If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
Josh Einstein wrote:
I don't know about the rest of you but I am on the beta and I didn't sign any non-disclosure agreements to get there. I'm not allowed to benchmark it or redistribute it, but I'm not prohibited from talking about it. If you are on the beta then you did sign an NDA. You may be on the Technical Preview, which has allowed access to RC1 and RC2 - but I am not sure about test builds such as the one mentioned -- Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows Technologies) Bournemouth, U.K. (remove the D8 bit) |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
I am simply letting you know that I am not just some guy off the street that
downloaded SP2 and thinks I'm a beta tester. I'm an actual beta tester. And I signed no NDA. Where's this "evidence" you speak of? You've quoted nothing that states I am not allowed to discuss SP2 builds. Your comments are duly noted. But you're not a moderator so don't tell me what I can and cannot talk about and the MVP's can stop making blanket statements that imply that you control or moderate the groups. "How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful." An insult to others sincerely attempting to help you. It's not an insult, it's how I see your contribution (or lackthereof) to the group. If you've nothing left to contribute to the thread, then stop posting. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies -------------------------------------------------------- Add ink input to Outlook with Tablet Enhancements for Outlook! Only $19.99! http://www.einsteinware.com "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote in message ... Josh; Then clearly you need to review the copies of the screens you agreed when you first started as a Beta tester for SP 2. This is not the EULA you seem to bring up often. There was an agreement you agreed you seem to have completely forgotten. You are still bound by it. The EULA may not fully apply to Beta testers. You are rapidly setting yourself for a violation of your agreements. You seem not to trust anyone here in spite of the overwhelming evidence what they say is true. You bring up irrelevant points such as Lonestar and SDK long after you originally brought them up. You have a hard time distinguishing between a Beta and the Technical Preview, major mistake on your part. I also fail to see why "lunch with the Tablet PC developers." has any connection or relevance or connection to being a Beta tester. I know many that claim much more than you and are not beta testers. Many of the MVPs here can make similar claims and more but they now such bragging is not relevant. "How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful." An insult to others sincerely attempting to help you. We seem to be unhelpful to you regardless the facts, as long as it is not what you want to hear we are "not very helpful". You need to seek the facts. To protect yourself legally and otherwise you need to get in touch with your Beta contact to ensure you have a clear understanding of your responsibilities. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... I'm on the beta "Jupiter". beta.microsoft.com. I was one of the earliest beta testers. You think I'm "out of the loop" or that I think I'm a cool beta tester because I downloaded a publicly available service pack when in fact I've been testing Lonestar and the SDK since it was first available. I've had lunch with the Tablet PC developers. So I very much consider myself a beta tester. You seem to be missing my point. There is no NDA. It's a EULA. I didn't sign anything. I clicked an "agree" button. And the terms that I agreed to don't prohibit me from talking about it in this group so long as I am not publicly divulging previously undisclosed features -- of which there are none. How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies -------------------------------------------------------- Add ink input to Outlook with Tablet Enhancements for Outlook! Only $19.99! http://www.einsteinware.com "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote in message ... Josh; "I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it" Which is it? They are two different programs with two different purposes. If you have no NDA, you are not part of the Beta. The Technical Preview currently has offered RC 1 & RC 2 of SP 2. That does not make you a Beta tester. You and your organization may consider you a Beta tester but that would be strictly internal to you. To use the two different terms here as if they are synonymous when they are not does nothing but add to the confusion. Since you seem to lack the knowledge of the difference it seems you are on the Technical Preview as all Beta testers would clearly know and distinguish the difference. To clarify, exactly how did you become involved with the Beta/Technical Preview and to what extent? -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... 1) I said Lonestar, not Longhorn. Lonestar was being actively discussed including the new TIP, new SDK, etc in these newsgroups for months. 2) Don't confuse a EULA with a NDA. They are two different things entirely. NDA's are legally binding, EULAs are not. The worst that can happen with a EULA is your software license is terminated. 3) The provision in the EULA for non-disclosure is about new features. Since SP2 was feature complete by the first RC, we are all at liberty to talk about any version. 4) I never said I was not in the beta newsgroups. I simply said I'm not prohibited from talking about it on here. I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it since it was first available to those outside Microsoft. I am not talking about the public beta. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
