If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
I can't get the same version of Dashboard in the video
or I'm doing something wrong. The version I have won't allow me to open settings etc. and doesn't even look the same as the one in the video. I checked the 8200 and its running Windows XP, Version 2002 Service Pack 3 I think you're correct that when I get the new PCI card installed it should resolve the issue and I should then be able to create backups. Thanks, Robert |
Ads |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
Mark Twain wrote:
I can't get the same version of Dashboard in the video or I'm doing something wrong. The version I have won't allow me to open settings etc. and doesn't even look the same as the one in the video. I checked the 8200 and its running Windows XP, Version 2002 Service Pack 3 I think you're correct that when I get the new PCI card installed it should resolve the issue and I should then be able to create backups. Thanks, Robert Are you using the version of Dashboard that came on the hard drive itself ? Or did you download a later one ? I would try the version on the hard drive, as it could be older, and more likely to match the video. Paul |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 5:56:43 PM UTC-7, Paul wrote:
Mark Twain wrote: I can't get the same version of Dashboard in the video or I'm doing something wrong. The version I have won't allow me to open settings etc. and doesn't even look the same as the one in the video. I checked the 8200 and its running Windows XP, Version 2002 Service Pack 3 I think you're correct that when I get the new PCI card installed it should resolve the issue and I should then be able to create backups. Thanks, Robert Are you using the version of Dashboard that came on the hard drive itself ? Or did you download a later one ? I would try the version on the hard drive, as it could be older, and more likely to match the video. Paul I'm using the downloaded version of Seagate Dashboard for Windows: http://www.seagate.com/support/exter...s/backup-plus/ I don't have a Dashboard on my HD only Sea Tools or did then uninstalled and re-installed both from the link above. Another thought while were waiting for the PCI card. Since I plan to use the external HD for backups for both computers unless you see a problem with that? Why not run a backup on the 8500 to test it? Thanks, Robert |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
I uninstalled Dashboard on the 8200 and then
downloaded it to try installing it again but I keep getting this error and it will not go away. Drive NOT Ready Exception processing message c00000a3 Parameters 75b6bf7c 4 75b6bf7c 75b6bf7c cancel try again continue I clicked continue before and got a Dashboard that doesn't look the same or work so this error that is preventing me getting a good download for Dashboard. Robert |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
Mark Twain wrote:
On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 5:56:43 PM UTC-7, Paul wrote: Mark Twain wrote: I can't get the same version of Dashboard in the video or I'm doing something wrong. The version I have won't allow me to open settings etc. and doesn't even look the same as the one in the video. I checked the 8200 and its running Windows XP, Version 2002 Service Pack 3 I think you're correct that when I get the new PCI card installed it should resolve the issue and I should then be able to create backups. Thanks, Robert Are you using the version of Dashboard that came on the hard drive itself ? Or did you download a later one ? I would try the version on the hard drive, as it could be older, and more likely to match the video. Paul I'm using the downloaded version of Seagate Dashboard for Windows: http://www.seagate.com/support/exter...s/backup-plus/ I don't have a Dashboard on my HD only Sea Tools or did then uninstalled and re-installed both from the link above. Another thought while were waiting for the PCI card. Since I plan to use the external HD for backups for both computers unless you see a problem with that? Why not run a backup on the 8500 to test it? Thanks, Robert Sure, using the 8500 for a backup test would work fine. ******* The Dashboard program has a user manual (with no pictures). http://www.seagate.com/files/www-con...r-guide-us.pdf Page 17 makes brief mention of "Set the power-saving mode", where you could set spindown to "Never", in an attempt to solve the problem on the 8200. If the PCI USB2 card doesn't help, you could try that. Paul |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
I did a upgrade to Macrium then did a backup:
http://i58.tinypic.com/2r42x6s.jpg http://i60.tinypic.com/mwtxf4.jpg http://i60.tinypic.com/rk62h1.jpg http://i60.tinypic.com/2ngabrb.jpg http://i58.tinypic.com/33zckyr.jpg http://i60.tinypic.com/1zwnlkw.jpg Two questions: 1. Will this backup have all my folders/files in addition to all the software or do I need to store my folders/files on CD? 2. What kind of backup is best? I prefer to have something like system restore rather than depending on just one backup. Thanks Robert |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
The only thing I'm not doing when installing dashboard is registering it because I didn't buy it. Would that prevent it from giving me a full download? This last install it came up with a message that there was a new version of Dashboard available, so I clicked it but nothing happened. So restarted the computer to see if I could get it to kick in again. it came back up with an update to version 4.0.21.0 which I did. I downloaded it but it gave me the same version I have been dealing with and I don't have access to storage devices where the settings are to spin down. Robert |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
