If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Mail Clients for Win 10
dadiOH wrote:
VanguardLH wrote ... dadiOH wrote: Unhappy Camper wrote ... Mail, is a POS. Windows Live Mail is marginally better, a buggy POS. Opera sucks as does Thunderbird. Any suggestions? Outlook express Please explain to the OP just how the OP would get Outlook Express installed and usable on Windows 10. Same way as I did. Download the installer from the runasxp site and click on it. Ah, so software from somewhere other than Microsoft but might be a redistribution of Microsoftware. OE from Microsoft is not available separate of IE; i.e., OE was bundled in IE's installer up to and including IE6. Before you explained, you might've be running OE (installed when IE was installed) inside a virtual machine which requires a separate license for Windows XP. But, as you mention, there are other ways to get OE installed (and apparently separate from IE). Don't know if runasxp catalogued the files and registry entries for OE and rolled them into a different installer or if they somehow hacked the OE installer out of the IE installer. Another possibility was that you were using OE Classic (which isn't OE proper). That's a clone of OE but flaky. Just so the OP understands, the registrar for the runasxp.com domain hides behind GoDaddy's private registration. That is, the actual registrant is not listed in the domain registration. The registrant is hiding. ICANN requires a valid registrant be listed in a domain registration. So registrars make some more money by adopting the role of official contact for a privatized domain. http://www.whois.com/whois/runasxp.com A reverse DNS lookup on runasxp.com returns 198.54.115.178. That IP address is in Namecheap's IP pool, a company known as a large spam source because they do not enforce their own policies - and spammers have long known it is a spam haven. Namecheap wants the money. They don't care about abuse complaints or spam reports. Namecheap was put on notice by ICANN in May 2014 for a breach of their Registrar Accreditation Agreement with ICANN. A traceroute on 198.54.115.178 shows web-hosting.com is the webhoster of the runasxp.com domain (http://www.whois.com/whois/web-hosting.com). Have you ever monitored to where runasxp's OE program connects? Users of Incredimail usually are not aware of spying on their e-mail (not the content but from where sent and to where delivered). Hopefully runasxp's OE is connecting only to where you configure it to connect. I have not yet found a privacy policy at runasxp.com. Nor have I found where they qualify their permission to legitmately disassemble and redistribute the files for a Microsoft's product. I downloaded the 31MB file to check what files were included within it. Boy, was that download s-l-o-w. I then submitted the file to VirusTotal.com. That shows 2 AVs flagging the file as "riskware"; however, I'm not sure that I'd care about alerts from K7AntiVirus or K7GW. Never heard of them but that doesn't mean they aren't good. K7 is not listed or tested at av-comparatives.org. virusbtn.com does list them but its reactive (sig based) and pro-active (heuristics based) detection are low; see https://www.virusbulletin.com/testin...-rap-quadrant/. The closer to the lower left-hand corner then the worse the AV product. The top right-hand corner is best. The score at VirusTotal shows runasxp's OE is probably not a threat. I'm just not sure that it is a legit redistribution of OE. runasxp.com mentions the Fidolook extension for OE (www.fidolook.org). I remember trying that for awhile. Had to discard it due to a severe lack of usable documentation. It had a lot of nice features but the user couldn't tell what would happen if options were changed or what the options did. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Mail Clients for Win 10
On 2016-11-13 09:02, Unhappy Camper wrote: Mail, is a POS. Windows Live Mail is marginally better, a buggy POS. Opera sucks as does Thunderbird. Any suggestions? http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php -- Web based forums are like subscribing to 10 different newspapers and having to visit 10 different news stands to pickup each one. Email list-server groups and USENET are like having all of those newspapers delivered to your door every morning. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Mail Clients for Win 10
"VanguardLH" wrote in message ... dadiOH wrote: VanguardLH wrote ... dadiOH wrote: Unhappy Camper wrote ... Mail, is a POS. Windows Live Mail is marginally better, a buggy POS. Opera sucks as does Thunderbird. Any suggestions? Outlook express Please explain to the OP just how the OP would get Outlook Express installed and usable on Windows 10. Same way as I did. Download the installer from the runasxp site and click on it. Ah, so software from somewhere other than Microsoft but might be a redistribution of Microsoftware. OE from Microsoft is not available separate of IE; i.e., OE was bundled in IE's installer up to and including IE6. Right. The score at VirusTotal shows runasxp's OE is probably not a threat. I'm just not sure that it is a legit redistribution of OE. I really don't care if it is legit or not. IMO, MS has not been legit for decades with users of any of their products. The runasxp version of OE works just fine. However, in case any Win10 users decide to try it, they should be aware that - as explained on the runasxp site - that any Win10 patches will wipe it and they need to manually restore it. That is NP for me as I never have Win10 patches, turned them off as soon as I got the Win 10 machine. Yes, I know, I am "vulnerable", don't care; I am no more vulnerable than I was when I first started using Microsoft's latest and greatest. How legit is it for MS to release material that needs constant security patches? They have been peddling expensive OS software for more than a third of a century...one would think that in that time they could come up with a secure OS out of the box. Heck, even Gates' first stepping stone, a 12K Basic interpreter, had bugs. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Mail Clients for Win 10
