A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » General XP issues or comments
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rude replies



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old June 6th 05, 07:41 PM
Neil UK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So admit it then, Sonny Jim. Go home to Mama.
--
Neil UK


"kurttrail" wrote:

Larry wrote:
You tell 'em, Neil. I'm too mad.


Admitting your problem is the first step on the road toward recovery.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"



Ads
  #17  
Old June 6th 05, 07:46 PM
John Eddy [MSFT]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Neil UK" wrote in message
...
| As a relatively new subscriber to this newsgroup, I wish to express my
| disgust that one or two people are replying to questions that have been
posed
| by persons who are in difficulties by writing insulting and useless
replies
| that do not help the person who posed the original queries. I myself am
not
| in any way an expert: but when I see people who hold themselves out to
be
| experts indulging in personal and scatological abuse of others, I say
ENOUGH!
|
| Recently a person who calls himself Kurtrail and another who is called
David
| Candy have, in my opinion, fallen below the standards that I believe
should
| apply to a zone that should be dedicated to the pursuit of constructive
| excellence. This site should not be the ground for the dissemination of
| political or self-aggrandizing opinions.
|
| Nor have we been helped by the fact that it now appears that two
different
| people are posting using the handle "Kelly". There is only one Kelly,
so
| please will the spoofer get off the line. I assume that those who host
this
| site will take notice of my remarks and take steps to regulate matters
so
| that only constructive and not DE-structive messages are posted.

As for a Kelly name. There is nothing that states you must use a unique
handle. The word
"Kelly" can be a first name or a last name. Try a situation where three
people in a NG call
themselves "Dave". If you are unsure, look at their headers to tell them
apart.


I do know how to separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to
handles.
I didn't need you to educate me. Being 70 years old doesn't make me an
idiot.
Rather the opposite I should think. I still say that there should only one
"Kelly" as there is only one "Neil UK".


If you wish to complain about any particular user, I'd ask that you use the
Contact Us link at the bottom of the page you are using, or at the bottom of
http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx.

As for people posting with 'duplicate' names, there isn't going to be
anything to be done about that. One Kelly is not trying to spoof another.
Unique logon names are not required in a Usenet newsgroup, which this is,
regardless of what client you are using.

John Eddy
Microsoft Newsgroups Administrator


  #18  
Old June 6th 05, 07:49 PM
Neil UK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gee, I am so terrified!

Get the basic point and don't tell me I spelled something wrong. Answer me
right now: is it GOOD or is it BAD to sneer and use insulting and bad
language in response to the queries of the afflicted?
--
Neil UK


"David H. Lipman" wrote:

From: "Neil UK"

| Dave
|
| Please, please, don't come over as arrogant. I am sure your family wouldn't
| recognise the way you are responding to my letter of complaint. I don't
| understand what you mean when you say "Welcome to newsnet". This zone is
| supposed to be dedicated to being constructive. Do you think you have been
| constructive in your response to me?
|
| I do know how to separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to handles.
| I didn't need you to educate me. Being 70 years old doesn't make me an idiot.
| Rather the opposite I should think. I still say that there should only one
| "Kelly" as there is only one "Neil UK".
| --
| Neil UK

Neil please don't come over as a naive child !

There is *much* you need to learn and I am not your teacher. Nor is anyone of the *many*
volunteers who spend their time helping those with Windows problems.

I didn't type "Welcome to newsnet", I wrote "Welcome to Usenet". Usenet is one of the
oldest Internet functions. It is older than http servers.

Back the Kelly name concept. You have to adapt to the system. The system will not adapt to
you. You also must be an adult and handle sarcasm and criticism.

Now to some facts...

This is not a "Zone". This is a Microsoft provided "News Group" to assist those with
problems with Windows XP.

