If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
"philo " wrote in message ... On 02/09/2014 07:29 PM, BillW50 wrote: IIRC version 4 introduced dosshell Yes I believe you are right or even a later version 4. And speaking about Dosshell, I heard only MS-DOS v4 sold in Europe included multitasking. And for some reason v5 didn't have it. I never had V5 as I went from 3.21 to 6.0. And I really liked Dosshell (I guess most people hated it). I used it a lot until I started using Windows 3.1. I think later versions of 6, MS dropped Dosshell. 4.01 was the only version of DOS released by Microsoft 4.0 never got out the door and I understand there was an OEM version 4.01a Yes I recall MS-DOS v4 wasn't around long and MS quickly released v5. MS-DOS v4 must be one of the rarest MS-DOS. Well probably not too many MS-DOS v1 around that I think of it. First version I used was 2.11. Next release was 5.O and it contained a newer version of dosshell I don't doubt that for a second. The still newer versions had dosshell but it might have been on a supplementary disk (I sure don't recall) Well I used all versions of MS-DOS v6. v6.0 definitely had it. And one of the later versions dropped it. Can't recall now which one of the v6 versions that happened in though. If I had to guess, I would say v6.0 had it and gone from the rest. I loved dosshell and now that I use Linux I use the similar...Midnight Commander Almost the same as Norton Commander for DOS...as a matter of fact...Norton Commander came out first...that was back in the day when Norton produced top-or-the-line utilities! I too liked it a lot. There was some compatibility problems I recall. But it was more like don't try this with this program, etc. When you learned what didn't work with so and so program, it was really nice. No version of DOS was ever able to multi-task unless one used a rare third party application...which was a precursor to Windows. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DESQview Oh yes! I remember DESQview. No I am sure I read it right years ago. They said there was a multitasking DOS v4 only available in Europe. I'll never forget it. Although I never was able to verify this statement. OTOH: The earlier CP/M could multi-task you could bring up another terminal in the same way you can do in Linux (or any *nix) Yes I remember this too. But it wasn't the standard CP/M. I forgot exactly what it was called now. I also recall it was very expensive. The last version I ran was CP/M 3+. Which was the same as 3.1 I believe. Then Gary Kildall pulled the plug on CP/M. -- Bill Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Windows Live Mail 2009 v14 Centrino Core2 Duo T7400 2.16 GHz - 4GB - Windows 7 Home SP1 |
Ads |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:49:09 -0700, Ken Blake wrote:
My current computer has a floppy drive. I just checked how old the computer is, and to my surprise it's five years old. It has a floppy drive. As best I can remember, I've never used its floppy drive. And except for a handful that I've kept (don't ask me why; there's really no good reason) I don't have any floppy disks left either. My next computer (probably in the next year or two) won't have a floppy drive either. Your next computer may not even have an optical drive. The last two laptops that I bought didn't have them. -- Char Jackson |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
"BillW50" wrote in message ... "philo " wrote in message ... The still newer versions had dosshell but it might have been on a supplementary disk (I sure don't recall) Well I used all versions of MS-DOS v6. v6.0 definitely had it. And one of the later versions dropped it. Can't recall now which one of the v6 versions that happened in though. If I had to guess, I would say v6.0 had it and gone from the rest. You are right! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS_Shell I loved dosshell and now that I use Linux I use the similar...Midnight Commander Almost the same as Norton Commander for DOS...as a matter of fact...Norton Commander came out first...that was back in the day when Norton produced top-or-the-line utilities! I too liked it a lot. There was some compatibility problems I recall. But it was more like don't try this with this program, etc. When you learned what didn't work with so and so program, it was really nice. No version of DOS was ever able to multi-task unless one used a rare third party application...which was a precursor to Windows. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DESQview Oh yes! I remember DESQview. No I am sure I read it right years ago. They said there was a multitasking DOS v4 only available in Europe. I'll never forget it. Although I never was able to verify this statement. Here is the near-mythical multitasking MS-DOS 4.00. http://www.os2museum.com/wp/?p=1769 -- Bill Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Windows Live Mail 2009 v14 Centrino Core2 Duo T7400 2.16 GHz - 4GB - Windows 7 Home SP1 |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On 02/10/2014 05:58 AM, BillW50 wrote:
snip[ Oh yes! I remember DESQview. No I am sure I read it right years ago. They said there was a multitasking DOS v4 only available in Europe. I'll never forget it. Although I never was able to verify this statement. Here is the near-mythical multitasking MS-DOS 4.00. http://www.os2museum.com/wp/?p=1769 WOW I never heard of that. They must have had problems with it or everyone would have used it. found this http://virtuallyfun.superglobalmegacorp.com/?p=2931 You can go to that page and where it says HOSTED you can go to jDosbox and download an emulated version of Dos4 and try it |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On 02/10/2014 12:34 AM, pjp wrote:
ybe 4/5 of them have any scratches on them at all. The floppies have been equally well treated. On occassion over last few years (less so now with USB & cd/dvds being able to boot a pc) I've needed a floppy. I go to box and find it's not unusual for 19 out of 20 (maybe more) are toast. They can't be read or even be reformatted properly. Sometimes it says they are but won't work anyway. Only thing they're any good for anymore is for starting fires, same as my mid 70's reel-to-reel tapes. Also a pain it's not so easy to create a DOS based boot floppy anymore since 98SE. I have a very old Dell laptop (Pentium 133Mz) with a working floppy disk drive I've kept just for this purpose among others. Well, if you even need a floppy boot disk image bootdisk.com still exists I keep quite a few vintage machines here |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:17:20 -0800, Gene E. Bloch
wrote: On 2/09/2014, Ken Blake posted: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:58:42 +0100, "s|b" wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 11:28:14 -0700, Ken Blake wrote: Yes, but... How does that differ from my number 3? "or in an external USB case." That's not the same as a USB adapter. I thought you would say that. g Yes, you're right, but to me, it's a very minor point. Not even minor, IMO. Just a tiny variant of the same idea Yep! My point exactly (I just said it slightly more gently than you did). g |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:59:38 -0600, Char Jackson
wrote: My next computer (probably in the next year or two) won't have a floppy drive either. Your next computer may not even have an optical drive. The last two laptops that I bought didn't have them. Laptops often don't have them to save space and weight. My last two laptops didn't have them either. But when I say "my next computer," I'm talking about a desktop. And even if desktops don't come with them, I will almost certainly again get a custom-built computer, and I will very likely choose to have one. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:11:35 -0600, "R. C. White"
wrote: Hi, Ken. My next computer (probably in the next year or two) won't have a floppy drive either. As I think I've said here before, neither of my last two motherboards has even had an FDD connector. And this latest one that I'm using now does not even have an IDE or PATA connector, so I had to retire my 2 DVD burners and buy a new SATA version. (For a decade or two, I used only SCSI HDDs and optical drives; my mobos never had SCSI connectors and I always used Adaptec adapter cards.) Maybe they call it HARDware because it's hard to keep up with the advances in technology. ;^} LOL! "Ken Blake" wrote in message news My next computer (probably in the next year or two) won't have a floppy drive either. So, speaking of what things are called, do you call this top-posting or bottom-posting? G |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:53:55 -0600, philo* wrote:
On 02/09/2014 05:34 PM, BillW50 wrote: "C Anybody interested in purchasing 100 copies of MS-DOS v4 (French Edition) in 720kb 3.5 floppies (still sealed)? If you are lucky, 6% of them still might work. :-( I bet it's version 4.01 If it's 4.0 you have a real collectors item as I think 4.01 was the only "4" released. Nope! G See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS-DOS#Versions and you'll see there was a 4.0. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:59:44 -0600, philo* wrote:
Well, if you even need a floppy boot disk image bootdisk.com still exists Is it still Plato's web site? I remember Plato very well--from newsgroups, and we corresponded by e-mail a little too. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:23:21 -0800, Gene E. Bloch
wrote: On 2/09/2014, Ken Blake posted: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 15:47:42 -0500, Paul wrote: Kingston makes a 1TB USB key. Only $1500 CDN. What a steal. http://www.canadacomputers.com/produ...item_id=063602 Amazon.com sells it for *only* $1285.16 g But they also have a U32 Shadow? 1TB External 2.5-in USB 3.0 Mini Portable Hard Drive for $94.95. It's not much larger physically (4.9 x 0.5 x 2.9 inches), but it's an actual rotating drive, not a flash drive. I still have a couple of CF hard drive cards. They're cute :-) I'm not at all familiar with these. What does "CF" stand for. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:59:38 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:49:09 -0700, Ken Blake wrote: My current computer has a floppy drive. I just checked how old the computer is, and to my surprise it's five years old. It has a floppy drive. As best I can remember, I've never used its floppy drive. And except for a handful that I've kept (don't ask me why; there's really no good reason) I don't have any floppy disks left either. My next computer (probably in the next year or two) won't have a floppy drive either. Your next computer may not even have an optical drive. The last two laptops that I bought didn't have them. In this new age of technology, optical media is being used less and less and for good reason: it's unreliable. People have come to refer to USB keys and direct downloads. Hell, even Blu-Ray isn't succeeding as well as people expected knowing that you can simply download the video you want to watch from iTunes or your cable box. -- Silver Slimer GNU/Linux is a duct-taped form of Communism |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Moving a healthy volume from one laptop to another
On 02/10/2014 11:19 AM, Ken Blake wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:59:44 -0600, philo wrote: Well, if you even need a floppy boot disk image bootdisk.com still exists Is it still Plato's web site? I remember Plato very well--from newsgroups, and we corresponded by e-mail a little too. I used to talk to Plato on 24hoursupport.helpdesk maybe ten years ago. I even sent him a few dollars for his very beneficial website... I do not know if he is still running it or if it's someone else. It's been a long time since I've needed a Win98 boot floppy but I see the site has been updated as it has info for USB boot sticks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|