A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Performance and Maintainance of XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

instal more ram



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old December 1st 09, 08:32 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Shenan Stanley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,523
Default instal more ram

Stewart wrote:
I have now tried the Crucial download and find that they are
selling 1Gb ram for £31; they do not state that it is DDR1 but at
that price I am fairly certain it is. I get the same results from
Kingston. I changed the ram around in the computer a few times but
stupidly
did not take a note of the part numbers on the functioning
installed ram, nowhere however did I see the words DDR1 or DDR2.
I have decided to go ahead and buy a strip of 1Gb DDR1 ram and if
that works then I shall get one more taking me to the maximum that
my motherboard can handle.


Crucial does give detailed specs on the RAM they are willing to sell you
(and you could use that to buy anywhere really) - can you cut/paste them
here?

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Ads
  #17  
Old December 1st 09, 08:32 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Shenan Stanley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,523
Default instal more ram

Stewart wrote:
I have now tried the Crucial download and find that they are
selling 1Gb ram for £31; they do not state that it is DDR1 but at
that price I am fairly certain it is. I get the same results from
Kingston. I changed the ram around in the computer a few times but
stupidly
did not take a note of the part numbers on the functioning
installed ram, nowhere however did I see the words DDR1 or DDR2.
I have decided to go ahead and buy a strip of 1Gb DDR1 ram and if
that works then I shall get one more taking me to the maximum that
my motherboard can handle.


Crucial does give detailed specs on the RAM they are willing to sell you
(and you could use that to buy anywhere really) - can you cut/paste them
here?

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


  #18  
Old December 1st 09, 08:57 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
SC Tom[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,089
Default instal more ram

They'd have to have separate memory slots, I would think, since DDR has 184
pins and DDR2 240. And while DDR3 also has 240 pins, the alignment notch is
in a different location.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Stewart, DDR2 Ram was so cheap for awhile I was tempted to buy some
for future use. There are Motherboards that take both kinds but they are
scarce. DDR2 and 3 are more common now.
"Stewart" wrote in message
...
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened; previously
Belarc advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with A2 empty, now
it is recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty; furthermore cpuz
records my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to be installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this
"pairing" and if there is a way I could recognise the positioniong before
I take them out and re-install.
Thank you.




  #19  
Old December 1st 09, 08:57 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
SC Tom[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,089
Default instal more ram

They'd have to have separate memory slots, I would think, since DDR has 184
pins and DDR2 240. And while DDR3 also has 240 pins, the alignment notch is
in a different location.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Stewart, DDR2 Ram was so cheap for awhile I was tempted to buy some
for future use. There are Motherboards that take both kinds but they are
scarce. DDR2 and 3 are more common now.
"Stewart" wrote in message
...
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened; previously
Belarc advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with A2 empty, now
it is recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty; furthermore cpuz
records my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to be installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this
"pairing" and if there is a way I could recognise the positioniong before
I take them out and re-install.
Thank you.




  #20  
Old December 1st 09, 10:35 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Rich Barry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,220
Default instal more ram

Tom, if I remember correctly that was the config of the MB. When DDR2
first came out there were a few boards that allowed
for both 1 & 2. Back then Ram was expensive and the thinking of some
Manufacturers I guess was to make their boards more
attractive by enabling both types of Ram. Though again my memory is
not that good but it was a very small window of opportunity.


"SC Tom" wrote in message
...
They'd have to have separate memory slots, I would think, since DDR has
184 pins and DDR2 240. And while DDR3 also has 240 pins, the alignment
notch is in a different location.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Stewart, DDR2 Ram was so cheap for awhile I was tempted to buy some
for future use. There are Motherboards that take both kinds but they are
scarce. DDR2 and 3 are more common now.
"Stewart" wrote in message
...
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram
cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened;
previously Belarc advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with
A2 empty, now it is recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty;
furthermore cpuz records my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to be
installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this
"pairing" and if there is a way I could recognise the positioniong
before I take them out and re-install.
Thank you.






