A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Windows 10 » Windows 10 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old February 20th 19, 09:34 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 344
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

David in Devon
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.


The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server,
or the server admin appointed him those duties.

As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your
part. As is most things you write.



--
insert funny tagline here
Ads
  #17  
Old February 20th 19, 09:34 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 344
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

David in Devon
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:45:35 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 19/02/2019 21:11, Shadow wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon
wrote:

On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-

How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
? OT up.
[]'s

The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups
on the private server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.


So respect his moderation.


Most certainly not.


It's a private server. he's the moderator for a reason, whether you
like or agree with that or not. If you cannot respect that, feel free
to discontinue abusing the server.

People who appoint themselves to a position of power will never

command my respect.

Isn't that what you demand of others? To respect and do as you want
them to do, or you'll blackmail and slime them on usenet and
elsewhere. Going so far as to create a totally bogus blog, and/or
facebook page. Really David, you're beyond what qualifies for a
normal pathetic sorry piece of ****.

It's just as well that your kid died so long ago, if you were my
parent, I'd be more than slightly ashamed of you. There's nothing
okay about what you do and have been doing for years to people you
don't know, David. Stalking isn't okay. Sliming people isn't okay.
Posting their copyrighted material to usenet, isn't okay.

Threatening to file fake dmca notices and counter notices, isn't
okay.

There's 'something of the dark' about him too.


I wouldn't know. What I do know is that you, unlike him, have a well
established track record of stalking, sliming, and copyright
infringing those you elect to have a problem with.

I've been very busy with work and meeting up with a friend in the TBI
concerning you. I told you awhile ago, I'd had about enough of your
bull**** didn't I?

From the TBI's point of view, you're stalking me and in clear
violation of state and federal laws here. If the first call doesn't
get the expected result, followup calls going higher up the food
chain will. I have little doubt that a phone call from a law
enforcement agency that outranks our state and local police will
carry more weight with your local officers than the same call from a
local (for me) police dept would. I'm going to test the theory,
infact.

That's my best bet for dealing with you, legally, in real life. And,
I'm going to. Btw, our countries copyright laws are quite similiar,
except that your country uses local police to arrest offenders, mine
typically does not.


--
The female gangbang world record is owned by a woman named Houston
who had intercourse with 620 men in one day! A video was made of this
historic event. As it took about 10 hours (with a few very brief
breaks) to do it, the average time of intercourse was less than 58
seconds.
  #18  
Old February 21st 19, 09:59 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10
David in Devon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
David in Devon
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.


The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server,
or the server admin appointed him those duties.

As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your
part. As is most things you write.



The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in
discussion, one on one, on his home turf.

You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an MVP!

--
David B.
Devon, UK
  #19  
Old February 21st 19, 10:05 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10
David in Devon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
[....]
I wouldn't know. What I do know is that you, unlike him, have a well
established track record of stalking, *sliming*, and copyright
infringing those you elect to have a problem with.

I've been very busy with work and meeting up with a friend in the *TBI*
concerning you. I told you awhile ago, I'd had about enough of your
bull**** didn't I?

From the TBI's point of view, you're stalking me and in clear
violation of state and federal laws here. If the first call doesn't
get the expected result, followup calls going higher up the food
chain will. I have little doubt that a phone call from a law
enforcement agency that outranks our state and local police will
carry more weight with your local officers than the same call from a
local (for me) police dept would. I'm going to test the theory,
infact.

That's my best bet for dealing with you, legally, in real life. And,
I'm going to. Btw, our countries copyright laws are quite *similiar*,
except that your country uses local police to arrest offenders, mine
typically does not.


What on earth are you smoking, Dustin?

What is the TBI?


--
David B.
Devon, UK
  #20  
Old February 22nd 19, 04:02 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Panthera Tigris Altaica
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 102
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

On 2019-02-19 16:59, nospam wrote:
In article , David in Devon
wrote:


The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
private server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.

So respect his moderation.


Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
too.


so that's why you were booted out of the navy.


No. He was booted out of the Navy for being a drunk incompetent. Given
the history of the Navy and the number of drunks and incompetents and
even drunk incompetents that the Navy has tolerated over the last 300
years, he must have been truly spectacular.
  #21  
Old February 22nd 19, 04:06 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Panthera Tigris Altaica
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 102
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

On 2019-02-20 03:34, Diesel wrote:
David in Devon
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.


