If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
I have a persistent, minor problem, where the explorer list 2
completely identical listings of the directory structure. The 1st behaves normally but the 2nd has no contents in the duplicant directories and no access or any functions. This "problem" is minor since it is only an extra line in the explorer. Any help greately appreciated and thanks ! |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
SteveGG wrote:
I have a persistent, minor problem, where the explorer list 2 completely identical listings of the directory structure. The 1st behaves normally but the 2nd has no contents in the duplicant directories and no access or any functions. This "problem" is minor since it is only an extra line in the explorer. Any help greately appreciated and thanks ! You must have some third-party app running and producing the 2nd list. Show us some snapshot of the listing and any other output relevant. Ed |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
Ed,
Thanks for your response. Where to send the screen capture ? Steve On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:53:57 +0100, Ed Cryer wrote: SteveGG wrote: I have a persistent, minor problem, where the explorer list 2 completely identical listings of the directory structure. The 1st behaves normally but the 2nd has no contents in the duplicant directories and no access or any functions. This "problem" is minor since it is only an extra line in the explorer. Any help greately appreciated and thanks ! You must have some third-party app running and producing the 2nd list. Show us some snapshot of the listing and any other output relevant. Ed |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
Ed Cryer wrote:
SteveGG wrote: I have a persistent, minor problem, where the explorer list 2 completely identical listings of the directory structure. The 1st behaves normally but the 2nd has no contents in the duplicant directories and no access or any functions. This "problem" is minor since it is only an extra line in the explorer. Any help greately appreciated and thanks ! You must have some third-party app running and producing the 2nd list. Show us some snapshot of the listing and any other output relevant. Ed He already posted a URL. I don't know why he doesn't include it on each re-post. The right-most picture shows all three entries. https://postimg.org/gallery/iwnvo96e/ Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
SteveGG wrote:
Ed, Thanks for your response. Where to send the screen capture ? Steve On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:53:57 +0100, Ed Cryer wrote: SteveGG wrote: I have a persistent, minor problem, where the explorer list 2 completely identical listings of the directory structure. The 1st behaves normally but the 2nd has no contents in the duplicant directories and no access or any functions. This "problem" is minor since it is only an extra line in the explorer. Any help greately appreciated and thanks ! You must have some third-party app running and producing the 2nd list. Show us some snapshot of the listing and any other output relevant. Ed Is it video-capture? What size? This is a deep problem, and we depend on what you can fathom of it. If it were me I'd apply what I call "push it to its limits" techniques. Those consists of doing it over and over, in different situations, constantly changing the situations; and noting, all the while, all changes in behaviour. It's not as hard as it sounds, because in real situations where I've used it, I've found that each iteration reduces the amount of future ones to try. Ed |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
On 16/08/2017 19:21, Ed Cryer wrote:
If it were me I thought you were you!!!!!!!!!!!!! No? I'd apply what I call "push it to its limits" techniques. You should tell him to rename the duplicate folder so that that idiot can see if it has any impact on the system's performance in any shape or form. There is no need to be politically correct when dealing with idiots like SteveGG, Win10Hater, WinXP-user, & Win7User. Idiots should be treated as idiots otherwise they won't know that they are idiots. It's not as hard as it sounds, because in real situations where I've used it, It is hard for idiots like SteveGG I've found that each iteration reduces the amount of future ones to try. Tell that to an idiot and spend another month to explain it how and why? Ed Ted -- With over 500 million devices now running Windows 10, customer satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
Good Guy wrote:
On 16/08/2017 19:21, Ed Cryer wrote: If it were me I thought you were you!!!!!!!!!!!!! No? I'd apply what I call "push it to its limits" techniques. You should tell him to rename the duplicate folder so that that idiot can see if it has any impact on the system's performance in any shape or form. There is no need to be politically correct when dealing with idiots like SteveGG, Win10Hater, WinXP-user, & Win7User. Idiots should be treated as idiots otherwise they won't know that they are idiots. It's not as hard as it sounds, because in real situations where I've used it, It is hard for idiots like SteveGG I've found that each iteration reduces the amount of future ones to try. Tell that to an idiot and spend another month to explain it how and why? Don't preach your fascist Apartheid policy to me. I hate it. Ed |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
On 16/08/2017 22:20, Ed Cryer wrote:
Don't preach your fascist Apartheid policy to me. I hate it. Ed Then you can **** off. Simple, don't you think so? I didn't expect you to receive my message because you are on record to tell us you have killed filed me. In fact you need your brain examined if you continue reading my posts because they are for **** offs, idiots and nutters. Do you belong to this group of people? I expect response from them!!!!!!! -- With over 500 million devices now running Windows 10, customer satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
Good Guy wrote:
On 16/08/2017 22:20, Ed Cryer wrote: Don't preach your fascist Apartheid policy to me. I hate it. Ed Then you can **** off. Simple, don't you think so? I didn't expect you to receive my message because you are on record to tell us you have killed filed me. In fact you need your brain examined if you continue reading my posts because they are for **** offs, idiots and nutters. Do you belong to this group of people? I expect response from them!!!!!!! -- With over 500 million devices now running Windows 10, customer satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows. What do you expect of your intelligentsia? Try me in Latin or classical Greek. Or maybe Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Or maybe even piano-playing; which I'm taking lessons on at the moment. Or maybe we could discuss why I didn't write "on which I'm taking lessons on at the moment". I'm highly educated, very bright, white male Caucasian; and I far prefer people like Steve who reach out, to bigoted bullies like yourself, who keep him and his like down-trodden. You're my enemy; not he. You're the kind I do battle with, not his. Ed |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
Well, that about covers it.
Just a kind of phantom duplicate listing of all the folder structure. Still no good ideas ? Anyone ? As I've said before, it's no big deal, but I don't like mysteries. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Explorer Identical Listings
SteveGG wrote:
Well, that about covers it. Just a kind of phantom duplicate listing of all the folder structure. Still no good ideas ? Anyone ? As I've said before, it's no big deal, but I don't like mysteries. Two action items for you: 1) Are you using any unusual software. DropBox ? Do an inventory. Check your Programs and Features. Think about any ShellEx you've added, any little "tweakers" you're using, and so on. 2) At one time, I thought you were the guy that was going to take all the executables on a x64 system, and put them into just one folder set. Am I mistaken ? Was it you or someone else who was working on that ? Since the flaw isn't one involving the various "sections" in a File Explorer display, it's my feeling there may be some sort of evidence in the file system itself. In which case, I use Everything.exe to make a CSV file listing. Or use NFI.exe and look for funny stuff in there. I would look for items with "Program" in the file name text string, to eliminate most of the entries and then you can focus on things that look like that. ******* At least on Win10, you can do this. I don't know if the "fsutil" on Win7 also has this feature or not. In an Administrator Command Prompt cd %userprofile% cd Downloads fsutil usn readjournal c: out2.txt The NTFS file system, records file system changes. They're recorded in a metadata file, the USN. That command keeps track. On some systems here, the USN becomes as big as 10GB. It can remember a *lot* of stuff. It would be the same deal. You'd be looking for entries concerning "Program Files". I consider that a long shot, so that wouldn't be my first choice of a forensic technique. But if you run out of other little projects to do, you can give that a try and see how many times you've messed with the "Program Files" entries. I suspect there is an illegal file name in your file system, and the system reads it, truncates the illegal part, and carries on. Leading to two items displayed on the screen. But unless you use the utilities to track it down, you're never going to find it. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|