If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 21:44:11 -0000 (UTC), William Unruh
wrote: On 2019-02-18, Ken Blake wrote: On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:15:26 -0600, Rene Lamontagne wrote: On 02/18/2019 11:01 AM, wrote: On 18-Feb-2019, Rene Lamontagne wrote: Worse, here is my RESPONSE to MIke's privacy rant: A. Mike essentially makes the claim that I have to DEFEND my right to privacy. B. I respond, strongly, with cites, that this is a common ignorant statement. C. When I ask Mike to provide cites backing up his ignorant claim, he can't. Let's state the super obvious things he 1. Nobody has to defend their right to privacy. 2. If you (Paul or Mike) want to claim otherwise, then back it up with cites. 3. Rest assured, I already provided Mike with cites proving my point of view. What the hell are cites? References. Thanks, I was mistaking it for sites. As far as I'm concerned, you are right, and the original post with the word "cites" is wrong. "Cite" is a verb, not a noun. The noun is "citation." I'm sure I'm going to get arguments about this, telling me I'm an old fuddy-duddy and I'm behind the times. So I'll repeat my first five words in the paragraph above: "as far as I'm concerned." English has the ability of making verbs into nouns. I knew I would get an argument. Maybe more are coming. You are certainly right. There are many, many examples of that. Some of those have been around for a long time. Some of them started very recently. Making nouns out of verbs is only one example of the way English changes. It also makes verbs out of nouns, and changes in many other ways. Like all languages, English changes over the years. Today's English isn't the same as Shakespeare's, and Shakespeare's wasn't the same as Chaucer's. And Italian isn't the same as Latin. I'm well aware of that. It's the nature of language. I can't object to that; it's a fact of life. But I can object to it's happening very quickly. To my way of thinking, because of television and the Internet, these days it happens too quickly, much more quickly than it used to. Too quickly, to me, means that it's very difficult for everyone to keep up with it, and the result is that communication is impeded. So wherever possible, I personally avoid those "nouns" made of verbs. I say (and write) "clean installation, " not "clean install," "invitation" not "invite," "citation" not "cite," and many other examples that don't spring to the mind at the moment. I know. I'm an old fuddy-duddy and I'm behind the times. So be it. There's an office complex near my home that has a sign in front of it: "If you officed here, you'd be home now." Besides making up the verb "office" from the noun "office," the sign makes no sense. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 20:44:10 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:
Only after you really state the problem that you want to solve. When that is known then we can offer solutions. Hi Carlos, Will you please just STOP foisting your CONFUSION onto me. o Please. I was NEVER confused about the "problem", Carlos. o Read the opening post of this thread, Carlos. Do I have to _beg_ you to read the opening post of this thread, Carlos? o Read it. Does that opening post NOT state the question in the SUBJECT line, Carlos? o Does that OP not state the question in the CLOSING LINE Carlos? You have to be an utter and complete IDIOT to be confused, Carlos. Read the opening post, Carlos. o Read it again. o And again. o And again. Carlos, read it one more time, please. o Do you notice the Subject, Carlos? o Do you notice the closing line, Carlos? Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? A: (It's pretty clear I was almost completely sure the answer is no.) Will you STOP with ascribing your confusion to me Carlos. o You are confused. o I'm NOT confused. I was NEVER confused. o Frank is confused. Mike is confused. Paul is confused. o Rene is an idiot. So is Unruh an idiot. Purgert is a troll. But I was never confused. o My whole POINT was that the proxy very likely didn't exist. So just STOP acribing YOUR confusion to me. o The question is and always was, trivially simple to compreyhend. The reason Paul, Mike, Frank, & you don't comprehend this simplest of the simplest of the simplest of questions, is, I posit, the same reason that the hypothetical southern hick can't comprehend that a Black Jewish female doctor can exist. The confusion is all yours, Carlos. o I was never confused. The question was asked in the assumption that the answer was zero. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenetposts?
On 02/18/2019 5:08 PM, arlen holder wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:24:50 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: chop chop. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenetposts?