  #21  
Old December 1st 09, 10:35 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Rich Barry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,220
Default instal more ram


Tom, if I remember correctly that was the config of the MB. When DDR2
first came out there were a few boards that allowed
for both 1 & 2. Back then Ram was expensive and the thinking of some
Manufacturers I guess was to make their boards more
attractive by enabling both types of Ram. Though again my memory is
not that good but it was a very small window of opportunity.


"SC Tom" wrote in message
...
They'd have to have separate memory slots, I would think, since DDR has
184 pins and DDR2 240. And while DDR3 also has 240 pins, the alignment
notch is in a different location.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Stewart, DDR2 Ram was so cheap for awhile I was tempted to buy some
for future use. There are Motherboards that take both kinds but they are
scarce. DDR2 and 3 are more common now.
"Stewart" wrote in message
...
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram
cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened;
previously Belarc advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with
A2 empty, now it is recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty;
furthermore cpuz records my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to be
installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this
"pairing" and if there is a way I could recognise the positioniong
before I take them out and re-install.
Thank you.






  #22  
Old December 1st 09, 10:54 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Stewart[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 55
Default instal more ram

Sorry to keep labouring this but the ram I tried had 184 pins and the
alignment notch is in the same position. I have the 2 of them lying on my
desk; they are 512MB DDR400 each but I am sure are DDR2 as they will not
work in my computer.
My computer is a gigabyte GA-7N400-L and crucial part Nos include the names
DDR PC2700 and also DDR PC3200.
As I said I shall go ahead and buy what I need and return the 2 spare to my
son (he gave them to me).

"SC Tom" wrote in message
...
They'd have to have separate memory slots, I would think, since DDR has
184 pins and DDR2 240. And while DDR3 also has 240 pins, the alignment
notch is in a different location.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Stewart, DDR2 Ram was so cheap for awhile I was tempted to buy some
for future use. There are Motherboards that take both kinds but they are
scarce. DDR2 and 3 are more common now.
"Stewart" wrote in message
...
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram
cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened;
previously Belarc advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with
A2 empty, now it is recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty;
furthermore cpuz records my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to be
installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this
"pairing" and if there is a way I could recognise the positioniong
before I take them out and re-install.
Thank you.






  #23  
Old December 1st 09, 10:54 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Stewart[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 55
Default instal more ram

Sorry to keep labouring this but the ram I tried had 184 pins and the
alignment notch is in the same position. I have the 2 of them lying on my
desk; they are 512MB DDR400 each but I am sure are DDR2 as they will not
work in my computer.
My computer is a gigabyte GA-7N400-L and crucial part Nos include the names
DDR PC2700 and also DDR PC3200.
As I said I shall go ahead and buy what I need and return the 2 spare to my
son (he gave them to me).

"SC Tom" wrote in message
...
They'd have to have separate memory slots, I would think, since DDR has
184 pins and DDR2 240. And while DDR3 also has 240 pins, the alignment
notch is in a different location.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Stewart, DDR2 Ram was so cheap for awhile I was tempted to buy some
for future use. There are Motherboards that take both kinds but they are
scarce. DDR2 and 3 are more common now.
"Stewart" wrote in message
...
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram
cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened;
previously Belarc advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with
A2 empty, now it is recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty;
furthermore cpuz records my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to be
installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this
"pairing" and if there is a way I could recognise the positioniong
before I take them out and re-install.
Thank you.






  #24  
Old December 1st 09, 11:52 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
SC Tom[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,089
Default instal more ram

That wouldn't surprise me. I remember one of the first 286 boards I owned
had DIP sockets and SIPP sockets. The DIP's were used for up to 64MB. The
SIPP's were for up to 256MB. I believe those were the numbers- that had to
be about 25 years ago.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Tom, if I remember correctly that was the config of the MB. When DDR2
first came out there were a few boards that allowed
for both 1 & 2. Back then Ram was expensive and the thinking of some
Manufacturers I guess was to make their boards more
attractive by enabling both types of Ram. Though again my memory is
not that good but it was a very small window of opportunity.


