If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
In article
nospam wrote: In article , Melzzzzz wrote: Two words: Windows Update. They need to fix that. Computer constantly writing to disk gigabytes of data is *not acceptable*. And Win 10 takes 1-1.5GB of RAM sitting doing nothing... You need at least 2GB to fire up program without having to swap out.... That is 64 bit version. I guess that for 32 bit version you need half of that... who cares. memory is cheap, as is disk space. Problem is that Windows Update hogs CPU/disk. Not pleasant experience if you do something with computer other than sending mails/chatting and surfing... no it doesn't and it doesn't take very long to update even if it did. |
Ads |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-05 6:45 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 18:26:23 -0400 Silver Slimer wrote: Start menu, task bar and tray icons. What else one needs? I use Gnome currently which begs for Mac like dock on the bottom so I combine cairo-dock with it I don't see a reason to use a dock with Gnome when it already comes with its own. Well if you want to quickly navigate windows by mouse dock comes handy. I find that Gnome 3's hot corner is actually a lot faster. I'm a gigantic fan of what they did with their hot corners to be honest and am disappointed that Unity doesn't do the same thing. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX9kz0AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uvLQIAILEijPP7ymnjFCiq8w4Sq6G 0IwH7K7D67bAipomd/83M73bF5kOsq6NlII3cAqV6u/vMGuWVeon8a/lRV6urYCO Jxi6A0L5b2wdq1KjTUM0TLm6sT/qp4rqSAP7q0eyCC+xmSOwRC8lp1y6DieVFFWT DTP753vJEPK6Uw+6mAtFxFB91M/qZEOBF9wl3iLLQvau3j5zmF9dQ3j88rXToWMQ E7tolv77ASQrWZvzBkh0v3aGWBR6xNSIWLYGrCJU0emjMc4sBY UJRjAr9XGecSX5 pt9S25OnhITBcxBErbtsfXtHch6gXqzQTbAgtEoROog7iGXb19 xOwsKZ6pC0RNg= =vZQt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal)loses patent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 09:09:08 -0400
Silver Slimer wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-05 6:45 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 18:26:23 -0400 Silver Slimer wrote: Start menu, task bar and tray icons. What else one needs? I use Gnome currently which begs for Mac like dock on the bottom so I combine cairo-dock with it I don't see a reason to use a dock with Gnome when it already comes with its own. Well if you want to quickly navigate windows by mouse dock comes handy. I find that Gnome 3's hot corner is actually a lot faster. I'm a gigantic fan of what they did with their hot corners to be honest and am disappointed that Unity doesn't do the same thing. Unity uses compiz, you can define hot corners but it's not obvious. -- press any key to continue or any other to quit |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
Silver Slimer wrote:
I find that Gnome 3's hot corner is actually a lot faster. I'm a gigantic fan of what they did with their hot corners to be honest and am disappointed that Unity doesn't do the same thing. Yes it does, it just is disabled by default. Simplest way to enable and configure is install the Unity Tweak Tool sudo apt-get install unity-tweak-tool launch it and under Windows Manager click Hotcorners, enjoy! -- Take care, Jonathan ------------------- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-05 8:01 PM, GreyCloud wrote: On 10/05/2016 02:18 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: On 2016-10-05 1:05 PM, GreyCloud wrote: On 10/05/2016 02:40 AM, Alan Baker wrote: On 2016-10-04 1:22 PM, GreyCloud wrote: On 10/03/2016 10:08 PM, Alan Baker wrote: snip Change of subject here, but have you downloaded Sierra yet? If so, did it speed up any? No, not yet. I try and live by the advice I give my clients: don't rush to adopt the latest thing. :-) That's why I'm asking. The 4k iMac is nice, but it is so slow. Should've paid the extra money with one with a faster hard drive or a big SSD. Regardless of what Mac heads tell you, OS X is slow no matter what kind of processor or amount of memory you throw at it. Apple is happy to see you spend the money but reward you with nothing at all. I recall getting my parents to pay for a 4GB upgrade on their Mac Mini to bring the total to 8GB. There's a 5400 RPM HD in there but even that kind of old technology would work relatively well with Linux or Windows on it. On the Mac? Disgusting. My parents felt _no change_ from 4GB to 8GB despiet assurances from zealots that the experience would be fantastic. Maybe things will change once the filesystem is replaced (did it happen yet?) but I doubt it; optimization is something absolutely no one at Apple can even spell much less implement. Well, the older iMac with snow leopard I had, it had a 5400 rpm drive in it and it performed satisfactory. It had 8Gb of ram, and only a Core-Duo Intel. Now it seems that Apple has missed something... could it be the logic board isn't designed right? Hard to tell. One way to tell is put Linux on it to find out. Well, I imagine that Apple's motherboards are some of the crappier ones on the market. I mean, even on the PC, if you buy a motherboard from a garbage company, you won't be getting the kind of performance you would get from the same CPU on an ASUS. It's quite possible that whatever they use is limiting the potential of the chip. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX9lTHAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uD/cH/0t6arIUXVXxwzrPVMHqT1by V1oYnVkHLDeKtiKiXS6biUP5pXDTWVDkxXhjjsKUJLRdkNSXOU g1Tyny6TMXcSJq kYgudyR9Rqpu5aQ6FGtmFw7+XeVEpZubcd/UfNkt6XlFsW1l8p2CrZ/mddGf/VGK +ZVsuGqceZlqOFiJ5q3GnPQJqHX8UkIdvO9DoyPgx7dOjs4sLO/DLcMEjVihCZtr nGLFDpSk5PwOkOG7qM1saytDIPm1WdOiKhhrdyFm0RLMimbTOl kHjM/ZuAscvmkS shhzHoz00r+qeG8N6Lq42rSzQ4W4H44tRJbhyRi3GCwcb5ITwQ 6ya6dDpigUsNk= =pVpr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-05 8:05 PM, GreyCloud wrote: On 10/05/2016 03:08 PM, nospam wrote: In article , Melzzzzz wrote: Two words: Windows Update. They need to fix that. Computer constantly writing to disk gigabytes of data is *not acceptable*. And Win 10 takes 1-1.5GB of RAM sitting doing nothing... You need at least 2GB to fire up program without having to swap out.... That is 64 bit version. I guess that for 32 bit version you need half of that... who cares. memory is cheap, as is disk space. But not on a new iMac. You can't even get inside on the 4k model. You either select all that should be in the mac or live with its slowness. And memory from Apple has never been cheap, and neither are their hard drives or SSDs. Apple and its users have always been proud to tell us that you need to buy a specific brand of RAM for the Mac if you want to maintain stability. It seemed pretty lame at the time that I owned Macs (2003-2005) but I think that it's still the same story today. Meanwhile, the PC actually offers you the opportunity to put whatever RAM you want in there. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX9lU1AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+utGwH/je3F1VTUvlZgRbO+rmrb6g0 EYhOn7C1bQhvqzYks9AvPrHru7DHGgRDpqK7GVHrpmvAf3oVrS lc+KN57xcM+g8O /8wsLi6zEjFK1CEi0o32Vyg8JtxYU8p9DN4/4Wagz5vop9bJfzZF7925p+BpEoeC swh9oTW6pFiqVhmw2IZ50jxRo9XMGG3fop2pYkWV0xiGyycRvJ MAJuA0+s0AwTfy ckKZoVjwJRqzoBHl/sjuNtC4a6dPCkwhIhxd01AyA7lUzOVWUl+csAz8WQRG9x7q IIzoseAAywE2SVO0NKa8KgASIC1Qz7EkTHKvDVF0pAYE+51f7i lT6T+qO7N/tK0= =ru9K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) loses patent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
In article , Silver Slimer wrote:
Apple and its users have always been proud to tell us that you need to buy a specific brand of RAM for the Mac if you want to maintain stability. It seemed pretty lame at the time that I owned Macs (2003-2005) but I think that it's still the same story today. complete nonsense. all that matters is that it meets the required specs for the system. Meanwhile, the PC actually offers you the opportunity to put whatever RAM you want in there. same with macs. |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
In article
Alan Baker wrote: On 2016-10-05 5:10 PM, GreyCloud wrote: On 10/05/2016 02:51 PM, nospam wrote: In article , Silver Slimer wrote: Regardless of what Mac heads tell you, OS X is slow no matter what kind of processor or amount of memory you throw at it. benchmarks show that to be complete rubbish. Apple is happy to see you spend the money but reward you with nothing at all. I recall getting my parents to pay for a 4GB upgrade on their Mac Mini to bring the total to 8GB. There's a 5400 RPM HD in there but even that kind of old technology would work relatively well with Linux or Windows on it. On the Mac? Disgusting. My parents felt _no change_ from 4GB to 8GB despiet assurances from zealots that the experience would be fantastic. that only means that you weren't memory bound. Maybe things will change once the filesystem is replaced (did it happen yet?) but I doubt it; optimization is something absolutely no one at Apple can even spell much less implement. nonsense. Why does the Apple Terminal program take 7 seconds to finally show a prompt then? I don't know, because I can open it and get a prompt instantly. |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-05 10:48 PM, nospam wrote: In article , Silver Slimer wrote: Windows 10 runs OK on 1GB of RAM on a 10 year-old computer. no it doesn't. i have it on a 7 year old computer and it redefines the meaning of slow. The student in question had the graphical enhancements automatically turned off in other words, it was so unusable that you had to gimp it so that it was tolerable. The sweet girl had no idea what she was doing so yes, I helped her out. and the experience was more than acceptable once I used CCleaner for her decade-old clogged registry and defragmented her hard disk. I expected it to be a joke but it was quite usable and even she was shocked. sure she was. more bull****. Imbecile. I know this because I did it for a student. 