If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Reason *TO* pick on Windows 10
Mike Easter wrote:
Paul wrote: There are kooky websites. http://www.lessemf.com/personal.html Nothing will get you, if you wear this stuff. https://lessemf.com/images/a279-1.jpg That site naturally has a page for arousing concern: http://www.lessemf.com/emf-news.html ... with a specific section for health effects with gobs of citations. I wondered what the wp article would say. Since it didn't even get into controversy about EMF in the main article, I tho't maybe that would come up in the Talk section. There wasn't even much there except one contributor gave citations to read at WHO, CDC, NIH, and FCC/EPA. His commentary was also useful, "The section should be re-formatted as an explanation of the public concern and reasons, versus the wealth of scientific research on the topic, indicating that precautionary guidelines have been issued based on public concerns, not on evidence that there is any evidence suggesting a real health concern. - It should also have an explanation of the nocebo effect's effect on the research." ... where nocebo is defined as: A nocebo effect is said to occur when negative expectations of the patient regarding a treatment cause the treatment to have a more negative effect than it otherwise would have. s/treatment/emf exposure/ That is, the same people who are shopping at lessemf are possibly suffering the ill-effects of their concern about emf, NOT emf. Wait until those people find out about the 5G deployment plans. And Musks array of satellites in LEO. They're going to freak :-) And all so we can have more fluffy cat photos. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|