On 02/18/2019 5:55 PM, arlen holder wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:23:03 -0000 (UTC), arlen holder wrote: more chop chop. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:35:27 +0100, Georg Schwarz wrote:
Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? You could for example use a SOCKS proxy, but why would you want to do that? Can't you connect directly to that free NNTP news server? Hi George, Thanks for the SOCK suggestion. I admit I haven't "played" with SOCKS since I had to get Mixmin encryption to work with, oh, was it "Pan" before Pan allowed it natively, so it has been _years_ since I touched SOCKS. To answer your question, of WHY, it was explained in the OP. Essentially, this is what happened: 1. I wrote a quick VPN basics for beginners 2. Mike Easter responded, essentially, advising the following: o Don't use VPN services. https://gist.github.com/joepie91/5a9909939e6ce7d09e29 3. I immediately summarized Mike's article as the following: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/Bv8bwG4ggnc/oAPYdk4QEgAJ Mike Easter _continued_ to keyword troll the thread, in essence, ruining it for beginners (which was, likely, Mike's intention from the start for all I know, since nothing he said passed the simple 3-word ignorance test). Many times I asked Mike to stop spewing ignorant bull****. o Almost nothing Mike wrote passed the simple 3-word ignorance test. Mike kept spewing more and more and more ignorant bull****. o Mike couldn't comprehend that he couldn't comprehend. Almost every post by Mike failed the 3-word ignorance test: o Name just one Since Mike refused to comprehend that the proxy doesn't exist, I brought the question over here, and let Mike know I did that (since I am an adult). It's abundantly clear that I assumed the answer was "no", but, since I'm an adult, I asked anyway, just in case the answer was not "no". Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? If the keyword trolls didn't exist, this thread would have remained on topic, but keyword trolls are like the hypothetical southern hick who can't comprehend the existence of a Black female Jewish doctor. Everything BUT that simple question was covered by the keyword trolls, almost all of which (if not all of which) was complete ignorant bull**** that didn't even pass the three word ignorance test of: o Name just one In the end, this thread likely should have been two post, the first asking: Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? *Name just one.* And the second providing the most likely answer: Q: *Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers?* A: *no* --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenetposts?
On 2/17/19 6:15 PM, arlen holder wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 14:29:54 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: I have no interest in that question and I'm under no obligation to even consider it worth discussing. The question is actually very simple & rather easy to comprehend Mike. Knowledgeable users who know the answer can add to our knowledge. Q: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Google is your friend. I copied and pasted your question into Google; it came back with "About 481,000 results (0.78 seconds)" The seventh result down the page was "25 Best Free Web Proxies for Safer and Anonymous Surfing | SpyAdvice https://spyadvice.com/free-web-proxies/" While I didn't check out the cite/site, it does mention "It also supports Usenet... posting..." -- Ken Hart |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:47:21 -0700, Ken Blake wrote:
There's an office complex near my home that has a sign in front of it: "If you officed here, you'd be home now." Besides making up the verb "office" from the noun "office," the sign makes no sense. I very much appreciate that the point was brought up, as I strive to speak (Am)English correctly, even as Usenet is a "casual" ad hoc medium. The folks like Cybe(r) Wizard and Dan Purgert, et al., have found that I thank them, and appreciate when my English is corrected, when done so with a helpful intent. In the case of Rene Lamontagne, it's not lost on anyone that his contribution (as has been that of Dan Purgert) to this thread has been negative value added, hence, Rene was, likely ecstatic that he _thought_ he found an "error" in my facts, much like Snit used to revel in his accusations that my facts are wrong. HINT: Watch this hilarious Snit video on the YouTube web site about me. https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo (Snit video) DOUBLEHINT: Snit posted that cite to that site hundreds of times. TRIPLEHINT: He _thought_ he _finally_ found my facts wrong. QUADRUPLEHINT: He was so _sure_ of himself, just like Mike Easter was. And yet, Snit never even _once_ comprehended the Y axis. Notice, the similarity to what Mike Easter and Carlos and Frank Slootweg (who was part of that Snit drama, by the way, despite the fact Frank tries to distance himself from his idiocy every time I mention it), are doing here. All Snit saw ... was a pretty graph. The graph was moving. Hooray! Just like a mouse sees a laser pointer moving... o The mouse POUNCES on it. Just like Mike did, when he saw the keyword "VPN". o Snit is a keyword troll, and so is Mike Easter a keyword troll. The moment they see a "moving graph", that's it. o Their brain goes into cat-pouncing-on-laser mode. It's like an alcoholic's response to being offered a drink. o They can't resist being a keyword troll. They think it's me confused, but all I did was ask this simple question: Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? A: Name just one. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:41:03 -0700, Ken Blake wrote:
Why do you want to help a troll? You should killfile him, not offer him solutions. Troll. Since this saga started with this very simple helpful tutoral... o How to get up & running on a free public vpn service in minutes What purposefully helpful tutorials have _you_ written, Ken Blake? o Name just one. Hint: o zero. troll. Idiot. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 19:18:59 -0500, Ken Hart wrote:
Google is your friend. I copied and pasted your question into Google; it came back with "About 481,000 results (0.78 seconds)" The seventh result down the page was "25 Best Free Web Proxies for Safer and Anonymous Surfing | SpyAdvice https://spyadvice.com/free-web-proxies/" While I didn't check out the cite/site, it does mention "It also supports Usenet... posting..." Idiot. Troll. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenetposts?
