Defrag Tools

"THE C. [MS MVP]" wrote in message
...
If you want free then DiskKeeper is good. But O & O defrag is the best.
Tests
prove this over and over... nothing compares to it! Google O & O 11 defrag
and you will see Olorin. Make it a great day.
--
Computer/Software Tech.


Charles Richmond
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/



"Olórin" wrote:

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
O & O defrag is the best on the market. You can defrag in stealth,
space, name, and file type or file name. I use 11 profesional.
Nothing compares to it. If you want free then Diskeeper is the best
choice.

snip

Nonsense! Plenty of other defrag tools compare to it. In the same way as
you
compare to a real MS MVP.

That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily favourable, mind...





Diskeeper isn't free..


--

Mike Hall - MVP Windows Experience
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/

"THE C. [MS MVP]" wrote in message
...
If you want free then DiskKeeper is good. But O & O defrag is the best.
Tests
prove this over and over... nothing compares to it! Google O & O 11 defrag
and you will see Olorin. Make it a great day.
--
Computer/Software Tech.


Charles Richmond
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/



"Olórin" wrote:

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
O & O defrag is the best on the market. You can defrag in stealth,
space, name, and file type or file name. I use 11 profesional.
Nothing compares to it. If you want free then Diskeeper is the best
choice.

snip

Nonsense! Plenty of other defrag tools compare to it. In the same way as
you
compare to a real MS MVP.

That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily favourable, mind...





Diskeeper isn't free..


--

Mike Hall - MVP Windows Experience
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/

In article , THEC.
@MSN.COM says...
If you want free then DiskKeeper is good. But O & O defrag is the best. Tests
prove this over and over... nothing compares to it! Google O & O 11 defrag
and you will see Olorin. Make it a great day.


If you want PAID Defrag, then O&O would not be my first choice -
DiskKeeper PAID would be my first choice.

I've moved to JKDefrag for all our clients servers and busy
workstations, since JK is free, and since it has options that give a
better drive layout than the PAID ones.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
(remove 999 for proper email address)

In article , THEC.
@MSN.COM says...
If you want free then DiskKeeper is good. But O & O defrag is the best. Tests
prove this over and over... nothing compares to it! Google O & O 11 defrag
and you will see Olorin. Make it a great day.


If you want PAID Defrag, then O&O would not be my first choice -
DiskKeeper PAID would be my first choice.

I've moved to JKDefrag for all our clients servers and busy
workstations, since JK is free, and since it has options that give a
better drive layout than the PAID ones.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
(remove 999 for proper email address)

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
If you want free then DiskKeeper is good. But O & O defrag is the
best. Tests prove this over and over... nothing compares to it!
Google O & O 11 defrag and you will see Olorin. Make it a great day.

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
O & O defrag is the best on the market. You can defrag in stealth,
space, name, and file type or file name. I use 11 profesional.
Nothing compares to it. If you want free then Diskeeper is the best
choice.

snip

Nonsense! Plenty of other defrag tools compare to it. In the same
way as you compare to a real MS MVP.

That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily favourable,
mind...

I'm well aware of O&O and how good it is; I used to use it but switched to
PerfectDisk.

However, the point you completely miss is that it was your choice of the
phrase "nothing compares to it" that I was picking up on. ANY defragger
*can* be compared to O&O - that's not to say it's anything like as good as
it. Much as (and this was my real point) the validity of your MS-MVP
standing compares to the real thing - by being nothing like it.

Oh, and Diskeeper (or DiskKeeper, you aren't consistent) isn't freeware -
unless you mean the Diskeeper Lite version that Intel released as part of a
bundle a while ago.

Make it a great day for yourself by proving us doubters wrong - or drop the
"[MS MVP]" you append yourself with.

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
If you want free then DiskKeeper is good. But O & O defrag is the
best. Tests prove this over and over... nothing compares to it!
Google O & O 11 defrag and you will see Olorin. Make it a great day.

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
O & O defrag is the best on the market. You can defrag in stealth,
space, name, and file type or file name. I use 11 profesional.
Nothing compares to it. If you want free then Diskeeper is the best
choice.

snip

Nonsense! Plenty of other defrag tools compare to it. In the same
way as you compare to a real MS MVP.

That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily favourable,
mind...

I'm well aware of O&O and how good it is; I used to use it but switched to
PerfectDisk.