"SC Tom" wrote in message
...
They'd have to have separate memory slots, I would think, since DDR has
184 pins and DDR2 240. And while DDR3 also has 240 pins, the alignment
notch is in a different location.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Stewart, DDR2 Ram was so cheap for awhile I was tempted to buy some
for future use. There are Motherboards that take both kinds but they
are scarce. DDR2 and 3 are more common now.
"Stewart" wrote in message
...
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram
cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened;
previously Belarc advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with
A2 empty, now it is recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty;
furthermore cpuz records my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to
be installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this
"pairing" and if there is a way I could recognise the positioniong
before I take them out and re-install.
Thank you.







  #25  
Old December 1st 09, 11:52 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
SC Tom[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,089
Default instal more ram


That wouldn't surprise me. I remember one of the first 286 boards I owned
had DIP sockets and SIPP sockets. The DIP's were used for up to 64MB. The
SIPP's were for up to 256MB. I believe those were the numbers- that had to
be about 25 years ago.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Tom, if I remember correctly that was the config of the MB. When DDR2
first came out there were a few boards that allowed
for both 1 & 2. Back then Ram was expensive and the thinking of some
Manufacturers I guess was to make their boards more
attractive by enabling both types of Ram. Though again my memory is
not that good but it was a very small window of opportunity.


"SC Tom" wrote in message
...
They'd have to have separate memory slots, I would think, since DDR has
184 pins and DDR2 240. And while DDR3 also has 240 pins, the alignment
notch is in a different location.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Stewart, DDR2 Ram was so cheap for awhile I was tempted to buy some
for future use. There are Motherboards that take both kinds but they
are scarce. DDR2 and 3 are more common now.
"Stewart" wrote in message
...
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram
cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened;
previously Belarc advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with
A2 empty, now it is recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty;
furthermore cpuz records my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to
be installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this
"pairing" and if there is a way I could recognise the positioniong
before I take them out and re-install.
Thank you.







  #26  
Old December 2nd 09, 05:15 AM
giantmonster giantmonster is offline
Registered User
 
First recorded activity by PCbanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Default

My pc gets very slow even though I have a 512 ram.I do know that it is low but is there any other means that I could fast up my pc? My clock speed is 2.6Ghz...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart[_3_] View Post
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is still
just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened; previously Belarc
advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with A2 empty, now it is
recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty; furthermore cpuz records
my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to be installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but have
not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try re-arranging
them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this "pairing" and if there
is a way I could recognise the positioniong before I take them out and
re-install.
Thank you.
  #27  
Old December 2nd 09, 05:09 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
SC Tom[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,089
Default instal more ram

If they are 184 pins, they cannot be DDR2.

"Stewart" wrote in message
...
Sorry to keep labouring this but the ram I tried had 184 pins and the
alignment notch is in the same position. I have the 2 of them lying on my
desk; they are 512MB DDR400 each but I am sure are DDR2 as they will not
work in my computer.
My computer is a gigabyte GA-7N400-L and crucial part Nos include the
names DDR PC2700 and also DDR PC3200.
As I said I shall go ahead and buy what I need and return the 2 spare to
my son (he gave them to me).

"SC Tom" wrote in message
...
They'd have to have separate memory slots, I would think, since DDR has
184 pins and DDR2 240. And while DDR3 also has 240 pins, the alignment
notch is in a different location.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Stewart, DDR2 Ram was so cheap for awhile I was tempted to buy some
for future use. There are Motherboards that take both kinds but they
are scarce. DDR2 and 3 are more common now.
"Stewart" wrote in message
...
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram
cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened;
previously Belarc advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with
A2 empty, now it is recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty;
furthermore cpuz records my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to
be installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this
"pairing" and if there is a way I could recognise the positioniong
before I take them out and re-install.
Thank you.







  #28  
Old December 2nd 09, 05:09 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
SC Tom[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,089
Default instal more ram

If they are 184 pins, they cannot be DDR2.

