If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
"Leythos" wrote in message news On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:26:03 -0500, Tom wrote: "kurttrail" wrote in message ... Leythos is a MS Partner. Oh, I didn't know that; so I guess that is why he is hog tied into making conformists posts here!. How could you miss it in all this time. I've stated it several times in the threads you were involved it. In any of your post to me, you never stated you are an MS partner. All you have made reference to me is how the MS OEM site makes other rules regarding what isn't stated in the EULA. Anyone can go to that site and read it, so, that isn't anything proof positive to your position with MS. But, after now know, it is all revealing anyway. What makes you so remarkable that I would read *all* of your posts anyway, related to others to whom you reply? Oh, and being a MS partner does not make one conform, if that were the case I would no be posting from a Linux workstation using PAN as my Usenet client. How in the effin hell would I know that you are using a linux based email client to post here? Do you think I actually look at the properties of everyone's messages to see what client they are using, if so, you are an arrogant ass? Even if I did look at the properties, how does that inform me that you are a MS partner (again, an arrogant ass!) Your understanding of conformity is nothing more than lies you posts on how others should make understandings of what the EULA doesn't say, that is what I have been replying to you about anyway. |
Ads |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
Pop wrote:
Hey kurtrattail, Didn't you just ask me to prove you're a rude, trolling type? And then ignore the questions I asked, knowing what I could come back with? What you talking about Willis? Hasn't it been a couple of weeks since we last crossed paths? I can repost your history list if you'd like. It's up to you. You are an imbecile and a flameout just waiting to happen. You need to just clench your sphincters, go back under your dark, dank bridge, and reattach your lips to the sewer pipe, where you're happier. I'll bet you also think it's OK to pirate software, download copyrighted music, Actually, if you look closely at the Music industries suit, they aren't going after the downloaders, they are going after those that make their collections available to others to download. In other words, those that are distributing music to others. tap into a cable TV box, unscramble TV signals off the air, and think seriously about killing anyone that looks sideways at you, don't you? Get a diet going! The extra 15 pounds I'm carrying at the moment ain't gonna kill me, and in fact, I usually feel better with a little extra weight than being at my target weight for my height and build, and much less susceptible to colds & other viruses. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
Pop wrote:
Leythos, You do know of course, that you are feeding a troll, right? You do know that you just did what you claim Leythos is did? The best thing to do with bass turds like that is starve it (the troll) to death with silence. And telling people to do that in a public forum instead by private channels, also feeds the troll. It really bugs them to no end and usually there will be a spate of foulness spread around, and then they drift into whatever stupor it is they return to in the darkness. You would know about being in a stupor! I sometimes go at them too, Self-admitted hypocrite! when they succeed in getting someone to respond more than once or twice, becuase it makes them all the madder when I won't bite and get mad back at it. LOL! I have begged people in the past, not to respond to me, for their own good. I mean, the toll. It leads a solitary life of mental confinement so pity it, but don't ever feed it. Except when you are being hypocritical, like you! Especially at night g. LOL! Whatever. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#214
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
Pop wrote:
... course I'm not so arrogant or delusional ... Really? That's in direct contradiction to something you said about two weeks ago, I think it was. Really? Please quote, because I wasn't saying I'm not arrogant, I said I'm not "so arrogant." But please feel free to quote what I said in the past that you think is "in direct contradiction" with my statement of not being "so arrogant." -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
Leythos wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:52:28 -0500, Tom wrote: Your understanding of conformity is nothing more than lies you posts on how others should make understandings of what the EULA doesn't say, that is what I have been replying to you about anyway. I love you too tom The drugs must be kicking in! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
"Leythos" wrote in message news On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:52:28 -0500, Tom wrote: Your understanding of conformity is nothing more than lies you posts on how others should make understandings of what the EULA doesn't say, that is what I have been replying to you about anyway. I love you too tom I noticed you snipped out the point I made where you never posted anything to me regarding your position of you being an MS partner, how quaint! |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
Leythos wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:05:49 -0500, kurttrail wrote: Leythos wrote: On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:52:28 -0500, Tom wrote: Your understanding of conformity is nothing more than lies you posts on how others should make understandings of what the EULA doesn't say, that is what I have been replying to you about anyway. I love you too tom The drugs must be kicking in! Dang it, I couldn't help but laugh that time - ouch, dang, ouch. Sorry. I know how much it hurts to laugh with damaged ribs! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#218
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
"Leythos" wrote in message news On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:25:14 -0500, Tom wrote: "Leythos" wrote in message news On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:52:28 -0500, Tom wrote: Your understanding of conformity is nothing more than lies you posts on how others should make understandings of what the EULA doesn't say, that is what I have been replying to you about anyway. I love you too tom I noticed you snipped out the point I made where you never posted anything to me regarding your position of you being an MS partner, how quaint! I tend to not reply to segments that were what I consider posted in rude manner, and sometimes that means I also snip over parts that I just figured where like the previous. In order to answer your question, I never addressed the posts to you specifically, I just figured that since you were in the thread, active, and I was replying to posts that you were also commenting about in that same active thread, that you would have seen my reply also. When reading usenet posts, unless you've kill filed me, my post would show up in the thread like all the others posting in those threads. It's sometimes hard to follow a thread while just skipping (ignoring) posts. I tend to read all the posts in a thread that I'm active in, even if I don't reply and even if I don't like the poster. Then don't figure (assume) that because I was active in a thread to mean that I read every posts, that is arrogance. If I got into a thread on a specific post, any replies by me are typically in repsonse to what I posted beforehand. Sometime I do read other posts made by other, to see if there is more info, but I don't read them all, and I only reply if I feel it is pertinent to what I was discussing. So, are we good now? I am always good, and happy; you just need to stop making assumptions, and take words for what they are, and not what you think they mean (ask if you're unsure). |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
428 messages just went bye-bye!
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:16:16 -0500, "kurttrail" wrote: Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea -- Top 10 Conservative Idiots: http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/ |
#220
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:20:15 GMT, Semper wrote:
I come to the newsgroups to try to learn something but instead like in threads like this get not what I came here for. What I see is a lot of smartassed comments that are completely off topic and a ****ing match to see who can post the most verbose discourse of utter nonsense. Yes I have filtered out Kurt's comments but I did so to cut down on the lengthy threads. I do get to read all the replies from everyone else Filter everyone who replies to either idiot for 15 days. That's what I do. -- Top 10 Conservative Idiots: http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/ |
#221
|
|||
|
|||
Rules about copies of XP?
Paul Knudsen wrote:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:20:15 GMT, Semper wrote: I come to the newsgroups to try to learn something but instead like in threads like this get not what I came here for. What I see is a lot of smartassed comments that are completely off topic and a ****ing match to see who can post the most verbose discourse of utter nonsense. Yes I have filtered out Kurt's comments but I did so to cut down on the lengthy threads. I do get to read all the replies from everyone else Filter everyone who replies to either idiot for 15 days. That's what I do. Please do. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Windows Server 2003 - Shared Fax - Long Distance Dialing Rules | Spencer Morley | Printing and Faxing with Windows XP | 5 | May 16th 05 10:07 PM |
Windows XP and DOS commands | Lexus | General XP issues or comments | 13 | April 28th 05 11:02 AM |
Cannot print multiple copies | daveg | Printing and Faxing with Windows XP | 0 | January 26th 05 06:33 PM |
Another question about "Rules" | David Schrader | Customizing Windows XP | 5 | January 25th 05 02:44 AM |
Fax and Calling Card dialing rules | e6bwhiz | Printing and Faxing with Windows XP | 6 | September 22nd 04 10:20 AM |