IPv6 Ownership

I am looking for either an application (preferably freeware) or a Web
site that will reveal the owner of an IPv6 address. I already have an
application that does a WhoIs on IPv4 addresses.

--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

By allowing employers to eliminate coverage for birth control
from their insurance plans, President Trump has guaranteed there
will be an increase in the demand for abortions.

David E. Ross wrote:

I am looking for either an application (preferably freeware) or a Web
site that will reveal the owner of an IPv6 address. I already have an
application that does a WhoIs on IPv4 addresses.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ipv6+whois

--
I've been here since the beginning
and I still don't know what the hell's goin' on.

On 11/5/2017 6:54 PM, Auric__ wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:

I am looking for either an application (preferably freeware) or a Web
site that will reveal the owner of an IPv6 address. I already have an
application that does a WhoIs on IPv4 addresses.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ipv6+whois


After posting my original message, I did locate a few Web tools. I am
still interested in locating an IPv6 WhoIs application to install on my
PC.

--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

By allowing employers to eliminate coverage for birth control
from their insurance plans, President Trump has guaranteed there
will be an increase in the demand for abortions.

By allowing employers to eliminate coverage for birth control
from their insurance plans, President Trump has guaranteed there
will be an increase in the demand for abortions.

I don't usually respond to sigs, but this one is just inflammatory to me.
Instead of blaming Trump for a policy that was debated and passed in some
states long before he was in office, maybe the responsibility should be put
upon the person who gets pregnant. Condoms are cheap, and, in a lot of
places, free for all at the local health and welfare offices. And, as un-fun
as it would be, no one ever got pregnant practicing abstinence (except, I
suppose, the Virgin Mary) :-)

In message , KenW
writes:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 07:53:49 -0500, "SC Tom" wrote:



By allowing employers to eliminate coverage for birth control
from their insurance plans, President Trump has guaranteed there
will be an increase in the demand for abortions.

I don't usually respond to sigs, but this one is just inflammatory to me.
[]
Don't you know, it is an "in" thing to bash Trump. For the uninformed
at least or worse.

The informed realise that the effort of doing so is not necessary (-:

KenW
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

My mission in life is not merely to survive, but to thrive, and to do so with
some passion, some compassion, some humour, and some style. - Maya Angelou,
quoted by Annabel Nnochiri, in RT 2017/5/13-19

"SC Tom" wrote

| I don't usually respond to sigs, but this
| one is just inflammatory to me.

They're all in bad taste. But I wouldn't have
noticed if you hadn't mentioned it. I skip them
in general.

| maybe the responsibility should be put
| upon the person who gets pregnant.

I think the idea is to make it as easy as possible
to use birth control, because the unplanned pregnancies
tend to be among teenagers who have difficulty
admitting their own sexual feelings to themselves.
Thus, consciously and reasonably planning their sex
lives is something they just can't handle. Standardizing
birth control makes that a bit easier.
Do you really want nervous teenagers to pay their
whole life for reckless judgement at 16 years old?

| And, as un-fun
| as it would be, no one ever got pregnant
| practicing abstinence

Misery loves company?

This is perhaps the best example of hypocrisy on
both left and right, which is why abortion is such
a central issue of debate. At their extremes the
left and right are a kind of polarity.

The left is obsessed with personal freedom above
all else and they want that legislated. Theirs is the
godless consumer approach and quality of life is all
that matters. They drive to the store in their giant
SUV to buy a 6-pack of disposable soy milk cartons,
but it's OK because they brought their own bag and
saved a tree. Lip service to moral superiority justifies
consumer freedom.

Their excuse for funding birth control is concern for
womens' freedom. With abortion, for them it's all
about the woman's rights. Fight oppression. But
really it's about freedom to pursue enjoyment in all
things: I pay my taxes. I have a right to have fun
with no penalty, from Man or karma.

The right is obsessed with rules and traditions and
social restrictions. Their excuse for being against abortion
rights and funding birth control is usually that the
public shouldn't have to pay for personal behavior.
The small gov't approach. But the real reason is that
they think people should feel guilty about sex and they
fear that things will fall apart if social norms change
or are even subjected to inspection: If God wanted
you to think he would have had you born in Europe.

Typically, you couldn't resist adding that no sex is
the real safe sex.

By disallowing birth control and abortion, they believe,
we can artificially revert to Nature's rule that existed
up until about 1960: Everyone has to get married and
raise kids, or suffer the crazed insanity of no sex life.
And everyone is either a rich boss or owes his soul to
the company store. Order restored. Then probably
global warming would go away because God would be
happy.
At root their real fear is being responsible for their own
actions. Much less stressful to be under the yoke of a
God/boss. There's no sin if there's no free will. Just
like it says in the Bible.... Oh, wait... never mind.

