A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Windows XP Help and Support
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hard Drive Failure - Happy Ending



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 25th 09, 03:22 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Leonard Grey[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,048
Default Hard Drive Failure - Happy Ending

In general I seem to be able to avoid the problems that people post
about here...but I'm not immune to PC trouble.

Last night my computer did not boot. I discovered that the BIOS was not
detecting either of my (ancient IDE) hard drives.

The BIOS was fine: It was detecting my other hardware and the clock
showed the right time. I could feel gentle vibrations from both hard
drives and the cooling fans were working, so my power supply was okay.

I swapped my IDE cable for a new one...no help. Motherboard damaged?
Perhaps, but not likely, unless my UPS failed.

That left the hard drives themselves. I removed my boot drive and
started the computer with only my storage drive and - voila - it was
detected. That meant the electronics in my boot drive had died, and
since it was first on the ribbon cable, neither drive was detected.

The rest was easy: Buy a new drive and restore the old drive from a disk
image made only 12 hours previously.

So what is the point of this post, besides boasting? The point is that
even a non-geek like me can solve most any computer problem with
methodical troubleshooting and a current backup.

---
Leonard Grey
Errare humanum est
Ads
  #2  
Old November 25th 09, 03:42 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Daave[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,461
Default Hard Drive Failure - Happy Ending

Leonard Grey wrote:
In general I seem to be able to avoid the problems that people post
about here...but I'm not immune to PC trouble.

Last night my computer did not boot. I discovered that the BIOS was
not detecting either of my (ancient IDE) hard drives.

The BIOS was fine: It was detecting my other hardware and the clock
showed the right time. I could feel gentle vibrations from both hard
drives and the cooling fans were working, so my power supply was okay.

I swapped my IDE cable for a new one...no help. Motherboard damaged?
Perhaps, but not likely, unless my UPS failed.

That left the hard drives themselves. I removed my boot drive and
started the computer with only my storage drive and - voila - it was
detected. That meant the electronics in my boot drive had died, and
since it was first on the ribbon cable, neither drive was detected.

The rest was easy: Buy a new drive and restore the old drive from a
disk image made only 12 hours previously.

So what is the point of this post, besides boasting? The point is that
even a non-geek like me can solve most any computer problem with
methodical troubleshooting and a current backup.


Yes, backups are a must. And a validated image can certainly save one's
bacon!


  #3  
Old November 25th 09, 04:33 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Unknown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,007
Default Hard Drive Failure - Happy Ending

You fail to recognize the fact that not everybody has methodical
troubleshooting ability.
One must have SOME knowledge of computer architecture to perform trial and
error,
or as you say, 'methodical troubleshooting'.
"Leonard Grey" wrote in message
...
In general I seem to be able to avoid the problems that people post about
here...but I'm not immune to PC trouble.

Last night my computer did not boot. I discovered that the BIOS was not
detecting either of my (ancient IDE) hard drives.

The BIOS was fine: It was detecting my other hardware and the clock showed
the right time. I could feel gentle vibrations from both hard drives and
the cooling fans were working, so my power supply was okay.

I swapped my IDE cable for a new one...no help. Motherboard damaged?
Perhaps, but not likely, unless my UPS failed.

That left the hard drives themselves. I removed my boot drive and started
the computer with only my storage drive and - voila - it was detected.
That meant the electronics in my boot drive had died, and since it was
first on the ribbon cable, neither drive was detected.

The rest was easy: Buy a new drive and restore the old drive from a disk
image made only 12 hours previously.

So what is the point of this post, besides boasting? The point is that
even a non-geek like me can solve most any computer problem with
methodical troubleshooting and a current backup.

---
Leonard Grey
Errare humanum est



  #4  
Old December 1st 09, 10:49 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
DavidM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default Hard Drive Failure - Happy Ending

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:42:42 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

Leonard Grey wrote:
In general I seem to be able to avoid the problems that people post
about here...but I'm not immune to PC trouble.

Last night my computer did not boot. I discovered that the BIOS was
not detecting either of my (ancient IDE) hard drives.

The BIOS was fine: It was detecting my other hardware and the clock
showed the right time. I could feel gentle vibrations from both hard
drives and the cooling fans were working, so my power supply was okay.

I swapped my IDE cable for a new one...no help. Motherboard damaged?
Perhaps, but not likely, unless my UPS failed.