On 2019-02-18, Ken Blake wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 21:44:11 -0000 (UTC), William Unruh wrote: ..... I'm well aware of that. It's the nature of language. I can't object to that; it's a fact of life. But I can object to it's happening very quickly. To my way of thinking, because of television and the Internet, these days it happens too quickly, much more quickly than it Too quickly now? I think Shakespeare introduced something like a few thousand new words into English. That is "rapidly" In fact the late Elizabethan theatre was rife with new useage. used to. Too quickly, to me, means that it's very difficult for everyone to keep up with it, and the result is that communication is impeded. Yup, that is what Shakespeare and Chaucer etc did, impede language. |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:04:16 -0600, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
more chop chop. Idiot. Troll. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts?
In article , Ken Blake
wrote: What the hell are cites? References. Thanks, I was mistaking it for sites. As far as I'm concerned, you are right, and the original post with the word "cites" is wrong. "Cite" is a verb, not a noun. The noun is "citation." I'm sure I'm going to get arguments about this, telling me I'm an old fuddy-duddy and I'm behind the times. So I'll repeat my first five words in the paragraph above: "as far as I'm concerned." English has the ability of making verbs into nouns. I knew I would get an argument. Maybe more are coming. You are certainly right. There are many, many examples of that. Some of those have been around for a long time. Some of them started very recently. Making nouns out of verbs is only one example of the way English changes. It also makes verbs out of nouns, and changes in many other ways. Like all languages, English changes over the years. Today's English isn't the same as Shakespeare's, and Shakespeare's wasn't the same as Chaucer's. And Italian isn't the same as Latin. I'm well aware of that. It's the nature of language. I can't object to that; it's a fact of life. But I can object to it's happening very quickly. To my way of thinking, because of television and the Internet, these days it happens too quickly, much more quickly than it used to. Too quickly, to me, means that it's very difficult for everyone to keep up with it, and the result is that communication is impeded. where 'quickly' is 'in my lifetime', and nothing is impeded. So wherever possible, I personally avoid those "nouns" made of verbs. I say (and write) "clean installation, " not "clean install," "invitation" not "invite," "citation" not "cite," and many other examples that don't spring to the mind at the moment. I know. I'm an old fuddy-duddy and I'm behind the times. So be it. if you insist. There's an office complex near my home that has a sign in front of it: "If you officed here, you'd be home now." Besides making up the verb "office" from the noun "office," the sign makes no sense. it makes perfect sense. it's a variant of the common sign, 'if you lived here, you'd be home now': https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4097/4936701584_0fefe13994_b.jpg |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenetposts?
On 02/18/2019 8:33 PM, Ken Hart wrote:
On 2/18/19 8:12 PM, arlen holder wrote: On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 19:18:59 -0500, Ken Hart wrote: Google is your friend. I copied and pasted your question into Google; it came back with "About 481,000 results (0.78 seconds)" The seventh result down the page was "25 Best Free Web Proxies for Safer and Anonymous Surfing | SpyAdvice https://spyadvice.com/free-web-proxies/" While I didn't check out the cite/site, it does mention "It also supports Usenet... posting..." Idiot. Troll. That's pretty rude! You asked a question. I presented your question, in your exact words (remember 'copied and pasted') to Google- which is why it exists. Google presented a myriad of answers. Generally, the first page or so of answers are the best: in this case, the seventh one exactly answered the question you asked. And you call me an "Idiot. Troll." I tried to help you, and that's the thanks I get? Rude is his middle name , he'll stab you in the back as soon as you disagree with his stupidity. Ignore him or make fun of the idiot. Rene |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenetposts?
