If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
"imhotep" wrote in message
... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message ... Oh my, you truly don't understand do you??? How tired I have become trying... Cool, the perhaps we will wear you down eventually. Roger, you just don't have the talent....sorry. Remember, your inability to see understanding does in no way indicate lack thereof. Oh Roger. How you desperately try to sound intelligent... I assure you, it is quite effortless I will not bother drawing comparison to your extended rants -- ra |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
"imhotep" wrote in message
.... Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to stop using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when someone replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my fault??? Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients, but of usage thereof. Now, I dare you to meaningfully explain how that response, I guess you deem it a reaonable explaination, is any except a self-centered viewpoint exponding a self-centered approach. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:
"imhotep" wrote in message .... Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to stop using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when someone replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my fault??? Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients, but of usage thereof. Yes. You have not read your "user manual" and choose to blame your problems in other... Now, I dare you to meaningfully explain how that response, I guess you deem it a reaonable explaination, is any except a self-centered viewpoint exponding a self-centered approach. The only thing self centered is you complaining because you newsreader is, dare I say, inadequate. Rather than talking about the topic of this thread, you choose to steer it in a different direction. That is the only self centered act I see... Hummmm... You are a MVP but rather than helping people here with security issues you choose to act like a clown. How exactly did you get your MVP status? Did you write spyware apps too? Im |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:
"imhotep" wrote in message ... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message ... Oh my, you truly don't understand do you??? How tired I have become trying... Cool, the perhaps we will wear you down eventually. Roger, you just don't have the talent....sorry. Remember, your inability to see understanding does in no way indicate lack thereof. Oh Roger. How you desperately try to sound intelligent... I assure you, it is quite effortless I am sure looking like a clown comes quite easy to you... I will not bother drawing comparison to your extended rants hahahaha.... I frequently email many of your post to my friends. We all get a good laugh from you... Keep the material flowing, Roger. Im |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
"imhotep" wrote in message
... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message .... Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to stop using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when someone replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my fault??? Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients, but of usage thereof. Yes. You have not read your "user manual" and choose to blame your problems in other... Again, it is totally the result of you choice to use the follow-ups in the way that you do which people are objecting to. It is your actions, not nntp nor any one implementation at issue. Now, I dare you to meaningfully explain how that response, I guess you deem it a reaonable explaination, is any except a self-centered viewpoint exponding a self-centered approach. The only thing self centered is you complaining because you newsreader is, dare I say, inadequate. Rather than talking about the topic of this thread, you choose to steer it in a different direction. That is the only self centered act I see... Hummmm... You are a MVP but rather than helping people here with security issues you choose to act like a clown. How exactly did you get your MVP status? Did you write spyware apps too? Right. And when you stop reading "your" posts you may start to realize how childish you sound saying such. You do perhaps need to get out more Im and discover, no - not other posts, but the importance of holding other's values as important. Cheers, anyway ra |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:
"imhotep" wrote in message ... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message .... Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to stop using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when someone replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my fault??? Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients, but of usage thereof. Yes. You have not read your "user manual" and choose to blame your problems in other... Again, it is totally the result of you choice to use the follow-ups in the way that you do which people are objecting to. It is your actions, not nntp nor any one implementation at issue. Really, why is it that my "just works"??? No problems no matter how you post...please explain this. Now, I dare you to meaningfully explain how that response, I guess you deem it a reaonable explaination, is any except a self-centered viewpoint exponding a self-centered approach. The only thing self centered is you complaining because you newsreader is, dare I say, inadequate. Rather than talking about the topic of this thread, you choose to steer it in a different direction. That is the only self centered act I see... Hummmm... You are a MVP but rather than helping people here with security issues you choose to act like a clown. How exactly did you get your MVP status? Did you write spyware apps too? Right. And when you stop reading "your" posts you may start to realize how childish you sound saying such. You do perhaps need to get out more Im and discover, no - not other posts, but the importance of holding other's values as important. Cheers, anyway ra Again, "ra", you have done nothing but hijack this post and other, which had a serious topic, and turn it into a discussion about your broken newsreader. An you say I am childish? Hahahahahahaha.... Again, I challenge you to help people with their security problems rather than hijack them... |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
"imhotep" wrote in message
... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message ... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message .... Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to stop using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when someone replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my fault??? Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients, but of usage thereof. Yes. You have not read your "user manual" and choose to blame your problems in other... Again, it is totally the result of you choice to use the follow-ups in the way that you do which people are objecting to. It is your actions, not nntp nor any one implementation at issue. Really, why is it that my "just works"??? No problems no matter how you post...please explain this. My NG client has no problems. How do you explain that? And, what is it that you needed to do to place the follow-up on your reply to my posting? If it was automatic by KNode then either you defined a preference for it to do so for you or KNode is broken in volunteering a follow-up header. In either case, many, not just I, find it obnoxious. Again, the issue is you (or your instance of KNode), not the software of others. But you will never see that, and I do not care to see you attempt to explain that once more. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:
"imhotep" wrote in message ... Again, "ra", you have done nothing but hijack this post and others, which had a serious topic, and turn it into a discussion about your broken newsreader. You say I am childish? Hahahahahahaha.... Yes, you do appear quite selfish, and your occassional rants childish I did not hijack this thread, although I did note it to be inapproriate. Seems you *still* are... Again, I challenge you to help people with their security problems rather than hijack them... I believe I do assist Not when you hijack. That you can say that makes you appear to read only your threads English please. As far as I have seen during the past year plus, you rarely attempt to do so, lest it is with a "get Linux" style comment. Talk of hijack! Like your endless rants of newsclients here in a thread about a new MVP who supported malware? However, just to reassure myself, I looked. (see below) I notice that right about 50% of your postings under this name in msnews hosted newsgroups in 2006 are replies in your own threads. I wonder why. Easy to deduce. How many time have you hijack the topic, like here, forcing me to try and steer the conversation back on topic for the sake of the many users here. What don't you investage that? Ah, I guess the truth hurts now, doesn't it. You need to get these post counts up before you attempt to make claims over your great helpfulness in solving real problems as actually experienced by people. Maybe that is why you hijack posts like this one? Don't feel you can contrube but *also* want to increase you news post counts? Listen, I do not get evaluated for the number of news posts. I believe an MVP does. If I was getting evaluated for the number of news posts, I would use my real name, *like* *you*... Im (oh - in case you are unfamilar with the public origin of this info, yes, one can simply click into any one of the threads to each of your posts) Author Profile : Metrics are for the calendar year spanning the search date Author: First Seen: 9/3/2005 Last Seen: 10/12/2006 Aliases: Imhotep Newsgroups Days Active Posts Threads Initiated Threads Touched Day / Last Day 5 / 4 20 / 13 0 / 0 9 / 7 Week / Last Week 11 / 12 5 / 4 62 / 75 4 / 5 21 / 32 Month / Last Month 13 / 11 9 / 19 137 / 134 9 / 11 4 / 36 Quarter / Last Quarter 13 / 15 9 / 49 137 / 295 9 / 36 44 / 98 Year / Last Year 19 / 38 58 / 64 432 / 476 45 / 62 136 / 196 Newsgroups (Ordered by Posts, descending) First