If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Didn't work
Well, after all my rushing for the Win10 deadline, I finally tried to install it this morning and it wouldn't do it. It said my CPU was inadequate. (NX) iirc. And my monitor was inadequate also! I feel so inadequate. I actually have a newer, thin-screen monitor, but I haven't installed it because the current one is too heavy to move! Of course it's only going to get heavier as I get older, and I probably could move it now but there are all those wires in the back. Okay, only one almost inaccessible wire. BTW, it's a Dell Trinitron at least 10 years old. But the bigger problem is the CPU, but since the box is almost 12 years old, it's sort of not surprising. So how come it works so well on 7 -- and it really does -- and they say it won't work on 10? Is it a deal to sell hardware, or is there really something different.? I think it's 2.8GHz with 4gig Ram. It's a Dell Dimension 4700. BTW, I was done a week ago Tuesday, but couldn't get the internet working. I thought the deadline was Thursday, but it was actually Friday night at midnight---- Hawaiian time, which is 11AM here in EDT. If I'd known I had 35 more hours I might have tried a little harder. But I almost made it. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Didn't work
On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:24:17 -0400, Micky
wrote: I actually have a newer, thin-screen monitor, but I haven't installed it because the current one is too heavy to move! Of course it's only going to get heavier as I get older, and I probably could move it now but there are all those wires in the back. Okay, only one almost inaccessible wire. BTW, it's a Dell Trinitron at least 10 years old. A Dell P780, by Sony. Posts about it in Jan. 2001!! I'll admit, it might not be as bright as it should be. Sometimes with pictures I can't get the black and dark parts bright enough to see details in them. Maybe once a week for 3 minutes this comes up. Otherwise it's fine. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Didn't work
"Micky" wrote in message
... Well, after all my rushing for the Win10 deadline, I finally tried to install it this morning and it wouldn't do it. It said my CPU was inadequate. (NX) iirc. And my monitor was inadequate also! I feel so inadequate. I actually have a newer, thin-screen monitor, but I haven't installed it because the current one is too heavy to move! Of course it's only going to get heavier as I get older, and I probably could move it now but there are all those wires in the back. Okay, only one almost inaccessible wire. BTW, it's a Dell Trinitron at least 10 years old. But the bigger problem is the CPU, but since the box is almost 12 years old, it's sort of not surprising. So how come it works so well on 7 -- and it really does -- and they say it won't work on 10? Is it a deal to sell hardware, or is there really something different.? I think it's 2.8GHz with 4gig Ram. It's a Dell Dimension 4700. BTW, I was done a week ago Tuesday, but couldn't get the internet working. I thought the deadline was Thursday, but it was actually Friday night at midnight---- Hawaiian time, which is 11AM here in EDT. If I'd known I had 35 more hours I might have tried a little harder. But I almost made it. I do computer work for my friends. Recently, my buddy John dropped off his laptop and his desktop and asked me about installing 10 on both of them. My reply, and my standard answer: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Didn't work
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 09:40:09 -0400, "Thip" wrote:
"Micky" wrote in message .. . Well, after all my rushing for the Win10 deadline, I finally tried to install it this morning and it wouldn't do it. It said my CPU was inadequate. (NX) iirc. And my monitor was inadequate also! I feel so inadequate. I actually have a newer, thin-screen monitor, but I haven't installed it because the current one is too heavy to move! Of course it's only going to get heavier as I get older, and I probably could move it now but there are all those wires in the back. Okay, only one almost inaccessible wire. BTW, it's a Dell Trinitron at least 10 years old. But the bigger problem is the CPU, but since the box is almost 12 years old, it's sort of not surprising. So how come it works so well on 7 -- and it really does -- and they say it won't work on 10? Is it a deal to sell hardware, or is there really something different.? I think it's 2.8GHz with 4gig Ram. It's a Dell Dimension 4700. BTW, I was done a week ago Tuesday, but couldn't get the internet working. I thought the deadline was Thursday, but it was actually Friday night at midnight---- Hawaiian time, which is 11AM here in EDT. If I'd known I had 35 more hours I might have tried a little harder. But I almost made it. I do computer work for my friends. Recently, my buddy John dropped off his laptop and his desktop and asked me about installing 10 on both of them. My reply, and my standard answer: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. I see your point but FWIW, this is fun for me. Plus how will I learn if I don't try these things. I had cloned the 7 partition so I could compare 7 and 10, for curiosity if nothing else. And I plan to clone my Vista partition, move it to the same computer**, and install 7 over it to compare that with the current 7 partition. And I'm keeping Vista until I'm satisfied with one of these things. **Yes, I know there are hardware issues, but they're both Dell so that might make them smaller. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Didn't work
Micky wrote:
On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:24:17 -0400, Micky wrote: I actually have a newer, thin-screen monitor, but I haven't installed it because the current one is too heavy to move! Of course it's only going to get heavier as I get older, and I probably could move it now but there are all those wires in the back. Okay, only one almost inaccessible wire. BTW, it's a Dell Trinitron at least 10 years old. A Dell P780, by Sony. Posts about it in Jan. 2001!! I'll admit, it might not be as bright as it should be. Sometimes with pictures I can't get the black and dark parts bright enough to see details in them. Maybe once a week for 3 minutes this comes up. Otherwise it's fine. I took my Trinitron to the recycler last year. Weighed around 80 pounds or so. It was stored in the basement, and while the 80 pounds isn't that heavy, in the box it was the full width of the stairwell, and there was hardly room to get your hands on it to lift it. Nearly killed me... :-) And like yours, the tube intensity was dropping