On 19/02/2019 04.50, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
On 02/18/2019 8:33 PM, Ken Hart wrote: On 2/18/19 8:12 PM, arlen holder wrote: On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 19:18:59 -0500, Ken Hart wrote: Google is your friend. I copied and pasted your question into Google; it came back with "About 481,000 results (0.78 seconds)" The seventh result down the page was "25 Best Free Web Proxies for Safer and Anonymous Surfing | SpyAdvice https://spyadvice.com/free-web-proxies/" While I didn't check out the cite/site, it does mention "It also supports Usenet... posting..." Idiot. Troll. That's pretty rude! You asked a question. I presented your question, in your exact words (remember 'copied and pasted') to Google- which is why it exists. Google presented a myriad of answers. Generally, the first page or so of answers are the best: in this case, the seventh one exactly answered the question you asked. And you call me an "Idiot. Troll." I tried to help you, and that's the thanks I get? Rude is his middle name , he'll stab you in the back as soon as you disagree with his stupidity. Ignore him or make fun of the idiot. He does that. One post he says you are an adult man, and the next that you are an idiot. I wonder how that site will do "usenet proxing", though. I don't understand what they do: «AnonyMouse is one of the best browser-based proxies available online. You can access various sites by merely inserting the name in the address bar. It offers both free and paid services. .... The free version allows the users to browse and send emails anonymously. It also supports Usenet (news) proxies that enable posting in newsgroups with a hidden identity.» -- Cheers, Carlos. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenetposts?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 Carlos E.R. wrote: On 19/02/2019 04.50, Rene Lamontagne wrote: On 02/18/2019 8:33 PM, Ken Hart wrote: On 2/18/19 8:12 PM, arlen holder wrote: On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 19:18:59 -0500, Ken Hart wrote: Google is your friend. I copied and pasted your question into Google; it came back with "About 481,000 results (0.78 seconds)" The seventh result down the page was "25 Best Free Web Proxies for Safer and Anonymous Surfing | SpyAdvice https://spyadvice.com/free-web-proxies/" While I didn't check out the cite/site, it does mention "It also supports Usenet... posting..." Idiot. Troll. That's pretty rude! You asked a question. I presented your question, in your exact words (remember 'copied and pasted') to Google- which is why it exists. Google presented a myriad of answers. Generally, the first page or so of answers are the best: in this case, the seventh one exactly answered the question you asked. And you call me an "Idiot. Troll." I tried to help you, and that's the thanks I get? Rude is his middle name , he'll stab you in the back as soon as you disagree with his stupidity. Ignore him or make fun of the idiot. He does that. One post he says you are an adult man, and the next that you are an idiot. Often within minutes of each other. Oh, and Ken, welcome to the group of "left side DK potluck picnic table ****ting children (tm)". We're generally a pretty chill bunch, mainly pointing out the myriad of flaws in our good friend Arlen's "tutorials", for various reasons (although most of us seemed to start out trying to guide him into more technically sound approaches). I wonder how that site will do "usenet proxing", though. I don't understand what they do: «AnonyMouse is one of the best browser-based proxies available online. You can access various sites by merely inserting the name in the address bar. It offers both free and paid services. ... The free version allows the users to browse and send emails anonymously. It also supports Usenet (news) proxies that enable posting in newsgroups with a hidden identity.» Given that it's browser-based, I imagine they've got a NNTP server on the backend handling things once that HTTP submit is triggered. Sent something through it to see what they do; but "in order to increase privacy, we're gonna delay up to 12 hours". *sigh* So you hit them, send your article to them, they inject it to the newsgroup. Always from the same IP (i.e. theirs). So, same "downside(tm)" as say leafnode running over on linode / digital ocean / aws / etc. Given that you only have the options of "group" / "subject" / "body", it would be a complete cluster**** trying to actually hold a conversation. Unless their "body(tm)" form will also properly parse the remainder of the header fields necessary to keep a proper conversation going. Attempted message follows, in case anyone cares (not likely, but I need a note to remind myself to check): ng - eternal-september.test sub - What is this nonsense msg - Guess I grabbed an old config ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxr4c sACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooHMXAf/W8IsZ9p31gRvgAvdc0lULS11HDZJ7+/63MXSPhwpSYOBtlisUHPTRa14 K13KIcv+GgtRt4MLkOZzv1Jivv9rm/w6Sxa/mcRaiJ8HJM9i2rkN8mSmVv86f708 xLCzgbNrZkKbkxg4j9J0Y7HXs4qxp3H9FjtUnyNCEt+dPkwuOv jmQJngQQB1X7HY nE3vIwas5Lgq4ZcGIlTICCzrGBWcDiWOuMGaKm7nQSGUstxr1k u3UaMitY6P6+2w S4GOjC+qf1+/UGO9doixUX20o3jv8UueVjqg1LNgvq1ucXkyRQv7gsOgH65tZI vR QKJfuomHwYNOrUlgweJWrKM5FMMO0Q== =8biz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|