"Chris H." wrote in message ... We are trying to be helpful, Just NO, troll. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:07:47 +0100, lonny wrote:
NobodyMan wrote: On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:20:27 +0100, lonny wrote: NobodyMan wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:07:52 +0100, lonny wrote: Mike Kolitz wrote: fact is that it was widely announced on the web ... but not by Microsoft. and is widely available for download. ... but not from Microsoft. If you want to download a beta service pack from CrazyJimmy's FTP server, be my guest, but don't complain when it doesn't work right. Just wait for the final release... and download it from Microsoft. I got it direct from the microsoft website, a link that is wdiely available on the net. Lon PS. nice troll ;-) OK. Put up or shut up: post the URL for this on the MS website. Why on the MS website? You lost me in one sentence. Lonny Read you own post. You stated "I got it direct from the microsoft website, a linke that is wdiely available on the net." Again I say: Put up or shut up. Post the URL for this you found on the MS website. Why would I want to post it on the MS website? Aha, you want me to post it here, is that it? OK, I go look for it for you :-) Lon YES! You keep claiming you found this built on the MS Website. OK, then, POST THE DAMN URL. That's what I keep asking you to do. Put your money where your mouth is (although it appears there isn't enough money in the entire universe to fill your mouth). |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
Josh;
Then clearly you need to review the copies of the screens you agreed when you first started as a Beta tester for SP 2. This is not the EULA you seem to bring up often. There was an agreement you agreed you seem to have completely forgotten. You are still bound by it. The EULA may not fully apply to Beta testers. You are rapidly setting yourself for a violation of your agreements. You seem not to trust anyone here in spite of the overwhelming evidence what they say is true. You bring up irrelevant points such as Lonestar and SDK long after you originally brought them up. You have a hard time distinguishing between a Beta and the Technical Preview, major mistake on your part. I also fail to see why "lunch with the Tablet PC developers." has any connection or relevance or connection to being a Beta tester. I know many that claim much more than you and are not beta testers. Many of the MVPs here can make similar claims and more but they now such bragging is not relevant. "How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful." An insult to others sincerely attempting to help you. We seem to be unhelpful to you regardless the facts, as long as it is not what you want to hear we are "not very helpful". You need to seek the facts. To protect yourself legally and otherwise you need to get in touch with your Beta contact to ensure you have a clear understanding of your responsibilities. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... I'm on the beta "Jupiter". beta.microsoft.com. I was one of the earliest beta testers. You think I'm "out of the loop" or that I think I'm a cool beta tester because I downloaded a publicly available service pack when in fact I've been testing Lonestar and the SDK since it was first available. I've had lunch with the Tablet PC developers. So I very much consider myself a beta tester. You seem to be missing my point. There is no NDA. It's a EULA. I didn't sign anything. I clicked an "agree" button. And the terms that I agreed to don't prohibit me from talking about it in this group so long as I am not publicly divulging previously undisclosed features -- of which there are none. How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies -------------------------------------------------------- Add ink input to Outlook with Tablet Enhancements for Outlook! Only $19.99! http://www.einsteinware.com "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote in message ... Josh; "I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it" Which is it? They are two different programs with two different purposes. If you have no NDA, you are not part of the Beta. The Technical Preview currently has offered RC 1 & RC 2 of SP 2. That does not make you a Beta tester. You and your organization may consider you a Beta tester but that would be strictly internal to you. To use the two different terms here as if they are synonymous when they are not does nothing but add to the confusion. Since you seem to lack the knowledge of the difference it seems you are on the Technical Preview as all Beta testers would clearly know and distinguish the difference. To clarify, exactly how did you become involved with the Beta/Technical Preview and to what extent? -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... 