If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
-----Original Message----- Wislu Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing quality.. there was no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't pre-empt that photos would be the main output.. photos are a very small part of the output from my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to lasers being expensive to recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are not cheap to replace, and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that laser printers are cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing color toner, a substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my original post was BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the output of others that you have misread and misunderstood?.. The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
-----Original Message----- Wislu Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing quality.. there was no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't pre-empt that photos would be the main output.. photos are a very small part of the output from my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to lasers being expensive to recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are not cheap to replace, and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that laser printers are cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing color toner, a substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my original post was BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the output of others that you have misread and misunderstood?.. The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
-----Original Message----- Wislu Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing quality.. there was no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't pre-empt that photos would be the main output.. photos are a very small part of the output from my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to lasers being expensive to recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are not cheap to replace, and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that laser printers are cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing color toner, a substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my original post was BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the output of others that you have misread and misunderstood?.. The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
-----Original Message----- Wislu Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing quality.. there was no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't pre-empt that photos would be the main output.. photos are a very small part of the output from my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to lasers being expensive to recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are not cheap to replace, and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that laser printers are cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing color toner, a substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my original post was BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the output of others that you have misread and misunderstood?.. The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself
"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message ... -----Original Message----- Wislu Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing quality.. there was no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't pre-empt that photos would be the main output.. photos are a very small part of the output from my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to lasers being expensive to recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are not cheap to replace, and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that laser printers are cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing color toner, a substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my original post was BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the output of others that you have misread and misunderstood?.. The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself
"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message ... -----Original Message----- Wislu Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing quality.. there was no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't pre-empt that photos would be the main output.. photos are a very small part of the output from my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to lasers being expensive to recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are not cheap to replace, and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that laser printers are cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing color toner, a substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my original post was BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the output of others that you have misread and misunderstood?.. The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself
"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message ... -----Original Message----- Wislu Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing quality.. there was no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't pre-empt that photos would be the main output.. photos are a very small part of the output from my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to lasers being expensive to recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are not cheap to replace, and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that laser printers are cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing color toner, a substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my original post was BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the output of others that you have misread and misunderstood?.. The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself
"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message ... -----Original Message----- Wislu Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing quality.. there was no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't pre-empt that photos would be the main output.. photos are a very small part of the output from my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to lasers being expensive to recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are not cheap to replace, and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that laser printers are cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing color toner, a substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my original post was BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the output of others that you have misread and misunderstood?.. The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself
"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message ... -----Original Message----- Wislu Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing quality.. there was no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't pre-empt that photos would be the main output.. photos are a very small part of the output from my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to lasers being expensive to recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are not cheap to replace, and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that laser printers are cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing color toner, a substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my original post was BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the output of others that you have misread and misunderstood?.. The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
-----Original Message----- "in some applications..." is a generalization in itself You are a top-posting moron. Permit me to explain. When one states that an idea is true "generally," it means that it is not true in all cases, but is in most. "In some applications" is clearly *not* a generalization, because it means that there are *specific* cases where the statement is not true (i.e., the statement "Laser printers are better than inkjet printers"). They are in fact *not* generally better than inkjet printers, which was *your* stupid statement. Because I'm disinclined to extend a battle of wits with an unarmed man, feel free to have the last word. You seem to be doing a much better job of arguing against yourself anyway. Remember, though: better to remian silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
-----Original Message----- "in some applications..." is a generalization in itself You are a top-posting moron. Permit me to explain. When one states that an idea is true "generally," it means that it is not true in all cases, but is in most. "In some applications" is clearly *not* a generalization, because it means that there are *specific* cases where the statement is not true (i.e., the statement "Laser printers are better than inkjet printers"). They are in fact *not* generally better than inkjet printers, which was *your* stupid statement. Because I'm disinclined to extend a battle of wits with an unarmed man, feel free to have the last word. You seem to be doing a much better job of arguing against yourself anyway. Remember, though: better to remian silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
-----Original Message----- "in some applications..." is a generalization in itself You are a top-posting moron. Permit me to explain. When one states that an idea is true "generally," it means that it is not true in all cases, but is in most. "In some applications" is clearly *not* a generalization, because it means that there are *specific* cases where the statement is not true (i.e., the statement "Laser printers are better than inkjet printers"). They are in fact *not* generally better than inkjet printers, which was *your* stupid statement. Because I'm disinclined to extend a battle of wits with an unarmed man, feel free to have the last word. You seem to be doing a much better job of arguing against yourself anyway. Remember, though: better to remian silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Colour lazer??
****lu, in your case you're equally a fool whether you speak or not, you
useless parasite. Who cares about your long-winded logic BS anyway? BTW it's "remain" not "remian" bozo. "Wislu Plethora" wrote in message ... You are a top-posting moron. Permit me to explain. When one states that an idea is true "generally," it means that it is not true in all cases, but is in most. "In some applications" is clearly *not* a generalization, because it means that there are *specific* cases where the statement is not true (i.e., the statement "Laser printers are better than inkjet printers"). They are in fact *not* generally better than inkjet printers, which was *your* stupid statement. Because I'm disinclined to extend a battle of wits with an unarmed man, feel free to have the last word. You seem to be doing a much better job of arguing against yourself anyway. Remember, though: better to remian silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|