"VanguardLH" wrote
| | Just so the OP understands, the registrar for the runasxp.com domain | hides behind GoDaddy's private registration. That doesn't mean much. Private registration is common, just like private phone numbers. GoDaddy use is tacky, as is using gmail for the official "company" contact email. But neither of those things is unusual and neither is suspicious. There are a lot of people running websites who just don't know what they're doing. There are also lots running seat-of-the -pants operations: Providing some kind of service on nearly-free hosting and making a few dollars from ads. But those people are not necessarily dishonest. They're just dealing with a medium where freebie is king. Someone has to pay for the download traffic costs. I'd be more concerned by DadiOH's note that Win10 updates will regularly erase OE. How far will Win10 users bend over backward in an attempt to convince themselves they have a usable product? If XP or 7 just erased a program, much less a critical program like email, it would be time for a malware hunt and reinstall. Or maybe new hardware. But apparently Win10 users have grown accustomed to just blandly regarding such mayhem as merely a scheduled Microsoft grenade; part of the joyous "Windows 10 Experience". |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Mail Clients for Win 10
On 2016-11-13 2:33 PM, dadiOH wrote:
"Unhappy Camper" wrote in message news Mail, is a POS. Windows Live Mail is marginally better, a buggy POS. Opera sucks as does Thunderbird. Any suggestions? Outlook express Claws Mail Claws is hilariously awful. -- Silver Slimer Liberalism is a mental disorder, Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"Claws Mail"
On 14/11/2016 10:24 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
Outlook express Claws Mail Claws is hilariously awful. Do their fingernails scratch your face mentally, Your Honor? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Claws Mail"
On 2016-11-14 9:29 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 14/11/2016 10:24 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: Outlook express Claws Mail Claws is hilariously awful. Do their fingernails scratch your face mentally, Your Honor? Let's just say that Claws Mail would have felt a lot more comfortable in Windows 95 than in Windows 10. It operates like a long-obsolete piece of software and even looks like one. -- Silver Slimer Liberalism is a mental disorder, Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"Claws Mail"
On 14/11/2016 10:33 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
On 2016-11-14 9:29 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: On 14/11/2016 10:24 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: Outlook express Claws Mail Claws is hilariously awful. Do their fingernails scratch your face mentally, Your Honor? Let's just say that Claws Mail would have felt a lot more comfortable in Windows 95 than in Windows 10. It operates like a long-obsolete piece of software and even looks like one. Could I paint Claws' fingernail? |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"Claws Mail"
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:33:24 -0500, Silver Slimer wrote:
On 2016-11-14 9:29 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: On 14/11/2016 10:24 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: Outlook express Claws Mail Claws is hilariously awful. Do their fingernails scratch your face mentally, Your Honor? Let's just say that Claws Mail would have felt a lot more comfortable in Windows 95 than in Windows 10. It operates like a long-obsolete piece of software and even looks like one. I've used Windows since 1.0 but I've never even heard of Claws Mail. I use Forte Agent for both email and usenet. Steve -- Neural Network Software for Windows http://www.npsnn.com |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Claws Mail"
On 2016-11-14, Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:33:24 -0500, Silver Slimer wrote: On 2016-11-14 9:29 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: On 14/11/2016 10:24 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: Outlook express Claws Mail Claws is hilariously awful. Do their fingernails scratch your face mentally, Your Honor? Let's just say that Claws Mail would have felt a lot more comfortable in Windows 95 than in Windows 10. It operates like a long-obsolete piece of software and even looks like one. I've used Windows since 1.0 but I've never even heard of Claws Mail. I use Forte Agent for both email and usenet. Steve That is because Claws Mail works only with cygwin.... it is Gtk application... speaking of Claws , I use it for usenet sometimes but I switched to slrn recently... -- press any key to continue or any other to quit |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
"Claws Mail"
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:31:37 +0000 (UTC), Melzzzzz
wrote: On 2016-11-14, Stephen Wolstenholme wrote: On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:33:24 -0500, Silver Slimer wrote: On 2016-11-14 9:29 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: On 14/11/2016 10:24 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: Outlook express Claws Mail Claws is hilariously awful. Do their fingernails scratch your face mentally, Your Honor? Let's just say that Claws Mail would have felt a lot more comfortable in Windows 95 than in Windows 10. It operates like a long-obsolete piece of software and even looks like one. I've used Windows since 1.0 but I've never even heard of Claws Mail. I use Forte Agent for both email and usenet. Steve That is because Claws Mail works only with cygwin.... it is Gtk application... speaking of Claws , I use it for usenet sometimes but I switched to slrn recently... That's another reason I've never heard of it. I've never used cygwin. Steve -- Neural Network Software for Windows http://www.npsnn.com |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
