Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge

On 5/15/2019 8:39 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , wrote:

2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible

no he doesn't.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l
ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump
Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks
like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for
obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special counsel
Robert Mueller's report.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t
rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president
About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with obstruction
if he wasn't president.

#Trump4Prison

http://NeedToImpeach.com

First he needs to actually break some laws.

he has, and ****loads of them.

here's mo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump
An analysis by USA Today published in June 2016 found that over the
previous three decades, United States president Donald Trump and
his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal
courts and state court, an unprecedented number for a U.S.
presidential candidate.

https://www.quora.com/Has-Trump-broken-any-laws-yet
He has been sued 4,500 times for breaking the law.

****ing you
off politically is what we sent him there to do.

you chose the wrong person.

Instead of being such a sore loser, go out and campaign
against him.

plenty of people are doing exactly that.


USA Today is fake news.
Along with the rest of them.

On 5/15/19 8:46 AM, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 5/15/2019 8:39 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , wrote:

2) Trump does follow the law.Â* ****es the swamp off something
terrible

no he doesn't.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l

ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump
Â*Â*Â* Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks
Â*Â*Â* like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for
Â*Â*Â* obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special
counsel
Â*Â*Â* Robert Mueller's report.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t

rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president
Â*Â*Â* About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with
obstruction
Â*Â*Â* if he wasn't president.

#Trump4Prison

http://NeedToImpeach.com

First he needs to actually break some laws.

he has, and ****loads of them.

here's mo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump
Â*Â* An analysis by USA Today published in June 2016 found that over the
Â*Â* previous three decades, United States president Donald Trump and
Â*Â* his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal
Â*Â* courts and state court, an unprecedented number for a U.S.
Â*Â* presidential candidate.

https://www.quora.com/Has-Trump-broken-any-laws-yet
Â*Â* He has been sued 4,500 times for breaking the law.

****ing you
off politically is what we sent him there to do.

you chose the wrong person.

Instead of being such a sore loser, go out and campaign
against him.

plenty of people are doing exactly that.


USA Today is fake news.
Along with the rest of them.


Why do you troll so obviously?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 5/15/19 8:46 AM, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 5/15/2019 8:39 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , wrote:

2) Trump does follow the law.Â* ****es the swamp off something
terrible

no he doesn't.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l

ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump
Â*Â*Â* Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks
Â*Â*Â* like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for
Â*Â*Â* obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special
counsel
Â*Â*Â* Robert Mueller's report.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t

rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president
Â*Â*Â* About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with
obstruction
Â*Â*Â* if he wasn't president.

#Trump4Prison

http://NeedToImpeach.com

First he needs to actually break some laws.

he has, and ****loads of them.

here's mo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump
Â*Â* An analysis by USA Today published in June 2016 found that over the
Â*Â* previous three decades, United States president Donald Trump and
Â*Â* his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal
Â*Â* courts and state court, an unprecedented number for a U.S.
Â*Â* presidential candidate.

https://www.quora.com/Has-Trump-broken-any-laws-yet
Â*Â* He has been sued 4,500 times for breaking the law.

****ing you
off politically is what we sent him there to do.

you chose the wrong person.

Instead of being such a sore loser, go out and campaign
against him.

plenty of people are doing exactly that.


USA Today is fake news.
Along with the rest of them.


American Pravda has gotten pretty bad.

There was a saying in the Soviet Unions that
does apply to American Pravda:

"There is no Izvestia in Pravda and no Pravda in Izvestia"

Izvestia is the "News" and Pravda is the "Truth"

On 5/15/19 10:51 AM, Snit wrote:
InsteadÂ*ofÂ*beingÂ*suchÂ*aÂ*soreÂ*loser,Â*goÂ*out Â*andÂ*campaign
againstÂ*him.

plentyÂ*ofÂ*peopleÂ*areÂ*doingÂ*exactlyÂ*that.


USAÂ*TodayÂ*isÂ*fakeÂ*news.
AlongÂ*withÂ*theÂ*restÂ*ofÂ*them.