That left the hard drives themselves. I removed my boot drive and
started the computer with only my storage drive and - voila - it was
detected. That meant the electronics in my boot drive had died, and
since it was first on the ribbon cable, neither drive was detected.

The rest was easy: Buy a new drive and restore the old drive from a
disk image made only 12 hours previously.

So what is the point of this post, besides boasting? The point is that
even a non-geek like me can solve most any computer problem with
methodical troubleshooting and a current backup.


Yes, backups are a must. And a validated image can certainly save one's
bacon!

So what's the best way of validating an image if you don't have a
spare drive laying around? I keep my C: images on a D: drive, so
certainly don't want to use that!
  #5  
Old December 1st 09, 11:37 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Brian A.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,079
Default Hard Drive Failure - Happy Ending

"DavidM" wrote in message

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:42:42 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

Leonard Grey wrote:
In general I seem to be able to avoid the problems that people post
about here...but I'm not immune to PC trouble.

Last night my computer did not boot. I discovered that the BIOS was
not detecting either of my (ancient IDE) hard drives.

The BIOS was fine: It was detecting my other hardware and the clock
showed the right time. I could feel gentle vibrations from both hard
drives and the cooling fans were working, so my power supply was okay.

I swapped my IDE cable for a new one...no help. Motherboard damaged?
Perhaps, but not likely, unless my UPS failed.

That left the hard drives themselves. I removed my boot drive and
started the computer with only my storage drive and - voila - it was
detected. That meant the electronics in my boot drive had died, and
since it was first on the ribbon cable, neither drive was detected.

The rest was easy: Buy a new drive and restore the old drive from a
disk image made only 12 hours previously.

So what is the point of this post, besides boasting? The point is that
even a non-geek like me can solve most any computer problem with
methodical troubleshooting and a current backup.


Yes, backups are a must. And a validated image can certainly save one's
bacon!

So what's the best way of validating an image if you don't have a
spare drive laying around? I keep my C: images on a D: drive, so
certainly don't want to use that!


When a user creates/schedules a backup/image/clone job in their application,
the user has the option to either verify or validate that the information
written to the Destination matches the information read from the Source once the
actual backup/image/clone process has completed.


--

Brian A. Sesko
Conflicts start where information lacks.
http://basconotw.mvps.org/

Suggested posting do's/don'ts: http://members.shaw.ca/dts-l/goodpost.htm
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375



  #6  
Old December 1st 09, 07:27 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
DavidM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default Hard Drive Failure - Happy Ending

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:37:57 -0600, "Brian A."
gonefish'n@afarawaylake wrote:


"DavidM" wrote in message

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:42:42 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

Leonard Grey wrote:
In general I seem to be able to avoid the problems that people post
about here...but I'm not immune to PC trouble.

Last night my computer did not boot. I discovered that the BIOS was
not detecting either of my (ancient IDE) hard drives.

The BIOS was fine: It was detecting my other hardware and the clock
showed the right time. I could feel gentle vibrations from both hard
drives and the cooling fans were working, so my power supply was okay.

I swapped my IDE cable for a new one...no help. Motherboard damaged?
Perhaps, but not likely, unless my UPS failed.

That left the hard drives themselves. I removed my boot drive and
started the computer with only my storage drive and - voila - it was
detected. That meant the electronics in my boot drive had died, and
since it was first on the ribbon cable, neither drive was detected.

The rest was easy: Buy a new drive and restore the old drive from a
disk image made only 12 hours previously.

So what is the point of this post, besides boasting? The point is that
even a non-geek like me can solve most any computer problem with
methodical troubleshooting and a current backup.

Yes, backups are a must. And a validated image can certainly save one's
bacon!

So what's the best way of validating an image if you don't have a
spare drive laying around? I keep my C: images on a D: drive, so
certainly don't want to use that!


When a user creates/schedules a backup/image/clone job in their application,
the user has the option to either verify or validate that the information
written to the Destination matches the information read from the Source once the
actual backup/image/clone process has completed.


All very fine, but that doesn't validate that the cloned image can be
restored and will boot - that's what I mean by validation, ie the
whole process. An image that can't be restored, or doesn't work, is
worse than usless, cos you don't know you have a problem until it's
too late.