2GB gives you a better experience so your 2007-2008 machine is still well-served. 4GB and it's quite good whereas OS X chugs along like molasses. 8GB and you have an excellent experience whereas OS X still just chugs along like molasses. I can't imagine why Apple users would be ready and willing to accept such abhorrent performance from a modern, expensive machine. nonsense. It's only nonsense to a Mac user who has never been exposed to better performance. If OS X is all that you see, you'll consider it to be very fast. However, once you use Windows on the same machine, OS X is exposed as the slow piece of crap that it is. It uses an outdated filesystem from the 90s which even the company itself recognizes as being an issue so no amount of lying from Mac zealots will change reality. nonsense. Yes, your post _is_ complete nonsense. Thank you for pointing it out. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX9lakAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uCeoH/2fodNtXkRGaCB/TT8+rai35 A5/3kghxS+wTVoqK8x+BKlwWbqWqxRxSRCHVwfLYMKNP861xKKpej 8Gl511z+rok APJi20wg4guAofeZnTw4LhzR1s99ekdjdL0URn6bfdWTkOYyaR 5Kg9vmxHgiIzBo 8QMTLX4YswNoRTNTsoPLbGCqERzT6+l8W1ZWmX/JsIwrFcJLrbTz1w2qX4EOjHk6 H2Y3qDwFn45+GhyJ44f3Dmh7GENzn07+TOBNuEyFzH8Gi8sGaP QFZVO8EyyAocjx c9QT2EnqRGqEy+qHiLBHDyiphcPAW5LxzQ6vJ5JSNeeqzKFD5X aIicB+GxUGze4= =f37c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-05 10:48 PM, nospam wrote: In article , Silver Slimer wrote: Like I said before, it has already been resolved with forced updates. The remaining problem is that after updating, Windows keeps the update files on the hard disk for God knows what reason. that's to be able to undo the update in case there are any problems, which is a very good idea and since disk space is cheap, who cares, and it eventually auto-deletes anyway (i think it's 10 days). The more they accumulate, the slower the computer gets. nonsense. it only takes up disk space. it doesn't affect speed. Theoretically, that's true. That's why I refused to believe it when people told me that back in the early 2000s. However, in my own experience, deleting those files indeed declogs the system and increases performance. If you have a Windows machine, I would suggest that you _not_ delete those files for a year and then delete them once 365 days have passed. Do nothing else; don't clean the registry or defragment. If the performance improves, you'll know I'm correct. Like I said, I didn't believe it either but that's actually what happens and was the case even on Win 9x machines. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX9leXAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uzzwH/RUlxCx2eBDTPf38lDFj/vsp pRDJ7dUMIzyZVx6As/5dSU10Gh2FalHZ31YBGpmg/SGhu/JmpiHa8AIeIwjfaMs0 QgJoirqfWpYibyUF2gszq1H5oFM+TeR3qmtgSw3LL0xJc4jyd0 3XhhW/1xFnWojm kti1g/z9BStkcPdlKvTqvU+53sqri4vyO660+s6vhpjkJ/xABDVosrfGEnbCGTWb xcr27oXbC8zsO5DNJUm2yJyl54VcI+Ml0/LpbirW+Wo8zvVG01ZS8l5hRFC9Ylhw xMkvHWSpuHPxoqsrowVqNMl50pwObtbXDL2W2o2cokrmWIPgRw eBMZ1FPZ6g5tc= =6Iaw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) loses patent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
In article , Silver Slimer wrote:
Like I said before, it has already been resolved with forced updates. The remaining problem is that after updating, Windows keeps the update files on the hard disk for God knows what reason. that's to be able to undo the update in case there are any problems, which is a very good idea and since disk space is cheap, who cares, and it eventually auto-deletes anyway (i think it's 10 days). The more they accumulate, the slower the computer gets. nonsense. it only takes up disk space. it doesn't affect speed. Theoretically, that's true. not just theoretically, but in reality. |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
In article