1) I said Lonestar, not Longhorn. Lonestar was being actively discussed including the new TIP, new SDK, etc in these newsgroups for months. 2) Don't confuse a EULA with a NDA. They are two different things entirely. NDA's are legally binding, EULAs are not. The worst that can happen with a EULA is your software license is terminated. 3) The provision in the EULA for non-disclosure is about new features. Since SP2 was feature complete by the first RC, we are all at liberty to talk about any version. 4) I never said I was not in the beta newsgroups. I simply said I'm not prohibited from talking about it on here. I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it since it was first available to those outside Microsoft. I am not talking about the public beta. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
We are trying to be helpful, Josh, but are having a difficult time
communicating with you. There are a couple points you really do need to understand: 1. The technical beta aspect and what goes on there is NDA. Period. You cannot discuss, hint or otherwise reveal anything from within the beta itself. Any questions you may have are to be directed to the technical beta newsgroups only. 2. The public preview version of XPSP2 has had two releases, RC1 and RC2. What is in those releases is in public domain, but discussion is to take place in the public preview newsgroups (from the URL I offered). Please direct your discussions to the appropriate areas. -- Chris H. Microsoft Windows MVP/Tablet PC Tablet Creations - http://nicecreations.us/ Associate Expert Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... I'm on the beta "Jupiter". beta.microsoft.com. I was one of the earliest beta testers. You think I'm "out of the loop" or that I think I'm a cool beta tester because I downloaded a publicly available service pack when in fact I've been testing Lonestar and the SDK since it was first available. I've had lunch with the Tablet PC developers. So I very much consider myself a beta tester. You seem to be missing my point. There is no NDA. It's a EULA. I didn't sign anything. I clicked an "agree" button. And the terms that I agreed to don't prohibit me from talking about it in this group so long as I am not publicly divulging previously undisclosed features -- of which there are none. How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
Josh Einstein wrote:
I don't know about the rest of you but I am on the beta and I didn't sign any non-disclosure agreements to get there. I'm not allowed to benchmark it or redistribute it, but I'm not prohibited from talking about it. If you are on the beta then you did sign an NDA. You may be on the Technical Preview, which has allowed access to RC1 and RC2 - but I am not sure about test builds such as the one mentioned -- Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows Technologies) Bournemouth, U.K. (remove the D8 bit) |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
I am simply letting you know that I am not just some guy off the street that
downloaded SP2 and thinks I'm a beta tester. I'm an actual beta tester. And I signed no NDA. Where's this "evidence" you speak of? You've quoted nothing that states I am not allowed to discuss SP2 builds. Your comments are duly noted. But you're not a moderator so don't tell me what I can and cannot talk about and the MVP's can stop making blanket statements that imply that you control or moderate the groups. "How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful." An insult to others sincerely attempting to help you. It's not an insult, it's how I see your contribution (or lackthereof) to the group. If you've nothing left to contribute to the thread, then stop posting. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies -------------------------------------------------------- Add ink input to Outlook with Tablet Enhancements for Outlook! Only $19.99! http://www.einsteinware.com "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote in message ... Josh; Then clearly you need to review the copies of the screens you agreed when you first started as a Beta tester for SP 2. This is not the EULA you seem to bring up often. There was an agreement you agreed you seem to have completely forgotten. You are still bound by it. The EULA may not fully apply to Beta testers. You are rapidly setting yourself for a violation of your agreements. You seem not to trust anyone here in spite of the overwhelming evidence what they say is true. You bring up irrelevant points such as Lonestar and SDK long after you originally brought them up. You have a hard time distinguishing between a Beta and the Technical Preview, major mistake on your part. I also fail to see why "lunch with the Tablet PC developers." has any connection or relevance or connection to being a Beta tester. I know many that claim much more than you and are not beta testers. Many of the MVPs here can make similar claims and more but they now such bragging is not relevant. "How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful." An insult to others sincerely attempting to help you. We seem to be unhelpful to you regardless the facts, as long as it is not what you want to hear we are "not very helpful". You need to seek the facts. To protect yourself legally and otherwise you need to get in touch with your Beta contact to ensure you have a clear understanding of your responsibilities. