If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:20 -0500, Tom wrote: "Leythos" wrote in message news On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 06:59:29 -0600, Susan wrote: What does this have to do with Windows XP? Well, trolls, like terrorists desire to destroy things. There are several trolls in these groups that seek only the destruction of them and/or MS and it's methods. Really, isn't calling other pirates and thieves a form of trolling? Not if the admit to being a pirate and/or thief or supporting those actions. I never admitted to any such thing! YOU ARE THE ONE THAT CALL MY THOSE THINGS IN OTHER THREADS! My interpretation of "fair use" of software has never been legally found to be a form of piracy or theft, yet you continue to label those that want to "fairly use" their software as pirates and thieves. You are the real troll in this group! Since the MSMVPHOS is actually an off-topic thread, what did you expect? That you would continue on as usual! And you help continue it with your posts too - what next? LOL! Are you asking him out on a date? -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
Ads |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
Tom wrote:
"Leythos" wrote in message news On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:26 -0500, Tom wrote: "Leythos" wrote in message news On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:58:54 -0500, Tom wrote: He was given an honorable discharge, cased closed, I showed you the document dated 1978, and it was made official in 2001. You either respect or you Honorable Discharges. Don't you find it odd that, and I had my dates wrong I think, he was discharged in 72, I think her service was 67-72, 6 years, so, as a matter of record his paperwork should indicate 72. Only someone that's had their service record changed would have a date after their EAOS. Kerry's service started (voluntarily) in "66". And it was state side until there was a political reason to go to Nam. If you check the facts, Carter was in office from 76-80 and Carter gave amnesty to all the dishonorable and draft dodgers which meant their service records were amended in the time period that you indicate above. Not one previously HONORABLE discharge had to be amended to make it HONORABLE. So, Ford pardoned a criminal, that allowed him to keep some kind of honor, but that is ok, since it is a presidential right to do so, as was Carters. If you don't like it, then bitch at congress to change the president's power in such cases. And the criminal isn't hiding the fact that he was a criminal either. Kerry is hiding the fact that he didn't get an Honorable discharge - big difference. Again, so, since Bush is hiding 6 months of what he actually did during his sefvice. there a commanders that don't ever remember hin being on duty during that certain period. How honorable! Come on, you seem like a bright person, are you seeing the truth now. Now you know why he won't release his records. Do you know why Bush won't own up to being AWOL for 6 months, and cannot (actually will not) provide records to show what he was doing, though he was honorably discharged. You keep ignoring that by the way; so it honorable at how Bush got away from Nam through power contacts while actually NOT doing his total duty? I don't ignore Bush's service record, there's nothing in it that isn't legit - and he wasn't AWOL at all, even CNN recanted that after they reported it. Hmm do search at http://factcheck.org/default.aspx and see what his serving status was. Before you try and explain how valiant and honorable he WAS and how his medals stand, explain why any respectable service member that was given an HONORABLE Discharge at the time of the separation would want to hide it. I don't know, again, he got it regardless of yours or my dislike. The fact remains he got it legally and it is honorable, refer to congress again for changes. But you don't acknowledge whether or not our comedian Nope, he didn't get it legally, it was the first discharge that he's hiding and that was also legal - why is he hiding it - ask yourself that instead of hiding from it. His OTH was converted to H (possibly) by Carter's actions, that doesn't change the fact that he was discharged with an OTH and is clearly hiding from it. Just like he's trying to hide how he got out of combat, you see no proof that anyone (other than himself) put him in for those Purple Hearts. Prove it (the 3rd request now) that he put himself in for the hearts! and cheat served honorably, though he got that type of discharge. You should be appalled at him for avoiding (again through connections) real combat duty based on how you hold such a high regard for those (as yourself) that have been there. I actually do have issues with people using their connections to limit their service stay or to pull strings, never said I didn't. What I care more about is people asking me to trust them with the nation and then hiding the fact that they were not Honorably discharged from the service. There is a big difference between pulling strings and getting a OTH discharge. But he was honorably discharged when asked at the time! I would rather take George into battle than Kerry, at least I know one would not run away in a time of need. Yes, a guy who actually thinks that doing what he does, will somehow find honor with god. Yes, you honor a patron of god, who served his country while others proably died in his stead due to his cowardice to actually do REAL combat, where Kerry ACTUALLY volunteered for that service. You complain about honor, while ignoring the honor in a volunteer, who wasn't afraid to use his freedom of speech you say he shouldn't have, that just as easily could have avoided doing combat duty ala Bush. You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real combat duty through the POWER channel, yes, I can see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite! And a sycophantic Troll for his corporate and political masters. If there really was a Dracula, Lamethos would be Renfield. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite.
