If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
Slimer wrote:
1.5%, give or take. People tend to try it out and lose their **** within the first week of its installation because an update broke some of the functionality or left them with an unusable desktop. Generalize with stereotypes much? I have two web sites that have nothing to do with computers or Linux and over 14% of the visitors use Linux and that's been going on for about a year (before that it was about 5%). Windows 8 (barf) helped a lot. The Windows 10 cloud trip and eventual rental will help even more. -- A |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
Slimer wrote:
On 2015-06-12 6:33 PM, Johnny wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:18:27 -0400 Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 4:47 PM, Ken1943 wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:36:57 -0700, T wrote: On 06/11/2015 12:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote: The problem with Linux distros is that when they come out with a new version they always introduce new bugs. As opposed to Windows? Oh my goodness!!! M$ has a long history of patches breaking all kinds of things. And their OS updates have a habit of breaking most everything, which is the point, so you have to buy updates and spend $$$$ on programmers, who have to buy software from M$ to write those programs. And as far as Linux goes, the things I have noticed getting broken as trivial. And the new bugs that get introduced a far fewer than the bugs that get fixed. And, And, you can always get Red Hat Enterprise Linux (or clones), where things are locked down from that sort of thing for 10 years! I can't be sure, but Linux has a .0000005% of the desktop users at the most ?? 1.5%, give or take. People tend to try it out and lose their **** within the first week of its installation because an update broke some of the functionality or left them with an unusable desktop. Why don't you quit lying and tell the truth for a change? I have never known an update to break anything. The people that give up in a week, just won't accept the fact that Linux is a completely different operating system, and take the time to learn how to use it. Instead they give up and run back to something that is more comfortable and familiar to them. I moved to Linux to get away from the Spyware that Windows is, and promised myself that I wouldn't go back, and I haven't. I probably had more trouble learning how to use Linux Mint without screwing it up so bad it was useless, than anyone, but I stuck with it, and had people to help me, and I'm still using it 18 months later. I'm lying about updates breaking the system? Let's see... https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/arch-29/arch-update-%3D-break-4175438110/ Three years old. https://superuser.com/questions/372962/why-would-an-efi-bios-update-break-the-efi-boot-manager Two years old. https://askubuntu.com/questions/223143/broken-package-after-update-linux-headers-error-brokencount-0 A year old and Ubuntu isn't as good as Mint. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/72815/mint-update-with-nvidia-breaks-cinnamon Two years old and three Linux versions behind. http://www.webupd8.org/2014/09/recent-update-broke-ubuntu-desktop-on.html A year old. https://forum.sabayon.org/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=32123 A year old and a few versions behind on a little known distro. I'm sure all of those are lies as well. Seems to me their problems rest between the keyboard and the chair, just like you. You might want to think twice about calling someone a liar when so much evidence is available on the web. Take your Linux propaganda and shove it up your ass, nobody here cares about the amateur code you call an operating system. Wrong again, I'm interested. -- A |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
Slimer wrote:
On 2015-06-12 4:28 PM, T wrote: 3) M$ has a long history of ripping others off Absolutely, it's not like Linux ripped Microsoft off or anything... GNOME until 3 - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 KDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 XFCE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Cinnamon - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 MATE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXQT - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Clearly, Linux is the hotbed of original ideas. So many lies, so much bull****. NONE of them look like Windows 95. -- A |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
On 2015-06-13 7:03 AM, A wrote:
Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 6:33 PM, Johnny wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:18:27 -0400 Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 4:47 PM, Ken1943 wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:36:57 -0700, T wrote: On 06/11/2015 12:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote: The problem with Linux distros is that when they come out with a new version they always introduce new bugs. As opposed to Windows? Oh my goodness!!! M$ has a long history of patches breaking all kinds of things. And their OS updates have a habit of breaking most everything, which is the point, so you have to buy updates and spend $$$$ on programmers, who have to buy software from M$ to write those programs. And as far as Linux goes, the things I have noticed getting broken as trivial. And the new bugs that get introduced a far fewer than the bugs that get fixed. And, And, you can always get Red Hat Enterprise Linux (or clones), where things are locked down from that sort of thing for 10 years! I can't be sure, but Linux has a .0000005% of the desktop users at the most ?? 