Usenet is as inter-connected system of servers that share News Group hierarchies Microsoft
owns the hiearchy microsoft.*. Other notable hierarchies are; alt.* , alt.binaries.* ,
comp.*, rec.*, and the list goes on. There are tens of thousands of Usenet News Group. The
microsoft.* hierarchy is but a small portion of the entire User's Network (ergo, Usenet)
system.

The "proper" was to access News Groups is via a News Client. Is uses a network protocol
called Network News Transport Protocol (NNTP). Just like you access a web server via a
Universal Resource Locator (URL) in the form of http://web_site_address/ there is a URL for
News Servers and News Grups news://news_server_name/news_group_name

The URL for this News Group is;
news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsof...dowsxp.general

If you were to click on the above URL it will take your default News Client to the Microsoft
News Server and this News Group. Most likely your default News Server is Outlook Express.

Microsoft also provides, for the newbie, a web browser front end to the Microsft News
Groups. It is for the intelectually challenged individual, those who don't know how to
"properly" access Usenet News Groups.

The following URL will take your default browser to this News Group.

http://support.microsoft.com/newsgro...-us;newsgroups

Now when I said "Welcome to Usenet" it was a sarcastic reply to indicate that your
expectations were too high and you need to go with the flow.

I don't know what your original problem was but if you don't drop that attitude of yours you
will not be helped and the sharks will smell blood in the Usenet waters and you will be
eaten alive.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm



  #19  
Old June 6th 05, 07:58 PM
kurttrail
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Neil UK wrote:
Dear Mr K**tr**l


http://microscum.com/kurtdevil.gif

You may address me as kurtdevil!

Is there some reason that you feel driven to write insulting and
abusive material?


Nope. I just want to.

It must go back to an unhappy childhood, I suppose.


LOL! If I had you as a father, perhaps, however my old man was a man
with a big set of balls, not a pretentious little pansy like you.

But why don't you cut out the "***" and write the words out in full
English? I assume it because you know that someone would cut out your
reply. Cowardly!


LOL!

http://microscum.com/censored/

I'm no stranger to being censored. I censor my own words for the little
brats left to surf the net without parental supervision.

I am not a pansy: details of my heterosexual background can be
supplied (though not on this site).


LOL! It figures you would misunderstand me alluding to your affected
effeminate nature as meaning I'm calling you gay! Your a senile
homophobic pansy!

But if all you can do is to smear
those who object to your remarks, then you have no place in what is
called an Expert Zone for the discussions of problems involving the
resolutions of XP problems.


LOL! "Expert Zone!"

Because you promoted it in these very pages, I have seen your
polemical website. It may surprise you but I do not disagree with
many of the points you make on that site. What I do disagree with is
your immediate snarling attitude on this particular website. The
words "Up" and "Grow" leap unbidden to my lips.


This isn't a website, it just appears that way to those that use the
dumbed down web access. If you polled all of the regulars around here,
most, like around 90% in not more, would vote to ban the web interface
to this group.

"Up" yours! And "Grow" some balls, Neil. There is a very long
tradition of flaming in Newsgroups. And if you can't stand the heat,
maybe you would fare better someplace else, like an old age home.

Go and lie in a darkened room and keep taking the tablets.


I'm a heretic and gave up on the Ten Commandments long ago!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"


  #20  
Old June 6th 05, 07:58 PM
David Candy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

is it GOOD or is it BAD to sneer and use insulting and bad=20
language in response to the queries of the afflicted


But this is only in your head. It didn't happen.

