If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Which Windows 10 switch *remembers* Run commands?
He who is harry newton said on Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:49:01 +0000 (UTC):
Thanks for that super not obvious suggestion which can only be borne from experience that you had that I did not have! At the moment, I'm tentatively anointing Bob as a genius ... because it does appear to work and it does not appear to show most recently used "apps" ... so it's confusing ... which is why you're the genius... http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/24/runmru2d55fa.jpg PROBLEM SUMMARY: Commands typed into "start run" were not remembered. SOLUTION SUMMARY: Start Settings PC Settings Personalization Start To turn off start-run memory, turn off "Show most used apps". http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/24/personalization.jpg This disables the reverse-order fedcba memory in the registry key: HKCU\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Exp lorer\RunMRU http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/24/runmru.jpg To turn on start-run memory, turn on "Show most used apps". http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/24/personalization2.jpg This enables the reverse-order fedcba memory in the registry key: HKCU\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Exp lorer\RunMRU http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/24/runmru2d55fa.jpg Hopefully, it doesn't show any idiotic "recently used apps" icons! -- Added windowsxp just so that it would be archived in degagoogle forever so others can find it in the future with a keyword search. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Which Windows 10 switch *remembers* Run commands?
Harry,
Why is this Win10 answer posted in an *XP* group ? Also, there are *three* other versions between Win10 and XP ... (I've removed the "microsoft.public.windowsxp.general" newsgroup from this follow-up Its therefore quite likely I won't read your reply. Just take it as a "WTF bub?" remark) Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Which Windows 10 switch *remembers* Run commands?
Lol.
I wanted to remove this newsgroup from the follow-upt, but somehow forgot to actually *do* it ... "R.Wieser" wrote in message news Harry, Why is this Win10 answer posted in an *XP* group ? Also, there are *three* other versions between Win10 and XP ... (I've removed the "microsoft.public.windowsxp.general" newsgroup from this follow-up Its therefore quite likely I won't read your reply. Just take it as a "WTF bub?" remark) Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Which Windows 10 switch *remembers* Run commands?
He who is R.Wieser said on Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:12:53 +0200:
Why is this Win10 answer posted in an *XP* group ? Also, there are *three* other versions between Win10 and XP ... (I've removed the "microsoft.public.windowsxp.general" newsgroup from this follow-up Its therefore quite likely I won't read your reply. Just take it as a "WTF bub?" remark) I already explained *exactly* why in the very post you're responding to. Didn't you see it? (HINT: Look in the sig.) I understand that you might not *agree* with my clear & obvious logic. But I *clearly* explained why in the very post you responded to. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Which Windows 10 switch *remembers* Run commands?
Harry,
Didn't you see it? (HINT: Look in the sig.) Nope, I didn't. Sigs are the place where "smart" lines go to die -- because of endless repetition, boring the **** outof everyone who sees them more than a couple of times. As a result I ignore most of them, just as I do spam. And putting an explanation about your post in the *signature line* ? Yeah, thats exactly where you should be doing that kind of stuff. Not. I understand that you might not *agree* with my clear & obvious logic. And your "logic" for dropping your *unrelated junk* into this newsgroup is to be certain that your post will be saved into prosperity ? Why ? Its already present in the Win10 group, and so that "degagoogle" will already archive it. Wat good does it do to have *two* copies of it on file ? Nope, although your reasoning might, to you, look to be "clear & obvious logic" at the surface, just a little dip below it shows its complete-and-utter rubbish ... Regards, Rudy Wieser |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|