1.5%, give or take. People tend to try it out and lose their **** within the first week of its installation because an update broke some of the functionality or left them with an unusable desktop. Why don't you quit lying and tell the truth for a change? I have never known an update to break anything. The people that give up in a week, just won't accept the fact that Linux is a completely different operating system, and take the time to learn how to use it. Instead they give up and run back to something that is more comfortable and familiar to them. I moved to Linux to get away from the Spyware that Windows is, and promised myself that I wouldn't go back, and I haven't. I probably had more trouble learning how to use Linux Mint without screwing it up so bad it was useless, than anyone, but I stuck with it, and had people to help me, and I'm still using it 18 months later. I'm lying about updates breaking the system? Let's see... https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/arch-29/arch-update-%3D-break-4175438110/ Three years old. https://superuser.com/questions/372962/why-would-an-efi-bios-update-break-the-efi-boot-manager Two years old. https://askubuntu.com/questions/223143/broken-package-after-update-linux-headers-error-brokencount-0 A year old and Ubuntu isn't as good as Mint. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/72815/mint-update-with-nvidia-breaks-cinnamon Two years old and three Linux versions behind. http://www.webupd8.org/2014/09/recent-update-broke-ubuntu-desktop-on.html A year old. https://forum.sabayon.org/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=32123 A year old and a few versions behind on a little known distro. I'm sure all of those are lies as well. Seems to me their problems rest between the keyboard and the chair, just like you. You might want to think twice about calling someone a liar when so much evidence is available on the web. Take your Linux propaganda and shove it up your ass, nobody here cares about the amateur code you call an operating system. Wrong again, I'm interested. Ugh, manipulation. If the articles were just two weeks old, you would actually say "two weeks old" as if it somehow forgave the operating system. The point I was making was that updating Linux risks breaking it. Your friend didn't believe me and I proved it with a number of links. You can claim that it's an old problem and that it's been fixed, but the reality is that it is a problem which has existed since Linux's beginnings and it is still around. -- Slimer Proud "wintroll" Encrypt. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
On 2015-06-13 7:05 AM, A wrote:
Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 4:28 PM, T wrote: 3) M$ has a long history of ripping others off Absolutely, it's not like Linux ripped Microsoft off or anything... GNOME until 3 - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 KDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 XFCE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Cinnamon - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 MATE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXQT - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Clearly, Linux is the hotbed of original ideas. So many lies, so much bull****. NONE of them look like Windows 95. LOL, let's have the newsgroup decide. I'll provide links to images of each one of them: https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-...2-32.png.en_GB (Gnome 2, notice the taskbar at the bottom and the "start button" at the top left) https://www.kde.org/announcements/4....ts/desktop.png (KDE, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar and the system tray) http://www.unixmen.com/wp-content/up...13/11/XFCE.png (XFCE, notice the "start button" Applications menu at the top left and the dock, stolen from OS X) http://helpsite.org/wp-content/uploa...on-Desktop.jpg (Cinnamon, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar, the system bar and the application shortcuts bar) https://ubuntu-mate.org/gallery/Scre...screenshot.png (MATE, notice the "start button" at the top left, the application shortcut tray, the taskbar and the system tray at the top right) http://www.linuxinsider.com/images/a...74_990x557.jpg (LXDE, notice the "Start button" at the bottom left, the system tray and the taskbar) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...f_LXQt_0.7.png (LXQT, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the applications shortcuts tray, the taskbar and the system tray) Need I go on? The Linux kernel is in itself a ripoff of UNIX and most of the desktop environments are clearly a ripoff of Windows 95. You can continue to call me a liar and embarrass yourself complete, losing every ounce of credibility you have in the process or you can do something Linux advocates seem incapable of and apologize to the person who has just schooled you. As long as imbeciles like you are around to propagate false propaganda about Linux in the hope of gaining converts, I'll be around to dismiss whatever bull**** you've spewed and bring you back to reality. -- Slimer Proud "wintroll" Encrypt. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
Slimer wrote:
On 2015-06-13 7:03 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 6:33 PM, Johnny wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:18:27 -0400 Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 4:47 PM, Ken1943 wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:36:57 -0700, T wrote: On 06/11/2015 12:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote: The problem with Linux distros is that when they come out with a new version they always introduce new bugs. As opposed to Windows? Oh my goodness!!! M$ has a long history of patches breaking all kinds of things. And their OS updates have a habit of breaking most everything, which is the point, so you have to buy updates and spend $$$$ on programmers, who have to buy software from M$ to write those programs. And as far as Linux goes, the things I have noticed getting broken as trivial. And the new bugs that get introduced a far fewer than the bugs that get fixed. And, And, you can always get Red Hat Enterprise Linux (or clones), where things are locked down from that sort of thing for 10 years! I can't be sure, but Linux has a .0000005% of the desktop users at the most ?? 1.5%, give or take. People tend to try it out and lose their **** within the first week of its installation because an update broke some of the functionality or left them with an unusable desktop. Why don't you quit lying and tell the truth for a change? I have never known an update to break anything. The people that give up in a week, just won't accept the fact that Linux is a completely different operating system, and take the time to learn how to use it. Instead they give up and run back to something that is more comfortable and familiar to them. I moved to Linux to get away from the Spyware that Windows is, and promised myself that I wouldn't go back, and I haven't. I probably had more trouble learning how to use Linux Mint without screwing it up so bad it was useless, than anyone, but I stuck with it, and had people to help me, and I'm still using it 18 months later. I'm lying about updates breaking the system? Let's see... https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/arch-29/arch-update-%3D-break-4175438110/ Three years old. https://superuser.com/questions/372962/why-would-an-efi-bios-update-break-the-efi-boot-manager Two years old. https://askubuntu.com/questions/223143/broken-package-after-update-linux-headers-error-brokencount-0 A year old and Ubuntu isn't as good as Mint. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/72815/mint-update-with-nvidia-breaks-cinnamon Two years old and three Linux versions behind. http://www.webupd8.org/2014/09/recent-update-broke-ubuntu-desktop-on.html A year old. https://forum.sabayon.org/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=32123 A year old and a few versions behind on a little known distro. I'm sure all of those are lies as well. Seems to me their problems rest between the keyboard and the chair, just like you. You might want to think twice about calling someone a liar when so much evidence is available on the web. Take your Linux propaganda and shove it up your ass, nobody here cares about the amateur code you call an operating system. Wrong again, I'm interested. Ugh, manipulation. If the articles were just two weeks old, you would actually say "two weeks old" as if it somehow forgave the operating system. The point I was making was that updating Linux risks breaking it. Your friend didn't believe me and I proved it with a number of links. You can claim that it's an old problem and that it's been fixed, but the reality is that it is a problem which has existed since Linux's beginnings and it is still around. I've never had that problem since 03. What am I doing wrong? It's easy to find problems with *any* OS, dumb ass, even Windows. I worked on a Windows laptop computer that would not boot. As the reboot on BSOD is set by default, there was no way to read the BSOD code. It wouldn't go into Safe Mode. Windows 7. Hardware, you'd say? Nope, WINDOWS. I reinstalled Windows and it's been working fine for a couple of weeks now. So if you think your little Google searches prove anything, I want whatever it is you've been smoking. -- A |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
Slimer wrote:
On 2015-06-13 7:05 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 4:28 PM, T wrote: 3) M$ has a long history of ripping others off Absolutely, it's not like Linux ripped Microsoft off or anything... GNOME until 3 - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 KDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 XFCE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Cinnamon - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 MATE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXQT - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Clearly, Linux is the hotbed of original ideas. So many lies, so much bull****. NONE of them look like Windows 95. LOL, let's have the newsgroup decide. I'll provide links to images of each one of them: https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-...2-32.png.en_GB (Gnome 2, notice the taskbar at the bottom and the "start button" at the top left) https://www.kde.org/announcements/4....ts/desktop.png (KDE, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar and the system tray) http://www.unixmen.com/wp-content/up...13/11/XFCE.png (XFCE, notice the "start button" Applications menu at the top left and the dock, stolen from OS X) http://helpsite.org/wp-content/uploa...on-Desktop.jpg (Cinnamon, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar, the system bar and the application shortcuts bar) https://ubuntu-mate.org/gallery/Scre...screenshot.png (MATE, notice the "start button" at the top left, the application shortcut tray, the taskbar and the system tray at