The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server,
or the server admin appointed him those duties.


Quite correct. You cannot just appoint yourself to be a moderator on one
of those services. Someone must grant you proper access, and that
someone must themselves be someone who has proper access.


As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your
part. As is most things you write.


It is, as always, a lie on his part. He has a problem with Winston
because Winston did his duty (something David Brooks knows nothing
about) and enforced moderation.
  #22  
Old February 23rd 19, 12:02 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Paul[_32_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,873
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-02-19 16:59, nospam wrote:
In article , David in Devon
wrote:


The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
private server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.

So respect his moderation.

Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
too.


so that's why you were booted out of the navy.


No. He was booted out of the Navy for being a drunk incompetent. Given
the history of the Navy and the number of drunks and incompetents and
even drunk incompetents that the Navy has tolerated over the last 300
years, he must have been truly spectacular.


Considering that receiving a "tot of rum" was part of
being in the navy, it goes with the territory.

You don't need to be sober to fire a 21" naval gun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rum_ration

"The rum ration (also called tot) was a daily amount of rum given
to sailors on Royal Navy ships. It was abolished in 1970 after
concerns that regular intakes of alcohol would lead to unsteady
hands when working machinery."

But they did manage to run their ships, unsteady hands and all,
for hundreds of years. Maybe the ships had more sensitive steering
or something on the 1970 ships. Or the gears weren't as rugged
on the machines.

*******

In the Canadian Navy, the beer vending machine was
removed, after some staff "abused it" :-)

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...hips-1.2871521

"Dec 12, 2014

Canadian sailors will no longer be able to drink aboard ships,
unless the vessel is tied up or an exception has been made for
a special occasion such as Christmas or a barbecue."

When you're at war, every day is a "barbecue"... for someone.

I'm beginning to see a theme here. It's not going to be as much
fun swabbing that deck, if you're sober.

Now that marijuana is legal in Canada, we'll have a bunch
of stoner hippies driving our remaining ships.

Dammit.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/canadi...licy-1.4084015

"Members of the Armed Forces will not be allowed to consume
cannabis during a shift or domestic exercise. They will not be
allowed to bring cannabis on any aircraft or vessel and are not
permitted to bring cannabis with them internationally.

As far as day-to-day tasks, military members cannot consume
cannabis up to eight hours before performing any duty, up to
24 hours before handling a loaded weapon or driving a vehicle,
and up to 28 days before joining the crew of an aircraft or
submarine."

After 28 days, those hippy hands are going to be pretty steady.

I bet the staff are going to be pretty grumpy.

"All ahead sober" "Ay, sir"

Paul
  #23  
Old February 23rd 19, 05:16 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware,alt.hackers.malicious
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 344
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

David in Devon
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:59:12 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
David in Devon
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.


The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the
server, or the server admin appointed him those duties.

As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on
your part. As is most things you write.



The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in
discussion, one on one, on his home turf.


I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you
that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site
when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so
now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt
with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.

You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an
MVP!


I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to share
the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times
to hack his server for your benefit. I'll provide him your full
contact details too, in the event he wants to discuss your
solicitation to commit criminal offenses against him with a lawyer,
or, a phone call to your local police. Maybe he'd like to see your
recent usenet posts, challenging me to hax0r him. G

Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my
country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with
data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your
benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you
explain that?







--
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
  #24  
Old February 23rd 19, 05:16 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 344
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

Panthera Tigris Altaica
Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:06:11 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2019-02-20 03:34, Diesel wrote:
David in Devon
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.


The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the
server, or the server admin appointed him those duties.


Quite correct. You cannot just appoint yourself to be a moderator
on one of those services. Someone must grant you proper access,
and that someone must themselves be someone who has proper access.


As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on
your part. As is most things you write.


It is, as always, a lie on his part. He has a problem with Winston
because Winston did his duty (something David Brooks knows nothing
about) and enforced moderation.


I know. Winston and the server he runs is one of the targets David
Brooks tried to hire me to not only hack, but, obtain data from said
target as well. That's two seperate felonies, right off the bat. And
that so called 'Christian' so called, 'good guy', tried to publish a
google street map view of my house as blackmail when I declined to
break federal laws on his behalf.

