|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
November 28th 09, 08:13 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
Top posters This month Nov 2009
This month 17
15 14 13 13 13 12 12 11 11 All time 13473 6866 5421 5160 4088 3281 3231 3083 2233 2140 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
November 28th 09, 05:12 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
Hi
Make that 18 Regards Bill "Southern Gospel News Updates" wrote in message ... This month 17 15 14 13 13 13 12 12 11 11 All time 13473 6866 5421 5160 4088 3281 3231 3083 2233 2140
|
|
#3
November 28th 09, 05:12 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
Hi
Make that 18 Regards Bill "Southern Gospel News Updates" wrote in message ... This month 17 15 14 13 13 13 12 12 11 11 All time 13473 6866 5421 5160 4088 3281 3231 3083 2233 2140
|
|
#4
November 29th 09, 08:04 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
I thought "top posters" were bad and "bottom posters" were good?!
|
|
#5
November 29th 09, 08:04 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
I thought "top posters" were bad and "bottom posters" were good?!
|
|
#6
November 30th 09, 12:05 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
Rick Merrill wrote:
I thought "top posters" were bad and "bottom posters" were good?! They're both superior to those who trim the entire text they are replying to. ;-)
|
|
#7
November 30th 09, 12:05 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
Rick Merrill wrote:
I thought "top posters" were bad and "bottom posters" were good?! They're both superior to those who trim the entire text they are replying to. ;-)
|
|
#8
November 30th 09, 04:55 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
Daave wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote: I thought "top posters" were bad and "bottom posters" were good?! They're both superior to those who trim the entire text they are replying to. ;-) Top posters are the Devil. You are forced to read the message and rely upside down. The end is the beginning. People that trim useless text when they reply are OK by me. What really bothers me is people that don't use their smell checkers. There is nothing like bad smelling. So they're. So their. So there. 8-) -- JD..
|
|
#9
November 30th 09, 04:55 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
Daave wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote: I thought "top posters" were bad and "bottom posters" were good?! They're both superior to those who trim the entire text they are replying to. ;-) Top posters are the Devil. You are forced to read the message and rely upside down. The end is the beginning. People that trim useless text when they reply are OK by me. What really bothers me is people that don't use their smell checkers. There is nothing like bad smelling. So they're. So their. So there. 8-) -- JD..
|
|
#10
November 30th 09, 09:36 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:55:22 -0600, JD wrote Re
Top posters This month Nov 2009: Top posters are the Devil. You are forced to read the message and rely upside down. Not if you put them in you kill file. -- A: Yes. Q: Does that happen with short messages too? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
#11
November 30th 09, 09:36 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:55:22 -0600, JD wrote Re
Top posters This month Nov 2009: Top posters are the Devil. You are forced to read the message and rely upside down. Not if you put them in you kill file. -- A: Yes. Q: Does that happen with short messages too? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
#12
November 30th 09, 02:00 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
: Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail? Net nannies like you.
|
|
#13
November 30th 09, 02:00 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
: Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail? Net nannies like you.
|
|
#14
December 1st 09, 09:01 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
I'm always curious about those who *insist* in newsgroups that everyone
should bottom-post - do they do the same in e-mails, or go along with what (in my experience) the overwhelming majority of people do, and top-post? (He *killfiles* people who top-post? Sheesh!) "Tom Willett" wrote in message ... : Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail? Net nannies like you.
|
|
#15
December 1st 09, 09:01 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top posters This month Nov 2009
I'm always curious about those who *insist* in newsgroups that everyone
should bottom-post - do they do the same in e-mails, or go along with what (in my experience) the overwhelming majority of people do, and top-post? (He *killfiles* people who top-post? Sheesh!) "Tom Willett" wrote in message ... : Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail? Net nannies like you.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