i don't know if you are this type of person specifically, but here is the BEST example i have seen in years. Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the following to his opponents: You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite! Tom wrote: "Leythos" wrote in message news On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:26 -0500, Tom wrote: "Leythos" wrote in message news On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:58:54 -0500, Tom wrote: He was given an honorable discharge, cased closed, I showed you the document dated 1978, and it was made official in 2001. You either respect or you Honorable Discharges. Don't you find it odd that, and I had my dates wrong I think, he was discharged in 72, I think her service was 67-72, 6 years, so, as a matter of record his paperwork should indicate 72. Only someone that's had their service record changed would have a date after their EAOS. Kerry's service started (voluntarily) in "66". And it was state side until there was a political reason to go to Nam. If you check the facts, Carter was in office from 76-80 and Carter gave amnesty to all the dishonorable and draft dodgers which meant their service records were amended in the time period that you indicate above. Not one previously HONORABLE discharge had to be amended to make it HONORABLE. So, Ford pardoned a criminal, that allowed him to keep some kind of honor, but that is ok, since it is a presidential right to do so, as was Carters. If you don't like it, then bitch at congress to change the president's power in such cases. And the criminal isn't hiding the fact that he was a criminal either. Kerry is hiding the fact that he didn't get an Honorable discharge - big difference. Again, so, since Bush is hiding 6 months of what he actually did during his sefvice. there a commanders that don't ever remember hin being on duty during that certain period. How honorable! Come on, you seem like a bright person, are you seeing the truth now. Now you know why he won't release his records. Do you know why Bush won't own up to being AWOL for 6 months, and cannot (actually will not) provide records to show what he was doing, though he was honorably discharged. You keep ignoring that by the way; so it honorable at how Bush got away from Nam through power contacts while actually NOT doing his total duty? I don't ignore Bush's service record, there's nothing in it that isn't legit - and he wasn't AWOL at all, even CNN recanted that after they reported it. Hmm do search at http://factcheck.org/default.aspx and see what his serving status was. Before you try and explain how valiant and honorable he WAS and how his medals stand, explain why any respectable service member that was given an HONORABLE Discharge at the time of the separation would want to hide it. I don't know, again, he got it regardless of yours or my dislike. The fact remains he got it legally and it is honorable, refer to congress again for changes. But you don't acknowledge whether or not our comedian Nope, he didn't get it legally, it was the first discharge that he's hiding and that was also legal - why is he hiding it - ask yourself that instead of hiding from it. His OTH was converted to H (possibly) by Carter's actions, that doesn't change the fact that he was discharged with an OTH and is clearly hiding from it. Just like he's trying to hide how he got out of combat, you see no proof that anyone (other than himself) put him in for those Purple Hearts. Prove it (the 3rd request now) that he put himself in for the hearts! and cheat served honorably, though he got that type of discharge. You should be appalled at him for avoiding (again through connections) real combat duty based on how you hold such a high regard for those (as yourself) that have been there. I actually do have issues with people using their connections to limit their service stay or to pull strings, never said I didn't. What I care more about is people asking me to trust them with the nation and then hiding the fact that they were not Honorably discharged from the service. There is a big difference between pulling strings and getting a OTH discharge. But he was honorably discharged when asked at the time! I would rather take George into battle than Kerry, at least I know one would not run away in a time of need. Yes, a guy who actually thinks that doing what he does, will somehow find honor with god. Yes, you honor a patron of god, who served his country while others proably died in his stead due to his cowardice to actually do REAL combat, where Kerry ACTUALLY volunteered for that service. You complain about honor, while ignoring the honor in a volunteer, who wasn't afraid to use his freedom of speech you say he shouldn't have, that just as easily could have avoided doing combat duty ala Bush. You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real combat duty through the POWER channel, yes, I can see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite! |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
JW wrote:
Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite. i don't know if you are this type of person specifically, but here is the BEST example i have seen in years. Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the following to his opponents: You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite! Bill Clinton was our best president since FDR. GWB is our worst president since Hoover! -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
Thank you. it's always nice to have somebody like you prove my point.
