Microsoft Gestapo

Nil wrote:
On 20 Jun 2014, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general:

Perhaps you'd like to question why no 'public' answer has been
forthcoming. If you did, I suspect YOU would be banned too! ;-)

Nobody cares about your petty vendettas.

WTF??? Petty?

This is all about *GOOD* v. *EVIL*!

It is *IMPORTANT*!

On 6/20/14 1:58 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 7:51 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
G. Morgan wrote:
Alias wrote:

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself. Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.



It's another "Boater Dave" a.k.a. "David Brooks" sock.

That in no way changes the fact that there *is* something untoward
happening at Microsoft Answers!

Think about it! ;-)

*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

I'm just curious... Why is it any of your business?

Perhaps your review of THIS thread will help you better understand, Ken!

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...o/QSgppAHWFcAJ

Support your position, answer the question.

As for the thread, I feel like I've been swimming in a septic tank.

HTH

Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!

As an aside, the most malevolent poster on the www.dogagent.com server
was CoyoteV - until not too long ago. That's the guy who USED to run
Scorched-Earth on the Annexcafe groups!

This is his personal web site: http://mindzon.com/



--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 25.0
Thunderbird 24.3.0
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:20:20 -0700, Charles Lindbergh wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:52:39 -0400, Nil wrote:

On 20 Jun 2014, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general:

Perhaps you'd like to question why no 'public' answer has been
forthcoming. If you did, I suspect YOU would be banned too! ;-)

Nobody cares about your petty vendettas.

Nil, I agree with you completely. I have kill-filtered BD as well as several of
the most vitriolic posters, e.g. Good Guy, VanguardLH, ....Winston.

This group is actually pretty enjoyable without the snarkiness and inane
trolling.

Please filter me too. I occasionally yield to temptation and get mildly
vitriolic.

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 1:58 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 7:51 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
G. Morgan wrote:
Alias wrote:

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself. Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you
can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.



It's another "Boater Dave" a.k.a. "David Brooks" sock.

That in no way changes the fact that there *is* something untoward
happening at Microsoft Answers!

Think about it! ;-)

*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

I'm just curious... Why is it any of your business?

Perhaps your review of THIS thread will help you better understand, Ken!

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...o/QSgppAHWFcAJ


Support your position, answer the question.

Which bit of THIS did you not understand, laddie?

"I've been attending the Alpha Course this winter (see:
http://alpha.org/default.asp) and am now absolutely certain that I'm being
tasked by God to pursue matters relentlessly until good defeats evil here on
the web. It has been extremely lonely at times and I'd welcome help from
anyone who is willing and able to help me achieve His aim."

As for the thread, I feel like I've been swimming in a septic tank.

I can understand that! :-)

HTH

Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!

As an aside, the most malevolent poster on the www.dogagent.com server
was CoyoteV - until not too long ago. That's the guy who USED to run
Scorched-Earth on the Annexcafe groups!

This is his personal web site: http://mindzon.com/

On 6/20/14 3:36 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 1:58 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 7:51 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
G. Morgan wrote:
Alias wrote:

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself. Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you
can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.



It's another "Boater Dave" a.k.a. "David Brooks" sock.

That in no way changes the fact that there *is* something untoward
happening at Microsoft Answers!

Think about it! ;-)

*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

I'm just curious... Why is it any of your business?

Perhaps your review of THIS thread will help you better understand, Ken!

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...o/QSgppAHWFcAJ


Support your position, answer the question.

Which bit of THIS did you not understand, laddie?

"I've been attending the Alpha Course this winter (see:
http://alpha.org/default.asp) and am now absolutely certain that I'm being
tasked by God to pursue matters relentlessly until good defeats evil here on
the web. It has been extremely lonely at times and I'd welcome help from
anyone who is willing and able to help me achieve His aim."

Besides the link being broken, you still have not answered the question.
You just have generalizations of what you believe. That proves
nothing. Tell my why *you* believe it's your business, not God's or
someone else.

Besides, if you're intelligent, you'd ask Winston, which you may have
done. If he hasn't answered, that may be some indication of his opinion
of you.



As for the thread, I feel like I've been swimming in a septic tank.

I can understand that! :-)

HTH

Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!

As an aside, the most malevolent poster on the www.dogagent.com server
was CoyoteV - until not too long ago. That's the guy who USED to run
Scorched-Earth on the Annexcafe groups!