Mark Twain wrote:
I did a upgrade to Macrium then did a backup: http://i58.tinypic.com/2r42x6s.jpg http://i60.tinypic.com/mwtxf4.jpg http://i60.tinypic.com/rk62h1.jpg http://i60.tinypic.com/2ngabrb.jpg http://i58.tinypic.com/33zckyr.jpg http://i60.tinypic.com/1zwnlkw.jpg Two questions: 1. Will this backup have all my folders/files in addition to all the software or do I need to store my folders/files on CD? 2. What kind of backup is best? I prefer to have something like system restore rather than depending on just one backup. Thanks Robert OK, you're using a version more modern than I use here. That looks like it might be version 6. First of all, it's "disk imaging". It deals with whole partitions. If you tell it to back up C:, it backs up the entire C:. It backs up C:\Windows. It backs up C:\Program Files. It backs up C:\users\Robert and all the files underneath. You can use Wikipedia for a definition of Differential and Incremental backups. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_backup There is an Illustration exactly half way down the page, which explains how each type works. Disk imaging does *complete* backups, but the .mrimg files can also be used to recover single files. There is a service running on the machine, where if you right-click the .mrimg file, you can mount it like it was a "fake disk drive". And by using file explorer on it, you can drill down and find a file you lost. So you do a complete image, and then, you have two restoration options. 1) Mount the .mrimg using the Macrium software (won't work on a PC without a Macrium installation in Program Files folder). Once the partition is mounted, you find, copy and paste the file you want. Or a whole directory if you want. This makes the tool almost as useful as a file-by-file backup utility. It's wasteful to back up the whole partition, but it also saves time on trying to define a precise set of files to back up. 2) You can restore a whole partition. That's how I manage my stuff here. Typically, I make a big mistake, ruin my C:, then restore the entire C: from the .mrimg. That happened to my laptop - an experiment ruined C: and the computer would not boot - but I had made a Macrium image only two hours before this. And in no time at all, the laptop was fully restored. When you use differential or incremental backups, you need as many .mrimg files on hand, as it takes to "get you to the day in question". The sizes might be 100GB Sunday - First backup 2GB Monday - Changed files since Sunday 2GB Tuesday - Changed files since Monday To restore to Tuesday, you need 100+2+2GB worth of files, to get you all the way up to Tuesday. In my example, this is incremental. If the Monday backup is damaged (corrupted), then the Tuesday backup is useless. Tuesday only works, if Monday is good. With differential, it would look like this 100GB Sunday - First backup 2GB Monday - Changed files since Sunday 4GB Tuesday - Changed files since Sunday It took a total of 106GB to store the backups this way. It takes more space than with the incremental method. But not a lot more. If I want to restore to the state things were in on Tuesday, I need 100+4GB worth of files. The Monday file is not needed. Only the first backup, plus the 4GB differential from Tuesday, gets me to Tuesday state. If all the files are kept in a common folder, you can rely on the tool selecting the files for itself. I only tried my hand at an illustration, so you can see the slight difference. The conditional probability of failure to restore, is higher with Incremental, and gets worse, the more days you "stack on top of one another". Now, file writing is very reliable, so normally there is little practical difference (this difference is more important with tape drives as backup devices). I'm trying to explain the differences here a bit. The Incremental saves space, but has poorer conditional probability of success. The Differential uses more space, but is more reliable. You need only two Differential files, to restore to any day in the backup set. So if you use the "Mount" feature on a Differential, it should ask you "what day do you want", it then locates the two necessary files, and shows you the partition as it was on Tuesday. Then you can reach in there, copy and paste the file you lost, dismount the image and you're done. You do a new "first backup", when you get tired of stretching the old backup set. The "first backup", you can keep an old one of those around for later, so perhaps you have a first backup from one year ago, a first backup from two years ago, and so on. The version 5 Macrium, the free version doesn't have any of that. All it makes is "first backups". No incremental or differential. And that's good enough for me. I'm in no rush to adopt version 6 (I have more than a terabyte of version 5 backups). Many of my backups are short term - and I put "erase me" in the file name, so later I can figure out which ones are of no future value. I take long term backups less frequently. HTH, Paul |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
Mark Twain wrote:
The only thing I'm not doing when installing dashboard is registering it because I didn't buy it. Would that prevent it from giving me a full download? This last install it came up with a message that there was a new version of Dashboard available, so I clicked it but nothing happened. So restarted the computer to see if I could get it to kick in again. it came back up with an update to version 4.0.21.0 which I did. I downloaded it but it gave me the same version I have been dealing with and I don't have access to storage devices where the settings are to spin down. Robert Doesn't the Dashboard product, use the existence of your Seagate drive as "proof of purchase" ? I can't expect to get the Dashboard to run here, because I have no Seagate external drive. You have a drive that qualifies you for that software. The "payment" part, may be for "Cloud storage". There is some option to include moving your files to a server on the Internet. You don't need that, and consequently there is nothing to pay for. The software should have been written, to be part of your hard drive purchase, and without the Cloud option, I would not be expecting to be charged any more for the software. I would try installing the software here, if I had some idea whether it checked for a Seagate branded external drive. Anything that checks for hardware, if I don't have the hardware, I can't really help you. Perhaps the fact that it is "not able to detect the drive", is why the software is refusing to finish installation ? If there is more than one version of Dashboard, you want to make sure you are downloading it from the correct product page on the Seagate site. You would think the Dashboard software product would recognize *all* the qualifying Seagate drives (doing "jumbo" software is quite popular with developers). But in case they make specific versions, you might try downloading from the precise product page for your external hard drive. Paul |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
So was my backup OK other than not
selecting what type of backup? Robert |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
I tried uninstalling and reinstalling Dashboard
again with the same but this time I tried registering it. Its strange that this doesn't download and work. Everything else does. Robert |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
Mark Twain wrote:
So was my backup OK other than not selecting what type of backup? Robert The backup operation itself looks OK. I would expect any rules you set in that backup, would only apply if you "saved" the backup operation when asked to do so, as well as running it. I just "run" my setups, and don't "save" them. You need to "save" the XML definition file, so you can re-run them later and have the defined policy take effect. One rule stated the maximum number of full backups. Yours was set to 12 by default. You have a 1TB drive and the source disk is 300GB, so there is only room for three full backups. The rule in this case would not apply, as the "I've run out of space" rule would apply. The rule says, it will store at maximum, 12 sets, but since your source drive is so big, it can never get to count to 12, because it runs out of storage space. Around the third backup, it's going to need to purge an older set, to make room for a new set. The differential field was set to 4. That means you could be making backup sets like this. This is similar to the other example I showed you, were I'm changing 2GB worth of files between backup intervals and the differential backup method grows in size to record the changes. So a total backup set (before it starts over), is 100+2+4+6+8= 120GB. The differential backups are small, because not a lot of files have changed on the disk (a normal pattern for a lot of users). Full Diff#1 Diff#2 Diff#3 Diff#4 Full Diff#1... 100GB 2GB 4GB 6GB 8GB 100GB 2GB When the backup disk runs out of space, the oldest complete set is thrown away. So in my example, the first set of 120GB of backups, would be deleted, to make room for todays backup operation. Your backup is intact. You can check the size of the ..mrimg file on your I: drive (the external), and verify it is present. The source disk was 300GB of stuff. You had Macrium compression setting set to Medium compression. The resulting .mrimg file will be a little less than 300GB. Perhaps 250GB or so. If you run future backups, and you notice the new .mrimg files are only 2GB in size, then it is likely the program is making a differential backup. As the later ones refer to the first backup as their "base" backup. Whether differential or incremental, they would do that. Checking the size, is a quick way to confirm the latest backup you make, isn't a "base" backup. So when you ask me whether it worked, check the size as a "confidence builder". The size of the file, hints at its type. You can also right-click the file and see if any of the Macrium property fields say anything about what kind of set it is making. Whether it's "none", "differential" or "incremental". I don't know what it is going to say, because I don't run version 6. So Macrium is maturing into a "full feature" backup tool. Which makes it a bit more complicated to use. It's very important when designing the GUI for such programs, to help the customer understand what it's doing. And the pictures you showed me, leave a lot to the imagination. It doesn't look like they spent a lot of time on the GUI design. A lot of people don't know there is a Wikipedia article that explains the (industry standard) backup types. And if they don't educate you, then you might make a less-than-ideal choice in the matter. It probably isn't possible to really foul up the backups, if that's what you're thinking. There is always going to be at least one "base" backup on there. When the disk gets full, it purges the old ones, before making a new one. And right after the new one, you'll have at least one good backup. So in that respect, you're covered. But you need to review and understand those settings in detail, do the math and figure out how