Yet, somehow, I'm the bad guy. Pfft.. right. And pigs fly at great
****ing altitudes, too.




--
Poetry is an echo, asking a shadow to dance.
  #25  
Old February 23rd 19, 01:38 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Dan Purgert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 281
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Diesel wrote:
[...] And pigs fly at great ****ing altitudes, too.


Only when they have a helicopter.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxxPr sACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooGOXQf9ExCkNHYOICsyt3WJ46xDR7UzrUvBmEHWrGvv6aUZVx 28mKeSZv2YBFSO
D6BZxYam+aKTf8nMkwm1BZbqXyfs3WUWNg7CcFDeQnZH9DoQsY 6ptRzGdA4CWNI5
OG/xEbu8pZrfMVhOk9Kevk/2pxKtKFNiK0+ZVEP+lqj4dUga9uXKUqf6k1EUZTWH
7wbs5dw0yUwSMFeZMs+ExqrWXIgqb7F5mwtKZe9+HKZmA60H/ODSGCTa1tOKN7au
cqvOR8SKEiYgOuBeXGgG/vupPWGuenuf0ki/koODLzqWa6cGyb6qqwzto9ffKIjm
Ao1i9wINXHZ1olfWLIeLPmP1+IJqhg==
=f32b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
  #26  
Old February 23rd 19, 04:31 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware,alt.hackers.malicious
David in Devon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again ...

David in Devon
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:59:12 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
David in Devon
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.

The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the
server, or the server admin appointed him those duties.

As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on
your part. As is most things you write.



The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in
discussion, one on one, on his home turf.


I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you
that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site
when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so
now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt
with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.


Winston, better known as C.Winston Natali doesn't, as far as I'm aware,
HAVE a site for you to explore.

You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an
MVP!


I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to share
the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times
to hack his server for your benefit.


Winston doesn't *HAVE* a server for you to hack.

I'll provide him your full
contact details too, in the event he wants to discuss your
solicitation to commit criminal offenses against him with a lawyer,
or, a phone call to your local police. Maybe he'd like to see your
recent usenet posts, challenging me to hax0r him. G


How can you a hack a server which does not exist?

Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my
country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with
data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your
benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you
explain that?


You're making things up again!

Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on Usenet

Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old

http://www.phillipmjones.net/

--
David B.
Devon, UK
  #27  
Old February 23rd 19, 04:44 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware,alt.hackers.malicious
David in Devon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

On 23/02/2019 15:31, David in Devon wrote:
On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again ...

David in Devon
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:59:12 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
David in Devon
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.

The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the
server, or the server admin appointed him those duties.

As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on
your part. As is most things you write.


The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in
discussion, one on one, on his home turf.


I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you
that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site
when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so
now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt
with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.


Winston, better known as C.Winston Natali doesn't, as far as I'm aware,
HAVE a site for you to explore.

You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an
MVP!


I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to share
the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times
to hack his server for your benefit.


Winston doesn't *HAVE* a server for you to hack.

I'll provide him your full
contact details too, in the event he wants to discuss your
solicitation to commit criminal offenses against him with a lawyer,
or, a phone call to your local police. Maybe he'd like to see your
recent usenet posts, challenging me to hax0r him. G


How can you a hack a server which does not exist?

Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my
country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with
data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your
benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you
explain that?


You're making things up again!

Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on Usenet

Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old

http://www.phillipmjones.net/


Here's an interesting turn up for the book!

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/...1-be014e8a8810

The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having been
made by "A. User" . *WOW*

That is confirming EXACTLY what I was talking about in the thread -
posts on the Answers forums *ARE* being 'manipulated'!

--
David B.
Devon, UK
  #28  
Old February 23rd 19, 05:06 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware,alt.hackers.malicious
Shadow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,638
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 +0000, David in Devon
wrote:

CUT_DENIALS


You're making things up again!


Diesel, I think he's asking you for PROOF that he asked you to
ILLEGALLY HACK into a PRIVATE server that CHOSE one of his STALKING
TARGETS as a MODERATOR. The moderator did his job, and BANNED him.
Is that what you meant, "commander" ?

Since Diesel is a "good guy" he refused, of course. Even after
he was threatened and blackmailed. And became a STALKING TARGET
himself.