However, the point you completely miss is that it was your choice of the
phrase "nothing compares to it" that I was picking up on. ANY defragger
*can* be compared to O&O - that's not to say it's anything like as good as
it. Much as (and this was my real point) the validity of your MS-MVP
standing compares to the real thing - by being nothing like it.

Oh, and Diskeeper (or DiskKeeper, you aren't consistent) isn't freeware -
unless you mean the Diskeeper Lite version that Intel released as part of a
bundle a while ago.

Make it a great day for yourself by proving us doubters wrong - or drop the
"[MS MVP]" you append yourself with.

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... nothing compares to it...

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... Nothing compares to it...

- Missing 'Ol?rin wrote:' attribution -
snip ... That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily
favourable ...

Ol?rin wrote:
... the point you completely miss is that it was your choice of the
phrase "nothing compares to it" that I was picking up on. ANY defragger
*can* be compared to O&O - that's not to say it's anything like as good
as it...

In colloquial English, it is common to omit the obvious.
'Nothing compares to it' means:
'nothing comes even close to matching insert attribute here of it',
where attribute could be any of (but not limited to):
safety, performance, appearance, cost/comfort, ease of use, durability.

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... nothing compares to it...

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... Nothing compares to it...

- Missing 'Ol?rin wrote:' attribution -
snip ... That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily
favourable ...

Ol?rin wrote:
... the point you completely miss is that it was your choice of the
phrase "nothing compares to it" that I was picking up on. ANY defragger
*can* be compared to O&O - that's not to say it's anything like as good
as it...

In colloquial English, it is common to omit the obvious.
'Nothing compares to it' means:
'nothing comes even close to matching insert attribute here of it',
where attribute could be any of (but not limited to):
safety, performance, appearance, cost/comfort, ease of use, durability.

Al Falfa wrote:
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... nothing compares to it...

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... Nothing compares to it...

- Missing 'Ol?rin wrote:' attribution -
snip ... That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily
favourable ...

Ol?rin wrote:
... the point you completely miss is that it was your choice of the
phrase "nothing compares to it" that I was picking up on. ANY
defragger *can* be compared to O&O - that's not to say it's anything
like as good as it...

In colloquial English, it is common to omit the obvious.
'Nothing compares to it' means:
'nothing comes even close to matching insert attribute here of it',
where attribute could be any of (but not limited to):
safety, performance, appearance, cost/comfort, ease of use,
durability.

OK, I'll forget the irony in future and just come out and say things
plainly... (The part you snipped.)

Besides, O&O *isn't* that far ahead of the competition. But I'd say "THE C."
*is* a huge distance from MS-MVPhood.

Al Falfa wrote:
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... nothing compares to it...

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... Nothing compares to it...

- Missing 'Ol?rin wrote:' attribution -
snip ... That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily
favourable ...

Ol?rin wrote:
... the point you completely miss is that it was your choice of the
phrase "nothing compares to it" that I was picking up on. ANY
defragger *can* be compared to O&O - that's not to say it's anything
like as good as it...

In colloquial English, it is common to omit the obvious.
'Nothing compares to it' means:
'nothing comes even close to matching insert attribute here of it',
where attribute could be any of (but not limited to):
safety, performance, appearance, cost/comfort, ease of use,
durability.

OK, I'll forget the irony in future and just come out and say things
plainly... (The part you snipped.)

Besides, O&O *isn't* that far ahead of the competition. But I'd say "THE C."
*is* a huge distance from MS-MVPhood.

My status is MVP with Microsoft. O & O Defrag 11 is far above any defrag
software period! If you must use a freeware then try IOBit.com for their
defrag software. Are you saying MVP's are from the hood?? Make it a great
day. ;-)
--
Computer/Software Tech.


Charles Richmond
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/



"Olórin" wrote:

Al Falfa wrote:
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... nothing compares to it...

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... Nothing compares to it...

- Missing 'Ol?rin wrote:' attribution -
snip ... That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily
favourable ...

Ol?rin wrote:
... the point you completely miss is that it was your choice of the
phrase "nothing compares to it" that I was picking up on. ANY
defragger *can* be compared to O&O - that's not to say it's anything
like as good as it...

In colloquial English, it is common to omit the obvious.
'Nothing compares to it' means:
'nothing comes even close to matching insert attribute here of it',
where attribute could be any of (but not limited to):
safety, performance, appearance, cost/comfort, ease of use,
durability.

OK, I'll forget the irony in future and just come out and say things
plainly... (The part you snipped.)