So I don't see a way of testing (fully) that it works without having a
completely spare drive, but I'd be happy to be wrong about that?
  #7  
Old December 1st 09, 07:46 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Daave[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,461
Default Hard Drive Failure - Happy Ending

DavidM wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:37:57 -0600, "Brian A."
gonefish'n@afarawaylake wrote:


"DavidM" wrote in message

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:42:42 -0500, "Daave"
wrote:

Leonard Grey wrote:
In general I seem to be able to avoid the problems that people
post about here...but I'm not immune to PC trouble.

Last night my computer did not boot. I discovered that the BIOS
was not detecting either of my (ancient IDE) hard drives.

The BIOS was fine: It was detecting my other hardware and the
clock showed the right time. I could feel gentle vibrations from
both hard drives and the cooling fans were working, so my power
supply was okay.

I swapped my IDE cable for a new one...no help. Motherboard
damaged? Perhaps, but not likely, unless my UPS failed.

That left the hard drives themselves. I removed my boot drive and
started the computer with only my storage drive and - voila - it
was detected. That meant the electronics in my boot drive had
died, and since it was first on the ribbon cable, neither drive
was detected.

The rest was easy: Buy a new drive and restore the old drive from
a disk image made only 12 hours previously.

So what is the point of this post, besides boasting? The point is
that even a non-geek like me can solve most any computer problem
with methodical troubleshooting and a current backup.

Yes, backups are a must. And a validated image can certainly save
one's bacon!

So what's the best way of validating an image if you don't have a
spare drive laying around? I keep my C: images on a D: drive, so
certainly don't want to use that!


When a user creates/schedules a backup/image/clone job in their
application, the user has the option to either verify or validate
that the information written to the Destination matches the
information read from the Source once the actual backup/image/clone
process has completed.


All very fine, but that doesn't validate that the cloned image can be
restored and will boot - that's what I mean by validation, ie the
whole process. An image that can't be restored, or doesn't work, is
worse than usless, cos you don't know you have a problem until it's
too late.

So I don't see a way of testing (fully) that it works without having a
completely spare drive, but I'd be happy to be wrong about that?


Nothing in life is 100% foolproof. The term "validation" has a specific
meaning (performing what is called a consistency check). You don't need
to fully test an image to validate it. If the image is validated, then
there is an *extremely* small chance that it won't be able to be
restored.

For those who are extra concerned, cloning can be done in addition to
imaging for another layer of backup. The advantage of a clone is that it
can be booted from instantly (and thus "validated" as you have been
using the word).


  #8  
Old December 3rd 09, 12:36 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
DavidM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default Hard Drive Failure - Happy Ending

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:46:00 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

DavidM wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:37:57 -0600, "Brian A."
gonefish'n@afarawaylake wrote:


"DavidM" wrote in message

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:42:42 -0500, "Daave"
wrote:

Leonard Grey wrote:
In general I seem to be able to avoid the problems that people
post about here...but I'm not immune to PC trouble.

Last night my computer did not boot. I discovered that the BIOS
was not detecting either of my (ancient IDE) hard drives.

The BIOS was fine: It was detecting my other hardware and the
clock showed the right time. I could feel gentle vibrations from
both hard drives and the cooling fans were working, so my power
supply was okay.

I swapped my IDE cable for a new one...no help. Motherboard
damaged? Perhaps, but not likely, unless my UPS failed.

That left the hard drives themselves. I removed my boot drive and
started the computer with only my storage drive and - voila - it
was detected. That meant the electronics in my boot drive had
died, and since it was first on the ribbon cable, neither drive
was detected.

The rest was easy: Buy a new drive and restore the old drive from
a disk image made only 12 hours previously.

So what is the point of this post, besides boasting? The point is
that even a non-geek like me can solve most any computer problem
with methodical troubleshooting and a current backup.

Yes, backups are a must. And a validated image can certainly save
one's bacon!

So what's the best way of validating an image if you don't have a
spare drive laying around? I keep my C: images on a D: drive, so
certainly don't want to use that!

When a user creates/schedules a backup/image/clone job in their
application, the user has the option to either verify or validate
that the information written to the Destination matches the
information read from the Source once the actual backup/image/clone
process has completed.


All very fine, but that doesn't validate that the cloned image can be
restored and will boot - that's what I mean by validation, ie the
whole process. An image that can't be restored, or doesn't work, is
worse than usless, cos you don't know you have a problem until it's
too late.