off. The Trinitron can draw around 200W. Even if you blank the screen, but maintain sync signals to the monitor, it *still* draws 200W. And the power is proportional to the resolution setting - 1280x1024 is detectably warmer than 1024x768 on those monitors. A small LCD can be 36W. And that difference adds up over the years, on your electric bill. You need a huge LCD screen, to get back to the 200W level (but they eventually do get that high). If an LCD screen is large enough, and has a high enough intensity rating, it feels like an "infrared oven" on your face while working in front of it. I noticed this while walking down an aisle at Best Buy... one of the large LCD monitors on display, would cook you on a hot day. The effect is not noticeable on a 17" LCD monitor. When you replace the Trinitron, you'll need to elevate the new LCD, to get it to the ergonomic height. Top of screen level with your eyes. I used a pile of (9) pieces of 3/4" thick lumber to build a stand, as the monitor stand does not extend like it should. Only some monitors have proper height adjustment, and the others are fixed. For the Trinitron, it only needed (2) pieces of 3/4" wood, to elevate it properly. My monitor stand is 12"x12" square, and there's no chance of the monitor stand falling over :-) Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Didn't work
On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 11:51:09 -0400, Paul
wrote: Micky wrote: On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 09:24:17 -0400, Micky wrote: I actually have a newer, thin-screen monitor, but I haven't installed it because the current one is too heavy to move! Of course it's only going to get heavier as I get older, and I probably could move it now but there are all those wires in the back. Okay, only one almost inaccessible wire. BTW, it's a Dell Trinitron at least 10 years old. A Dell P780, by Sony. Posts about it in Jan. 2001!! I'll admit, it might not be as bright as it should be. Sometimes with pictures I can't get the black and dark parts bright enough to see details in them. Maybe once a week for 3 minutes this comes up. Otherwise it's fine. I took my Trinitron to the recycler last year. Weighed around 80 pounds or so. It was stored in the basement, and while the 80 pounds isn't that heavy, in the box it was the full width of the stairwell, and there was hardly room to get your hands on it to lift it. Nearly killed me... :-) LOL. I can relate to that. Fortunately this stairway doesn't have a wall on one side, but once I get to the first floor, the place is so full of junk. I may have to clean before I can take the thing out. And like yours, the tube intensity was dropping off. The Trinitron can draw around 200W. Even if you blank the screen, but maintain sync signals to the monitor, it *still* draws 200W. And the power is proportional to Oh, that's not good. the resolution setting - 1280x1024 is detectably warmer than 1024x768 on those monitors. That's not good either! From my pov. A small LCD can be 36W. And that difference adds up over the years, on your electric bill. You need a huge LCD screen, to get back to the 200W level (but they eventually do get that high). If an LCD screen is large enough, and has a high enough intensity rating, it feels like an "infrared oven" on your face while working in front of it. I noticed this while walking down an aisle at Best Buy... one of the large LCD monitors on display, would cook you on a hot day. The effect is not noticeable on a 17" LCD monitor. This sounds worse than a CRT! When you replace the Trinitron, you'll need to elevate the new LCD, to get it to the ergonomic height. Top of screen level with your eyes. I used a pile of (9) pieces of 3/4" thick lumber to build a stand, as the monitor stand does not extend like it should. Only some monitors have proper height adjustment, and the others are fixed. For the Trinitron, it only needed (2) pieces of 3/4" wood, to elevate it properly. My monitor stand is 12"x12" square, and there's no chance of the monitor stand falling over :-) I have a MasterPIece Plus, a box with switches for 4 things and everything, under the monitor, but that's only 1 1/2". I used to use the switches a lot more until the two adapter failures and conversations here or XP convinced me I wasn't saving much. But the 200 W for the monitor does sound like a problem to work on. Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Didn't work
"Micky" wrote in message
... On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 09:40:09 -0400, "Thip" wrote: "Micky" wrote in message . .. Well, after all my rushing for the Win10 deadline, I finally tried to install it this morning and it wouldn't do it. It said my CPU was inadequate. (NX) iirc. And my monitor was inadequate also! I feel so inadequate. I actually have a newer, thin-screen monitor, but I haven't installed it because the current one is too heavy to move! Of course it's only going to get heavier as I get older, and I probably could move it now but there are all those wires in the back. Okay, only one almost inaccessible wire. BTW, it's a Dell Trinitron at least 10 years old. But the bigger problem is the CPU, but since the box is almost 12 years old, it's sort of not surprising. So how come it works so well on 7 -- and it really does -- and they say it won't work on 10? Is it a deal to sell hardware, or is there really something different.? I think it's 2.8GHz with 4gig Ram. It's a Dell Dimension 4700. BTW, I was done a week ago Tuesday, but couldn't get the internet working. I thought the deadline was Thursday, but it was actually Friday night at midnight---- Hawaiian time, which is 11AM here in EDT. If I'd known I had 35 more hours I might have tried a little harder. But I almost made it. I do computer work for my friends. Recently, my buddy John dropped off his laptop and his desktop and asked me about installing 10 on both of them. My reply, and my standard answer: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. I see your point but FWIW, this is fun for me. Plus how will I learn if I don't try these things. I had cloned the 7 partition so I could compare 7 and 10, for curiosity if nothing else. And I plan to clone my Vista partition, move it to the same computer**, and install 7 over it to compare that with the current 7 partition. And I'm keeping Vista until I'm satisfied with one of these things. **Yes, I know there are hardware issues, but they're both Dell so that might make them smaller. I completely understand. I did the same thing. I didn't find W10 fun at all, but it did have some good points. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|