WhyÂ*doÂ*youÂ*trollÂ*soÂ*obviously?

Definition of a troll:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels
or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord
by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or
off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup,
forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking
readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing
tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement
or a specific gain.

Don't call someone a troll because he disagrees with you.

On 5/15/19 5:13 PM, T wrote:
On 5/15/19 10:51 AM, Snit wrote:
InsteadÂ*ofÂ*beingÂ*suchÂ*aÂ*soreÂ*loser,Â*goÂ*out Â*andÂ*campaign
againstÂ*him.

plentyÂ*ofÂ*peopleÂ*areÂ*doingÂ*exactlyÂ*that.


USAÂ*TodayÂ*isÂ*fakeÂ*news.
AlongÂ*withÂ*theÂ*restÂ*ofÂ*them.


WhyÂ*doÂ*youÂ*trollÂ*soÂ*obviously?

Definition of a troll:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

Â*Â*Â*Â* In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels
Â*Â*Â*Â* or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord
Â*Â*Â*Â* by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or
Â*Â*Â*Â* off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup,
Â*Â*Â*Â* forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking
Â*Â*Â*Â* readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing
Â*Â*Â*Â* tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement
Â*Â*Â*Â* or a specific gain.

Don't call someone a troll because he disagrees with you.

I did not. I was noting how his comments fit that definition.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 5/15/19 4:51 AM, chrisv wrote:
T wrote:

2) Trump does follow the law.

Of course he does. He tells the truth, too.

Some of the time, anyway.


Problem here is that the left in the zeal to enforce
Gleichschaltung has lost their sense of humor. You can't
tell when other people are being sarcastic or are joking.

You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees
with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms
like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you.

And a lot of the time he is right. Remember American Pravda
making fun of him about his campaign being spied on? He
was right.

You have also redefined what a crime is. Not something that
breaks the law, but something that breaks Gleichschaltung.

On 5/15/19 5:16 PM, Snit wrote:
On 5/15/19 5:13 PM, T wrote:
On 5/15/19 10:51 AM, Snit wrote:
InsteadÂ*ofÂ*beingÂ*suchÂ*aÂ*soreÂ*loser,Â*goÂ*out Â*andÂ*campaign
againstÂ*him.

plentyÂ*ofÂ*peopleÂ*areÂ*doingÂ*exactlyÂ*that.


USAÂ*TodayÂ*isÂ*fakeÂ*news.
AlongÂ*withÂ*theÂ*restÂ*ofÂ*them.


WhyÂ*doÂ*youÂ*trollÂ*soÂ*obviously?

Definition of a troll:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup,
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* or a specific gain.

Don't call someone a troll because he disagrees with you.

I did not. I was noting how his comments fit that definition.



My apologies if I misread you.

In article
T wrote:

On 5/15/19 4:51 AM, chrisv wrote:
T wrote:

2) Trump does follow the law.

Of course he does. He tells the truth, too.

Some of the time, anyway.


Problem here is that the left in the zeal to enforce
Gleichschaltung has lost their sense of humor. You can't
tell when other people are being sarcastic or are joking.

You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees
with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms
like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you.

And a lot of the time he is right. Remember American Pravda
making fun of him about his campaign being spied on? He
was right.

You have also redefined what a crime is. Not something that
breaks the law, but something that breaks Gleichschaltung.

I T wrote:
On 5/15/19 5:16 PM, Snit wrote:
On 5/15/19 5:13 PM, T wrote:
On 5/15/19 10:51 AM, Snit wrote:
InsteadÂ*ofÂ*beingÂ*suchÂ*aÂ*soreÂ*loser,Â*goÂ*out Â*andÂ*campaign
againstÂ*him.

plentyÂ*ofÂ*peopleÂ*areÂ*doingÂ*exactlyÂ*that.


USAÂ*TodayÂ*isÂ*fakeÂ*news.
AlongÂ*withÂ*theÂ*restÂ*ofÂ*them.