the top right) http://www.linuxinsider.com/images/a...74_990x557.jpg (LXDE, notice the "Start button" at the bottom left, the system tray and the taskbar) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...f_LXQt_0.7.png (LXQT, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the applications shortcuts tray, the taskbar and the system tray) Need I go on? The Linux kernel is in itself a ripoff of UNIX and most of the desktop environments are clearly a ripoff of Windows 95. You can continue to call me a liar and embarrass yourself complete, losing every ounce of credibility you have in the process or you can do something Linux advocates seem incapable of and apologize to the person who has just schooled you. As long as imbeciles like you are around to propagate false propaganda about Linux in the hope of gaining converts, I'll be around to dismiss whatever bull**** you've spewed and bring you back to reality. iOS, Windows, Next, Linux, etc. have similar looks. Linux is more configurable. None of these screen shots look exactly like Win95. Linux doesn't do much malware. Windows loves malware. Linux is more stable. Windows is not. Linux is free. Windows is not. Those are the main differences, not eye candy, dumb ass. -- A |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
On 2015-06-13 10:15 AM, A wrote:
Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-13 7:05 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 4:28 PM, T wrote: 3) M$ has a long history of ripping others off Absolutely, it's not like Linux ripped Microsoft off or anything... GNOME until 3 - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 KDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 XFCE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Cinnamon - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 MATE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXQT - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Clearly, Linux is the hotbed of original ideas. So many lies, so much bull****. NONE of them look like Windows 95. LOL, let's have the newsgroup decide. I'll provide links to images of each one of them: https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-...2-32.png.en_GB (Gnome 2, notice the taskbar at the bottom and the "start button" at the top left) https://www.kde.org/announcements/4....ts/desktop.png (KDE, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar and the system tray) http://www.unixmen.com/wp-content/up...13/11/XFCE.png (XFCE, notice the "start button" Applications menu at the top left and the dock, stolen from OS X) http://helpsite.org/wp-content/uploa...on-Desktop.jpg (Cinnamon, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar, the system bar and the application shortcuts bar) https://ubuntu-mate.org/gallery/Scre...screenshot.png (MATE, notice the "start button" at the top left, the application shortcut tray, the taskbar and the system tray at the top right) http://www.linuxinsider.com/images/a...74_990x557.jpg (LXDE, notice the "Start button" at the bottom left, the system tray and the taskbar) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...f_LXQt_0.7.png (LXQT, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the applications shortcuts tray, the taskbar and the system tray) Need I go on? The Linux kernel is in itself a ripoff of UNIX and most of the desktop environments are clearly a ripoff of Windows 95. You can continue to call me a liar and embarrass yourself complete, losing every ounce of credibility you have in the process or you can do something Linux advocates seem incapable of and apologize to the person who has just schooled you. As long as imbeciles like you are around to propagate false propaganda about Linux in the hope of gaining converts, I'll be around to dismiss whatever bull**** you've spewed and bring you back to reality. iOS, Windows, Next, Linux, etc. have similar looks. Linux is more configurable. None of these screen shots look exactly like Win95. So it's forgivable for Linux to have a start button, have the same elements in the same parts of the screen and even operate like Windows 95 as long as it doesn't look *exactly* like Windows 95. What a crock of ****. Linux doesn't do much malware. Windows loves malware. Windows 7 and 8 have built-in defenses against malware. It, in addition to setting your UAC to the highest level or even using a Guest account as you would in Linux ensures that malware stays off. This argument is an old one and doesn't excuse how awful Linux is. Linux is more stable. Windows is not. This was only true when Microsoft was delivering the 9x of Windows. Since 2000, it has been the absolute opposite. Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 work wonderfully and do not crash unless you use faulty hardware. Linux, on the other hand, has applications which just quit for no reason and don't even provide you with an explanation as well as bugs which freeze the system entirely and require you to power off. Your continued bull**** is noted. Linux is free. Windows is not. Ebola is free, the vaccine against it is not. -- Slimer Proud "wintroll" Encrypt. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
Slimer wrote:
On 2015-06-13 10:15 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-13 7:05 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 4:28 PM, T wrote: 3) M$ has a long history of ripping others off Absolutely, it's not like Linux ripped Microsoft off or anything... GNOME until 3 - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 KDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 XFCE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Cinnamon - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 MATE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXQT - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Clearly, Linux is the hotbed of original ideas. So many lies, so much bull****. NONE of them look like Windows 95. LOL, let's have the newsgroup decide. I'll provide links to images of each one of them: https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-...2-32.png.en_GB (Gnome 2, notice the taskbar at the bottom and the "start button" at the top left) https://www.kde.org/announcements/4....ts/desktop.png (KDE, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar and the system tray) http://www.unixmen.com/wp-content/up...13/11/XFCE.png (XFCE, notice the "start button" Applications menu at the top left and the dock, stolen from OS X) http://helpsite.org/wp-content/uploa...on-Desktop.jpg (Cinnamon, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar, the system bar and the application shortcuts bar) https://ubuntu-mate.org/gallery/Scre...screenshot.png (MATE, notice the "start button" at the top left, the application shortcut tray, the taskbar and the system tray at the top right) http://www.linuxinsider.com/images/a...74_990x557.jpg (LXDE, notice the "Start button" at the bottom left, the system tray and the taskbar) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...f_LXQt_0.7.png (LXQT, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the applications shortcuts tray, the taskbar and the system tray) Need I go on? The Linux kernel is in itself a ripoff of UNIX and most of the desktop environments are clearly a ripoff of Windows 95. You can continue to call me a liar and embarrass yourself complete, losing every ounce of credibility you have in the process or you can do something Linux advocates seem incapable of and apologize to the person who has just schooled you. As long as imbeciles like you are around to propagate false propaganda about Linux in the hope of gaining converts, I'll be around to dismiss whatever bull**** you've spewed and bring you back to reality. iOS, Windows, Next, Linux, etc. have similar looks. Linux is more configurable. None of these screen shots look exactly like Win95. So it's forgivable for Linux to have a start button, have the same elements in the same parts of the screen and even operate like Windows 95 as long as it doesn't look *exactly* like Windows 95. What a crock of ****. Linux doesn't do much malware. Windows loves malware. Windows 7 and 8 have built-in defenses against malware. It, in addition to setting your UAC to the highest level or even using a Guest account as you would in Linux ensures that malware stays off. This argument is an old one and doesn't excuse how awful Linux is. Linux is more stable. Windows is not. This was only true when Microsoft was delivering the 9x of Windows. Since 2000, it has been the absolute opposite. Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 work wonderfully and do not crash unless you use faulty hardware. Bull****. Linux, on the other hand, has applications which just quit for no reason and don't even provide you with an explanation as well as bugs which freeze the system entirely and require you to power off. Your continued bull**** is noted. You're the one doing the bull****ting. I've never known anyone to have those types of problems with Linux. Linux is free. Windows is not. Ebola is free, the vaccine against it is not. Your analogy is false but, then again, so are you. -- A |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
Slimer wrote:
So it's forgivable for Linux to have a start button, have the same elements in the same parts of the screen and even operate like Windows 95 as long as it doesn't look *exactly* like Windows 95. What a crock of ****. What Gates/Jobs stole from Xerox: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...rkstations.jpg So are you saying Xerox Alto/Star is better than Windows (only using your "logic") -- A |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
On 2015-06-13 10:37 AM, A wrote:
Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-13 10:15 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-13 7:05 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 4:28 PM, T wrote: 3) M$ has a long history of ripping others off Absolutely, it's not like Linux ripped Microsoft off or anything... GNOME until 3 - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 KDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 XFCE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Cinnamon - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 MATE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXQT - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Clearly, Linux is the hotbed of original ideas. So many lies, so much bull****. NONE of them look like Windows 95. LOL, let's have the newsgroup decide. I'll provide links to images of each one of them: https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-...2-32.png.en_GB (Gnome 2, notice the taskbar at the bottom and the "start button" at the top left) https://www.kde.org/announcements/4....ts/desktop.png (KDE, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar and the system tray) http://www.unixmen.com/wp-content/up...13/11/XFCE.png (XFCE, notice the "start button" Applications menu at the top left and the dock, stolen from OS X) http://helpsite.org/wp-content/uploa...on-Desktop.jpg (Cinnamon, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar, the system bar and the application