|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
November 30th 17, 02:20 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
On 11/29/17, 7:12 PM, in article , "harry
newton" wrote: He who is Doomsdrzej said on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:31:35 -0500: Oh, I forgot, Snit utilizes a lot of socks. A LOT of socks. Anytime he's being decimated in a debate, a "person" pops out of nowhere to defend him. I have Snit killfiled so I don't see him anymore. http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/11/29/plonk_snit.jpg That is because I used evidence to counter your lies. .... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308 
|
| Ads |
|
#17
November 30th 17, 03:03 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 02:12:58 +0000 (UTC), harry newton
wrote: He who is Doomsdrzej said on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:31:35 -0500: Oh, I forgot, Snit utilizes a lot of socks. A LOT of socks. Anytime he's being decimated in a debate, a "person" pops out of nowhere to defend him. I have Snit killfiled so I don't see him anymore. http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/11/29/plonk_snit.jpg But he's truly dangerous deranged person who incessantly trolled this idiotic video over 200 times claiming imaginary iOS functionality. https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo When I ignored his direct taunts for all those 200 times, he was simply emboldened in his narcissistic delight - telling Davoud he was viciously kicking me on the ground while I was (to him) defenseless (even though I was just ignoring his two hundred cut-and-paste trolls of the same thing). Meanwhile, Snit was dead wrong in *everything* he said in that video! This one screenshot shows Snit to be the utter imbecile he really is! iOS: http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/11/wifi_sweetspots.jpg This is what he was claiming iOS had the functionality of: Android: http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/11/2wifianalyzer.jpg Android: http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/11/fritz_wlan.jpg The main danger of Snit isn't that he's dead wrong on everything he says, nor that he doesn't even know the difference between a megabit and a decibel, nor even that he's trolling that same video over 200 times and counting. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/K_yBNZiPFYo No. The main danger is that Snit is a truly deranged individual who is a danger to anyone he latches onto and follows from group to group to group just to troll his hateful narcissistic idiocy (like he apparently did here where he stalks his victims even though I have told him many times to stop stalking me as I fear for my safety with deranged people like Snit on the net). https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0%5B1-25%5D Without privacy, people like Snit would track us down to our very bedrooms, and try to viciously hurt us like he tries in this video he trolled over two hundred times (and counting!) https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo Boy am I happy to know that the people here didn't need a whole two decades to figure out that Snit wasn't worth engaging.
|
|
#19
November 30th 17, 03:13 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
He who is Doomsdrzej said on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:03:18 -0500:
Boy am I happy to know that the people here didn't need a whole two decades to figure out that Snit wasn't worth engaging. He's one of those truly dangerous serial predators because he is incomprehensibly stupid, which in itself is not a big deal. For example, he trolled his video hundreds of times stalking on the net in threads that had nothing to do with his topic - and his video was dead wrong - where he never once looked at the Y axis of what his app showed. The fact that he's incomprehensibly stupid is that he *still* doesn't know the difference between a Megabit and a decibel. But there are plenty of imbeciles on the net. What's different about Snit is that he's a vicious narcissist. Did you watch the video for example? https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo It's not that he attacks what turns out to be completely accurate facts (since all Snit saw was a pretty graph where he never bothered to even *look* at the Y axis!) nor is it that he attacks people who speak only facts. What makes him vicious is that he told many people that he was *finally right* after all these years, simply because he trolled the idiotic video so many times that we all gave up correcting him. Then when multiple people told him to stop trolling his video, since they had had enough, Snit repeatedly screamed out that he was going to pummel the original person (me, as it turns out) who said the facts in the face to kill him. Snit really said that he *enjoyed* kicking a poster down, over two hundred times, where Snit actually *thought* he was hurting the poster. In reality, it doesn't matter that Snit is yet another of many Apple Apologist imbeciles who, in this case, trolled that idiotic video of his blatantly fabricated imaginary iOS functionality *hundreds* of times. What matters is that Snit, when he *thought* he was *finally right*, decided to viciously pummel the original poster of fact into a bloody pulp. He said so himself. He's *that* dangerous. I am truly scared of him, where I suspect he and GoodGuy are the same sock.
