Why I no Longer Use Windows 7.

XS11E wrote:

(Student) wrote:

I value my time

Then why are you replying to a Linux troll?

Actually, this thread was started by a Wintroll pretending to be a
Linux booster.

--
"They like the broader choices Windows provides in terms of HW support
(phone sync etc) and Gaming." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark

bd wrote:

Democrats control congress and have since 2007. Only democrats can stop
him from getting a bill to sign.

Wrong.

Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?

--
"They also want the source code so they can steal other peoples hard
work." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark, on "Linux users in the
main"

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:48:07 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:

On 2010-10-24, Agent_C wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 05:42:24 +0000 (UTC), Robin T Cockslee
wrote:

Linux just does everything I need[...]

Your needs must be very rudimentary.

That's true of a lot of people actually.

Although what's still unaddressed is just what am I supposed to be
missing exactly? I've got copies of Windows 7 and Snow Leopard and no
interest in running either one of them. Linux simply does not look bad
next to them (despite all the lies to the contrary).

Isn't it amazing how, when you ask these WinTrolls what exactly Windows
does that Linux doesn't, they only come up with snide nothing? Just
Microsoft FUD, they don't even know why they are parroting it anymore.

--
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:37:37 -0700, Frank wrote:

On 10/25/2010 2:49 AM, Alias wrote:
On 10/25/2010 11:44 AM, RonB wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:20:12 +0200, Alias wrote:

I feel sorry for you who thinks you have to lie to win an argument.
None of what you say about me is true.

This is all the Windows FUDites have, lies and character
assassination.


He and Frank are sterling examples.

You and your butt-buddy lying linturd FUD spreading assholes are the
real sterling examples of TROLLS!

Yeah, you're really "stable" there, "Frank."

And, BTW, adios.

--
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:01:18 -0500, Quantum Leaper wrote:

I agree Linux is growing in the backroom but not on the desktop,
advocates have been saying this is the Year of Desktop Linux,

What users have been saying this? The imaginary ones in your head?

--
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:23:51 +0200, Alias wrote:

Prediction: the Dems will win big in November and hold both houses.

Only if they rig the voting machines.

--
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:20:53 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

RonB pulled this Usenet face plant:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:59:41 +0200, Alias wrote:

Ballmer has appointed an anti Linux czar. If he's worried, you know
his mindless follower are and for good reason!

Microsoft is becoming inconsequential. It still has desktops, and the
office suite and... that's about it, except for the XBox which...

As much as Microsoft bugs me, they are far from inconsequential, even
ignoring Windows (and MS Office and the "apps" that can be written with
it).

Which is why I wrote "becoming" inconsequential. You'll have to admit
their "big events" are not nearly as big as they used to be.

--
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

"chrisv" wrote in message
...
bd wrote:

Democrats control congress and have since 2007. Only democrats can stop
him from getting a bill to sign.

Wrong.

Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?

The dems had 60 votes. How could a filibuster stop them?

"Valorie *~" wrote in message
b.com...

"chrisv" wrote in message
...
bd wrote:

Democrats control congress and have since 2007. Only democrats can stop
him from getting a bill to sign.

Wrong.

Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?

The dems had 60 votes. How could a filibuster stop them?

figures that a stupid fscking piece of **** like "chrisv" would think that
someone is ignorant of a filibuster.

we now see that the "chrisv" scumbag turd is so fscking ignorant that ****
has no idea what a filibuster is.

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:51:26 -0700, Valorie *~ wrote:


"chrisv" wrote in message
...
bd wrote:

Democrats control congress and have since 2007. Only democrats can stop
him from getting a bill to sign.

Wrong.

Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?

The dems had 60 votes. How could a filibuster stop them?

They only had 60 votes for a short time. And the Republicans used
blocks and secret blocks to bring the Senate to a halt. The crazy
Senate rules allow a single senator to block a vote (even a vote for
cloture) without having to identify himself.

Bug

"bugbuster" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:51:26 -0700, Valorie *~ wrote:


"chrisv" wrote in message
...
bd wrote:

Democrats control congress and have since 2007. Only democrats can stop
him from getting a bill to sign.

Wrong.

Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?

The dems had 60 votes. How could a filibuster stop them?

They only had 60 votes for a short time. And the Republicans used
blocks and secret blocks to bring the Senate to a halt. The crazy
Senate rules allow a single senator to block a vote (even a vote for
cloture) without having to identify himself.

A year and a half is a short time? They could have passed anything they
wanted. Their legislation was blocked or delayed by fellow democrats!
The kings of filibuster were the democrats during 6 of the Bush years.

chrisv wrote in
:

bd wrote:

Democrats control congress and have since 2007. Only democrats can stop
him from getting a bill to sign.

Wrong.

Are you so ignorant that you've not heard of a filibuster?


If that is the case, why didn't they filibuster the health care debacle?

RonB pulled this Usenet face plant:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:20:53 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

RonB pulled this Usenet face plant:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:59:41 +0200, Alias wrote:

Ballmer has appointed an anti Linux czar. If he's worried, you know
his mindless follower are and for good reason!

Microsoft is becoming inconsequential. It still has desktops, and the
office suite and... that's about it, except for the XBox which...

As much as Microsoft bugs me, they are far from inconsequential, even
ignoring Windows (and MS Office and the "apps" that can be written with
it).

Which is why I wrote "becoming" inconsequential. You'll have to admit
their "big events" are not nearly as big as they used to be.

The bizznizzmen don't care about those ;-

--
Troubles are like babies; they only grow by nursing.

On 10/25/2010 11:27 AM, RonB wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:37:37 -0700, Frank wrote:

On 10/25/2010 2:49 AM, Alias wrote:
On 10/25/2010 11:44 AM, RonB wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:20:12 +0200, Alias wrote:

I feel sorry for you who thinks you have to lie to win an argument.
None of what you say about me is true.

This is all the Windows FUDites have, lies and character
assassination.


He and Frank are sterling examples.

You and your butt-buddy lying linturd FUD spreading assholes are the
real sterling examples of TROLLS!

Yeah, you're really "stable" there, "Frank."

And, BTW, adios.

Just stop cross posting you lying linturd troll and don't let the door
hit you on the way out, asshole!

"Clogwog" wrote in message ...

"Doum" schreef in bericht
.. .
RonB écrivait -
september.org:

On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 08:35:12 +0000, Student wrote:

Having paid 100 dollars for windows 7 home premium oem one year ago i
consider it the best bargain in the world for me as I value my time

I value my time also -- that's why I like Linux. Faster booting, less
disk
thrashing when the OS is booted, no anti-malware or anti-virus worries
(no
lost time to the constant updates required for those applications) and an
easy path to updating the OS *and* the applications all at the same time
with one command.

Nothing like that in the Windows world.


I use Windows (7) because the programs I use run under Windows.

BTW no problem, no crash, no BSOD, some bugs in one program but nothing to
do with Windows.


In short: A happy windows user, like 90% of desktop computer users
worldwide!

The Linux advocates all have access to Windows but they will not admit it.