--=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/...nt/001075.html
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"Neil UK" wrote in message =
...
Gee, I am so terrified!=20
=20
Get the basic point and don't tell me I spelled something wrong. =

Answer me=20
right now: is it GOOD or is it BAD to sneer and use insulting and bad=20
language in response to the queries of the afflicted?=20
--=20
Neil UK
=20
=20
"David H. Lipman" wrote:
=20
From: "Neil UK"
=20
| Dave
|
| Please, please, don't come over as arrogant. I am sure your family =

wouldn't
| recognise the way you are responding to my letter of complaint. I =

don't
| understand what you mean when you say "Welcome to newsnet". This =

zone is
| supposed to be dedicated to being constructive. Do you think you =

have been
| constructive in your response to me?
|
| I do know how to separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes =

to handles.
| I didn't need you to educate me. Being 70 years old doesn't make =

me an idiot.
| Rather the opposite I should think. I still say that there should =

only one
| "Kelly" as there is only one "Neil UK".
| --=20
| Neil UK
=20
Neil please don't come over as a naive child !
=20
There is *much* you need to learn and I am not your teacher. Nor is =

anyone of the *many*
volunteers who spend their time helping those with Windows problems.
=20
I didn't type "Welcome to newsnet", I wrote "Welcome to Usenet". =

Usenet is one of the
oldest Internet functions. It is older than http servers.
=20
Back the Kelly name concept. You have to adapt to the system. The =

system will not adapt to
you. You also must be an adult and handle sarcasm and criticism.
=20
Now to some facts...
=20
This is not a "Zone". This is a Microsoft provided "News Group" to =

assist those with
problems with Windows XP.
=20
Usenet is as inter-connected system of servers that share News Group =

hierarchies Microsoft
owns the hiearchy microsoft.*. Other notable hierarchies are; =

alt.* , alt.binaries.* ,
comp.*, rec.*, and the list goes on. There are tens of thousands of =

Usenet News Group. The
microsoft.* hierarchy is but a small portion of the entire User's =

Network (ergo, Usenet)
system.
=20
The "proper" was to access News Groups is via a News Client. Is =

uses a network protocol
called Network News Transport Protocol (NNTP). Just like you access =

a web server via a
Universal Resource Locator (URL) in the form of =

http://web_site_address/ there is a URL for
News Servers and News Grups news://news_server_name/news_group_name
=20
The URL for this News Group is;
news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsof...dowsxp.general
=20
If you were to click on the above URL it will take your default News =

Client to the Microsoft
News Server and this News Group. Most likely your default News =

Server is Outlook Express.
=20
Microsoft also provides, for the newbie, a web browser front end to =

the Microsft News
Groups. It is for the intelectually challenged individual, those =

who don't know how to
"properly" access Usenet News Groups.
=20
The following URL will take your default browser to this News Group.
=20
=

http://support.microsoft.com/newsgro...up=3Dmicrosof=
t.public.windowsxp.general&SLCID=3DUS&ICP=3DGSS3&s d=3DGN&id=3Dfh;en-us;ne=
wsgroups
=20
Now when I said "Welcome to Usenet" it was a sarcastic reply to =

indicate that your
expectations were too high and you need to go with the flow.
=20
I don't know what your original problem was but if you don't drop =

that attitude of yours you
will not be helped and the sharks will smell blood in the Usenet =

waters and you will be
eaten alive.
=20
--=20
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
=20
=20


  #21  
Old June 6th 05, 08:02 PM
Jone Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frankly no one is interested in your opinion, and most of us are now
recognizing you for what you are, which is a troll, and will ignore anything
more you post.

"Neil UK" wrote in message
...
Dear Mr K**tr**l



  #22  
Old June 6th 05, 08:02 PM
Canopus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Neil UK on 06/06/2005 wrote:

As a relatively new subscriber to this newsgroup, I wish to express
my disgust that one or two people are replying to questions that have
been posed by persons who are in difficulties by writing insulting
and useless replies that do not help the person who posed the
original queries.