In message , Mayayana
writes:
[]
The right is obsessed with rules and traditions and
[]
If God wanted
you to think he would have had you born in Europe.
[]
I love that one!
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

Our thorny national debate about Brexit could turn out to be irrelevant.
Sooner or later the EU as we know it may no longer be there for us to leave.
- Katya Adler, BBC Europe editor (RT, 2017/2/4-10)

"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote

| If God wanted
| you to think he would have had you born in Europe.
| []
| I love that one!

I guess you would.

It has to be recognized, though, that the US has
a long tradition of willful stupidity, falsely believing
it's necessary for equality that no one excel academically.
We come from a culture of hayseeds. Good students
are harassed. While in Europe there's a long tradition
of taking pride in intellectual excellence.

In message , Mayayana
writes:
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote

| If God wanted
| you to think he would have had you born in Europe.
| []
| I love that one!

I guess you would.

It has to be recognized, though, that the US has
a long tradition of willful stupidity, falsely believing
it's necessary for equality that no one excel academically.
We come from a culture of hayseeds. Good students
are harassed. While in Europe there's a long tradition
of taking pride in intellectual excellence.


Ah, would that it were so! Yes, at some of the universities - some of
the German ones, and about two of them here when they dare. But the
levelling view is more common he not so much that good students are
harassed, more that everyone has to be told they're a good student.
(There are periodic backlashes of course - but on the whole, the
"everyone is good" view prevails. Often this is confused with "everyone
deserves a chance", which is _not_ the same thing; I think most people
would agree with that. But anyone who challenges "everyone is good" is
in danger of being accused of attacking "everyone deserves a chance",
even though mostly they're not.)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

"We're plumbing shallows we didn't know existed here" - Jeremy Paxman (as
quizmaster of "University Challenge"), 1998 (when losing team suddenly put on a
spurt by showing knowledge of things like the Eurovision Song Contest ...)

Il giorno Mon 06 Nov 2017 03:54:11a, *Auric__* ha inviato su
alt.windows7.general il messaggio
15.223. Vediamo cosa ha
scritto:

http://lmgtfy.com

this new version is too much polite

where is the good old one with that sarcastic question at the end?
I remember something like "Was it so difficult?"

--
/-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\
-=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=-
http://www.bb2002.it
............ [ al lavoro ] ...........

"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote

| Ah, would that it were so! Yes, at some of the universities - some of
| the German ones, and about two of them here when they dare. But the
| levelling view is more common he not so much that good students are
| harassed, more that everyone has to be told they're a good student.

That's true here, too. I guess I think of them as
two different things. The anti-intelligence position
is somewhat of an American tradition. The "man of
action" is the idealized type. He represents winning
through ambition. The existence of unequal talents
and unequal opportunity conflict with our mythology.

But the approach of giving everyone a trophy has
also developed here. It seems that we've equated
gross egoism with self-respect. Pride means in-your-
face. Integrity means not backing down on what you
want. And Heaven forbid we should introduce
self doubt with constructive criticism or imposed
discipline. The kids end up seeming confident, but at
some level they undoubtedly sense that the whole
thing is neither honest nor wholesome. It reminds me
of a high school sports cheer:

We're from [your town here]
And no one could be prouder
If you can't hear us
We'll yell a little louder.

That chant would be done maybe a half dozen times,
presumably intimidating the opposing team. But that
was just high school sports. Now swaggering has
become an advanced skill that indicates.... balanced
self-actualization!

Ammammata wrote:

Il giorno Mon 06 Nov 2017 03:54:11a, *Auric__* ha inviato su
alt.windows7.general il messaggio
15.223. Vediamo cosa ha
scritto:

http://lmgtfy.com

this new version is too much polite

where is the good old one with that sarcastic question at the end?
I remember something like "Was it so difficult?"

Probably too many complaints from special snowflakes. "You hurt my widdle
feewings, waaaaah!"

--
Illnesses include The Common Cold, Bad Hair Day,
Relationship Problems, Unemployment, and Paranoia.

Il giorno Thu 09 Nov 2017 04:10:22a, *Auric__* ha inviato su
alt.windows7.general il messaggio
15.223. Vediamo cosa
ha scritto:

where is the good old one with that sarcastic question at the end?
I remember something like "Was it so difficult?"

Probably too many complaints from special snowflakes. "You hurt my
widdle feewings, waaaaah!"



I wrote to the developer to allow customized messages...

--
/-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\
-=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=-
http://www.bb2002.it
............ [ al lavoro ] ...........