This is his personal web site: http://mindzon.com/





--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 25.0
Thunderbird 24.3.0
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"

On 20 Jun 2014, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general:

WTF??? Petty?

This is all about *GOOD* v. *EVIL*!

It is *IMPORTANT*!

It's only important to an attention whore like yourself. To those of us
who have a firmer grip on reality, it's irrelevent bull****.

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:50:27 -0700, Charles Lindbergh wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:23:31 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch"
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:20:20 -0700, Charles Lindbergh wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:52:39 -0400, Nil wrote:

On 20 Jun 2014, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general:

Perhaps you'd like to question why no 'public' answer has been
forthcoming. If you did, I suspect YOU would be banned too! ;-)

Nobody cares about your petty vendettas.

Nil, I agree with you completely. I have kill-filtered BD as well as several of
the most vitriolic posters, e.g. Good Guy, VanguardLH, ....Winston.

This group is actually pretty enjoyable without the snarkiness and inane
trolling.

Please filter me too. I occasionally yield to temptation and get mildly
vitriolic.

When you become too vitriolic for my tastes, I will do so. So far, you have
been a reasonably sober gentleman. The others I mentioned, not so much.

I did have fun writing the above request. Since it was mildly vitriolic,
I felt that it was self-referent, which is always (IMO) a good thing.

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 3:36 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 1:58 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 7:51 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
G. Morgan wrote:
Alias wrote:

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted
by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and
not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting
Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself.
Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you
can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.



It's another "Boater Dave" a.k.a. "David Brooks" sock.

That in no way changes the fact that there *is* something untoward
happening at Microsoft Answers!

Think about it! ;-)

*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

I'm just curious... Why is it any of your business?

Perhaps your review of THIS thread will help you better understand,
Ken!

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...o/QSgppAHWFcAJ



Support your position, answer the question.

Which bit of THIS did you not understand, laddie?

"I've been attending the Alpha Course this winter (see:
http://alpha.org/default.asp) and am now absolutely certain that I'm
being
tasked by God to pursue matters relentlessly until good defeats evil
here on
the web. It has been extremely lonely at times and I'd welcome help from
anyone who is willing and able to help me achieve His aim."

Besides the link being broken, you still have not answered the question.

I sincerely apologize for the broken link. Things do change with time!

You may learn more he- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_course

You just have generalizations of what you believe. That proves
nothing. Tell my why *you* believe it's your business, not God's or
someone else.

As a relative newbie here, *please tell me WHY you wish to know*.

It may help you to know that it was immediately after I made that post
(a little tongue-in-cheek) that I was banned from posting on the
Annexcafe groups. Hey Ho! ;-)

Besides, if you're intelligent, you'd ask Winston, which you may have
done. If he hasn't answered, that may be some indication of his opinion
of you.

I'm sufficiently intelligent to have bought an Apple iMac! (but it's at
home, not on my boat!) Please explain why YOU are not using Mavericks.
Does your machine not meet the required 'specs'?
https://www.apple.com/uk/osx/specs/

As for the thread, I feel like I've been swimming in a septic tank.

I can understand that! :-)

HTH

Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!

As an aside, the most malevolent poster on the www.dogagent.com server
was CoyoteV - until not too long ago. That's the guy who USED to run
Scorched-Earth on the Annexcafe groups!

This is his personal web site: http://mindzon.com/

Oh! Yes! He's a nasty *piece of work* (as Peter Foldes liked to say!)

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 14:12:26 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

You just have generalizations of what you believe. That proves
nothing. Tell my why *you* believe it's your business, not God's or
someone else.

As a relative newbie here, *please tell me WHY you wish to know*.

He's the reg, BD. You answer first. It's called respect.
Why you are obsessed with a post made 12 years or so ago about
a firm you do not work for and an OS that you don't use ????

So much so that you have flooded various groups with it, under
various names and multiple crossposting (BTW, I snipped alt.2600 from
these headers --- they DID ask you very politely to leave).
PS I've spotted 3 or 4 of your fake nyms just in this group.
Although I have around 10 email addresses (nothing wrong with that), I
rarely change my user on Usenet. If people want to filter me, so be
it. It's call fair play.
HTH
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

Shadow claimed

He's the reg

I do not understand what that means. :-(

Shadow wrote:
Why you are obsessed with a post made 12 years or so ago about
a firm you do not work for and an OS that you don't use ????

