BD/GGB's online behavior problem (was Moderated Newsgroup Charters or FAQs)

On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 21:24:51 +0100, DGB wrote:

On 04/07/2019 15:37, Mike Easter wrote:
I'm going to attempt to construct a coherent theme of this exchange,
even tho' BD/DGB is attempting to 'talk past' me; ie 'reply' but not
actually answer.

DGB wrote:
[....]
Let me see if I can explain!
CUT_IRRELEVANT_STALKING_MALICIOUS_LINK

But, then BD/DGB didn't explain AT ALL; not one single word.* Instead he
mentioned some irrelevant old history

It may be irrelevant to you, but the eyes of 'others' read here too,
don't they?

Yes, and I think EVERYONE agrees you didn't answer the
question. You posted yet another STALKING link from years ago. The
OP's question was(in a nutshell): Why have you been stalking innocent
people for 15 years ?

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

44 #FAKE_NYMS and counting.
[]'s

--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012