|
|
#20
November 30th 17, 03:21 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
On 11/29/17, 8:13 PM, in article , "harry
newton" wrote: He who is Doomsdrzej said on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:03:18 -0500: Boy am I happy to know that the people here didn't need a whole two decades to figure out that Snit wasn't worth engaging. He's one of those truly dangerous I offer evidence. To you that is "dangerous". OK. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308
|
|
#21
November 30th 17, 04:19 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
Doomsdrzej wrote:
I for one am glad you're around. I always enjoyed our discussions in the other NGs. Oh, I forgot, Snit utilizes a lot of socks. A LOT of socks. Anytime he's being decimated in a debate, a "person" pops out of nowhere to defend him. I know you don't like to have anyone challenge your trolling claims about Snit, but resorting to false accusations (I am not a new poster in aco.windows-10) is indicative of your motives. You can't get Snit on substance, no one ever really does, but you can lie, twist, exaggerate, and otherwise fabricate claims about him. Congrats at being such a determined Internet jerk/troll. -- Joel Crump
|
|
#22
November 30th 17, 04:24 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
|
|
#23
November 30th 17, 01:32 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 03:13:55 +0000 (UTC), harry newton
wrote: He who is Doomsdrzej said on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:03:18 -0500: Boy am I happy to know that the people here didn't need a whole two decades to figure out that Snit wasn't worth engaging. He's one of those truly dangerous serial predators because he is incomprehensibly stupid, which in itself is not a big deal. For example, he trolled his video hundreds of times stalking on the net in threads that had nothing to do with his topic - and his video was dead wrong - where he never once looked at the Y axis of what his app showed. The fact that he's incomprehensibly stupid is that he *still* doesn't know the difference between a Megabit and a decibel. That's pretty funny because one and the other are not even in the same category. But there are plenty of imbeciles on the net. What's different about Snit is that he's a vicious narcissist. Did you watch the video for example? https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo It's not that he attacks what turns out to be completely accurate facts (since all Snit saw was a pretty graph where he never bothered to even *look* at the Y axis!) nor is it that he attacks people who speak only facts. What makes him vicious is that he told many people that he was *finally right* after all these years, simply because he trolled the idiotic video so many times that we all gave up correcting him. Then when multiple people told him to stop trolling his video, since they had had enough, Snit repeatedly screamed out that he was going to pummel the original person (me, as it turns out) who said the facts in the face to kill him. The guy is a complete nut. In case you need a profile of him to get an idea of what you're dealing with, he's a welfare recipient who occasionally gives classes on basic web authoring at some local college to make ends meet. He doesn't help his wife around the house and his kids never get to see him since he spends his entire days, without sleep, trolling Usenet. The worst part is that he doesn't even just post as Snit, he uses a number of Google accounts to support himself which results in something like 400 posts a day. Snit really said that he *enjoyed* kicking a poster down, over two hundred times, where Snit actually *thought* he was hurting the poster. In reality, it doesn't matter that Snit is yet another of many Apple Apologist imbeciles who, in this case, trolled that idiotic video of his blatantly fabricated imaginary iOS functionality *hundreds* of times. What matters is that Snit, when he *thought* he was *finally right*, decided to viciously pummel the original poster of fact into a bloody pulp. He said so himself. He's *that* dangerous. I am truly scared of him, where I suspect he and GoodGuy are the same sock. Nah, GoodGuy is just a similar idiot. I've seen him post here from time and time and quickly binned him but the things he sends out are slightly different from the idiocy Snit, also known as "The Prescott Computer Guy" and Michael Glasser posts.
|
|
#24
November 30th 17, 01:33 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:19:23 -0500, Joel wrote:
Doomsdrzej wrote: I for one am glad you're around. I always enjoyed our discussions in the other NGs. Oh, I forgot, Snit utilizes a lot of socks. A LOT of socks. Anytime he's being decimated in a debate, a "person" pops out of nowhere to defend him. I know you don't like to have anyone challenge your trolling claims about Snit, but resorting to false accusations... *plonk*
|
|
#25
November 30th 17, 01:45 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
He who is Joel said on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:19:23 -0500:
I know you don't like to have anyone challenge your trolling claims about Snit, but resorting to false accusations (I am not a new poster in aco.windows-10) is indicative of your motives. Joel, I only speak fact. The *only* way you can say Snit isn't a classic troll, is to be an idiot. I only speak fact. Please act like an adult and look here before you respond! http://tinyurl.com/misc-phone-mobile-iphone Did you look there? Good. Now look for Snit's posts. Did you look for Snit's posts? Do you see what *everyone* else sees? If not, then you are simply a Snit sock. You can't get Snit on substance, no one ever really does, but you can lie, twist, exaggerate, and otherwise fabricate claims about him. Congrats at being such a determined Internet jerk/troll. I only speak fact. You clearly are a Snit apolosist sock. Because Snit is *always* wrong. He's so stupid, he will always be wrong. I only speak fact. Just look at this idiotic video Snit made & posted *hundreds* of times! https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo Notice that the Snit Apple Apologists went to all that trouble to post a video of completely fabricated claims of iOS imaginary functionality, and he didn't stop there. When we just silently laughed at the imbecile, he then was encouraged by our silence to post it hundreds upon hundreds of times, saying gleefully he had our backs against the wall. Meanwhile, the Apple Apologist never even *looked* at the Y-Azis! iOS: http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/11/wifi_sweetspots.jpg Snit posted about four or five hundred posts, of the same idiocy, where he never even *looked* at the Y-Axis of what he was posting! This is what he *claimed* the Y-axis looked like (these are Android which actually does do the stated task that Snit fabricated for iOS): Android: http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/11/2wifianalyzer.jpg Android: http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/11/fritz_wlan.jpg I only speak fact. Nobody who is an adult could possibly conclude that Snit is not a troll. If you claim Snit is not a troll, then you didn't even look yourself. (Which is an exact replicate of Snit behavior).