shortcuts bar) https://ubuntu-mate.org/gallery/Scre...screenshot.png (MATE, notice the "start button" at the top left, the application shortcut tray, the taskbar and the system tray at the top right) http://www.linuxinsider.com/images/a...74_990x557.jpg (LXDE, notice the "Start button" at the bottom left, the system tray and the taskbar) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...f_LXQt_0.7.png (LXQT, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the applications shortcuts tray, the taskbar and the system tray) Need I go on? The Linux kernel is in itself a ripoff of UNIX and most of the desktop environments are clearly a ripoff of Windows 95. You can continue to call me a liar and embarrass yourself complete, losing every ounce of credibility you have in the process or you can do something Linux advocates seem incapable of and apologize to the person who has just schooled you. As long as imbeciles like you are around to propagate false propaganda about Linux in the hope of gaining converts, I'll be around to dismiss whatever bull**** you've spewed and bring you back to reality. iOS, Windows, Next, Linux, etc. have similar looks. Linux is more configurable. None of these screen shots look exactly like Win95. So it's forgivable for Linux to have a start button, have the same elements in the same parts of the screen and even operate like Windows 95 as long as it doesn't look *exactly* like Windows 95. What a crock of ****. Linux doesn't do much malware. Windows loves malware. Windows 7 and 8 have built-in defenses against malware. It, in addition to setting your UAC to the highest level or even using a Guest account as you would in Linux ensures that malware stays off. This argument is an old one and doesn't excuse how awful Linux is. Linux is more stable. Windows is not. This was only true when Microsoft was delivering the 9x of Windows. Since 2000, it has been the absolute opposite. Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 work wonderfully and do not crash unless you use faulty hardware. Bull****. To a blind Linux advocate. Meanwhile, the 90% of the computer-using world which has chosen Windows over OS X and Linux disagrees with you. It's not a coincidence that the operating system you guys gave birth to in a toilet is only used by about 1.5% of the world. Hell, I was in Cuba where a distribution is sponsored by the government and where Windows use is discouraged and its airports and resorts _STILL_ use Windows. Even the dirt-poor Communists refuse to use it, imagine that. Linux, on the other hand, has applications which just quit for no reason and don't even provide you with an explanation as well as bugs which freeze the system entirely and require you to power off. Your continued bull**** is noted. You're the one doing the bull****ting. I've never known anyone to have those types of problems with Linux. I have no reason to believe you since you've already lied several times to protect your toiletware, in particular about updates not breaking the system and it not borrowing heavily from Windows 95. Your credibility is nil and therefore any statement you make is worth less than dirt. Linux is free. Windows is not. Ebola is free, the vaccine against it is not. Your analogy is false but, then again, so are you. I have evidence and statistics on my side, you have a bunch of unwashed, obese, bearded virgin fellow liars on yours. I prefer my position. -- Slimer Proud "wintroll" Encrypt. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
On 2015-06-13 10:43 AM, A wrote:
Slimer wrote: So it's forgivable for Linux to have a start button, have the same elements in the same parts of the screen and even operate like Windows 95 as long as it doesn't look *exactly* like Windows 95. What a crock of ****. What Gates/Jobs stole from Xerox: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...rkstations.jpg So are you saying Xerox Alto/Star is better than Windows (only using your "logic") Jobs was the one who "stole" from Xerox and even then, he paid for the right to do so. Everyone knows that the modern GUI was ripped off from Mac OS and that Atari's TOS and every other imaginable modern operating system was the result of it. However, the Start button, the system tray and the application menu used by so many Linux environments were a creation of Microsoft and introduced in Windows 95. If Microsoft is evil and everything they do is wrong, you have to wonder why Linux developers have done everything in their power to imitate it, as poorly as they have. Your idiotic argument ignores all of history which isn't surprising since you don't seem to know much about anything at all. -- Slimer Proud "wintroll" Encrypt. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
On 6/13/2015 10:03 AM, Slimer wrote:
On 2015-06-13 10:37 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-13 10:15 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-13 7:05 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 4:28 PM, T wrote: 3) M$ has a long history of ripping others off Absolutely, it's not like Linux ripped Microsoft off or anything... GNOME until 3 - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 KDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 XFCE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Cinnamon - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 MATE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXQT - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Clearly, Linux is the hotbed of original ideas. So many lies, so much bull****. NONE of them look like Windows 95. LOL, let's have the newsgroup decide. I'll provide links to images of each one of them: https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-...2-32.png.en_GB (Gnome 2, notice the taskbar at the bottom and the "start button" at the top left) https://www.kde.org/announcements/4....ts/desktop.png (KDE, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar and the system tray) http://www.unixmen.com/wp-content/up...13/11/XFCE.png (XFCE, notice the "start button" Applications menu at the top left and the dock, stolen from OS X) http://helpsite.org/wp-content/uploa...on-Desktop.jpg (Cinnamon, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar, the system bar and the application shortcuts bar) https://ubuntu-mate.org/gallery/Scre...screenshot.png (MATE, notice the "start button" at the top left, the application shortcut tray, the taskbar and the system tray at the top right) http://www.linuxinsider.com/images/a...74_990x557.jpg (LXDE, notice the "Start button" at the bottom left, the system tray and the taskbar) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...f_LXQt_0.7.png (LXQT, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the applications shortcuts tray, the taskbar and the system tray) Need I go on? The Linux kernel is in itself a ripoff of UNIX and most of the desktop environments are clearly a ripoff of Windows 95. You can continue to call me a liar and embarrass yourself complete, losing every ounce of credibility you have in the process or you can do something Linux advocates seem incapable of and apologize to the person who has just schooled you. As long as imbeciles like you are around to propagate false propaganda about Linux in the hope of gaining converts, I'll be around to dismiss whatever bull**** you've spewed and bring you back to reality. iOS, Windows, Next, Linux, etc. have similar looks. Linux is more configurable. None of these screen shots look exactly like Win95. So it's forgivable for Linux to have a start button, have the same elements in the same parts of the screen and even operate like Windows 95 as long as it doesn't look *exactly* like Windows 95. What a crock of ****. Linux doesn't do much malware. Windows loves malware. Windows 7 and 8 have built-in defenses against malware. It, in addition to setting your UAC to the highest level or even using a Guest account as you would in Linux ensures that malware stays off. This argument is an old one and doesn't excuse how awful Linux is. Linux is more stable. Windows is not. This was only true when Microsoft was delivering the 9x of Windows. Since 2000, it has been the absolute opposite. Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 work wonderfully and do not crash unless you use faulty hardware. Bull****. To a blind Linux advocate. Meanwhile, the 90% of the computer-using world which has chosen Windows over OS X and Linux disagrees with you. It's not a coincidence that the operating system you guys gave birth to in a toilet is only used by about 1.5% of the world. Hell, I was in Cuba where a distribution is sponsored by the government and where Windows use is discouraged and its airports and resorts _STILL_ use Windows. Even the dirt-poor Communists refuse to use it, imagine that. Linux, on the other hand, has applications which just quit for no reason and don't even provide you with an explanation as well as bugs which freeze the system entirely and require you to power off. Your continued bull**** is noted. You're the one doing the bull****ting. I've never known anyone to have those types of problems with Linux. I have no reason to believe you since you've already lied several times to protect your toiletware, in particular about updates not breaking the system and it not borrowing heavily from Windows 95. Your credibility is nil and therefore any statement you make is worth less than dirt. Linux is free. Windows is not. Ebola is free, the vaccine against it is not. Your analogy is false but, then again, so are you. I have evidence and statistics on my side, you have a bunch of unwashed, obese, bearded virgin fellow liars on yours. I prefer my position. Well A, listen and learn, Yesterday out of sheer boredom I Loaded up Zorin Linux, I saw on the web that it was better then some of the others I've tried. Well as usual the network would not work,with my Nettgear WDRN 3100v2 adapter, had to switch to an older Dlink unit and **** around with it till got it to work. Sound was weak had to turn speakers up to about 70% manually. Then finally tried to increase cursor size from 24 to 36 as I can barely see the tiny white cursor on a light background. Anyway when i tried to back out of Dconf THE SYSTEM LOCKED UP SOLID!!!!! I had to power off the computer to reboot back to Windows, Where I found That Your so good Linux had lost all The macros on my Steelseries gaming Keyboard. SO DON'T tell me that you have never heard of such things, NOW YOU HAVE. Needless to say another Linus distro went into the ****pile. Rene |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
Slimer wrote:
I have evidence and statistics on my side That's funny! -- A |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Build 1074 feels like Linux
Rene Lamontagne wrote:
On 6/13/2015 10:03 AM, Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-13 10:37 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-13 10:15 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-13 7:05 AM, A wrote: Slimer wrote: On 2015-06-12 4:28 PM, T wrote: 3) M$ has a long history of ripping others off Absolutely, it's not like Linux ripped Microsoft off or anything... GNOME until 3 - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 KDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 XFCE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Cinnamon - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 MATE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXDE - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 LXQT - Looks and behaves exactly like Windows 95 Clearly, Linux is the hotbed of original ideas. So many lies, so much bull****. NONE of them look like Windows 95. LOL, let's have the newsgroup decide. I'll provide links to images of each one of them: https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-...2-32.png.en_GB (Gnome 2, notice the taskbar at the bottom and the "start button" at the top left) https://www.kde.org/announcements/4....ts/desktop.png (KDE, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar and the system tray) http://www.unixmen.com/wp-content/up...13/11/XFCE.png (XFCE, notice the "start button" Applications menu at the top left and the dock, stolen from OS X) http://helpsite.org/wp-content/uploa...on-Desktop.jpg (Cinnamon, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the taskbar, the system bar and the application shortcuts bar) https://ubuntu-mate.org/gallery/Scre...screenshot.png (MATE, notice the "start button" at the top left, the application shortcut tray, the taskbar and the system tray at the top right) http://www.linuxinsider.com/images/a...74_990x557.jpg (LXDE, notice the "Start button" at the bottom left, the system tray and the taskbar) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...f_LXQt_0.7.png (LXQT, notice the "start button" at the bottom left, the applications shortcuts tray, the taskbar and the system tray) Need I go on? The Linux kernel is in itself a ripoff of UNIX and most of the desktop environments are clearly a ripoff of Windows 95. You can continue to call me a liar and embarrass yourself complete, losing every ounce of credibility you have in the process or you can do something Linux advocates seem incapable of and apologize to the person who has just schooled you. As long as imbeciles like you are around to propagate false propaganda about Linux in the hope of gaining converts, I'll be around to dismiss whatever bull**** you've spewed and bring you back to reality. iOS, Windows, Next, Linux, etc. have similar looks. Linux is more configurable. None of these screen shots look exactly like Win95. So it's forgivable for Linux to have a start button, have the same elements in the same parts of the screen and even operate like Windows 95 as long as it doesn't look *exactly* like Windows 95. What a crock of ****. Linux doesn't do much malware. Windows loves malware. Windows 7 and 8 have built-in defenses against malware. It, in addition to setting your UAC to the highest level or even using a Guest account as you would in Linux ensures that malware stays off. This argument is an old one and doesn't excuse how awful Linux is. Linux is more stable. Windows is not. This was only true when Microsoft was delivering the 9x of Windows. Since 2000, it has been the absolute opposite. Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 work wonderfully and do not crash unless you use faulty hardware. Bull****. To a blind Linux advocate. Meanwhile, the 90% of the computer-using world which has chosen Windows over OS X and Linux disagrees with you. It's not a coincidence that the operating system you guys gave birth to in a toilet is only used by about 1.5% of the world. Hell, I was in Cuba where a distribution is sponsored by the government and where Windows use is discouraged and its airports and resorts _STILL_ use Windows. Even the dirt-poor Communists refuse to use it, imagine that. Linux, on the other hand, has applications which just quit for no reason and don't even provide you with an explanation as well as bugs which freeze the system entirely and require you to power off. Your continued bull**** is noted. You're the one doing the bull****ting. I've never known anyone to have those types of problems with Linux. I have no reason to believe you since you've already lied several times to protect your toiletware, in particular about updates not breaking the system and it not borrowing heavily from Windows 95. Your credibility is nil and therefore any statement you make is worth less than dirt. Linux is free. Windows is not. Ebola is free, the vaccine against it is not. Your analogy is false but, then again, so are you. I have evidence and statistics on my side, you have a bunch of unwashed, obese, bearded virgin fellow liars on yours. I prefer my position. Well A, listen and learn, Yesterday out of sheer boredom I Loaded up Zorin Linux, I saw on the web that it was better then some of the others I've tried. Well as usual the network would not work,with my Nettgear WDRN 3100v2 adapter, had to switch to an older Dlink unit and **** around with it till got it to work. Sound was weak had to turn speakers up to about 70% manually. Then finally tried to increase cursor size from 24 to 36 as I can barely see the tiny white cursor on a light background. Anyway when i tried to back out of Dconf THE SYSTEM LOCKED UP SOLID!!!!! I had to power off the computer to reboot back to Windows, Where I found That Your so good Linux had lost all The macros on my Steelseries gaming Keyboard. SO DON'T tell me that you have never heard of such things, NOW YOU HAVE. Needless to say another Linus distro went into the ****pile. Rene Do you always give up so easily? -- A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|