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... I'm on the beta "Jupiter". beta.microsoft.com. I was one of the earliest beta testers. You think I'm "out of the loop" or that I think I'm a cool beta tester because I downloaded a publicly available service pack when in fact I've been testing Lonestar and the SDK since it was first available. I've had lunch with the Tablet PC developers. So I very much consider myself a beta tester. You seem to be missing my point. There is no NDA. It's a EULA. I didn't sign anything. I clicked an "agree" button. And the terms that I agreed to don't prohibit me from talking about it in this group so long as I am not publicly divulging previously undisclosed features -- of which there are none. How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies -------------------------------------------------------- Add ink input to Outlook with Tablet Enhancements for Outlook! Only $19.99! http://www.einsteinware.com "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote in message ... Josh; "I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it" Which is it? They are two different programs with two different purposes. If you have no NDA, you are not part of the Beta. The Technical Preview currently has offered RC 1 & RC 2 of SP 2. That does not make you a Beta tester. You and your organization may consider you a Beta tester but that would be strictly internal to you. To use the two different terms here as if they are synonymous when they are not does nothing but add to the confusion. Since you seem to lack the knowledge of the difference it seems you are on the Technical Preview as all Beta testers would clearly know and distinguish the difference. To clarify, exactly how did you become involved with the Beta/Technical Preview and to what extent? -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... 1) I said Lonestar, not Longhorn. Lonestar was being actively discussed including the new TIP, new SDK, etc in these newsgroups for months. 2) Don't confuse a EULA with a NDA. They are two different things entirely. NDA's are legally binding, EULAs are not. The worst that can happen with a EULA is your software license is terminated. 3) The provision in the EULA for non-disclosure is about new features. Since SP2 was feature complete by the first RC, we are all at liberty to talk about any version. 4) I never said I was not in the beta newsgroups. I simply said I'm not prohibited from talking about it on here. I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it since it was first available to those outside Microsoft. I am not talking about the public beta. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
"Chris H." wrote in message ... We are trying to be helpful, Just NO, troll. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:07:47 +0100, lonny wrote:
NobodyMan wrote: On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:20:27 +0100, lonny wrote: NobodyMan wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:07:52 +0100, lonny wrote: Mike Kolitz wrote: fact is that it was widely announced on the web ... but not by Microsoft. and is widely available for download. ... but not from Microsoft. If you want to download a beta service pack from CrazyJimmy's FTP server, be my guest, but don't complain when it doesn't work right. Just wait for the final release... and download it from Microsoft. I got it direct from the microsoft website, a link that is wdiely available on the net. Lon PS. nice troll ;-) OK. Put up or shut up: post the URL for this on the MS website. Why on the MS website? You lost me in one sentence. Lonny Read you own post. You stated "I got it direct from the microsoft website, a linke that is wdiely available on the net." Again I say: Put up or shut up. Post the URL for this you found on the MS website. Why would I want to post it on the MS website? Aha, you want me to post it here, is that it? OK, I go look for it for you :-) Lon YES! You keep claiming you found this built on the MS Website. OK, then, POST THE DAMN URL. That's what I keep asking you to do. Put your money where your mouth is (although it appears there isn't enough money in the entire universe to fill your mouth). |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
Josh;
