If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
Scrolling issues also confirmed to be fixed by this previous post.
From: "The PocketTV Team" Subject: KB832894 patch fixes IE6 double-scroll bug Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 17:49:04 -0800 Organization: PocketTV - http://www.pockettv.com FYI: MS just fixed the double-scroll bug in their latest IE6 patch, released today (KB832894). see http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tre...n/MS04-004.asp This bug fix is not documented in the patch information, but this latest patch silently fixes the double-scroll bug introduced in the Q824145/K824145 "update". -- Henri Leboeuf Web page: http://www.generation.net/~hleboeuf/index.htm "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Robert Moir wrote: snipped on both ends If I thought they were waiting to include it in a roll-up fix then I would/will agree with you. I've not seen anything pointing to that myself, I'm assuming that fixing this is more trouble than it appeared at first and they've had to go back to it a couple of times. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tre...n/MS04-004.asp Well they waited to fix it to included in a IE cumulative patch! You guys should really learn to listen to me! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!" |
Ads |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
H Leboeuf wrote:
Scrolling issues also confirmed to be fixed by this previous post. From: "The PocketTV Team" Subject: KB832894 patch fixes IE6 double-scroll bug Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 17:49:04 -0800 Organization: PocketTV - http://www.pockettv.com FYI: MS just fixed the double-scroll bug in their latest IE6 patch, released today (KB832894). see http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tre...n/MS04-004.asp This bug fix is not documented in the patch information, but this latest patch silently fixes the double-scroll bug introduced in the Q824145/K824145 "update". shaking head And they didn't document it. I guess the extra paragraph would have cut into their bottom line! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!" |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
Microsoft doesn't make only one OS.
WinXP has a different oleaut32.dll than Win2k than Win9x than DOS. Point in case, Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20 operating systems all different in many ways, all similar in many ways. A global attack on Windows machines won't affect every Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. Being that DOS IS a variation of Unix whats the difference? That DOS uses a backslash and Unix uses a forward slash? I'm just being stupid by posting to this message, but I think I have a somewhat unobtrusive point to present. -- Jim Carlock http://www.microcosmotalk.com/ Post replies to the newsgroup. "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote: Kurt; Stay with your facts. I did, notice that I was quoting myself. I never even suggested "one big target of an OS" is the way to go. You were disputing my arguement that MS's monopoy OS is what is the biggest security hole for the general public by blaming the general public. Those are your words and ideas. Which you were trying to dispute by blaming the victims, rather than the delivery system of being locked into one big fat target of a Desktop OS. You seem to need to falsely put statements to others in order to support your ideas. No, I trying to actually get you to confront my ideas, instead of doing the side-step shuffle to protect your Masters. To bad you can not support your point on its own merit. I already have, it's you that have not support any contrary point the dimishes my opinion in the slightest bit. Furthermore you start to name calling. What else could you be called when you only answer that most inconsequential part of my post, and leave the meat of it untouched? That's exactly the tactics of a troll. Name calling is strong evidence that you lack the ability to support your own point of view. My point has been proved, and only the MicroDeafDumb&Blind can't see it. MS's desktop OS monopoly is the biggest security risk for the general public today, because that one giant-assed target can't help from getting hit. It's a hell of a lot easier to hit one bird with one stone, than two birds with one stone. I have common sense on my side, you have only your unwavering devotion to MS to back you up. Thank you! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!" |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
Xref: kermit microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser: 286222 microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:1020330 microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web:194256 microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers:125151 microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin:141127
