If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
Per ...winston:
Imo. Home Premium based on the info you've provided would probably be sufficient (if those are your only needs) and possibly a better choice. Personally I prefer the Pro version. Ok, you've talked me out of Basic. What does Premium do for you that I might want done for me? -- Pete Cresswell |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
In message , ...winston
writes: [snip Pete Cresswell's bit - I think; ...winston is using WLW15 without http://www.dusko-lolic.from.hr/wlmquote/, so I'm not sure who said what] Basic is primarily intended for emerging market countries and correspondingly has less geographical availability which also means geographical restrictions on activation. [] I presume you mean as an aftermarket add-on. It's certainly widely available here (UK, not I wouldn't have thought an "emerging market") installed on basic netbooks. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf .... unlike other legal systems the common law is permissive. We can do what we like, unless it is specifically prohibited by law. We are not as rule-bound and codified as other legal systems. - Helena Kennedy QC (Radio Times 14-20 July 2012). |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
"Gene E. Bloch" wrote in message ... On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:24:59 -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:22:22 -0400, "(PeteCresswell)" wrote in article ... Per Bruce Hagen: You may never need it, but with Pro or higher, you can use XP Mode. It has come in handy for me. Which begs the question that's been in the back of my mind since first seeing "XP Mode".... Is "XP Mode" something global - i.e. where one boots up the system in "XP Mode"? Or is it on an application-by-application basis where an application can be started in "XP Mode" while the rest of the sys is running normally? It is a VM (virtual machine) that you run inside of Windows 7 that looks and works almost exactly like running XP natively. Video isn't as good (no 3d as far as I know), performance is a little lacking, and hardware is virtualized but otherwise it is just like running XP. From what I understand, you can also run it on an application-by- application basis as you describe, but I've not run it that way so I can't really comment or offer advice. My understanding is that the application-by-application basis is a matter of configuring the VM to be invisible except for the application you are running. Yes, the VM runs invisible and applications are presented to the host desktop via an RDP connection to the guest. As anecdotal evidence(?), when I tried to run an application that way, the program took nearly as long to start as if I had booted the VM first and then started the program :-) Depends on how the VM is configured. Default behavior, when no applications are running, is to hibernate. So launching an application will include the time it takes to boot the VM up from hibernation. If you have the system resources you can configure it to stay running so apps will launch quicker but it will slow down shutting the host down as it will first have to send a shutdown\hibernate command to the VM and wait for that to complete before the host finishes its shutdown process. I didn't use XP Mode for very long, since it was not a match to my apps, so I didn't learn very much, sorry. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:54:09 -0400, "...winston"
wrote: Basic is primarily intended for emerging market countries and correspondingly has less geographical availability which also means geographical restrictions on activation. Home Basic is only capable of joining a network. Home Premium is able to create and join a network. I believe you mean to replace 'network' with 'Homegroup', right? As in, "Home Basic is only capable of joining a Homegroup. Home Premium is able to create and join a Homegroup." Since most people don't use the Homegroup feature, (in my experience), this isn't a serious limitation. -- Char Jackson |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:23:19 -0400, Seth wrote:
As anecdotal evidence(?), when I tried to run an application that way, the program took nearly as long to start as if I had booted the VM first and then started the program :-) Depends on how the VM is configured. Default behavior, when no applications are running, is to hibernate. So launching an application will include the time it takes to boot the VM up from hibernation. If you have the system resources you can configure it to stay running so apps will launch quicker but it will slow down shutting the host down as it will first have to send a shutdown\hibernate command to the VM and wait for that to complete before the host finishes its shutdown process. The VM was not running - or hibernating - until I explicitly started it (or an XP-Mode application), since I always closed the VM when I was finished. -- Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch) |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
I use Win7 Pro not Premium since it provides XP Mode and Presentation Mode.
- you can Google or Bingle for explanations for both of those Pro (or higher) options. -- ....winston msft mvp mail "(PeteCresswell)" wrote in message ... Per ...winston: Imo. Home Premium based on the info you've provided would probably be sufficient (if those are your only needs) and possibly a better choice. Personally I prefer the Pro version. Ok, you've talked me out of Basic. What does Premium do for you that I might want done for me? -- Pete Cresswell |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
Correct.