Seen Last Seen Days Active Posts Replies Threads Initiated Threads Touched microsoft.public.security 9/8/2005 10/12/2006 49 255 217 30 57 microsoft.public.security.homeusers 7/17/2006 10/12/2006 46 189 152 29 59 microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security 9/17/2005 10/12/2006 39 178 142 26 43 microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin 7/17/2006 10/12/2006 39 151 115 27 48 alt.security 9/11/2005 10/10/2006 32 63 29 16 39 comp.security.misc 9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 49 14 16 37 comp.security 9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 44 10 16 34 comp.os.linux.security 7/17/2006 10/10/2006 11 13 4 5 11 comp.security.firewalls 9/22/2005 10/10/2006 9 11 2 5 10 microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general 7/29/2006 8/6/2006 2 3 3 0 1 microsoft.public.windows.server.security 9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2 0 1 comp.security.unix 10/7/2005 8/10/2006 1 2 2 0 1 comp.security.pgp.test 8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2 0 1 alt.computer.security 9/3/2005 10/3/2006 1 2 2 0 1 microsoft.public.win2000.security 9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2 0 1 sci.crypt 10/2/2006 10/9/2006 2 2 1 0 2 alt.security.pgp 8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2 0 1 soc.culture.canada 10/2/2006 10/2/2006 1 1 1 0 1 microsoft.public.windowsxp.general 9/11/2005 10/12/2006 1 1 1 0 1 |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:
"imhotep" wrote in message ... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message ... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message .... Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to stop using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when someone replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my fault??? Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients, but of usage thereof. Yes. You have not read your "user manual" and choose to blame your problems in other... Again, it is totally the result of you choice to use the follow-ups in the way that you do which people are objecting to. It is your actions, not nntp nor any one implementation at issue. Really, why is it that my "just works"??? No problems no matter how you post...please explain this. My NG client has no problems. How do you explain that? If it works flawlessly why do you cry so much. Explain that, spanky. And, what is it that you needed to do to place the follow-up on your reply to my posting? If it was automatic by KNode then either you defined a preference for it to do so for you or KNode is broken in volunteering a follow-up header. In either case, many, not just I, find it obnoxious. I find your constant hijacking obnoxious but you don't seem to want to change anything either. Maybe you should take you own advice??? Again, the issue is you (or your instance of KNode), not the software of others. But you will never see that, and I do not care to see you attempt to explain that once more. Funny, my newsclient just works. No problems what-so-ever....I guess if yours did, you would never have brought it up, or even noticed, a problem now would you? However, you did. So you *did* have a problem but you just don't want to admit it...now that is funny! Im |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
"imhotep" wrote in message
... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: Again, I challenge you to help people with their security problems rather than hijack them... I believe I do assist Not when you hijack. And you, not when you fragment threads That you can say that makes you appear to read only your threads English please. It is. I do not care to diagram for you. As far as I have seen during the past year plus, you rarely attempt to do so, lest it is with a "get Linux" style comment. Talk of hijack! Like your endless rants of newsclients here in a thread about a new MVP who supported malware? That topic was dead out of the starting gate. However, just to reassure myself, I looked. (see below) I notice that right about 50% of your postings under this name in msnews hosted newsgroups in 2006 are replies in your own threads. I wonder why. Easy to deduce. How many time have you hijack the topic, like here, forcing me to try and steer the conversation back on topic for the sake of the many users here. What don't you investage that? Ah, I guess the truth hurts now, doesn't it. I like the truth. I just do not see you displaying it much, certainly not here/now. You need to get these post counts up before you attempt to make claims over your great helpfulness in solving real problems as actually experienced by people. Maybe that is why you hijack posts like this one? Don't feel you can contrube but *also* want to increase you news post counts? Listen, I do not get evaluated for the number of news posts. I believe an MVP does. If I was getting evaluated for the number of news posts, I would use my real name, *like* *you*... You clear do not understand how it works. As I see you are quite difficult to wear down, I guess just ignoring you would be the best way to minimize your presence, ey? (oh - in case you are unfamilar with the public origin of this info, yes, one can simply click into any one of the threads to each of your posts) Author Profile : Metrics are for the calendar year spanning the search date Author: First Seen: 9/3/2005 Last Seen: 10/12/2006 Aliases: Imhotep Newsgroups Days Active Posts Threads Initiated Threads Touched Day / Last Day 5 / 4 20 / 13 0 / 0 9 / 7 Week / Last Week 11 / 12 5 / 4 62 / 75 4 / 5 21 / 32 Month / Last Month 13 / 11 9 / 19 137 / 134 9 / 11 4 / 36 Quarter / Last Quarter 13 / 15 9 / 49 137 / 295 9 / 36 44 / 98 Year / Last Year 19 / 38 58 / 64 432 / 476 45 / 62 136 / 196 Newsgroups (Ordered by Posts, descending) First Seen Last Seen Days Active Posts Replies Threads Initiated Threads Touched microsoft.public.security 9/8/2005 10/12/2006 49 255 217 30 57 microsoft.public.security.homeusers 7/17/2006 10/12/2006 46 189 152 29 59 microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security 9/17/2005 10/12/2006 39 178 142 26 43 microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin 7/17/2006 10/12/2006 39 151 115 27 48 alt.security 9/11/2005 10/10/2006 32 63 29 16 39 comp.security.misc 9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 49 14 16 37 comp.security 9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 44 10 16 34 comp.os.linux.security 7/17/2006 10/10/2006 11 13 4 5 11 comp.security.firewalls 9/22/2005 10/10/2006 9 11 2 5 10 microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general 7/29/2006 8/6/2006 2 3 3 0 1 microsoft.public.windows.server.security 9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2 0 1 comp.security.unix 10/7/2005 8/10/2006 1 2 2 0 1 comp.security.pgp.test 8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2 0 1 alt.computer.security 9/3/2005 10/3/2006 1 2 2 0 1 microsoft.public.win2000.security 9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2 0 1 sci.crypt 10/2/2006 10/9/2006 2 2 1 0 2 alt.security.pgp 8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2 0 1 soc.culture.canada 10/2/2006 10/2/2006 1 1 1 0 1 microsoft.public.windowsxp.general 9/11/2005 10/12/2006 1 1 1 0 1 |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:
"imhotep" wrote in message ... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: Again, I challenge you to help people with their security problems rather than hijack them... I believe I do assist Not when you hijack. And you, not when you fragment threads It only is fragmented when you do not know what you are doing! So from your point of view, I guess it is.... That you can say that makes you appear to read only your threads English please. It is. I do not care to diagram for you. Oh please... As far as I have seen during the past year plus, you rarely attempt to do so, lest it is with a "get Linux" style comment. Talk of hijack! Like your endless rants of newsclients here in a thread about a new MVP who supported malware? That topic was dead out of the starting gate. That Microsoft gave a MVP to a spyware pusher? Not at all. If nothing else, it signifies that the MVP does not mean much. You have one right? However, just to reassure myself, I looked. (see below) I notice that right about 50% of your postings under this name in msnews hosted newsgroups in 2006 are replies in your own threads. I wonder why. Easy to deduce. How many time have you hijack the topic, like here, forcing me to try and steer the conversation back on topic for the sake of the many users here. What don't you investage that? Ah, I guess the truth hurts now, doesn't it. I like the truth. I just do not see you displaying it much, certainly not here/now. The truth is you *do* hijack the topic of this and other threads. You know as do I. You need to get these post counts up before you attempt to make claims over your great helpfulness in solving real problems as actually experienced by people. Maybe that is why you hijack posts like this one? Don't feel you can contrube but *also* want to increase you news post counts? Listen, I do not get evaluated for the number of news posts. I believe an MVP does. If I was getting evaluated for the number of news posts, I would use my real name, *like* *you*... You clear do not understand how it works. Funny, mine works flawlessly without any problems. I simply click and go. You are having problems but, *I* don't understand? Hahahahahahahahahahaha.... Thanks, for the chuckle! As I see you are quite difficult to wear down, I guess just ignoring you would be the best way to minimize your presence, ey? I don't really care what you do. I never have. You're just learning that now? You really are slow.... Roger, let's be honest here. Your whole rant here was not about anything more than the fact that Microsoft messed up and gave a spyware pusher a MVP. You being a MVP felt your had to somehow defend/protect Microsoft. I would respect you more if you were just honest from the beginning. However, you are not. As such, I view you, and your posts, as pretty much worthless. In either case, ignore me if you wish. Never did care much what you did... Im (oh - in case you are unfamilar with the public origin of this info, yes, one can simply click into any