Besides, O&O *isn't* that far ahead of the competition. But I'd say "THE C."
*is* a huge distance from MS-MVPhood.

My status is MVP with Microsoft. O & O Defrag 11 is far above any defrag
software period! If you must use a freeware then try IOBit.com for their
defrag software. Are you saying MVP's are from the hood?? Make it a great
day. ;-)
--
Computer/Software Tech.


Charles Richmond
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/



"Olórin" wrote:

Al Falfa wrote:
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... nothing compares to it...

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... Nothing compares to it...

- Missing 'Ol?rin wrote:' attribution -
snip ... That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily
favourable ...

Ol?rin wrote:
... the point you completely miss is that it was your choice of the
phrase "nothing compares to it" that I was picking up on. ANY
defragger *can* be compared to O&O - that's not to say it's anything
like as good as it...

In colloquial English, it is common to omit the obvious.
'Nothing compares to it' means:
'nothing comes even close to matching insert attribute here of it',
where attribute could be any of (but not limited to):
safety, performance, appearance, cost/comfort, ease of use,
durability.

OK, I'll forget the irony in future and just come out and say things
plainly... (The part you snipped.)

Besides, O&O *isn't* that far ahead of the competition. But I'd say "THE C."
*is* a huge distance from MS-MVPhood.

THE C

No he isn't. A few of of us doubt that you are a genuine Microsoft MVP!

--


Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
My status is MVP with Microsoft. O & O Defrag 11 is far above any
defrag software period! If you must use a freeware then try IOBit.com
for their defrag software. Are you saying MVP's are from the hood??
Make it a great day. ;-)

Al Falfa wrote:
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... nothing compares to it...

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... Nothing compares to it...

- Missing 'Ol?rin wrote:' attribution -
snip ... That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily
favourable ...

Ol?rin wrote:
... the point you completely miss is that it was your choice of the
phrase "nothing compares to it" that I was picking up on. ANY
defragger *can* be compared to O&O - that's not to say it's
anything like as good as it...

In colloquial English, it is common to omit the obvious.
'Nothing compares to it' means:
'nothing comes even close to matching insert attribute here of
it', where attribute could be any of (but not limited to):
safety, performance, appearance, cost/comfort, ease of use,
durability.

OK, I'll forget the irony in future and just come out and say things
plainly... (The part you snipped.)

Besides, O&O *isn't* that far ahead of the competition. But I'd say
"THE C." *is* a huge distance from MS-MVPhood.

THE C

No he isn't. A few of of us doubt that you are a genuine Microsoft MVP!

--


Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
My status is MVP with Microsoft. O & O Defrag 11 is far above any
defrag software period! If you must use a freeware then try IOBit.com
for their defrag software. Are you saying MVP's are from the hood??
Make it a great day. ;-)

Al Falfa wrote:
THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... nothing compares to it...

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
... Nothing compares to it...

- Missing 'Ol?rin wrote:' attribution -
snip ... That's not to say that the comparison is necessarily
favourable ...

Ol?rin wrote:
... the point you completely miss is that it was your choice of the
phrase "nothing compares to it" that I was picking up on. ANY
defragger *can* be compared to O&O - that's not to say it's
anything like as good as it...

In colloquial English, it is common to omit the obvious.
'Nothing compares to it' means:
'nothing comes even close to matching insert attribute here of
it', where attribute could be any of (but not limited to):
safety, performance, appearance, cost/comfort, ease of use,
durability.

OK, I'll forget the irony in future and just come out and say things
plainly... (The part you snipped.)

Besides, O&O *isn't* that far ahead of the competition. But I'd say
"THE C." *is* a huge distance from MS-MVPhood.

THE C. [MS MVP] wrote:
My status is MVP with Microsoft.

Then, once mo prove it or stop making this claim.

O & O Defrag 11 is far above any
defrag software period! If you must use a freeware then try IOBit.com
for their defrag software.

Just now you were recommending the mysterious and unnamed free version of
Diskeeper (or "DiskKeeper")... C'est-à-dire, the one that isn't really free.
Or perhaps it's free to those like you who are "Microsoft MVP employees"...
You know, those with secret squirrel access to the confidential "direct MS
news server" for these groups that you've mentioned. The one that no "other"
MS-MVP has heard of. The one you seem to use via web-based access to the
group.

Are you saying MVP's are from the hood??

Stop deliberately misunderstanding and prevaricating.

Make it a great day. ;-)


Make yours an honest one.

snip