the disk space is being used, to really be satisfied with what it is doing. You should also review the naming scheme of the files, do Properties on the .mrimg file, to see if it is identified with respect to the backup scheme it is using. As confirmation of the backup type, if you use the same backup template a second time. Or schedule regular backups say. I don't know if the free version supports that or not. Or whether that's even a good idea (I don't recommend leaving the backup drive powered and running all the time, because of the possibility of malware like Sality, which attacks all disk drives). I like to make my backup image, then disconnect the backup hard drive until next time. With a 1TB drive, storing a 300GB backup, there isn't really a lot of space for doing "sets". Yes, you can fit at least two full sets, and when the third starts, the first set will likely be purged. Just to give you some idea of the granularity. On my backup drive, there is only room for one set! So I have no elbow room, compared to you. And that's why the differential and incremental holds almost no interest for me. I don't have the space for that. And I compress the hell out of my backups, to make them take less space on the disk. And I can still only fit one set. Paul |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
That's allot of good information
which I need a little time to digest. I didn't really set anything because I didn't know what to set so I just went with the defaults. Hmmmm, I thought 1TB would be enough but from what you say no matter what kind of backup I choose it will always delete the oldest to make room. Should I consider buying a new external HD with like 3-15 TB? How much are they? I always unplug the external HD after backups. I've given up on trying to get the correct version of Dashboard as I really won't need to spindown once I get the PCI card installed. I'll have to check out the backup and all the information you've given about the .mrimg f file. Thanks, Robert |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
Mark Twain wrote:
That's allot of good information which I need a little time to digest. I didn't really set anything because I didn't know what to set so I just went with the defaults. Hmmmm, I thought 1TB would be enough but from what you say no matter what kind of backup I choose it will always delete the oldest to make room. Should I consider buying a new external HD with like 3-15 TB? How much are they? I always unplug the external HD after backups. I've given up on trying to get the correct version of Dashboard as I really won't need to spindown once I get the PCI card installed. I'll have to check out the backup and all the information you've given about the .mrimg f file. Thanks, Robert The largest practical drive worth buying, is a certain Seagate 6TB drive. The one which does not use "shingled writes". It transfers data at around 220MB/sec. It's just too expensive to consider, and is at least $500. Seagate ST6000NM0024 6TB 7200RPM $424.99 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...9SIA5EM1PU0755 http://www.seagate.com/www-content/p...1-3-1403us.pdf "Max. Sustained Transfer Rate at Outer Diameter 216 MB/sec" That's a raw drive, so you'd need to buy an enclosure for it. This is an example of a "dock". You could plug in the Seagate drive, like a slice of toast. The fan on the end of this unit, cools the drive. StarTech SDOCK2U33HFW 2.5" & 3.5" White SATA USB 3.0 Hard Drive Docking Station w/Fan $88 (there are a few cheaper ones) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817707338 It's a 1 inch drive, so a bit taller than your average "boot drive" in an OEM PC. It still fits, it's just a bit taller and heavier than you might be used to. It's really rather amazing that all those platters fit in there, without changing the operating envelope. (Hitachi built a helium-filled drive, to achieve the same result.) One other thing that's weird about the drive, is it has a humidity sensor. So it's a miniature weather station too :-) It can measure both temperature and humidity. It's suspected that humidity affects the lifetime of high tech hard drives. And they wouldn't provide that sensor, unless they wanted to encourage people to measure it. ******* You'll just have to be content with around two or three full backups. If you backup both the 8200 and the 8500, then you would not expect the backup drive to hold too many sets in that case. All you really need is at least one full image of each machine. That prevents total loss in the event of some bad malware. As to how frequently you do the backups, that depends on how slow it is and how long it takes. If you were to transfer 300GB at 30MB/sec (USB2 speeds), then that is about 3 hours (depending on how fast the compression step will go). The 8500 could probably do the same sized backup in an hour or so. My C: drive is small enough, I can back up C: alone in about ten minutes. I've moved a fair amount of stuff to other partitions. But if I back up everything, do compression to save space, the total time is a couple days. So there's a big difference for me, between backing up everything, and backing up my boot partition. Paul |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Unable to create a bootable rescue disk:
I had no idea I had accumulated so much
usage on the drive! I suppose when it gets full I'll have to buy another HD for the computer just for storage. With the size of drives now and by the time I need one, they should be fairly cheap. Is one brand better than another or size or drive construction? Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|