"Jim Carlock" wrote: Microsoft doesn't make only one OS. WinXP has a different oleaut32.dll than Win2k than Win9x than DOS. Point in case, Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20 operating systems all different in many ways, all similar in many ways. A global attack on Windows machines won't affect every Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. MS currently sells XP Home, XP Pro and Server 2003. I'm not sure whether they are currently selling Win2000 (but I don't think so). That's far fewer than 20 operating systems. A global attack on any MS system will affect *many, many* computers. How many has Blaster hit? No, it won't affect DOS, but how many computers use DOS anymore? Being that DOS IS a variation of Unix whats the difference? That DOS uses a backslash and Unix uses a forward slash? DOS is in some ways a pale imitation of Unix. But DOS cannot be said to be a variation of Unix, there are HUGE differences. Unix was built to be a multi-user OS to be run on quite large machines. DOS was built to run on tiny computers that would have all they could do to handle a single user. They have very little in common. -- Tim Slattery MS MVP(DTS) |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
In article , Tim Slattery wrote:
MS currently sells XP Home, XP Pro and Server 2003. I'm not sure whether they are currently selling Win2000 (but I don't think so). That's far fewer than 20 operating systems. A global attack on any MS system will affect *many, many* computers. How many has Blaster hit? No, it won't affect DOS, but how many computers use DOS anymore? And yet, and yet, and yet... How big of an effect has Blaster had on the world? Sure it's caused some significant expenditure on cleanup, but for the most part, trains have continued to run, airplanes are still flying, life-support monitors are still running, but Jim down the road can't get Solitaire to work, because his machine's too busy sending worm-seed through his ADSL line. A focussed, terrorist attack on Windows would need to be orders of magnitude more successful in order to merit anything more than "oh, great, another dateless zit-pocked teenager has found out how to run a root kit". Alun. ~~~~ [Please don't email posters, if a Usenet response is appropriate.] -- Texas Imperial Software | Find us at http://www.wftpd.com or email 1602 Harvest Moon Place | . Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers. Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
"Alun Jones [MS MVP]" wrote in message
m... A focussed, terrorist attack on Windows would need to be orders of magnitude more successful in order to merit anything more than "oh, great, another dateless zit-pocked teenager has found out how to run a root kit". LOL I love this; can I quote you? G -- Hyperlinks are used to ensure advice remains current Do NOT send me an email. I will NOT see it (thank the spammers and viruses) _______________________________________ Sandi - Microsoft MVP since 1999 (IE/OE) http://www.mvps.org/inetexplorer |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
In article , "Sandi - Microsoft MVP" wrote:
"Alun Jones [MS MVP]" wrote in message om... A focussed, terrorist attack on Windows would need to be orders of magnitude more successful in order to merit anything more than "oh, great, another dateless zit-pocked teenager has found out how to run a root kit". LOL I love this; can I quote you? G Please do. Quite frankly, I'm more bored by the tedium of the "wave of worms" than frightened by the threat. There's nothing interesting, technically speaking, about any of the new worms. It's just antisocial tosspots who have nothing better to do than try to spray paint their names on walls around the world - except their mums won't let them buy spray paint for fear that they'll sniff it and kill off their one remaining brain cell. So they do the next best thing - send out a bunch of email versions of a Turing test, to see whether anyone's having a "stupid moment" that renders them incapable of "running it to see what it does". Alun. ~~~~ [Please don't email posters, if a Usenet response is appropriate.] -- Texas Imperial Software | Find us at http://www.wftpd.com or email 1602 Harvest Moon Place | . Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers. Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
Jim Carlock wrote:
Microsoft doesn't make only one OS. WinXP has a different oleaut32.dll than Win2k than Win9x than DOS. Point in case, Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20 operating systems all different in many ways, all similar in many ways. A global attack on Windows machines won't affect every Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. Since more than half the machines out already aren't running w9x, the one different file won't be mattering much. Being that DOS IS a variation of Unix whats the difference? That DOS uses a backslash and Unix uses a forward slash? I'm just being stupid by posting to this message, but I think I have a somewhat unobtrusive point to present. -- Jim Carlock http://www.microcosmotalk.com/ Post replies to the newsgroup. "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote: Kurt; Stay with your facts. I did, notice that I was quoting myself. I never even suggested "one big target of an OS" is the way to go. You were disputing my arguement that MS's monopoy OS is what is the biggest security hole for the general public by blaming the general public. Those are your words and ideas. Which you were trying to dispute by blaming the victims, rather than the delivery system of being locked into one big fat target of a Desktop OS. You seem to need to falsely put statements to others in order to support your ideas. No, I trying to actually get you to confront my ideas, instead of