Diesel, try to keep it short. Just the proof.
I and the "commander" say TIA

Read all about the "commander" he
https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

He's the pride of many "sailor boys"
[]'s


--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Nineteen Eighty-Four was a work of FICTION !!!! - Orwell

  #29  
Old February 24th 19, 08:55 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware,alt.hackers.malicious
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 344
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

David in Devon
Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again
...


Drugs? That's just yet another lie on your part. You've done better
in the past, David. I'm disappointed with you.

I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you
that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his
site when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think
I'll do so now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit
of the doubt with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.


Winston, better known as C.Winston Natali doesn't, as far as I'm
aware, HAVE a site for you to explore.


Either you've really lost some brain cells hitting that bottle and
forgot what you told me via email (and asked of me), or, you're
seeking my help via a phishing attempt since directly asking me
(again) won't work. You know you aren't getting any favors with the
recent **** you've pulled. Or, you should know that.

You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is
an MVP!


I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to
share the email exchange between you and I where you asked me
several times to hack his server for your benefit.


Winston doesn't *HAVE* a server for you to hack.


See above. You think you're so ****ing slick don't you, David?
Forget your recent Winston posts? You think you'll con me into
confirming one or more things you asked in them do you?

I'll take the risk and stick to what I wrote without providing any
specific details (I already have actually) that might help you do
what I think you're upto.

Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In
my country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for)
along with data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do
both for your benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS,
David. How do you explain that?


You're making things up again!


Are you denying (after having admitted in usenet many times during
various discussions; how else would I know you didn't intend to make
good on payment for services rendered had I done it? Because you told
me, on usenet! [g]) that you've attempted to hire me to hack into
sites for you, David?

Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on
Usenet


David, what do you hope to gain by consistently writing lies about
another person?

MID:

On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel wrote:
Nah, you just lie


Nope!

--
David B.
Devon, UK

** end paste

Not only do you lie freely with ease, you lie about the dumbest
things possible too!

Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old


Any particular reason someone else should do this?

You're the one who seems to have an issue with Winston, going back
years (I checked our email correspondence to be sure about a few
things while writing this reply) so you and you alone should be the
one to deal with it. Nobody else needs to get involved. You got
yourself into the mess with Winston, you can get yourself out of it.

I don't know why you keep forgetting about the things you've written
about me and the things you've done repeatedly with copies of some of
my items you lifted from my website... But you must, because you
continue to write garbage about me (you did it again in the post I'm
writing this reply for) and in the same ****ing post no less, ask me
to do something... A

As if we have no problems and no issues of any sort between us that
need to be resolved in a manner both parties find acceptable. Have
you really (all fun and games aside, serious time now) drank so much
during your life that you actually do have, measureable, permanent
brain damage in one or more regions? The black legion effect, if i'm
not mistaken. You are of the right age...

David, Your friends in all actuality (I've told you this before, so
it's no surprise to you now, unless you've forgotten for the
aforementioned reasons) emailed me due to a real concern for you.
Your behaviour continues to be off irl. And I know you haven't
completely stopped drinking, just yet, too. So quit bsing the good
doc Shadow on that. You've cut down, considerably, you aren't
drinking daily, but you are most certainly still having a nip now and
then. You were partially telling the truth about the date you quit.
You did quit, for the next three days in a row afterwards. So, the
date is only right for a period of three days. Any sentence that
contains that date followed up by didn't touch it since is a lie from
just past the date. A bold faced, ****ing lie. And a stupid one too!
Nobody really gives a **** about the drinking, David! it's just
ANOTHER EXAMPLE of you lying, and, it's not even an important one.

I've left some details out, I don't want to toss any source(s) under
a bus; I can just imagine how obnoxious you'd be towards them in real
life if you ever found out they provided me information on you, and
not the other way around as you'd originally intended and planned
for! You *are a ****ing prick*, btw, for having tried that. I knew
you've tried to sick people online on me for your revenge, but, I
wasn't aware you'd been soliciting people you knew locally in real
life to help get your sorry ass out of my frying pan, too.

I just wanted to give you enough so you can confirm (I don't expect
you to do that on usenet. G just you knowing I'm giving your balls
a gentle squeeze is enough satisfaction for me... for now) that I
updated my information on you recently. In other words, comms link
between your friend(s) remains open for business.