"Stewart" wrote in message
...
Sorry to keep labouring this but the ram I tried had 184 pins and the
alignment notch is in the same position. I have the 2 of them lying on my
desk; they are 512MB DDR400 each but I am sure are DDR2 as they will not
work in my computer.
My computer is a gigabyte GA-7N400-L and crucial part Nos include the
names DDR PC2700 and also DDR PC3200.
As I said I shall go ahead and buy what I need and return the 2 spare to
my son (he gave them to me).

"SC Tom" wrote in message
...
They'd have to have separate memory slots, I would think, since DDR has
184 pins and DDR2 240. And while DDR3 also has 240 pins, the alignment
notch is in a different location.

SC Tom

"Rich Barry" wrote in message
...
Stewart, DDR2 Ram was so cheap for awhile I was tempted to buy some
for future use. There are Motherboards that take both kinds but they
are scarce. DDR2 and 3 are more common now.
"Stewart" wrote in message
...
I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200 ram
cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte
installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened;
previously Belarc advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with
A2 empty, now it is recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty;
furthermore cpuz records my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to
be installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this
"pairing" and if there is a way I could recognise the positioniong
before I take them out and re-install.
Thank you.







  #29  
Old December 2nd 09, 07:23 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Rich Barry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,220
Default instal more ram

GM, 1/2G of Ram is fine for WinXP unless you are heavy into movie
editing etc. You may be infected with Malware. You can
check using Spybot Search and Destroy, Adaware and Spyware Doctor.
The first two have free versions. The last one you can
use and it will provide a summary of the nasties it finds and a path
where you can find them. To have them removed automatically
will require the purchase of SD. Also, go to StartRun type:
msconfig look in Startup. There may be many you can uncheck
if not needed at startup. Also, do a defrag of your hard drive.
"giantmonster" wrote in message
...

My pc gets very slow even though I have a 512 ram.I do know that it is
low but is there any other means that I could fast up my pc? My clock
speed is 2.6Ghz...
'Stewart[_3_ Wrote:
;3358879']I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200
ram cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte

installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still
just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened; previously
Belarc
advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with A2 empty, now it
is
recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty; furthermore cpuz
records
my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to be installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have
not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging
them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this "pairing" and if
there
is a way I could recognise the positioniong before I take them out and

re-install.
Thank you.





--
giantmonster



  #30  
Old December 2nd 09, 07:23 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain
Rich Barry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,220
Default instal more ram

GM, 1/2G of Ram is fine for WinXP unless you are heavy into movie
editing etc. You may be infected with Malware. You can
check using Spybot Search and Destroy, Adaware and Spyware Doctor.
The first two have free versions. The last one you can
use and it will provide a summary of the nasties it finds and a path
where you can find them. To have them removed automatically
will require the purchase of SD. Also, go to StartRun type:
msconfig look in Startup. There may be many you can uncheck
if not needed at startup. Also, do a defrag of your hard drive.
"giantmonster" wrote in message
...

My pc gets very slow even though I have a 512 ram.I do know that it is
low but is there any other means that I could fast up my pc? My clock
speed is 2.6Ghz...
'Stewart[_3_ Wrote:
;3358879']I have a gigabyte motherboard currently with 2 No 512DDRPC3200
ram cards.
There are slots for 4 memory modules; the names quoted in the Gigabyte

installation guide are ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 and ddr4.
I have to-day installed a further 2 No 512 cards but the computer is
still
just recognising 2 however a strange thing has happened; previously
Belarc
advisor recorded them being in slots AO and A1 with A2 empty, now it
is
recording them in slots A1 and A2 with AO empty; furthermore cpuz
records
my total dram at 2048 MBytes so they seem to be installed OK.
I am told that the problem may rise with the "pairing" of the cards but
have
not heard of this before. Obviously I can take them out and try
re-arranging
them but it would be helpful if anyone knew of this "pairing" and if
there
is a way I could recognise the positioniong before I take them out and

re-install.
Thank you.





--
giantmonster



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.