doing the side-step shuffle to protect your Masters. To bad you can not support your point on its own merit. I already have, it's you that have not support any contrary point the dimishes my opinion in the slightest bit. Furthermore you start to name calling. What else could you be called when you only answer that most inconsequential part of my post, and leave the meat of it untouched? That's exactly the tactics of a troll. Name calling is strong evidence that you lack the ability to support your own point of view. My point has been proved, and only the MicroDeafDumb&Blind can't see it. MS's desktop OS monopoly is the biggest security risk for the general public today, because that one giant-assed target can't help from getting hit. It's a hell of a lot easier to hit one bird with one stone, than two birds with one stone. I have common sense on my side, you have only your unwavering devotion to MS to back you up. Thank you! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!" -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!" |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
E McCann wrote:
Can we cut out the crossposts? Yes, but they can be added right back. There is nothing intriscally wrong with cross-posting. BTW, I'd put money down you wouldn't find oleaut32.dll in DOS.... DOS has no DLLs, for starters. It doesn't support object linking and embedding (OLE,) and it's not 32 bit... "Jim Carlock" wrote in message ... Microsoft doesn't make only one OS. WinXP has a different oleaut32.dll than Win2k than Win9x than DOS. Point in case, Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20 operating systems all different in many ways, all similar in many ways. A global attack on Windows machines won't affect every Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. Being that DOS IS a variation of Unix whats the difference? That DOS uses a backslash and Unix uses a forward slash? I'm just being stupid by posting to this message, but I think I have a somewhat unobtrusive point to present. -- Jim Carlock http://www.microcosmotalk.com/ Post replies to the newsgroup. "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote: Kurt; Stay with your facts. I did, notice that I was quoting myself. I never even suggested "one big target of an OS" is the way to go. You were disputing my arguement that MS's monopoy OS is what is the biggest security hole for the general public by blaming the general public. Those are your words and ideas. Which you were trying to dispute by blaming the victims, rather than the delivery system of being locked into one big fat target of a Desktop OS. You seem to need to falsely put statements to others in order to support your ideas. No, I trying to actually get you to confront my ideas, instead of doing the side-step shuffle to protect your Masters. To bad you can not support your point on its own merit. I already have, it's you that have not support any contrary point the dimishes my opinion in the slightest bit. Furthermore you start to name calling. What else could you be called when you only answer that most inconsequential part of my post, and leave the meat of it untouched? That's exactly the tactics of a troll. Name calling is strong evidence that you lack the ability to support your own point of view. My point has been proved, and only the MicroDeafDumb&Blind can't see it. MS's desktop OS monopoly is the biggest security risk for the general public today, because that one giant-assed target can't help from getting hit. It's a hell of a lot easier to hit one bird with one stone, than two birds with one stone. I have common sense on my side, you have only your unwavering devotion to MS to back you up. Thank you! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!" -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!" |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
Alun Jones [MS MVP] wrote:
In article , Tim Slattery wrote: MS currently sells XP Home, XP Pro and Server 2003. I'm not sure whether they are currently selling Win2000 (but I don't think so). That's far fewer than 20 operating systems. A global attack on any MS system will affect *many, many* computers. How many has Blaster hit? No, it won't affect DOS, but how many computers use DOS anymore? And yet, and yet, and yet... How big of an effect has Blaster had on the world? Sure it's caused some significant expenditure on cleanup, but for the most part, trains have continued to run, airplanes are still flying, life-support monitors are still running, but Jim down the road can't get Solitaire to work, because his machine's too busy sending worm-seed through his ADSL line. A focussed, terrorist attack on Windows would need to be orders of magnitude more successful in order to merit anything more than "oh, great, another dateless zit-pocked teenager has found out how to run a root kit". Alun. I agree, but that doesn't mean that there won't be a zero-day bug sometime soon. That day will be a horrible mess, the day that patch & computer nasty is released in the same day. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!" |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
kurttrail wrote:
Alun Jones [MS MVP] wrote: In article , Tim Slattery wrote: MS currently sells XP Home, XP Pro and Server 2003. I'm not sure whether they are currently selling Win2000 (but I don't think so). That's far fewer than 20 operating systems. A global attack on any MS system will affect *many, many* computers. How many has Blaster hit? No, it won't affect DOS, but how many computers use DOS anymore? And yet, and yet, and yet... How big of an effect has Blaster had on the world? Sure it's caused some significant expenditure on cleanup, but for the most part, trains have continued to run, airplanes are still flying, life-support monitors are still running, but Jim down the road can't get Solitaire to work, because his machine's too busy sending worm-seed through his ADSL line. A focussed, terrorist attack on Windows would need to be orders of magnitude more successful in order to merit anything more than "oh, great, another dateless zit-pocked teenager has found out how to run a root kit". Alun. I agree, but that doesn't mean that there won't be a zero-day bug sometime soon. That day will be a horrible mess, the day that patch & computer nasty is released in the same day. http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5180482.html 2 days between patch release and the nasties release. It was a lucky thing that it wasn't a MS hole. If you haven't noticed, things are speeding up and a Zero-day bug is just a few years down the bend, if we're lucky. The mono-culture of the Microsoft desktop is just too big a target to be missed, eventually someone is gonna hit the bulls-eye. So we, as a society that security-conscious at present, can do one of two things, find ways to break up the mono-culture to distribute the threat amongst may targets, or bunker up at the MicroAlamo, and wait to be overrun. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!" |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
kurttrail wrote:
2 days between patch release and the nasties release. It was a lucky thing that it wasn't a MS hole. http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm005-mc/ 'GreyMagic started work on this issue with Microsoft on 11-Mar-2004. They have quickly confirmed our findings and were able to produce a fix less than two days later. As a result, Hotmail is no longer vulnerable to this method of exploitation. All attempts to contact Yahoo unfortunately failed. Mail was sent to security and secure at yahoo.com and at yahoo-inc.com, no replies were received to date. ' -- Hyperlinks are used to ensure advice remains current Do NOT send me an email. I will NOT see it (thank the spammers and viruses) _______________________________________ Sandi - Microsoft MVP since 1999 (IE/OE) http://www.mvps.org/inetexplorer |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
Sandi - Microsoft MVP wrote:
kurttrail wrote: 2 days between patch release and the nasties release. It was a lucky thing that it wasn't a MS hole. http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm005-mc/ 'GreyMagic started work on this issue with Microsoft on 11-Mar-2004. They have quickly confirmed our findings and were able to produce a fix less than two days later. As a result, Hotmail is no longer vulnerable to this method of exploitation. All attempts to contact Yahoo unfortunately failed. Mail was sent to security and secure at yahoo.com and at yahoo-inc.com, no replies were received to date. ' And your point is? What does that have similar to a what a Zero-Day bug would do explointing a flaw in MS OSs, where most people wouldn't be aware a flaw, a patch, and a bug already existed. MS got Hotmail protected in two days. Congratulations are in order, but some day soon, a Zero-Day bug is inevitable, and if the target is MS's OSs, and we haven't attempted to break up the mono-culture of the MS desktop, the consequences will be global in its impact. A wise society doesn't put all its eggs in one basket, because you risk breaking all those eggs with one careless step. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!" |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
In article , "kurttrail"
wrote: 2 days between patch release and the nasties release. It was a lucky thing that it wasn't a MS hole. If you haven't noticed, things are speeding up and a Zero-day bug is just a few years down the bend, if we're lucky. The mono-culture of the Microsoft desktop is just too big a target to be missed, eventually someone is gonna hit the bulls-eye. So we, as a society that security-conscious at present, can do one of two things, find ways to break up the mono-culture to distribute the threat amongst may targets, or bunker up at the MicroAlamo, and wait to be overrun. "How shall we f- off, oh master?" - Monty Python's Life of Brian. You know that if you were to persuade the world to drop the monoculture and disperse, they would ask you _which_ solution to disperse to, and would ask you to direct them to one. They'd get peeved if you gave them a choice. "Yes, we are all individuals." - Crowd, Monty Python's Life of Brian. Monoculture is a fact, and always will be. Poor Microsoft, they're stuck with being the monoculture of choice today. It used to be IBM. Who knows - maybe a few years down the road, it'll be someone else. Alun. ~~~~ [Please don't email posters, if a Usenet response is appropriate.] -- Texas Imperial Software | Find us at http://www.wftpd.com or email 1602 Harvest Moon Place | . Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers. Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|