Greetings David,

....and before you pull the age trip on me I have to say I am not too
far off your age ;-)

Although I agree with your sentiments over rudeness to people asking
sensible questions please try to understand the following. The vast
proportion of Usenet is anarchistic, there is no one who can control
it. There are some newsgroups through some servers that are heavily
moderated to the extent that you may not see the question that you
posted for a few days...the more moderated and controlled the less
usable they become. The thing is that for an anarchistic environment
things work pretty well on the whole. Now about trouble makers and
rude people who rile you enough to make you angry etc.:

As you are posting via web you have very little control over them.
Best to get a good newsreader client (I use XanaNews, but, most are
functional) and with that you can if necessary block or filter users
and content as you see fit. Watch out for Trolls too, they will bait
you at first gently maybe or figure out your weakness just to wind you
up and create arguments. Normally they are sociopathic and attention
seeking, but, often intelligent as well.

There is no way of really stopping people using newsgroups as even if
they can be banned or warned they can always re-enter under a different
alias. There is no international law, and probably never be one, to
stop unstable, insane or just rude people using the Internet. The
bottom line is to not get wound up, not concentrate upon the Bozos, get
a good newsreader and learn how to filter etc.

Don't blame God for the rain, take an umbrella.

Rob (and I bet there are quite a few other Robs too :-))

  #23  
Old June 6th 05, 08:04 PM
Neil UK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for the balanced response. I learned something new. But when I see
people responding arrogantly (not you), I will reply. Someone has to stand up
for decency and constructive assistance.
--
Neil UK


"Leythos" wrote:

In article ,
says...
Dave

Please, please, don't come over as arrogant. I am sure your family wouldn't
recognise the way you are responding to my letter of complaint. I don't
understand what you mean when you say "Welcome to newsnet". This zone is
supposed to be dedicated to being constructive. Do you think you have been
constructive in your response to me?


Neil, I've been on Usenet since the early 80's, and it gets worse every
year as more an more home users join the Internet age. The way that
Usenet works is that ANYONE can post ANYTHING and that it gets spread
around the world. The only thing that makes the MS groups different than
other groups is that MS has it's own Usenet servers which feed other
Usenet servers - and many of the MS groups are monitored by select
members of the team and some posts are filtered based on content.

In most groups, there are no moderators to filter posts, no admins, no
ability for us to cancel posts from lamers, etc....

The only thing that makes a "Zone" anything is the title of the group
and the quality of the members that frequent it.

I do know how to separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to handles.
I didn't need you to educate me. Being 70 years old doesn't make me an idiot.
Rather the opposite I should think. I still say that there should only one
"Kelly" as there is only one "Neil UK".


This isn't going to happen - in Usenet it's not the posters name that
means anything, it's the message. You could have 50 people using "Neil
UK" and there is nothing you can do about it. If you connect to Usenet
through a Usenet feed and not a web interface you will find that it's a
lot easier to manage posts/replies/identities.

Just remember, it's not the user/name, it's the message that makes the
difference - anyone can post under any name at any time.


--
--

remove 999 in order to email me

  #24  
Old June 6th 05, 08:06 PM
David Candy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

web interface=20

In part this is what the thread he complains about is about. Of which no =
person seeking assistance was even mentioned after the first level =
replies and certainly not abused. Also the original poster was not =
afflicted.
--=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/...nt/001075.html
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"kurttrail" wrote in message =
...
Neil UK wrote:
Dear Mr K**tr**l

=20
http://microscum.com/kurtdevil.gif
=20
You may address me as kurtdevil!
=20
Is there some reason that you feel driven to write insulting and
abusive material?

=20
Nope. I just want to.
=20
It must go back to an unhappy childhood, I suppose.

=20
LOL! If I had you as a father, perhaps, however my old man was a man=20
with a big set of balls, not a pretentious little pansy like you.
=20
But why don't you cut out the "***" and write the words out in full
English? I assume it because you know that someone would cut out =

your
reply. Cowardly!

=20
LOL!
=20
http://microscum.com/censored/
=20
I'm no stranger to being censored. I censor my own words for the =

little=20
brats left to surf the net without parental supervision.
=20
I am not a pansy: details of my heterosexual background can be
supplied (though not on this site).