kurttrail wrote: JW wrote: Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite. i don't know if you are this type of person specifically, but here is the BEST example i have seen in years. Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the following to his opponents: You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite! Bill Clinton was our best president since FDR. GWB is our worst president since Hoover! |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
Did I say I love Bill Clinton? Since I didn't, how does that make me an
opponent? Itdoesn't mean any such thing, my words are what the discussion is about, not being pro or con concerning political preferences. (If you only knew my voting record). I think Lamethos liked having his balls cleaned by you though! "JW" wrote in message ... Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite. i don't know if you are this type of person specifically, but here is the BEST example i have seen in years. Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the following to his opponents: You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite! Tom wrote: "Leythos" wrote in message news On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:26 -0500, Tom wrote: "Leythos" wrote in message news On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:58:54 -0500, Tom wrote: He was given an honorable discharge, cased closed, I showed you the document dated 1978, and it was made official in 2001. You either respect or you Honorable Discharges. Don't you find it odd that, and I had my dates wrong I think, he was discharged in 72, I think her service was 67-72, 6 years, so, as a matter of record his paperwork should indicate 72. Only someone that's had their service record changed would have a date after their EAOS. Kerry's service started (voluntarily) in "66". And it was state side until there was a political reason to go to Nam. If you check the facts, Carter was in office from 76-80 and Carter gave amnesty to all the dishonorable and draft dodgers which meant their service records were amended in the time period that you indicate above. Not one previously HONORABLE discharge had to be amended to make it HONORABLE. So, Ford pardoned a criminal, that allowed him to keep some kind of honor, but that is ok, since it is a presidential right to do so, as was Carters. If you don't like it, then bitch at congress to change the president's power in such cases. And the criminal isn't hiding the fact that he was a criminal either. Kerry is hiding the fact that he didn't get an Honorable discharge - big difference. Again, so, since Bush is hiding 6 months of what he actually did during his sefvice. there a commanders that don't ever remember hin being on duty during that certain period. How honorable! Come on, you seem like a bright person, are you seeing the truth now. Now you know why he won't release his records. Do you know why Bush won't own up to being AWOL for 6 months, and cannot (actually will not) provide records to show what he was doing, though he was honorably discharged. You keep ignoring that by the way; so it honorable at how Bush got away from Nam through power contacts while actually NOT doing his total duty? I don't ignore Bush's service record, there's nothing in it that isn't legit - and he wasn't AWOL at all, even CNN recanted that after they reported it. Hmm do search at http://factcheck.org/default.aspx and see what his serving status was. Before you try and explain how valiant and honorable he WAS and how his medals stand, explain why any respectable service member that was given an HONORABLE Discharge at the time of the separation would want to hide it. I don't know, again, he got it regardless of yours or my dislike. The fact remains he got it legally and it is honorable, refer to congress again for changes. But you don't acknowledge whether or not our comedian Nope, he didn't get it legally, it was the first discharge that he's hiding and that was also legal - why is he hiding it - ask yourself that instead of hiding from it. His OTH was converted to H (possibly) by Carter's actions, that doesn't change the fact that he was discharged with an OTH and is clearly hiding from it. Just like he's trying to hide how he got out of combat, you see no proof that anyone (other than himself) put him in for those Purple Hearts. Prove it (the 3rd request now) that he put himself in for the hearts! and cheat served honorably, though he got that type of discharge. You should be appalled at him for avoiding (again through connections) real combat duty based on how you hold such a high regard for those (as yourself) that have been there. I actually do have issues with people using their connections to limit their service stay or to pull strings, never said I didn't. What I care more about is people asking me to trust them with the nation and then hiding the fact that they were not Honorably discharged from the service. There is a big difference between pulling strings and getting a OTH discharge. But he was honorably discharged when asked at the time! I would rather take George into battle than Kerry, at least I know one would not run away in a time of need. Yes, a guy who actually thinks that doing what he does, will somehow find honor with god. Yes, you honor a patron of god, who served his country while others proably died in his stead due to his cowardice to actually do REAL combat, where Kerry ACTUALLY volunteered for that service. You complain about honor, while ignoring the honor in a volunteer, who wasn't afraid to use his freedom of speech you say he shouldn't have, that just as easily could have avoided doing combat duty ala Bush. You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real combat duty through the POWER channel, yes, I can see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite! |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