|
|
#26
November 30th 17, 02:13 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
He who is Doomsdrzej said on Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:32:05 -0500:
That's pretty funny because one and the other are not even in the same category. What's different about Snit isn't really that he's incomprehsibly stupid, but how vicious he is. All he saw was a "moving graph" in this video: https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo That's it. A moving graph. (HINT: It happens to be megabits per second - but he didn't see that.) He saw a moving graph that moved just like these moving graphs did: Android: http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/11/2wifianalyzer.jpg Android: http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/11/fritz_wlan.jpg So sure, he's incomprehensibly stupid, but that's not what is dangerous about Snit. What he then did was create a video attacking me, for simply stating that Android graphs WiFi decibels over time while iOS does not. https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo But that just means he is an incomprehensibly stupid iOS apologist. That's not what is dangerous about Snit. What's dangerous about Snit is that, when I ignored his incomprehensibly stupid iOS apology, he felt emboldened and powerful. He claimed to Davoud that he "had my back against the wall". He claimed to nospam that he'll never stop until he has me beaten to a bloody pulp. That's what's so dangerous about the incomprehensibly stupid iOS apologist Snit - he's a vicious narcissist who, when he thinks he's finally right for once, will pummel you to death - in hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of completely unrelated posts. Even though I'm truly scared of Snit, he follows me around like a deranged stalker, posting his narcissistic rants everywhere I go. I know this (since I have him plonked) by the very need for this thread to warn others about Snit. The guy is a complete nut. In case you need a profile of him to get an idea of what you're dealing with, he's a welfare recipient who occasionally gives classes on basic web authoring at some local college to make ends meet. He doesn't help his wife around the house and his kids never get to see him since he spends his entire days, without sleep, trolling Usenet. The worst part is that he doesn't even just post as Snit, he uses a number of Google accounts to support himself which results in something like 400 posts a day. The only thing I can credit Snit with teaching me is that he proves that the endless Apple-versus-the-world threads are unilaterally because the Apple apologists can't comprehend basic facts about their chosen platform. Everyone else can comprehend that Linux or Windows or Android has its flaws too - but the Apple Apologists like Snit can't comprehend that. It's OK to be an iOS apologist - and it's even ok to be incomprehensibly stupid - but what makes Snit truly dangerous is that he stalks people everywhere they go to post his drivel - hundreds upon hundreds of times - like he apparently started just yesterday here. What kind of person does that?
|
|
#27
November 30th 17, 04:25 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
On 11/30/17, 7:13 AM, in article , "harry newton"
wrote: He who is Doomsdrzej said on Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:32:05 -0500: That's pretty funny because one and the other are not even in the same category. What's different about Snit isn't really that he's incomprehsibly stupid, And yet it was trivial to find examples of iOS doing things Android does not do or does very poorly... something you denied existed. .... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308
|
|
#28
November 30th 17, 04:25 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
On 11/30/17, 6:45 AM, in article , "harry newton"
wrote: He who is Joel said on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:19:23 -0500: I know you don't like to have anyone challenge your trolling claims about Snit, but resorting to false accusations (I am not a new poster in aco.windows-10) is indicative of your motives. Joel, I only speak fact. The *only* way you can say Snit isn't a classic troll, is to be an idiot. And yet I found it TRIVIAL to find tasks iOS does which Android does not or does poorly, something you denied existed. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308
|
|
#29
November 30th 17, 04:28 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
|
|
#30
December 1st 17, 02:41 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to the newsgroup about Snit
Snit wrote:
I know you don't like to have anyone challenge your trolling claims about Snit, but resorting to false accusations (I am not a new poster in aco.windows-10) is indicative of your motives. You can't get Snit on substance, no one ever really does, but you can lie, twist, exaggerate, and otherwise fabricate claims about him. Congrats at being such a determined Internet jerk/troll. Exactly correct. And if he *really* thought I was a bad person he would quote the things I say which are bad. And he would show support for his accusations. By the way, he is often called "Slimer" because that was his old name... he changes fairly often. I find it a noteworthy coincidence that he's trying to turn this group into an anti-Mac trollfest. And yet *you* are the bad guy, and he makes wild accusations about puppets - it's interesting. -- Joel Crump
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
