If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a year before its record $5 billion fine from the EU
"Anonymous" wrote | Google lawyers talked to their EU counterparts about the | possibility of a settlement in June 2017, Bloomberg says, weeks | after the company had been fined 2.4 billion euros for abusing | its dominant position to promote its shopping service. | | https://www.businessinsider.com/goog...-avert-record- | fine-from-eu-2018-7 | | I hate google, apple, microsoft, and facebook. Never considered | buying an apple. Switch from google to duckduckgo. Interesting new twist on this: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/26/b...ust-trump.html James B. Stewart, business columnist for the NYT, has a stunningly idiotic column today. Worse than idiotic, in fact. It's deeply misleading. His case is that Trump "is right" in saying that the EU is attacking American companies with the Google fine. It seems to be a deliberate attempt to portray Google's punishment as anti-Americanism. Are Stewart and/or the Times taking payoffs to make such an absurd claim and fire up public opinion? I have to give Stewart the benefit of the doubt and provisionally assume that he actually does think Trump is smart, and that he has no understanding of the tech world. The NYT is not likely to actually take payoffs from the likes of Google, except in the form of ad contracts. Instead they just assign writers to pen skewed news and analysis that favors big business. I'm repeatedly impressed by the subtlety of their pro-business slant. It usually reads like real news and coherent thinking. Example: Stewart accepts Google's argument that forced tying of its products on Android by pre-installing them is not an issue because it's easy to install something different. He even finds a researcher (Google-funded, by his own admission) to make that statement. Then, to prove his point, he goes online and tries installing something different. Easy as pie! See! Google's innocent! It's all just anti-Americanism from those sneaky Europeans who are our foes! Stewart never addresses the obvious question of why Google is so set on tying if it doesn't matter. Nor does he even have the sense to notice his own actions: He never thought to replace the defaults before he tried it for his article. What he ended up demonstrating was exactly why tie-ins are so important to Google -- because most people will never even know which product they're using, much less try to switch. His whole column is like that. One tech misconception after another. But I'm guessing that the non-techie, business-oriented, mostly conservative readership of the NYT business section thought Stewart's analysis was sharp and informative, and that they now have "scientific" evidence to back up their opposition to all gov't regulation and to the EU's regulation specifically. I find the apparent decency and intelligence of EU regulators to be a heartening source of hope, though it's embarassing that we have to turn to them to uphold democracy and common decency. I also find it bracing to watch as the new, clever tech companies of the 90s, run mainly by young geeks, turn into the monopoly utility companies of the 21st century. Especially scary is that the geek brat billionaires may actually be less ethical than traditional corporate executives because they grew up seeing themselves as idealistic underdogs who were applying their incredible genius to improve the world. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a year beforeits record $5 billion fine from the EU
Mayayana wrote:
"Anonymous" wrote | Google lawyers talked to their EU counterparts about the | possibility of a settlement in June 2017, Bloomberg says, weeks | after the company had been fined 2.4 billion euros for abusing | its dominant position to promote its shopping service. | | https://www.businessinsider.com/goog...-avert-record- | fine-from-eu-2018-7 | | I hate google, apple, microsoft, and facebook. Never considered | buying an apple. Switch from google to duckduckgo. Interesting new twist on this: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/26/b...ust-trump.html James B. Stewart, business columnist for the NYT, has a stunningly idiotic column today. Worse than idiotic, in fact. Some phrases come to mind. "Click Bate" "A Dollar A Word" And nothing really changes. http://history.journalism.ku.edu/1900/1900.shtml Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a year before its record $5 billion fine from the EU
on 7/27/2018, Mayayana supposed :
"Anonymous" wrote Google lawyers talked to their EU counterparts about the possibility of a settlement in June 2017, Bloomberg says, weeks after the company had been fined 2.4 billion euros for abusing its dominant position to promote its shopping service. https://www.businessinsider.com/goog...-avert-record- fine-from-eu-2018-7 I hate google, apple, microsoft, and facebook. Never considered buying an apple. Switch from google to duckduckgo. Interesting new twist on this: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/26/b...ust-trump.html James B. Stewart, business columnist for the NYT, has a stunningly idiotic column today. Worse than idiotic, in fact. It's deeply misleading. His case is that Trump "is right" in saying that the EU is attacking American companies with the Google fine. It seems to be a deliberate attempt to portray Google's punishment as anti-Americanism. Are Stewart and/or the Times taking payoffs to make such an absurd claim and fire up public opinion? I have to give Stewart the benefit of the doubt and provisionally assume that he actually does think Trump is smart, and that he has no understanding of the tech world. The NYT is not likely to actually take payoffs from the likes of Google, except in the form of ad contracts. Instead they just assign writers to pen skewed news and analysis that favors big business. I'm repeatedly impressed by the subtlety of their pro-business slant. It usually reads like real news and coherent thinking. Example: Stewart accepts Google's argument that forced tying of its products on Android by pre-installing them is not an issue because it's easy to install something different. He even finds a researcher (Google-funded, by his own admission) to make that statement. Then, to prove his point, he goes online and tries installing something different. Easy as pie! See! Google's innocent! It's all just anti-Americanism from those sneaky Europeans who are our foes! Stewart never addresses the obvious question of why Google is so set on tying if it doesn't matter. Nor does he even have the sense to notice his own actions: He never thought to replace the defaults before he tried it for his article. What he ended up demonstrating was exactly why