"Leythos" wrote in message news On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:20:33 -0500, Tom wrote: "Alias" wrote in message ... It's useless to reply to Leythos. It's like trying to talk to a rock. The truth probably is that he voted for Kerry and has a cracked version on every one of his 100 computers he brags about except the one with Linux. I say this because the lady protesteth waaaaaaaaaay too much. Alias I don't believe that he has how many whatnot PC/servers in his home, and his abilities. here is testament to my disbelief, when he hinted that a new MOBO would need drivers! http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...df92f68491d7cc "A change in motherboard, while it can be done with a repair/reinstall as I clearly stated, is best done with a full reinstall due to the number of changes in drivers and other functions." I said that and I stand by it - the user had already tried a repair and it failed, his next option was a reinstall since the repair didn't work - what have you offered him that worked? He didn't say his repair install failed, only that he got a BSOD after putting in the new MOBO the after the repair, but that his system again worked with the original MOBO. Seems to me that something was mangled anyway in his system. The fact that it gave him a BSOD could have been caused by any number if thing besides your assumptions, e.g. badly seated pins/connectors, MOBO BIOS setup, etc. I have performed 4 repair installs of XP having changed out the MOBO for a few folks I know. The only thing I needed to do was update the chipset drivers after the install. Any modern MOBO will use the built-in XP chipset drivers when Windows is installed. But your new install logic using the forced need to install new drivers is only done in Windows, and cannot be accomplished beforehand. So, a repair install works just fine in many cases, saving settings, and 3rd party installed programs, something a fresh install cannot do. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
JW wrote:
kurttrail wrote: JW wrote: Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite. i don't know if you are this type of person specifically, but here is the BEST example i have seen in years. Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the following to his opponents: You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite! Bill Clinton was our best president since FDR. GWB is our worst president since Hoover! Thank you. it's always nice to have somebody like you prove my point. LOL! You had a point? What was it? Any married man's first inclination would be to lie about getting a blow job from another woman. The only people Clinton really hurt were his family. Bush's lies have hurt many families. -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:42:58 -0500, Tom wrote: I think Lamethos liked having his XXXXX cleaned by you though! Why is it that your kind can hold a discussion without resorting to foul or abusive comments that don't add anything to the discussion? By not being able converse without using attack methods and constantly using snide comments, you only show the level of maturity you have and lessen your position. So I guess you are saying that you didn't enjoy the ball-cleaning? ;-) -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
"Leythos" wrote in message news On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:44:05 -0500, kurttrail wrote: Leythos wrote: On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:42:58 -0500, Tom wrote: I think Lamethos liked having his XXXXX cleaned by you though! Why is it that your kind can hold a discussion without resorting to foul or abusive comments that don't add anything to the discussion? By not being able converse without using attack methods and constantly using snide comments, you only show the level of maturity you have and lessen your position. So I guess you are saying that you didn't enjoy the ball-cleaning? ;-) No, I'm saying that I don't understand your types, where you can only inject insults and trollings into threads. Well, having the potty mind you do, you turned my comment to JW into a dirty thing. Where did I say "balls" were organic organs on the male animal species. I could have been talking about JWs golf balls for all you know. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
you are clearly struggling to make any sense.