Then clearly you need to review the copies of the screens you agreed when you first started as a Beta tester for SP 2. This is not the EULA you seem to bring up often. There was an agreement you agreed you seem to have completely forgotten. You are still bound by it. The EULA may not fully apply to Beta testers. You are rapidly setting yourself for a violation of your agreements. You seem not to trust anyone here in spite of the overwhelming evidence what they say is true. You bring up irrelevant points such as Lonestar and SDK long after you originally brought them up. You have a hard time distinguishing between a Beta and the Technical Preview, major mistake on your part. I also fail to see why "lunch with the Tablet PC developers." has any connection or relevance or connection to being a Beta tester. I know many that claim much more than you and are not beta testers. Many of the MVPs here can make similar claims and more but they now such bragging is not relevant. "How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful." An insult to others sincerely attempting to help you. We seem to be unhelpful to you regardless the facts, as long as it is not what you want to hear we are "not very helpful". You need to seek the facts. To protect yourself legally and otherwise you need to get in touch with your Beta contact to ensure you have a clear understanding of your responsibilities. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... I'm on the beta "Jupiter". beta.microsoft.com. I was one of the earliest beta testers. You think I'm "out of the loop" or that I think I'm a cool beta tester because I downloaded a publicly available service pack when in fact I've been testing Lonestar and the SDK since it was first available. I've had lunch with the Tablet PC developers. So I very much consider myself a beta tester. You seem to be missing my point. There is no NDA. It's a EULA. I didn't sign anything. I clicked an "agree" button. And the terms that I agreed to don't prohibit me from talking about it in this group so long as I am not publicly divulging previously undisclosed features -- of which there are none. How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies -------------------------------------------------------- Add ink input to Outlook with Tablet Enhancements for Outlook! Only $19.99! http://www.einsteinware.com "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote in message ... Josh; "I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it" Which is it? They are two different programs with two different purposes. If you have no NDA, you are not part of the Beta. The Technical Preview currently has offered RC 1 & RC 2 of SP 2. That does not make you a Beta tester. You and your organization may consider you a Beta tester but that would be strictly internal to you. To use the two different terms here as if they are synonymous when they are not does nothing but add to the confusion. Since you seem to lack the knowledge of the difference it seems you are on the Technical Preview as all Beta testers would clearly know and distinguish the difference. To clarify, exactly how did you become involved with the Beta/Technical Preview and to what extent? -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... 1) I said Lonestar, not Longhorn. Lonestar was being actively discussed including the new TIP, new SDK, etc in these newsgroups for months. 2) Don't confuse a EULA with a NDA. They are two different things entirely. NDA's are legally binding, EULAs are not. The worst that can happen with a EULA is your software license is terminated. 3) The provision in the EULA for non-disclosure is about new features. Since SP2 was feature complete by the first RC, we are all at liberty to talk about any version. 4) I never said I was not in the beta newsgroups. I simply said I'm not prohibited from talking about it on here. I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it since it was first available to those outside Microsoft. I am not talking about the public beta. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
We are trying to be helpful, Josh, but are having a difficult time
communicating with you. There are a couple points you really do need to understand: 1. The technical beta aspect and what goes on there is NDA. Period. You cannot discuss, hint or otherwise reveal anything from within the beta itself. Any questions you may have are to be directed to the technical beta newsgroups only. 2. The public preview version of XPSP2 has had two releases, RC1 and RC2. What is in those releases is in public domain, but discussion is to take place in the public preview newsgroups (from the URL I offered). Please direct your discussions to the appropriate areas. -- Chris H. Microsoft Windows MVP/Tablet PC Tablet Creations - http://nicecreations.us/ Associate Expert Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... I'm on the beta "Jupiter". beta.microsoft.com. I was one of the earliest beta testers. You think I'm "out of the loop" or that I think I'm a cool beta tester because I downloaded a publicly available service pack when in fact I've been testing Lonestar and the SDK since it was first available. I've had lunch with the Tablet PC developers. So I very much consider myself a beta tester. You seem to be missing my point. There is no NDA. It's a EULA. I didn't sign anything. I clicked an "agree" button. And the terms that I agreed to don't prohibit me from talking about it in this group so long as I am not publicly divulging previously undisclosed features -- of which there are none. How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