WhyÂ*doÂ*youÂ*trollÂ*soÂ*obviously?

Definition of a troll:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup,
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement
Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* or a specific gain.

Don't call someone a troll because he disagrees with you.

I did not. I was noting how his comments fit that definition.



My apologies if I misread you.



No problem. Text is an easy medium to misunderstand. And that goes both
ways. Sorry if I cane across cold. Getting too used to the cesspool here.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

T wrote:

You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees
with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms
like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you.

Lie, after lie, after lie. Typical, for a right-winger.

--
"Compassionate liar chrisv believes everything the media tells him."
- "Slimer", packing two *lies* into one short sentence.

In article
chrisv wrote:

T wrote:

You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees
with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms
like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you.

Lie, after lie, after lie. Typical, for a right-winger.

--
"Compassionate liar chrisv believes everything the media tells him."
- "Slimer", packing two *lies* into one short sentence.

On Wed, 15 May 2019 17:19:06 -0700, T wrote:

On 5/15/19 4:51 AM, chrisv wrote:
T wrote:

2) Trump does follow the law.

Of course he does. He tells the truth, too.

Some of the time, anyway.


Problem here is that the left in the zeal to enforce
Gleichschaltung has lost their sense of humor. You can't
tell when other people are being sarcastic or are joking.

Trump isn't smart enough to joke.

You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees
with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms
like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you.

Hardly. Some things are apparent and Trump's racism is overt.

And a lot of the time he is right. Remember American Pravda
making fun of him about his campaign being spied on? He
was right.

You mistake spying with legal, non-hostile surveillance.

You have also redefined what a crime is. Not something that
breaks the law, but something that breaks Gleichschaltung.

You have mental problems.

On 5/16/2019 11:53 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2019 17:19:06 -0700, T wrote:

On 5/15/19 4:51 AM, chrisv wrote:
T wrote:

2) Trump does follow the law.

Of course he does. He tells the truth, too.

Some of the time, anyway.


Problem here is that the left in the zeal to enforce
Gleichschaltung has lost their sense of humor. You can't
tell when other people are being sarcastic or are joking.

Trump isn't smart enough to joke.

You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees
with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms
like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you.

Hardly. Some things are apparent and Trump's racism is overt.

And a lot of the time he is right. Remember American Pravda
making fun of him about his campaign being spied on? He
was right.

You mistake spying with legal, non-hostile surveillance.

You have also redefined what a crime is. Not something that
breaks the law, but something that breaks Gleichschaltung.

You have mental problems.


Another communist we can bin.

On 5/15/19 11:16 PM, Snit wrote:
My apologies if I misread you.


No problem. Text is an easy medium to misunderstand. And that goes both
ways. Sorry if I cane across cold. Getting too used to the cesspool here.

I worked a place once where I could not use the eMail because
no matter how polite I was, I got marched in front of
my management and lectured about being "flippant".

I got so bad that I had to wait till after hours when they had gone home
and leave an answering machine message to the effect that it "shipped".
Mind you I could not even say what or my name. Then they had a great
laugh about truing to figure out who it was and all was forgiven.
(Bunch of ass holes.)

That why emotocons are useful, even though they on 12 year old level.

:-)

On 5/15/19 6:59 PM, Anonymous wrote:
In article
T wrote:

On 5/15/19 4:51 AM, chrisv wrote:
T wrote:

2) Trump does follow the law.

Of course he does. He tells the truth, too.

Some of the time, anyway.


Problem here is that the left in the zeal to enforce
Gleichschaltung has lost their sense of humor. You can't
tell when other people are being sarcastic or are joking.

You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees
with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms
like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you.

And a lot of the time he is right. Remember American Pravda
making fun of him about his campaign being spied on? He
was right.

You have also redefined what a crime is. Not something that
breaks the law, but something that breaks Gleichschaltung.


Anonymous, if you wrote me something, I can't find it.