you said "Did I say I love Bill Clinton ? " No. in fact, nobody asked you. you said " ...how does that make me an opponent ?" it doesn't. but that's not the point (the 2-faced hypocrisy). so, besides the fact that nobody asked you, you clearly cannot see the point that was made. you said "(If you only knew my voting record.)" nobody was talking about voting records, and the fact is, nobody here cares about your voting record. it's irrelevant. in fact, indications from your remarks suggest you very probably are nothing more than a well-educated foul-mouthed teenager, not even old enough to vote yet, masquerading as an adult. but you were tricked into giving away your true identity, when you revealed that you are learning how to disagree with somebody, using language you newly learned from the wall of your grade school bathroom. now go back to class. i was not talking to you before, and since you are furious, vulgar and irrelevant, your juvenile behavior will no longer receive a response. Tom wrote: Did I say I love Bill Clinton? Since I didn't, how does that make me an opponent? Itdoesn't mean any such thing, my words are what the discussion is about, not being pro or con concerning political preferences. (If you only knew my voting record). I think Lamethos liked having his balls cleaned by you though! JW wrote: Thank you. it's always nice to have somebody like you prove my point. kurttrail wrote: JW wrote: Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite. i don't know if you are this type of person specifically, but here is the BEST example i have seen in years. Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the following to his opponents: You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite! Bill Clinton was our best president since FDR. GWB is our worst president since Hoover! |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:44:05 -0500, kurttrail wrote: Leythos wrote: On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:42:58 -0500, Tom wrote: I think Lamethos liked having his XXXXX cleaned by you though! Why is it that your kind can hold a discussion without resorting to foul or abusive comments that don't add anything to the discussion? By not being able converse without using attack methods and constantly using snide comments, you only show the level of maturity you have and lessen your position. So I guess you are saying that you didn't enjoy the ball-cleaning? ;-) No, I'm saying that I don't understand your types, where you can only inject insults and trollings into threads. LOL! You are the one trolling in MY thread! And if you don't like being called names or being insulted, then you get off the effin' USENET, Lameboy! You are an insult to the whole effin' human race, and I think we need to pass a law that allows the post-birth arbortion of YOUR TYPE! Those that step into the flames and don't expect to get burned! "BOO! HOO! The bad men called me a name after I acted like a complete idiot on the USENET! BOO HOO!" See Ya, CryBabyThos! :-p -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
JW wrote:
you are clearly struggling to make any sense. you said "Did I say I love Bill Clinton ? " No. in fact, nobody asked you. you said " ...how does that make me an opponent ?" it doesn't. but that's not the point (the 2-faced hypocrisy). so, besides the fact that nobody asked you, you clearly cannot see the point that was made. you said "(If you only knew my voting record.)" nobody was talking about voting records, and the fact is, nobody here cares about your voting record. it's irrelevant. in fact, indications from your remarks suggest you very probably are nothing more than a well-educated foul-mouthed teenager, not even old enough to vote yet, masquerading as an adult. but you were tricked into giving away your true identity, when you revealed that you are learning how to disagree with somebody, using language you newly learned from the wall of your grade school bathroom. now go back to class. i was not talking to you before, and since you are furious, vulgar and irrelevant, your juvenile behavior will no longer receive a response. Vulgarity is in the mind of the beholder. So the question you should be asking yourself is why is your filled with Vulgarity? -- Peace! Kurt Self-anointed Moderator microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea http://microscum.com/mscommunity "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei" |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
"JW" wrote in message ... you are clearly struggling to make any sense. you said "Did I say I love Bill Clinton ? " No. in fact, nobody asked you. Umm, you mentioned for "those that love Bill Clinton" and injected into this thread, I followed inline. Of course your reply is inline with the acts like Lamethos, so I am not surprised. you said " ...how does that make me an opponent ?" it doesn't. but that's not the point (the 2-faced hypocrisy). so, besides the fact that nobody asked you, you clearly cannot see the point that was made. Not clearly made, noting the hypocrisy Lamethos has exhibited, and you ignored by not reading the thread. you said "(If you only knew my voting record.)" nobody was talking about voting records, and the fact is, nobody here cares about your voting record. it's irrelevant. Of course not, but your point about Clinton lovers was also relevant to the topic at hand, since Clinton was never mentioned, let alone evenmentioning politics, or