=20
LOL! It figures you would misunderstand me alluding to your affected=20
effeminate nature as meaning I'm calling you gay! Your a senile=20
homophobic pansy!
=20
But if all you can do is to smear
those who object to your remarks, then you have no place in what is
called an Expert Zone for the discussions of problems involving the
resolutions of XP problems.

=20
LOL! "Expert Zone!"
=20
Because you promoted it in these very pages, I have seen your
polemical website. It may surprise you but I do not disagree with
many of the points you make on that site. What I do disagree with is
your immediate snarling attitude on this particular website. The
words "Up" and "Grow" leap unbidden to my lips.

=20
This isn't a website, it just appears that way to those that use the=20
dumbed down web access. If you polled all of the regulars around =

here,=20
most, like around 90% in not more, would vote to ban the web interface =


to this group.
=20
"Up" yours! And "Grow" some balls, Neil. There is a very long=20
tradition of flaming in Newsgroups. And if you can't stand the heat,=20
maybe you would fare better someplace else, like an old age home.
=20
Go and lie in a darkened room and keep taking the tablets.

=20
I'm a heretic and gave up on the Ten Commandments long ago!
=20
--=20
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"=20
=20
=20


  #25  
Old June 6th 05, 08:10 PM
Steve N.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Neil UK wrote:

Thanks for the balanced response. I learned something new. But when I see
people responding arrogantly (not you), I will reply. Someone has to stand up
for decency and constructive assistance.


You'll just get flamed for it (as you already have), generating more of
the same stuff you're objecting to.

Steve
  #26  
Old June 6th 05, 08:11 PM
David Candy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Although I agree with your sentiments over rudeness to people asking
sensible questions ..."

Didn't happen. He is complaining about people, who seek to make the =
"afflicted" life's very hard, being abused for their abusive behaviour.=20

The moron seems to think that swearing is a crime but denying fixes to =
people is a good thing.

--=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/...nt/001075.html
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"Canopus" wrote in message =
...
Neil UK on 06/06/2005 wrote:
=20
As a relatively new subscriber to this newsgroup, I wish to express
my disgust that one or two people are replying to questions that =

have
been posed by persons who are in difficulties by writing insulting
and useless replies that do not help the person who posed the
original queries.

=20
Greetings David,
=20
...and before you pull the age trip on me I have to say I am not too
far off your age ;-)
=20
Although I agree with your sentiments over rudeness to people asking
sensible questions please try to understand the following. The vast
proportion of Usenet is anarchistic, there is no one who can control
it. There are some newsgroups through some servers that are heavily
moderated to the extent that you may not see the question that you
posted for a few days...the more moderated and controlled the less
usable they become. The thing is that for an anarchistic environment
things work pretty well on the whole. Now about trouble makers and
rude people who rile you enough to make you angry etc.:
=20
As you are posting via web you have very little control over them.
Best to get a good newsreader client (I use XanaNews, but, most are
functional) and with that you can if necessary block or filter users
and content as you see fit. Watch out for Trolls too, they will bait
you at first gently maybe or figure out your weakness just to wind you
up and create arguments. Normally they are sociopathic and attention
seeking, but, often intelligent as well.
=20
There is no way of really stopping people using newsgroups as even if
they can be banned or warned they can always re-enter under a =

different
alias. There is no international law, and probably never be one, to
stop unstable, insane or just rude people using the Internet. The
bottom line is to not get wound up, not concentrate upon the Bozos, =

get
a good newsreader and learn how to filter etc.
=20
Don't blame God for the rain, take an umbrella.
=20
Rob (and I bet there are quite a few other Robs too :-))
=20


  #27  
Old June 6th 05, 08:13 PM
Neil UK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dear Mr Eddy

I do appreciate the fact that you are taking the time to address the issues
I have raised. I don't at this time see the link you mention for complaining.
I have already complained in detail. If you can't find the people concerned,
that's your problem.

