If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
OAuth2?
VanguardLH wrote:
T wrote: A pay version that did not support OAuth2 until last December. Where did you see they did not add OAUTH2 until last December (aka December 2019)? Their blog to which I linked that announced they added OAUTH2 was dated back in January 2016. Not 3 months ago, but over 4 *YEARS* ago. For more evidence, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bat!#History Version 7.1 released Jan 2016 added OAUTH2 support. These guys do not look like the can be counted on to fix things. Supposition without evidence. You're making up excuses to qualify your decision to cease investigation. If I am going to pay you for your software, you'd better fix your sh*t and do it in a timely manner! More suppositions without any evidence. More FUD. First, visit their forums to see who is responding there. Then, if you buy the program, report back after you have tried working with them to resolve an issue. I'd suggest first hitting their forums with your inquiries rather than waiting for responses back from their technical support, especially if you're asking how to use the product rather than reporting something not working with it. It's obvious you don't want to spend the time to test The Bat! as a solution or spend the money on it (for your copy to do the testing although you'll pass that cost to customers later if it is a solution). So, just say so. Stop condemning without proof, and just admit to your bias. I don't have any trouble getting my customers to buy software if it is under $100.00. Are these the same customers that wouldn't spend a dime on business-grade backup software, like Macrium Reflect, and why you were still trying to use free Cobian for them? firmly_sitting_on_hands |
Ads |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
OAuth2?
On 2020-03-27 04:45, VanguardLH wrote:
Where did you see they did not add OAUTH2 until last December (aka December 2019)? Their blog to which I linked that announced they added OAUTH2 was dated back in January 2016. Not 3 months ago, but over 4 *YEARS* ago. I misread it. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
OAuth2?
On 2020-03-27 04:45, VanguardLH wrote:
Are these the same customers that wouldn't spend a dime on business-grade backup software, like Macrium Reflect, and why you were still trying to use free Cobian for them? Same ones. Macrium is a bad deal. It uses proprietary archives. And no OAuth2 support last I checked. These customers would pay for it if I told then to do so. The reason for Cobian is that it uses non-proprietary archives that can be read with any file manager from any operating system. No bull**** when you are trying to recover a system. And no bull**** about your version being too out of date and you have to buy the current version to get your stuff back and the current version won't read your stuff because it is so out of date and you have to send it to us to get it back, for an additional fee, of course and guess you will be down for another two weeks, but only if you pay for FedEx overnight. I would love to find a sub for Cobian, but have not so far. With all the wrappers I have written for Cobian, it does ot look like it would be too hard just to finish the job myself, but then the gate of hell would open and gobble me up. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
OAuth2?
On 2020-03-27 04:45, VanguardLH wrote:
More suppositions without any evidence. More FUD. They are not cross platform, so I don't care. Also Thunderbird is a wonderful product. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
OAuth2?
T wrote:
On 2020-03-27 04:45, VanguardLH wrote: More suppositions without any evidence. More FUD. They are not cross platform, so I don't care. Also Thunderbird is a wonderful product. Not being cross-platform is not cause for your claims they don't support their product. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
OAuth2?
On 2020-03-27 17:07, VanguardLH wrote:
T wrote: On 2020-03-27 04:45, VanguardLH wrote: More suppositions without any evidence. More FUD. They are not cross platform, so I don't care. Also Thunderbird is a wonderful product. Not being cross-platform is not cause for your claims they don't support their product. Of course. My claim was based on the year that I got wrong on OAuth2 support, not on them not being cross platform. My considerable years of experience is that paid software does not take requests from their customers. It is pretty much "as is". On the other hand, one of the Thunderbird developers threw together a special version of Thunderbird to help me with an imap migration problem |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|