party lines. You just posted non-sequitur. in fact, indications from your remarks suggest you very probably are nothing more than a well-educated foul-mouthed teenager, not even old enough to vote yet, masquerading as an adult. but you were tricked into giving away your true identity, when you revealed that you are learning how to disagree with somebody, using language you newly learned from the wall of your grade school bathroom. And this is the assumption of a lesser educated older texan red colluge schooled male woman abuser alcoholic. now go back to class. i was not talking to you before, and since you are furious, vulgar and irrelevant, your juvenile behavior will no longer receive a response. I am finished with school, but I find it interesting that your colluge has these neat, if not insane sweats,"T"s, caps, and whatnots for sale: http://www.cafepress.com/thewhitehouse/417452 Tom wrote: Did I say I love Bill Clinton? Since I didn't, how does that make me an opponent? Itdoesn't mean any such thing, my words are what the discussion is about, not being pro or con concerning political preferences. (If you only knew my voting record). I think Lamethos liked having his balls cleaned by you though! JW wrote: Thank you. it's always nice to have somebody like you prove my point. kurttrail wrote: JW wrote: Now here's a REAL example of a hypocrite. i don't know if you are this type of person specifically, but here is the BEST example i have seen in years. Example of a hypocrite: a person who loves Bill Clinton and says the following to his opponents: You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real combat duty... ...I can see where a man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite! Bill Clinton was our best president since FDR. GWB is our worst president since Hoover! |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!
Depends on where you live...here I am definitely buying the roads.
"Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message ... Since you don't own the software, yes you do need instructions. You cannot unilaterally declare the software yours. When you buy a license plate for your car you are licensing the car to use the public roads, but you are not buying the roads. -- Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine] (Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested) "Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)" wrote in message ... I bought the "software" and got the license. I didn't buy the license, and get the software. I will use MY software as I see fit! I know how to use it. I don't need no damn instructions from within the package telling me when, where, how and why. -- Regards, Richard Urban aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-) If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message ... Software has become a term applied to a lot of things. You still have to read the license to understand the difference between the generic term and the specifics of a published edition. Even open software is licensed. -- Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine] (Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested) "Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)" wrote in message ... What Alias is getting at is that all web sites, and stores, sell you software. Don't they all have software departments, T.V. departments, appliance departments etc. Yet after they have sold you the "software", they try to tell you that you have bought a license. Well, people DID NOT buy it in the license department - did they? Based upon that fact, and that even Microsoft offers you software downloads (not license downloads) I think I also am going to begin to state that I OWN the "software". The license that was in the package is ancillary to the fact of my purchase, and I don't really have to even read it. The software is mine, whether I have a license or not! -- Regards, Richard Urban aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-) If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message ... I have a degree in English from the University of Texas Arlington and my comprehension skills are fine. If you install software without reading through the EULA then the problem is not comprehension, but reading at all. -- Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine] (Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested) "Alias" wrote in message ... "Colin Barnhorst" wrote If you can read the website, you can read the EULA. If you just click through it during an install, that's your issue. Huh? I didn't say anything about reading or clicking through the scammy EULA, now did I, sport? Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Is English not your first language? The web sites I was referring to and I made it clear by typing *computer web sites" say *software*, not "licences". Yaknow, the ones that sell Microsoft *Software*? -- Alias -- Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine] (Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested) "Alias" wrote in message ... "Colin Barnhorst" wrote You were sold the licenses, not the software. -- Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine] (Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested) We know about the licencing scam. It's a scam. It's highway robbery. EVERY computer web site says "software", not "licences". Alias |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|