I don't know to what you refer, Shadow.

Which post? Which firm?

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 19:20:31 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

Shadow claimed

He's the reg

I do not understand what that means. :-(

As you pointed out, you are a newbie, he's a REGular poster,
here. He asked you first.
Be polite.
Tell him EXACTLY what you want to know, cite dates (they are
very important), operating system you use and of course, why it was so
important you needed to crosspost 100 times about it.
Then we can finally solve your problem (even if that might
involve recommending a shrink)
HTH
[]'s

--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

s|b wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:58:46 +0100, AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

*WHICH* moderator?!!

See for yourself!

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/...privatemessage

HTH

~BD~ wrote:
s|b wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:58:46 +0100, AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

*WHICH* moderator?!!

See for yourself!

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/...privatemessage

Hmmm!!!

Graeme Bennett - Community Team
Microsoft Wiki Author

The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed.
No reply necessary.
Graeme
Site Administrator

You cannot reply to this message.

================================================== =================

FYI
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/p...6-045fbf33e641

Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 19:20:31 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

Shadow claimed

He's the reg

I do not understand what that means. :-(

As you pointed out, you are a newbie, he's a REGular poster,
here. He asked you first.
Be polite.
Tell him EXACTLY what you want to know, cite dates (they are
very important), operating system you use and of course, why it was so
important you needed to crosspost 100 times about it.
Then we can finally solve your problem (even if that might
involve recommending a shrink)
HTH
[]'s

Might THIS help?

Subject: Can Microsoft Answers be abused?
From: PhillipJones
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:48:47 -0400
Message-ID:
References:
Bytes: 3257
Lines: 76
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.75.60.83
Path: pegasus.annex.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: annexcafe.general.user2user,annexcafe.uk.general.u ser2user
X-Authenticated-User: pjonesCET
X-Trace: pegasus.annex.net 1401814131 75.75.60.83 (3 Jun 2014 11:48:51
-0500)
Reply-to:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
annexcafe.uk.general.user2user:7842

Tony Smith wrote:
...winston said in Usenet Message-ID:

"My Outlook.com account on the other hand has been in use publicly much
longer (initially in 1995) until 2007 on Usenet, continued instant
messaging on 6 contintents, blog contact address 7 yrs until 2013 on a
public site with over 1.6 million visits, Skype, Twitter and Facebook.
- similar results to Gmail for the Hotmail Junk Folder, but nothing to
the Inbox.

A few years ago I would agree that Gmail's were better, today I don't
see a difference (and I've 11 Outlook.com accounts). Now, if I include
a Yahoo Plus account, no comparison, Yahoo is the worst by a long
shot..it misses more than all my other web based email accounts
combined."

John Doe responded with: Message-ID:

(and I've 11 Outlook.com accounts)

I've noticed that http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us requires folk to
'sign in' in order to make a post. It appears that the sign in page

hxxps://login.live.com/login.srf?wa=wsignin1.0&rpsnv=12&ct=1401699036&


rver=6.1.6206.0&wp=LBI&wreply=https:%2F%2Fanswers. microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fsite%2Fcompletesignin%3Fsilent%3DFalse&id=273 572


http://goo.gl/GrvyWA

... is much the same as that used when signing in to use Outlook.com

hxxps://login.live.com/login.srf?wa=wsignin1.0&rpsnv=12&ct=1401699247&


rver=6.4.6456.0&wp=MBI&wreply=http:%2F%2Fmail.live .com%2Fdefault.aspx&lc=1033&id=64855&mkt=en-us&cbcxt=mai&snsc=1


http://goo.gl/K6OwpC

If you have 11 accounts, how do you know which one to use when using
Microsoft Answers?

(long links broken deliberately)

So ...........

If one can 'sign in' to http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us with *ANY*
Outlook.com account/identity one chooses there is, surely, an
opportunity for the facility to be abused.

Think about it!

To sign answers I went Ms LiveID site and got a LiveId address.
I use that live.com address to sign in to answers and when I set it up I
had all email to go to my regular ISP address.
I frequently answer questions for Mac Office (Word, Excel) and am a MCC
(Microsoft Content creator (create excellent content answer many
questions,etc). And currently am a CM ( Community Moderator - crack the
whip when needed grin. Merge duplicate questions. Edit content when
need. Report when people use Private Info they should, report Spam and
report user profiles that spam to Moderator with more power than I. )

--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net mailto