If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
virtual memory
eddie wrote:
i need to know why xp will not let me set my vurtual=20 memory to min 500- max 500 no matter what i do it still=20 reads 144-288, could some one please help????? i also only have 128 mg ram {96 availble, 32 shared to=20 video card} As a start, that idea of making the initial and maximum sizes the same, while it is often touted, is not a good idea. Read up on the subject at www.aumha.org/a/xpvm.htm --=20 Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows - File Systems) Bournemouth, U.K. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
virtual memory
"eddie" clurgee@hotmail wrote:
i need to know why xp will not let me set my vurtual memory to min 500- max 500 no matter what i do it still reads 144-288, could some one please help????? i also only have 128 mg ram {96 availble, 32 shared to video card} if some one could please help me out i would be most greatful... thank you, eddie Virtual memory settings aside, you really do need more RAM. 96 mb of RAM is nowhere near enough for reasonable performance with Windows XP. You should seriously consider adding at least an additional 256 mb of RAM. You will be pleasantly surprised by the improvement in overall performance. Good luck Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada -- Microsoft MVP On-Line Help Computer Service http://onlinehelp.bc.ca "The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|