tie-ins are so important to Google -- because most people will never even know which product they're using, much less try to switch. His whole column is like that. One tech misconception after another. But I'm guessing that the non-techie, business-oriented, mostly conservative readership of the NYT business section thought Stewart's analysis was sharp and informative, and that they now have "scientific" evidence to back up their opposition to all gov't regulation and to the EU's regulation specifically. I find the apparent decency and intelligence of EU regulators to be a heartening source of hope, though it's embarassing that we have to turn to them to uphold democracy and common decency. I also find it bracing to watch as the new, clever tech companies of the 90s, run mainly by young geeks, turn into the monopoly utility companies of the 21st century. Especially scary is that the geek brat billionaires may actually be less ethical than traditional corporate executives because they grew up seeing themselves as idealistic underdogs who were applying their incredible genius to improve the world. democrats can not accept the truth. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a year before its record $5 billion fine from the EU
"Paul" wrote
| | James B. Stewart, business columnist for the NYT, | has a stunningly idiotic column today. Worse than idiotic, | in fact. | | Some phrases come to mind. | | "Click Bate" | | "A Dollar A Word" | | And nothing really changes. | | http://history.journalism.ku.edu/1900/1900.shtml | Interesting link. Thanks. Maybe I'm a bit naive, but I expect more from top newspapers. This wasn't the 25-year-older fluff that the newspaper companies have been using to fill their websites. It was the business columnist in the NYT print edition. And it wasn't especially titillating, in the sense that click-bait would be. It was just insidiously misleading. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a year before its record $5 billion fine from the EU
In message
Anonymous wrote: democrats can not accept the truth. What a bizarre thing to say. Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a year beforeits record $5 billion fine from the EU
Anonymous wrote:
democrats can not accept the truth. Considering the fine took years to consider, process and act upon, probably not. They could certainly accelerate or delay the final step in the process, to align it with someones birthday. But I would expect the bureaucratic process took a while. And Google tried to negotiate with them, so the writing was on the wall for a while. Someone didn't get out of bed on a Tuesday, whip out a police ticket book and write up a $5B ticket. https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/18/1...fine-antitrust "Google's illegal payments for app bundling ceased in 2014 after the EU started to look into the issue." "FairSearch originally filed a complaint against Google back in 2013, and the group included competitors like Nokia, Microsoft, and Oracle. Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer also called Google a "monopoly" at the time, one that authorities should control. While Google and Microsoft ended their Android patent disagreements a few years ago, that hasn't stopped the EU from investigating the original allegations." A process years in the making. Think of all the Happy Meals the bureaucrats enjoyed while working themselves into a frenzy. That takes time. Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a yearbefore its record $5 billion fine from the EU
In article
David Higton wrote: In message Anonymous wrote: democrats can not accept the truth. What a bizarre thing to say. Dave It's a side affect of drinking Fox "news" Kool Aid. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a year before its record $5 billion fine from the EU
David Higton wrote :
In message Anonymous wrote: democrats can not accept the truth. What a bizarre thing to say. Dave One thing that gives me great pleasure is knowing that all these commie, socialist, lying, democrats are going to end up in eternal damnation. When the great judgment comes after that, they will try to lie their way out of being poured into the lake of fire, but to no avail. They think that their arrogant, totalitarian desires for all of mankind, except themselves, are not going to come back upon them. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a year before its record $5 billion fine from the EU
"Anonymous ****" wrote:
David Higton wrote : In message Anonymous wrote: democrats can not accept the truth. What a bizarre thing to say. One thing that gives me great pleasure is knowing that all these commie, socialist, lying, democrats are going to end up in eternal damnation. When the great judgment comes ... So you're a religious nutcase as well as a ****. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a yearbefore its record $5 billion fine from the EU
In article
"Sclr" wrote: "Anonymous ****" wrote: David Higton wrote : In message Anonymous wrote: democrats can not accept the truth. What a bizarre thing to say. One thing that gives me great pleasure is knowing that all these commie, socialist, lying, democrats are going to end up in eternal damnation. When the great judgment comes ... So you're a religious nutcase as well as a ****. +1 |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Google secretly tried to stop the probe into Android a year before its record $5 billion fine from the EU
Nomen Nescio pretended :
In article Anonymous wrote: David Higton wrote : In message Anonymous wrote: democrats can not accept the truth. What a bizarre thing to say. Dave One thing that gives me great pleasure is knowing that all these commie, socialist, lying, democrats are going to end up in eternal damnation. When the great judgment comes after that, they will try to lie their way out of being poured into the lake of fire, but to no avail. They think that their arrogant, totalitarian desires for all of mankind, except themselves, are not going to come back upon them. Democrat leadership, if you can call it that, is total failure. Look at San Fagsicko. Heroin addict queers, homeless and illegals ****ting all over the streets and cars. Democrats refuse to do anything about it because "they have rights". Actually, I love it! It shows what liberals are all about and the degradation that comes from socialist thinking. This is all because of San Fagsicko's acceptance of sexual perverts. The next great thing is for SF to be shaken severely. The biggest fault runs under Hayward, CA and Hayward is the biggest fag cesspool in the world. Hope it happens during a time of day when queers are poking each other in the butt. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|