So I don't see a way of testing (fully) that it works without having a
completely spare drive, but I'd be happy to be wrong about that?


Nothing in life is 100% foolproof. The term "validation" has a specific
meaning (performing what is called a consistency check). You don't need
to fully test an image to validate it. If the image is validated, then
there is an *extremely* small chance that it won't be able to be
restored.

For those who are extra concerned, cloning can be done in addition to
imaging for another layer of backup. The advantage of a clone is that it
can be booted from instantly (and thus "validated" as you have been
using the word).

Well in 40 years of working in the IT business I've seen many
instances where "verified" backups and images have been useless
because the end to end process of restoring a system has not been
thoroughly tested and has failed to work at the critical time, and
this includes PCs up large complex systems.

I think we'll just agree to differ and let people make up their own
mind about the level of risk that they are happy with for their
particular system.
  #9  
Old December 3rd 09, 12:53 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Daave[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,461
Default Hard Drive Failure - Happy Ending

DavidM wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:46:00 -0500, "Daave" wrote:

DavidM wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:37:57 -0600, "Brian A."
gonefish'n@afarawaylake wrote:


"DavidM" wrote in message

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:42:42 -0500, "Daave"
wrote:

Leonard Grey wrote:
In general I seem to be able to avoid the problems that people
post about here...but I'm not immune to PC trouble.

Last night my computer did not boot. I discovered that the BIOS
was not detecting either of my (ancient IDE) hard drives.

The BIOS was fine: It was detecting my other hardware and the
clock showed the right time. I could feel gentle vibrations from
both hard drives and the cooling fans were working, so my power
supply was okay.

I swapped my IDE cable for a new one...no help. Motherboard
damaged? Perhaps, but not likely, unless my UPS failed.

That left the hard drives themselves. I removed my boot drive
and started the computer with only my storage drive and - voila
- it was detected. That meant the electronics in my boot drive
had died, and since it was first on the ribbon cable, neither
drive was detected.

The rest was easy: Buy a new drive and restore the old drive
from a disk image made only 12 hours previously.

So what is the point of this post, besides boasting? The point
is that even a non-geek like me can solve most any computer
problem with methodical troubleshooting and a current backup.

Yes, backups are a must. And a validated image can certainly save
one's bacon!

So what's the best way of validating an image if you don't have a
spare drive laying around? I keep my C: images on a D: drive, so
certainly don't want to use that!

When a user creates/schedules a backup/image/clone job in their
application, the user has the option to either verify or validate
that the information written to the Destination matches the
information read from the Source once the actual backup/image/clone
process has completed.

All very fine, but that doesn't validate that the cloned image can
be restored and will boot - that's what I mean by validation, ie the
whole process. An image that can't be restored, or doesn't work, is
worse than usless, cos you don't know you have a problem until it's
too late.

So I don't see a way of testing (fully) that it works without
having a completely spare drive, but I'd be happy to be wrong about
that?


Nothing in life is 100% foolproof. The term "validation" has a
specific meaning (performing what is called a consistency check).
You don't need to fully test an image to validate it. If the image
is validated, then there is an *extremely* small chance that it
won't be able to be restored.

For those who are extra concerned, cloning can be done in addition to
imaging for another layer of backup. The advantage of a clone is
that it can be booted from instantly (and thus "validated" as you
have been using the word).

Well in 40 years of working in the IT business I've seen many
instances where "verified" backups and images have been useless
because the end to end process of restoring a system has not been
thoroughly tested and has failed to work at the critical time, and
this includes PCs up large complex systems.


I don't doubt this. A very small percentage of a very large number of
instances (40 years' worth in your case) still yields a significant
number of negative events. And this is the reason I added:

For those who are extra concerned, cloning can be done in addition to
imaging for another layer of backup. The advantage of a clone is
that it can be booted from instantly (and thus "validated" as you
have been using the word).


So, I agree with you that "having a completely spare drive" that is a
perfect clone which can be booted from and therefore instantly tested is
the easiest way too minimize risk even further. But again, nothing is
100% foolproof and it's possible (though, *highly* unlikely) for this
method also to eventually fail.

I think we'll just agree to differ and let people make up their own
mind about the level of risk that they are happy with for their
particular system.


There's more common ground here than you think. I believe there was a
misunderstanding of terminology.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.