're a liar.

You are an idiot child! Scary, that a grown man could think to say such
a thing. There may be a few warped children like you, but certainly not
everyone among grownup men.

Any other of you grownup men out there find silver streaks in a women's
hair to be sexy?

For a wife, or mate, only if it streaked silver during our life together.
My preference for a wife was a virgin.
I got what I wanted.

You must still be looking.

Not at all.

yourself.

Thank you.


Snip-Snip

Getting back to the subject *LINUX*.
Over the holiday I ran across a writeup on Puppy Linux, Xenialpup 7.5,
It looked interesting so decided to try it, Downloaded and installed it
on a self booting USB stick.
Well I was pleasantly supersized at the results, For a 330MB OS it is
quite good.
Everything including sound, video WiFi, internet all worked out of the
box, I know it's no windows 10 which I use as my main OS but for people
who would like to try Linux this is a good choice.

Rene

Rene Lamontagne wrote:

yourself.

Thank you.


Snip-Snip

Getting back to the subject *LINUX*.
Over the holiday I ran across a writeup on Puppy Linux, Xenialpup 7.5,
It looked interesting so decided to try it, Downloaded and installed it
on a self booting USB stick.
Well I was pleasantly supersized at the results, For a 330MB OS it is
quite good.
Everything including sound, video WiFi, internet all worked out of the
box, I know it's no windows 10 which I use as my main OS but for people
who would like to try Linux this is a good choice.

Rene


There are different generations of Puppy.

The older versions were meant for Pentium III computers
and the like. The kernel is 2.4 or 2.6 or so. The older
kernels are likely to have drivers for the crusty old hardware.

Later ones switched to 64 bit, and with it, a later
kernel. Those are the ones more likely to have drivers
for your hardware.

http://puppylinux.com/family-tree.html

Distros also vary by intent. Some are intended for live boot
from the CD/DVD, as well as installing to a hard drive. Others,
the developer will tell you they're really meant for live boot only.
Knoppix is one where the developer intended it to be live only.

You can find other family tree pictures. But the Puppy section
here is a bit incomplete.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...n_Timeline.svg

Distros are also listed here by popularity (how many times
people have clicked a link). The popularity list is on the lower
right of the page. You can see that Debian still has sizable
interest, and it's the "parent" of many of the others. The only
thing I recommend with Debian, is watch out for their
installer. Until you get used to using it (and perhaps
even later), feed it only a single blank HDD at install time,
so there are no surprises with the install outcome. I had it
erase several other Linux distros on me, because the
installer doesn't "play nice". I can't think of too many
other distros that are quite that bad at it. I had entered
a custom install configuration, fed it a prepped partition...
and it just erased the MBR for kicks.

https://distrowatch.com/

And distros range all the way down, on "crudeness". There
are distros with text installers, and text runtimes. This means
you may be staring at a 80x24 text screen for quite a while
until you find the package manager and download a DE to provide
graphics. But that approach also solves the problems, on some
distros, of poor DE choices, and starting off from scratch
in text mode, allows you to have a DE that the more
graphically oriented DVD didn't allow.

You can make a full time job out of testing these things.

And while you might think the bug count would have dropped
to zero, due to the maturity of the ecosystem, that's
not always the case. I had several this year with broken
DNS out of the box. I also downloaded something not too long
ago, where the package manager was replaced by "Snaps".
And "Snaps" was broken. Horribly broken. Toss that DVD in
the trash.

When people ask me "why are you testing these things in
a VM, before using them live on a real computer", I just
have to show them the pile of discarded DVDs to explain why.
A virtual machine allows booting the ISO file, rather
than having to make a real DVD from it.

Currently I have LTS distros or one-step-older distros
on USB keys, and those are the keepers at the moment.
Nothing I've seen recently tempted me to update a USB key.

Paul

On 26 Dec 2017, Rene Lamontagne wrote in
alt.comp.os.windows-10:

Getting back to the subject *LINUX*.
Over the holiday I ran across a writeup on Puppy Linux,
Xenialpup 7.5,
It looked interesting so decided to try it, Downloaded and
installed it on a self booting USB stick.
Well I was pleasantly supersized at the results, For a 330MB OS it
is quite good.
Everything including sound, video WiFi, internet all worked out of
the box, I know it's no windows 10 which I use as my main OS but
for people who would like to try Linux this is a good choice.

