If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Firewall vs. NPF
hello...
I used to run 'Norton Personal Firewall'...& it had a function that would detect & disallow dangerous connections. for example, it used to pop up from time to time w/ an 'Internet Access Control' window...during web surfing...advising me to block a 'high risk remote system' which was attempting to access my machine. They were various Inbound TCP, UDP, IMCP & NetBIOS Services...utilizing any number of different ports. So my question is...now that I'm running XP Pro...(& assuming my 'Windows Firewall' is up & running)...does Windows Firewall have a function that accomplishes the same thing ??? thanks, mark4man BTW - side question: how does one actually determine if Windows Firewall is up & running ??? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Firewall vs. NPF
mark4man wrote:
I used to run 'Norton Personal Firewall'...& it had a function that would detect & disallow dangerous connections. for example, it used to pop up from time to time w/ an 'Internet Access Control' window...during web surfing...advising me to block a 'high risk remote system' which was attempting to access my machine. They were various Inbound TCP, UDP, IMCP & NetBIOS Services...utilizing any number of different ports. So my question is...now that I'm running XP Pro...(& assuming my 'Windows Firewall' is up & running)...does Windows Firewall have a function that accomplishes the same thing ??? BTW - side question: how does one actually determine if Windows Firewall is up & running ??? The Windows Firewall in Windows XP is inbound - the only exceptions allowed are those you define. It's very simplistic and easy to manage. It's not going to bug you about anything, it's just not going to allow anything through you didn't specify (or that doesn't get specified by applications you install and allow to change the firewall settings.) http://www.google.com/search?q=How+t...ws+XP+firewall -- Shenan Stanley MS-MVP -- How To Ask Questions The Smart Way http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Firewall vs. NPF
mark4man wrote:
hello... I used to run 'Norton Personal Firewall'...& it had a function that would detect & disallow dangerous connections. for example, it used to pop up from time to time w/ an 'Internet Access Control' window...during web surfing...advising me to block a 'high risk remote system' which was attempting to access my machine. They were various Inbound TCP, UDP, IMCP & NetBIOS Services...utilizing any number of different ports. So my question is...now that I'm running XP Pro...(& assuming my 'Windows Firewall' is up & running)...does Windows Firewall have a function that accomplishes the same thing ??? No, it doesn't. WinXP's built-in firewall is usually adequate at stopping incoming attacks, and hiding your ports from probes. What WinXP SP2's firewall does not do, is protect you from any Trojans or spyware that you (or someone else using your computer) might download and install inadvertently. It doesn't monitor out-going traffic at all, other than to check for IP-spoofing, much less block (or at even ask you about) the bad or the questionable out-going signals. It assumes that any application you have on your hard drive is there because you want it there, and therefore has your "permission" to access the Internet. Further, because the Windows Firewall is a "stateful" firewall, it will also assume that any incoming traffic that's a direct response to a Trojan's or spyware's out-going signal is also authorized. ZoneAlarm, Kerio, or Sygate are all much better than WinXP's built-in firewall, and are much more easily configured, and there are free versions of each readily available. Even the commercially available Symantec's Norton Personal Firewall is superior by far, although it does take a heavier toll of system performance then do ZoneAlarm or Sygate. Having said that, it's important to remember that firewalls and anti-virus applications, which should always be used and should always be running, while important components of "safe hex," cannot, and should not be expected to, protect the computer user from him/herself. Ultimately, it is incumbent upon each and every computer user to learn how to secure his/her own computer. -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers. ~ Denis Diderot |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|