Matter of fact, it's really nobodies business but your own at the end
of the day what you do/don't do in your own personal life. The only
time that it's not, is when whatever it is you're doing causes
interference in anothers and they have a problem with it.

You're a ****ing coward, David. You picked a fight with the wrong
person. Rather than accept the righteous 0wnage you received, and
move on, you opt to try and solicit help from others under the guise
of you being a harmless soul who was picked on by a mean old Hacker.
You lie to them, outright, lie to them about the entire thing for
their sympathy and what you hope, is their help.

I'm not the only one you've tried this **** with either. I'm one of
several, infact. You tried (and failed miserably) to solicit my help
to deal with some people and servers you had an issue with; an issue
you no doubt (based on what I know of you) caused yourself! And
you've tried to solicit others help in forcing me to either do your
bidding, and/or be 'hung out to dry' as you so eloquently put it to
Savageduck when you tried to recruit him. I suspect you won't turn on
him as you've done others so quickly if at all is because you're
aware of the fact he actually is a retired Police officer, and can
easily acquire full contact details of yourself and police dept
simply by reviewing old posts, or asking. People like you so much,
anyone who knows your details will happily share them on a moments
notice with anyone who wants it.

I have no sympathy for this, because you've tried to do the same
exact thing to me for the past decade or so now without any concern
or thought about potential outcomes for myself and others who may
reside with me. You don't consider personal safety and seem to think
your idea of privacy (none) applies to all. Instead, you knowingly
and willingly, try placing myself and others in potential harms way
with address after address you think is mine, phone numbers when
possible, family members names, etc.

You spare no nothing and no-one. You are not a good guy, you are not
some unfortunate lost soul who's picked on by a Hacker and needs
another to run to his rescue. You're an evil ****ing manipulative
sociopath who gets off on stalking people and if at all possible,
using them to stalk others and/or further abuse other
individuals/companies/servers you feel have wronged you in some way
shape or form. It's all about you and how you feel, **** everything
and everyone else. That's exactly how you are, David!

You, being the coward you are - feel it necessary to try and recruit
others to help you out. You just neglect to mention that it's not a
case of someone picking on poor harmless David. It's a case of David
taking a swing at someone, getting put on his ass for his trouble,
and having to ask another person to stand in his place and take
another swing for him, since he missed the first time AND got decked
for his effort. Since you got your ass put on the ground with a
quickness for your trouble, you somehow think it's unjust and you
need to get even for it. Sorry ass, cowardly, piece of ****.

Not only did you start the problem you have with me, you couldn't
handle the response, and you can't finish the problem yourself. All
you can do is continue getting your arse kicked. Can we say, dumb ass
****ing coward? Yes, yes we can.


--
Cats must toss their poop out of the litter box and play hockey with
it.
  #30  
Old February 24th 19, 08:55 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.freeware,alt.hackers.malicious
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 344
Default [OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)

Shadow
Sat, 23 Feb 2019 16:06:00 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 +0000, David in Devon
wrote:

CUT_DENIALS


You're making things up again!


Diesel, I think he's asking you for PROOF that he asked you
to
ILLEGALLY HACK into a PRIVATE server that CHOSE one of his
STALKING TARGETS as a MODERATOR. The moderator did his job, and
BANNED him.
Is that what you meant, "commander" ?


No, he didn't. He's had these discussions via email and in public on
another newsgroup with me (and various others, some of which are
RIP), multiple times, some years ago. He knows I can pull those
MIDs, share links, etc. But that isn't what he wants me to prove.
G

He isn't sure at this point what Winstons role is, and is actually
on a phishing expedition to find out. You're not privvy to the full
background (if you took the large amount of time required to read
the emails I've shared you would be) concerning David and Winston so
you didn't see this for what it is, and had you been able to provide
him useful information, would have done so, without even giving it a
second thought.

Be more careful next time. I don't call David a slimeball and snake
just because I find the names amusing. He really is a slippery
****er sometimes.

Diesel, try to keep it short. Just the proof.
I and the "commander" say TIA


I'll shorten it up as follows, then.

You got duped into asking me to help David, without realizing what
he was asking for help with. David is on a phishing expedition. Be
more careful next time. G

Read all about the "commander" he
https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

He's the pride of many "sailor boys"
[]'s


ROFL


--
We already have enough youth -- how about a fountain of 'smart'?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.