"Jonathan N. Little" wrote: Silver Slimer wrote: I find that Gnome 3's hot corner is actually a lot faster. I'm a gigantic fan of what they did with their hot corners to be honest and am disappointed that Unity doesn't do the same thing. Yes it does, it just is disabled by default. Simplest way to enable and configure is install the Unity Tweak Tool sudo apt-get install unity-tweak-tool launch it and under Windows Manager click Hotcorners, enjoy! -- Take care, Jonathan ------------------- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-06 9:34 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Silver Slimer wrote: I find that Gnome 3's hot corner is actually a lot faster. I'm a gigantic fan of what they did with their hot corners to be honest and am disappointed that Unity doesn't do the same thing. Yes it does, it just is disabled by default. Simplest way to enable and configure is install the Unity Tweak Tool I meant by default. Clearly, every Linux DE allows you to customize it if you are looking for a specific feature. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX9ll3AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uqr8H/RBowo2/qFBt3jV/BydQuURe W1JrSUOWdifwcmWIRqId/yIFqItoR55FHfItFq5xXkbTcFsY4/5fm91tSqMQwZbR wT937+ikYFtWxewpo6JWo/mag3oEsVWEtI2vnSK87A/0cKHWmubtmUJovS+JaEBD cBpyNxftez9LsVQNFxs60xDXwDecdFsd+uxlM1hQHEYYRZrnoj lfED+VSsB/cdm8 oo+A7g+z7nqHyvppr3Mxzx2w8MU/J+A+U/fJxGdIi+dbveHuLDK+9rOkC3cmzASC rDXtbppQ5+UKJKaD3VWdP3x2bqtzO1xn2g6u0osL5/5p2HRKfZK8W0zTzVZu2qk= =xB9F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-06 9:47 AM, nospam wrote: In article , Silver Slimer wrote: Apple and its users have always been proud to tell us that you need to buy a specific brand of RAM for the Mac if you want to maintain stability. It seemed pretty lame at the time that I owned Macs (2003-2005) but I think that it's still the same story today. complete nonsense. all that matters is that it meets the required specs for the system. That's true, but I was and am referring to what _Apple_ and its _users_ said/say. The truth and what they say aren't usually in sync. Meanwhile, the PC actually offers you the opportunity to put whatever RAM you want in there. same with macs. Tell that to the other zealots. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX9lrmAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+u2KAH/juLgZtN4Tg5p9P2JsBFtHqa NGDI7kkoM0jccA0vlMGTf/3OCMqJFG05g54uFjdKsFDwVJjum6z3fJsemLpr33QC OhZdfvpBNAMlxbNk9g0kTKb9uqK4Vj7vr8Uf7FEfwyIMtY0N8v 0Q4Yr5gRJxNd3e 8SV4ZwmOvT29/X+4dw7G5GoWX/daxgyiKW1UhENsaAoUQF4dHI1mNvEtW3wAFgfa 7kbXkKSHIE7f1Bx/2o4fW0ABT3gVF+SWf1vnvP1yIxA3L0GafINl1LzmojMPc6u8 SpnDClpMrSY4dVYOjQ408O8huBCoWRFTZW86AeaNboTu+j62jy oXriBfTA/BXsU= =Z5cJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
Apple (Who really never invented anything they could steal) losespatent retrial, owes $302.4 million to VirnetX.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-06 9:57 AM, nospam wrote: In article , Silver Slimer wrote: Like I said before, it has already been resolved with forced updates. The remaining problem is that after updating, Windows keeps the update files on the hard disk for God knows what reason. that's to be able to undo the update in case there are any problems, which is a very good idea and since disk space is cheap, who cares, and it eventually auto-deletes anyway (i think it's 10 days). The more they accumulate, the slower the computer gets. nonsense. it only takes up disk space. it doesn't affect speed. Theoretically, that's true. not just theoretically, but in reality. http://www.theeldergeek.com/disk_cleanup_utility.htm "To keep a PC running smoothly, regular maintenance is critical. Many users shy away from maintenance tasks, thinking it is a long, drawn out manual affair, but the Disk Cleanup Utility can easily determine which files on a hard drive may no longer be needed and delete those files. In addition to freeing up potentially significant amounts of hard drive space, using Disk Cleanup on a regular basis can significantly improve system performance." http://windowssecrets.com/forums/sho...sk-cleanup-and - -performance-improvements "Clearly there has been an increase in performance observed, but why? What is is about the removal of log files, setup files, temporary internet files, etc that makes the system run faster?" The only nonsense here is whatever _you_ post. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX9lw0AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uZhYH/3rO4yyV7BJ7GL7ErgUkVCQs wsJsJcU1BMtaAJxs0rhpAvklQfg4D/5Z86LJaX0jSR2OOyJLvdGs5TG2+GSY6h/3 fU8OeZywU4St/WsFgsUapbA8TeH/n5JN2pOW06JazfZ6PE/4FK3KKdJSPA6q4E4+ i+IPmDPKozYyah8c1sk2iNaPpgBiqdNSKelOsBKSiFsDBBnPTl 9kc/VubvUwWFsB 1daPvyBGB1UguIYlfSEWrSmF2h+1kqPe0IAH3nltSaglMyfdEW Z3sGGec7VzDiLs wRRX5PBMhdkZA5wDYm4RgrwoVMm66zs/U8yP3e5fq3bQ9Z4YVzbEtdiOoTbiC0o= =SIIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|