"Claws Mail"
On 2016-11-14 9:54 AM, Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:33:24 -0500, Silver Slimer wrote: On 2016-11-14 9:29 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: On 14/11/2016 10:24 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: Outlook express Claws Mail Claws is hilariously awful. Do their fingernails scratch your face mentally, Your Honor? Let's just say that Claws Mail would have felt a lot more comfortable in Windows 95 than in Windows 10. It operates like a long-obsolete piece of software and even looks like one. I've used Windows since 1.0 but I've never even heard of Claws Mail. I use Forte Agent for both email and usenet. Claws Mail = low quality open-source product recommended by renowned vagabond Richard "Wretched" Stallman. -- Silver Slimer Liberalism is a mental disorder, Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Mail Clients for Win 10
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:13:27 -0500
Silver Slimer wrote: On 2016-11-14 2:19 PM, VanguardLH wrote: What's "awful"? Let's just say that using it is very cumbersome and since it's an open-source product, you can't rely on it to be stable. How do you know while actually never using it? -- press any key to continue or any other to quit |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Mail Clients for Win 10
On 2016-11-14 3:29 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:13:27 -0500 Silver Slimer wrote: On 2016-11-14 2:19 PM, VanguardLH wrote: What's "awful"? Let's just say that using it is very cumbersome and since it's an open-source product, you can't rely on it to be stable. How do you know while actually never using it? I _did_ use it but found it underwhelming fairly quickly. I only considered it because GnuPG support is built-in which makes it attractive but like every other Gnu project, it's not quite polished. -- Silver Slimer Liberalism is a mental disorder, Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Mail Clients for Win 10
Claws Mail: Installation and Use (Part 1 of 4)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xToShZMC-6c (auto-play goes to the remaining parts) "even though it's a text based client". Huh? Look GUI'ed to me. Wouldn't need the GTK+ package if it had no GUI. "The only pain-in-the-butt part is that it is not easy to configure." "it's so quick". Don't know how big is the message store in his test. "queue messes up [in Claws Mail] on IMAP". Looks like the Queue folder is called Outbox in other e-mail clients. He shows having to install a plug-in so HTML-formatted e-mails get rendered properly. So HTML viewing must not be a native feature within Claws Mail. Odd since every other GUI e-mail client that I've tried handled HTML-formatted e-mails okay. Later he shows the Preferences to display HTML-formatted e-mails and those options require the plug-in. Well, if the options are in the GUI config screen then the plug-in should have been installed by default when installing the program. He sets the mail polling interval. Claws Mail does not support IMAP IDLE? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMAP_IDLE doesn't show Claws Mail as supporting IMAP IDLE. Crap. Normally "Check for mail every" and "Check for mail on startup" are only needed for POP. (timemark 4:00) Shows him putting his signature at the wrong location. Whether e-mail or newsgroups, sigs always go at the bottom whether you top- or bottom-post. He mentions the qualifiers that can be used in templates. Apparently the Information button does not provide a decription of all the available qualifiers, like %D, so he shows going to a web site to get that info. This is the reason why I dumped the Fidolook extension for OE: crappy documentation. When he described the fonts preferences, I saw no means of selecting fallback fonts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallback_font). Don't recall if OE had that, either. All in all, doesn't seem that "awful". I would prefer a native Windows program over one that uses cross-platform coding frameworks (which mostly seems to bring Linux paradigms to Windows) but it seems to be mostly okay (if you only want to send plain-text messages - see below). Tweaking can get, as the author says, a bit nerdy at times. I did not see an equivalent of Thunderbird's Unified Folders view which I like in that program. Instead of seeing a tree packed with multiple e-mail accounts and have to click on each Inbox to get at those messages, I can use a unified Inbox folder (and even select which accounts' Inboxes to include in the unified Inbox). I add the Account column to the header list pane so I can tell under which account a message is stored. Don't recall OE having a unified view. MS Outlook doesn't and only has a Favorites list. I could not tell from the video if Claws Mail releases its UI resources when it gets minimized to the tray icon. That would reduces the memory footprint when the user is not actually in the program's GUI. The graphical objects don't need to stay loaded just to have the program do its e-mail tasks. (timemark 5:15) You cannot compose in HTML. You can only compose, reply, and forward in plain text. Well, that sucks. I don't use much of HTML but do use bolding, italics, coloring, and even occasionally use tables to keep content aligned. Bullets and paragraph indenting are also nice. Not available in this e-mail client. The author equates lack for formatting with cell phone texting. WTF is that about? So some technology has less features. Are we also going to go back to ASCII-7 because, gee, that's what teletype machines could use? He's using a program on a real computer, not on a toy computer (smartphone). There's no reason to toss away features for some lowest common denominator scenario that doesn't exist. Claws Mail is not available as an Android or iOS app. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|