I appreciate what has been said about people using the same name: it just
doesn't sit well with me. Change the system, I say. One name one contributor!
--
Neil UK


"John Eddy [MSFT]" wrote:

"Neil UK" wrote in message
...
| As a relatively new subscriber to this newsgroup, I wish to express my
| disgust that one or two people are replying to questions that have been
posed
| by persons who are in difficulties by writing insulting and useless
replies
| that do not help the person who posed the original queries. I myself am
not
| in any way an expert: but when I see people who hold themselves out to
be
| experts indulging in personal and scatological abuse of others, I say
ENOUGH!
|
| Recently a person who calls himself Kurtrail and another who is called
David
| Candy have, in my opinion, fallen below the standards that I believe
should
| apply to a zone that should be dedicated to the pursuit of constructive
| excellence. This site should not be the ground for the dissemination of
| political or self-aggrandizing opinions.
|
| Nor have we been helped by the fact that it now appears that two
different
| people are posting using the handle "Kelly". There is only one Kelly,
so
| please will the spoofer get off the line. I assume that those who host
this
| site will take notice of my remarks and take steps to regulate matters
so
| that only constructive and not DE-structive messages are posted.

As for a Kelly name. There is nothing that states you must use a unique
handle. The word
"Kelly" can be a first name or a last name. Try a situation where three
people in a NG call
themselves "Dave". If you are unsure, look at their headers to tell them
apart.


I do know how to separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to
handles.
I didn't need you to educate me. Being 70 years old doesn't make me an
idiot.
Rather the opposite I should think. I still say that there should only one
"Kelly" as there is only one "Neil UK".


If you wish to complain about any particular user, I'd ask that you use the
Contact Us link at the bottom of the page you are using, or at the bottom of
http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx.

As for people posting with 'duplicate' names, there isn't going to be
anything to be done about that. One Kelly is not trying to spoof another.
Unique logon names are not required in a Usenet newsgroup, which this is,
regardless of what client you are using.

John Eddy
Microsoft Newsgroups Administrator



  #28  
Old June 6th 05, 08:14 PM
Canopus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Canopus on 06/06/2005 wrote:

PS. Meanwhile I see quite a few posts in that thread have been pulled.
Can't quite figure how mine was pulled as I didn't swear in it and just
said goodbye to the one that was using a foul mouth. There you go,
censorship is indiscriminatory.
  #29  
Old June 6th 05, 08:14 PM
kurttrail
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Neil UK wrote:
Gee, I am so terrified!

Get the basic point and don't tell me I spelled something wrong.
Answer me right now: is it GOOD or is it BAD to sneer and use
insulting and bad language in response to the queries of the
afflicted?


You should just have read DHL's post and tried to learn from it.

If every reply that David Candy or I made here was one long continuous
insult, I might be more inclined to agree with you. However that is
very far from the case. With the exception of a handful of regulars,
I'm on very respectful terms with most every one else.

You paint way to broad a brush. From my point of view, I'm only "rude"
to those deserving of it. And those that butt their nose where it
really doesn't belong, deserve it in my book. I'm an Amercian, and I
don't mince words. I tell it as I see it, and I don't take any
prisoners.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"


  #30  
Old June 6th 05, 08:20 PM
kurttrail
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Neil UK wrote:
Dear K******l

You are the problem. We don't need you. Bye, bye!


LOL! Is someone forcing you to read my posts? If you do not possess
the self-control to stop reading my posts, then you are the one with the
problem.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Post no replies Bill Stillman General XP issues or comments 7 September 27th 04 04:22 PM
no replies to desktop shortcut problem Dan Performance and Maintainance of XP 3 July 25th 04 12:38 AM
no replies to desktop shortcut problem Dan Performance and Maintainance of XP 0 July 24th 04 02:13 AM
no replies to desktop shortcut problem Dan Performance and Maintainance of XP 0 July 24th 04 02:13 AM






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.