one of the threads to each of your posts) Author Profile : Metrics are for the calendar year spanning the search date Author: First Seen: 9/3/2005 Last Seen: 10/12/2006 Aliases: Imhotep Newsgroups Days Active Posts Threads Initiated Threads Touched Day / Last Day 5 / 4 20 / 13 0 / 0 9 / 7 Week / Last Week 11 / 12 5 / 4 62 / 75 4 / 5 21 / 32 Month / Last Month 13 / 11 9 / 19 137 / 134 9 / 11 4 / 36 Quarter / Last Quarter 13 / 15 9 / 49 137 / 295 9 / 36 44 / 98 Year / Last Year 19 / 38 58 / 64 432 / 476 45 / 62 136 / 196 Newsgroups (Ordered by Posts, descending) First Seen Last Seen Days Active Posts Replies Threads Initiated Threads Touched microsoft.public.security 9/8/2005 10/12/2006 49 255 217 30 57 microsoft.public.security.homeusers 7/17/2006 10/12/2006 46 189 152 29 59 microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security 9/17/2005 10/12/2006 39 178 142 26 43 microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin 7/17/2006 10/12/2006 39 151 115 27 48 alt.security 9/11/2005 10/10/2006 32 63 29 16 39 comp.security.misc 9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 49 14 16 37 comp.security 9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 44 10 16 34 comp.os.linux.security 7/17/2006 10/10/2006 11 13 4 5 11 comp.security.firewalls 9/22/2005 10/10/2006 9 11 2 5 10 microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general 7/29/2006 8/6/2006 2 3 3 0 1 microsoft.public.windows.server.security 9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2 0 1 comp.security.unix 10/7/2005 8/10/2006 1 2 2 0 1 comp.security.pgp.test 8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2 0 1 alt.computer.security 9/3/2005 10/3/2006 1 2 2 0 1 microsoft.public.win2000.security 9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2 0 1 sci.crypt 10/2/2006 10/9/2006 2 2 1 0 2 alt.security.pgp 8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2 0 1 soc.culture.canada 10/2/2006 10/2/2006 1 1 1 0 1 microsoft.public.windowsxp.general 9/11/2005 10/12/2006 1 1 1 0 1 |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
Leythos wrote:
In article , says... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message ... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message ... Oh my, you truly don't understand do you??? How tired I have become trying... Cool, the perhaps we will wear you down eventually. Roger, you just don't have the talent....sorry. Remember, your inability to see understanding does in no way indicate lack thereof. Oh Roger. How you desperately try to sound intelligent... I assure you, it is quite effortless I am sure looking like a clown comes quite easy to you... I wonder if you are related to PC BUTTS 1. Legos, Recess is over. Go inside. Imhotep |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
Leythos wrote:
In article , says... Leythos wrote: In article , says... Why don't one of you try to describe the problem so at least I understand what your problem is? See, this whole "issue" started by a couple of people accusing me of using a broken newsreader, etc, etc. Now, fair is fair, if anyone starts a conversation with such rudeness I am really not going to take them very seriously, especially when it *is* their newsclient after all... What about the people that don't have the group to force the follow-up to from their ISP? Which is exactly why I set the "followup-to" a very common generalized newsgroup. In this case "microsoft.public.security". This newsgroup just about all newsservers carry. By doing what you are doing, the reply will never be seen from you and they will never be able to reply properly. Read above...This would only be true if I set the followup-to to a specialized, and hence non-popular, newsgroup... Except you don't know what groups are carried by what ISP, and you state you are trying to reach the masses with your message, but you don't seem to care that the non-technical will not be able to properly reply to your message due to the way you break the chain for your own personal pleasure. Legos, Again, read my post. I intentionally place a very common group in within the "followup-to" field. In fact the most common newsgroup. Did you not even read my previous post? Im |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher
Leythos wrote:
In article , says... Leythos wrote: In article , says... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message ... Roger Abell [MVP] wrote: "imhotep" wrote in message ... Oh my, you truly don't understand do you??? How tired I have become trying... Cool, the perhaps we will wear you down eventually. Roger, you just don't have the talent....sorry. Remember, your inability to see understanding does in no way indicate lack thereof. Oh Roger. How you desperately try to sound intelligent... I assure you, it is quite effortless I am sure looking like a clown comes quite easy to you... I wonder if you are related to PC BUTTS 1. Legos, Recess is over. Go inside. At least I'm not immature enough to not spell your name properly. Legos, So, ah, "...PC BUTTS 1" is mature? Nothing worse than a hypocrite. Go away the amateur hour is over. Im |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|