I've seen both. Users with Homegroups and those without. If only one pc, then Homegroup isn't really a variable. -- ....winston msft mvp mail "Char Jackson" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:54:09 -0400, "...winston" I believe you mean to replace 'network' with 'Homegroup', right? As in, "Home Basic is only capable of joining a Homegroup. Home Premium is able to create and join a Homegroup." Since most people don't use the Homegroup feature, (in my experience), this isn't a serious limitation. -- Char Jackson |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
"...winston" wrote in message
... Correct. I've seen both. Users with Homegroups and those without. If only one pc, then Homegroup isn't really a variable. -- ...winston msft mvp mail "Char Jackson" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:54:09 -0400, "...winston" I believe you mean to replace 'network' with 'Homegroup', right? As in, "Home Basic is only capable of joining a Homegroup. Home Premium is able to create and join a Homegroup." Since most people don't use the Homegroup feature, (in my experience), this isn't a serious limitation. I've found Homegroups to be a major retrograde step and I've set up my networked PCs to use "old fashioned" XP/Vista style networking, with servernames and sharenames (\\servername\sharename\folder1\folder2 etc). One thing to be aware of is that, certainly for Vista, Professional didn't include Windows Media Centre which Home Premium did. I *think* the same distinction is true of Win 7 as well, but I've not tried Win 7 Pro so I can't be certain. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
Per ...winston:
I've seen both. Users with Homegroups and those without. If only one pc, then Homegroup isn't really a variable. Has MS moved the furniture around again, and "HomeGroup" is really what "WorkGroup" is under XP? -- Pete Cresswell |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:21:08 +0100, "Mortimer" wrote:
"...winston" wrote in message ... Correct. I've seen both. Users with Homegroups and those without. If only one pc, then Homegroup isn't really a variable. -- ...winston msft mvp mail "Char Jackson" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:54:09 -0400, "...winston" I believe you mean to replace 'network' with 'Homegroup', right? As in, "Home Basic is only capable of joining a Homegroup. Home Premium is able to create and join a Homegroup." Since most people don't use the Homegroup feature, (in my experience), this isn't a serious limitation. I've found Homegroups to be a major retrograde step and I've set up my networked PCs to use "old fashioned" XP/Vista style networking, with servernames and sharenames (\\servername\sharename\folder1\folder2 etc). I tried the Homegroups feature with a couple of Win 7 machines and it worked perfectly. Very easy to set up and use. Absolutely no problems at all. Of course, the trouble comes if you want to add an XP machine, so you're right back at 'old school' networking. You can do both, of course, but I figured why bother. -- Char Jackson |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:46:02 -0400, "(PeteCresswell)"
wrote: Per ...winston: I've seen both. Users with Homegroups and those without. If only one pc, then Homegroup isn't really a variable. Has MS moved the furniture around again, and "HomeGroup" is really what "WorkGroup" is under XP? No, Homegroup is a new networking feature that exists in addition to Workgroup, not instead of it. You can ignore it if you like. -- Char Jackson |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
Per Char Jackson:
No, Homegroup is a new networking feature that exists in addition to Workgroup, not instead of it. You can ignore it if you like. It's sounding more-and-more like Basic is the one. Having said that, my gut says there's about a 97% chance I'll be sorry if I go with Basic.... There's probably something behind Winston's general assertion that's going to bite me. But so far, I have not seen any specifics - in fact, the closest thing to a specific is the thought that it is designed for less-powerful machines and, by implication, may be less resource-intensive. I guess now I'm trolling for somebody who has both (or even all 3: Basic, Premium, and Pro...) -- Pete Cresswell |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
(PeteCresswell) wrote:
Per Char Jackson: No, Homegroup is a new networking feature that exists in addition to Workgroup, not instead of it. You can ignore it if you like. It's sounding more-and-more like Basic is the one. I read somewhere that with Basic, you can only run a couple of apps at a time. If'n I was you, I'd look into that. I think you should get at least Home Premium. After all, it's only a few bucks more than Home Basic. Skip your latte for a day. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
Per Sam Hill:
I think you should get at least Home Premium. After all, it's only a few bucks more than Home Basic. Skip your latte for a day. Point taken. But then I'm on to obsessing about the OEM versions - which are a good hundred bucks less..... -- Pete Cresswell |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Home Basic vs Home Premium vs Professional?
"(PeteCresswell)" wrote:
Per ...winston: Imo. Home Premium based on the info you've provided would probably be sufficient (if those are your only needs) and possibly a better choice. Personally I prefer the Pro version. Ok, you've talked me out of Basic. What does Premium do for you that I might want done for me? Wikipedia has a concise summary of the differences between the various editions of Windows 7: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7_editions Joe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|