Nil consistently proves my point, in every post, that his posts are worthless.

On 25 Jun 2018, Arlen Holder wrote in
alt.comp.os.windows-10:

I challenged Nil to show us just once, in all those 25 years of
his nonsensical chit-chat on Usenet, all for his own amusement
(and apparently that of yours), where he has added any on-topic
value to a technical question.

If you can't be bothered to search for yourself, I certainly can't be
bothered to do it for you. Not that I have any need to justify myself
to a raging loony toon like you...

As expected of all you cowardly bullies, Nil can't find a single
time he has added on-topic technical value in 25 years of posting.

Of course I can. I'm not going to, but I can.

*Not once has Nil ever added on-topic technical value to *any*
thread!*

Babble, burble, banter, bicker bicker bicker
Brouhaha, balderdash, ballyhoo
It's only talk.

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 21:26:22 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:24:00 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:

There's that 'we' stuff again. Just a friendly reminder that nobody but
you can hear the voices in your head.

Char Jackson,

You can chit-chat all your fifth-grade silly semantics you want, but that
doesn't change the facts, Char Jackson.

People with this condition (AS) may be socially awkward and have an
all-absorbing interest in specific topics.

People may experience:
Behavioral: aggression, compulsive behavior, fidgeting, impulsivity,
repetitive movements, social isolation, or persistent repetition of
words or actions

Muscular: inability to combine muscle movements, poor coordination, or
tic

Mood: anger, anxiety, or apprehension

Also common: depression, intense interest in a limited number of things,
learning disability, nightmares, or sensitivity to sound

***

My sincere sympathies. It doesn't let you off the hook, but it does go a
long way toward explaining your behavior.

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 21:22:07 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:17:13 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:

The days of "I only speak facts" seem so long ago now.

I challenged Nil snip

Who are you to be issuing challenges?

*Not once has Nil ever added on-topic technical value to *any* thread!*

You'd have a different opinion if you did more reading and less posting.

Char Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 21:26:22 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:24:00 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:

There's that 'we' stuff again. Just a friendly reminder that nobody but
you can hear the voices in your head.

Char Jackson,

You can chit-chat all your fifth-grade silly semantics you want, but that
doesn't change the facts, Char Jackson.

People with this condition (AS) may be socially awkward and have an
all-absorbing interest in specific topics.

People may experience:
Behavioral: aggression, compulsive behavior, fidgeting, impulsivity,
repetitive movements, social isolation, or persistent repetition of
words or actions

Muscular: inability to combine muscle movements, poor coordination, or
tic

Mood: anger, anxiety, or apprehension

Also common: depression, intense interest in a limited number of things,
learning disability, nightmares, or sensitivity to sound

***

My sincere sympathies. It doesn't let you off the hook, but it does go a
long way toward explaining your behavior.

It indeed doesn't let him off the hook, especially because he knows -
and has said so - the problems that his condition presents to him,
especially in the area of human interaction/communication, i.e. such as
participating on Usenet.

I just checked, but acting like a jerk/creep is *not* in the DSM.

On 26 Jun 2018 10:30:21 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote:

I just checked, but acting like a jerk/creep is *not* in the DSM.

Frank Slootweg,

When you act like an adult, I treat you like an adult.
When you act like a child, I treat you like a child.

*You're a cowardly bully, Frank Slootweg.*

When you bully in threads I don't care about, I ignore you.
But you try to bully in threads that I author (hence I care about them).

When you stop bullying in threads I care about, you won't hear from me.

The moment you trolls comprehend that simple logic - we'll all benefit!

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:45:27 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:

Who are you to be issuing challenges?

Char Jackson,

Notice how both you, Char Jackson, and Frank Slootweg, and the other troll
bullies, are supremely affronted by me asking you to simply stop your
bullying trolling in threads I care about!

Hehhehheh ... your response above is *exactly the response of a bully!"

I treat you no differently than all the other cowardly bullying trolls.

When you act like an adult, I treat you like an adult.
When you act like a child, I treat you like a child.

*You're a cowardly bully, Char Jackson.*

When you bully in threads I don't care about, I ignore you.
But you try to bully in threads that I author (hence I care about them).

When you stop bullying in threads I care about, you won't hear from me.

The moment you trolls comprehend that simple logic - we'll all benefit!

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:36:31 -0400, Wolf K wrote:

The funny thing about you Wolf K., is that I've added more on-topic
technical value to this newsgroup in the past 24 hours than you've added in
the past 24 years.