Linux as a desktop OS is fine and dandy, if a bit unrefined, if your
expectations are low. It makes an excellent server platform. The
problem is the lack of quality applications. If your main goal is web
surfing and email that could be just what the doctor ordered. I might
set my grandmother up with a Linux machine if she was on a budget. But
for me, No, exept as a server and/or nerd toy (which I've been doing
for years.)

Doomsdrzej wrote:

There are photos of me available all over the place and some of them
also show my physique. Feel free to check them out at your soonest
convenience

I must admit, "Slimer", you're looking quite fit, in this photo:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:B...ls_spricht.jpg

--
"Whazza matta there turdv? Boss wouldn't let you upgrade to windoze
8?" - some POS that calls itself "GreyCloud"

On 20/12/2017 21:36, Doomsdrzej wrote:
...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Ubuntu-17.10-BIOS-Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.


Window$ could do that as well!

--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
�借貸! ��騙! ��交! �打交! �打劫! �自殺! 請考慮綜� (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:50:20 -0500, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2017-12-25 17:25, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:44:19 -0500, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2017-12-25 06:44, Brick wrote:
[...]
If you don't marry them young, you're marrying an ejaculation bucket.
If that turns you on, then you are the wierd one.
All men prefer young virgins.
Old virgins are also acceptable, just rare.

Ah, I see, you're one of those who's afraid that an experienced woman
will rate you based on the quality of your, erm, technique.

No, she won't.

She'll rate you on the quality of your character.

Yours would rate close to zero.

While I can't speak for Brick, the reality is that _no_ honest man
would find an "experienced" woman to be more attractive than a young
virgin around the age of 18 or 19.

So as you wife ages, you find her less attractive?

Pity.

Idiot.

As my wife ages, so do I. As such, my priorities change. While I
dated, it's clear that I was mostly attracted to the physical
attributes of a person. As a result, it's normal that I would prefer a
19 year-old to a 35 year-old. One has a firm body while the other is
sagging. Not only that, the 19 year-old is a lot more accepting of
flaws than a 35 year-old usually is.

The 35 year-old, theoretically, should have a better personality and
allow you to have a better conversation. In practise though, they tend
to be a lot more judgmental, carry a lot more baggage and find it a
lot easier to complain than a young woman does. You can form the young
one to be an ideal mate and grow with you while the other is, like an
old dog, unteachable. As a result, not only does the man make
compromises on a physical level to be with her, he also compromises in
whatever happiness he might find on a more personal level. MAYBE the
sex is better because of experience... but no amount of experience
will cover for the fact that the body itself is less attractive IMO.

With that in mind, my wife, having met her at 19, was attractive to me
on a physical leve but in the time we've been together, we've learned
how to deal with one another so personalities also match. It helps
that she also aged very gracefully.

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 12:22:31 -0500, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2017-12-25 18:08, Bob F wrote:
On 12/25/2017 3:01 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 14:50:03 -0800, Bob F wrote:

On 12/25/2017 2:25 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:44:19 -0500, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2017-12-25 06:44, Brick wrote:
[...]
If you don't marry them young, you're marrying an ejaculation bucket.
If that turns you on, then you are the wierd one.
All men prefer young virgins.
Old virgins are also acceptable, just rare.

Ah, I see, you're one of those who's afraid that an experienced woman
will rate you based on the quality of your, erm, technique.

No, she won't.

She'll rate you on the quality of your character.

Yours would rate close to zero.
While I can't speak for Brick, the reality is that _no_ honest man
would find an "experienced" woman to be more attractive than a young
virgin around the age of 18 or 19.

Wow! Speak for yourself, or grow up. There are some really screwed up
men here.

Then you're a liar.

You are an idiot child! Scary, that a grown man could think to say such
a thing. There may be a few warped children like you, but certainly not
everyone among grownup men.

Any other of you grownup men out there find silver streaks in a women's
hair to be sexy?

Sure. One of the sexiest women I know is 81 years old.

Ok... *plonk*