"Chris H." wrote in message ... See you, root. Is the troll threatening? Is there anyone at MS to report NG abusive behavior to? Chris H. Microsoft Windows MVP/Tablet PC Tablet Creations - http://nicecreations.us/ Associate Expert Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone "root" wrote in message ... Yes, now take you off topic troll out of here. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
Josh;
"I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it" Which is it? They are two different programs with two different purposes. If you have no NDA, you are not part of the Beta. The Technical Preview currently has offered RC 1 & RC 2 of SP 2. That does not make you a Beta tester. You and your organization may consider you a Beta tester but that would be strictly internal to you. To use the two different terms here as if they are synonymous when they are not does nothing but add to the confusion. Since you seem to lack the knowledge of the difference it seems you are on the Technical Preview as all Beta testers would clearly know and distinguish the difference. To clarify, exactly how did you become involved with the Beta/Technical Preview and to what extent? -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... 1) I said Lonestar, not Longhorn. Lonestar was being actively discussed including the new TIP, new SDK, etc in these newsgroups for months. 2) Don't confuse a EULA with a NDA. They are two different things entirely. NDA's are legally binding, EULAs are not. The worst that can happen with a EULA is your software license is terminated. 3) The provision in the EULA for non-disclosure is about new features. Since SP2 was feature complete by the first RC, we are all at liberty to talk about any version. 4) I never said I was not in the beta newsgroups. I simply said I'm not prohibited from talking about it on here. I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it since it was first available to those outside Microsoft. I am not talking about the public beta. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone tried XP SP2 post RC2 build 2162 ??
I'm on the beta "Jupiter". beta.microsoft.com. I was one of the earliest
beta testers. You think I'm "out of the loop" or that I think I'm a cool beta tester because I downloaded a publicly available service pack when in fact I've been testing Lonestar and the SDK since it was first available. I've had lunch with the Tablet PC developers. So I very much consider myself a beta tester. You seem to be missing my point. There is no NDA. It's a EULA. I didn't sign anything. I clicked an "agree" button. And the terms that I agreed to don't prohibit me from talking about it in this group so long as I am not publicly divulging previously undisclosed features -- of which there are none. How did you guys become MVP's anyway? You're not very helpful. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies -------------------------------------------------------- Add ink input to Outlook with Tablet Enhancements for Outlook! Only $19.99! http://www.einsteinware.com "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote in message ... Josh; "I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it" Which is it? They are two different programs with two different purposes. If you have no NDA, you are not part of the Beta. The Technical Preview currently has offered RC 1 & RC 2 of SP 2. That does not make you a Beta tester. You and your organization may consider you a Beta tester but that would be strictly internal to you. To use the two different terms here as if they are synonymous when they are not does nothing but add to the confusion. Since you seem to lack the knowledge of the difference it seems you are on the Technical Preview as all Beta testers would clearly know and distinguish the difference. To clarify, exactly how did you become involved with the Beta/Technical Preview and to what extent? -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Josh Einstein" wrote in message ... 1) I said Lonestar, not Longhorn. Lonestar was being actively discussed including the new TIP, new SDK, etc in these newsgroups for months. 2) Don't confuse a EULA with a NDA. They are two different things entirely. NDA's are legally binding, EULAs are not. The worst that can happen with a EULA is your software license is terminated. 3) The provision in the EULA for non-disclosure is about new features. Since SP2 was feature complete by the first RC, we are all at liberty to talk about any version. 4) I never said I was not in the beta newsgroups. I simply said I'm not prohibited from talking about it on here. I have been on the beta, technical preview whatever you want to call it since it was first available to those outside Microsoft. I am not talking about the public beta. -- Josh Einstein Einstein Technologies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|