Irrelevant.

Hehhehheh ... *trolls like Wolf K. prove my point in every post!*

To wit:
a. We tell Wolf K. that he doesn't contribute any added value,
b. Wolf K. responds, rather clearly, that added value is "irrelevant"!

*Wolf K. - to you - Usenet is a chit chat model solely for your amusement.*

That you trolls, like Wolf K., consistently prove me right, is amazing.

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 17:08:15 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:36:31 -0400, Wolf K wrote:

The funny thing about you Wolf K., is that I've added more on-topic
technical value to this newsgroup in the past 24 hours than you've added in
the past 24 years.

Irrelevant.

Hehhehheh ... *trolls like Wolf K. prove my point in every post!*

To wit:
a. We tell Wolf K. that he doesn't contribute any added value,
b. Wolf K. responds, rather clearly, that added value is "irrelevant"!

What did your doctor say about referring to yourself as "we"?

*Wolf K. - to you - Usenet is a chit chat model solely for your amusement.*

That you trolls, like Wolf K., consistently prove me right, is amazing.

If you were right a little more often, it would stop being "amazing".

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:39:40 -0400, Wolf K wrote:

Not affronted, just puzzled. Why do you believe we should do as you ask?
This is an unmoderated newsgroup. Anybody can post whatever they want.
If you don't like a post, ignore it. Or killfile the poster.

Wolf K.,

You prove my point in every post you make.

*That you feel value is irrelevant explains why you can't add any value.*

All you _can_ do, Wolf K, is meaningless chit chat on Usenet.

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 15:42:13 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:

What did your doctor say about referring to yourself as "we"?

*Why you, Char Jackson, prove your mind is that of a child, is amazing.*

Every post of yours simply proves my point - Char Jackson.

*All you _can_ do, Char Jackson, is play silly semantic games on Usenet.*

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:00:25 -0400, Wolf K wrote:

Nope, I've merely reminded you (I hope it's a reminder) that logic
matters. My opinion of your claim that you have added value is
completely irrelevant to my claim that you can't "save this newsgroup
from trolls like [me]."

The question is whether you will fall to the level of Snit-like trolls,
Wolf K, or if you remain at the level of nospam-like trolls.

If you're Snit-like, then absolutely nothing will have any impact on you.
If you're nospam-like, then you likely have "some" morsels of decency left.

I simply appeal to your remaining scraps of decency, if they still exist.

Furthermore, any opinion held by anyone on any matter whatsoever, is
irrelevant to my claim. Opinions have no truth-value: they are neither
true nor false. Therefore they cannot used to construct an argument.

You again, very consistently, prove I'm correct:
a. You love to play silly semantic games, and,
b. Usenet is, for you, a source of your amusement.

You have zero intention on actually being helpful by adding value.

And that, dear sir, is a small sample of the value I can add to any
thread that veers into illogic.

Indeed. The value you add is that you prove me correct in every post!

On 25 Jun 2018 21:45:44 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote:

Entertainment value? Maybe.

You prove my point, Frank Slootweg, in every post.

*You, Frank Slootweg, are on Usenet for its "entertainment value" to you.*

Hence, you almost never have any intention to actually be helpful.

Arlen Holder wrote:
On 25 Jun 2018 21:45:44 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote:
unsnip
Arlen Holder wrote:
On 25 Jun 2018 21:03:15 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote:

Simple. Plonk me if you want to.

Understand this:
a. You plonk me, you lose value.
/unsnip

Entertainment value? Maybe.

You prove my point, Frank Slootweg, in every post.

*You, Frank Slootweg, are on Usenet for its "entertainment value" to you.*

1) Apparent case of sarchasm. 2) Non sequitur logical fallacy/failure.

Hence, you almost never have any intention to actually be helpful.

Non sequitur logical fallacy/failure.

unsnip
b. I plonk you, I lose nothing of any value whatsoever.

Then why don't you? Lack the self control?
/unsnip

Non response duly noted.

[Rewind/Repeat:]

Now give yourself and us a break and see your health professional for
your AS! It's completely out of control!

On 27 Jun 2018 10:57:43 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote:

1) Apparent case of sarchasm. 2) Non sequitur logical fallacy/failure.

More silly semantic games from Frank Slootweg, who hasn't a clue about the
answer to any real problem.

*All you can do, Frank Slootweg, is play your silly childish games.*

You prove my right in every post.

On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:12:13 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:

You prove my right in every post.

You prove me right in every post.