I'm throwing my computer in the garbage

Gordon posted this via
:

I'm old and retired now but throughout my younger days I spent my time
and energy earning enough money to pay enough taxes to support those
who wouldn't work and earn their own way

And ALL the Negroes, Illegal Mexicans, a couple of sex-slaves from Bosnia and
people of all races takin' the food stamps sincerely thank Gordon! We should
have ourselves a national "Thank You Gordon" day for supportin' all those
lower class people. For my contribution, I evade paying taxes EVERY chance I
get!

--

I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;

Resolve conflicts the American way :

Rock - Paper - Scissors - Twitter War - Concealed Firearm

.... and I approve this message!

On 14 Mar 2016 14:37:00 GMT, Bucky Breeder
wrote:

Gordon posted this via
:

I'm old and retired now but throughout my younger days I spent my time
and energy earning enough money to pay enough taxes to support those
who wouldn't work and earn their own way

And ALL the Negroes, Illegal Mexicans, a couple of sex-slaves from Bosnia and
people of all races takin' the food stamps sincerely thank Gordon! We should
have ourselves a national "Thank You Gordon" day for supportin' all those
lower class people. For my contribution, I evade paying taxes EVERY chance I
get!

A much more effective solution to this set of problems would be some
form of reproductive sterilization before those people could be given
any form of support. If they don't want to have their reproductive
system turned off they should flee back to wherever they came from.
Gordon

Wolf K conflated thusly :

The notion that breeding with
a high IQ person will result in high IQ children is, um, somewhat dubious

Naahhhhh... Not so much! Part of it is certainly genetics, but a big part of
it is evironmental. Nuturing, health, social interaction, field of
experiences, formal education, and most developmental elements tend to filter
down through the generations... Like any statistical curve, there are
exceptions at either end... to wit, well-bred kids can go bad and ill-bred
kids can beat the mold; but it's rare.

--

I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;

Resolve conflicts the American way :

Rock - Paper - Scissors - Twitter War - Concealed Firearm

.... and I approve this message!

Gordon posted this via
:

Selective breeding guided by human intelligence does work. This is how
our domestic animal breeds were developed. For example, a Hereford cow
and a Guernsey cow are definitely not the same.

Oh yeah?!? Then why they tip-over the same way?

--

I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;

Resolve conflicts the American way :

Rock - Paper - Scissors - Twitter War - Concealed Firearm

.... and I approve this message!

Wolf K observed :

Selective breeding guided by human intelligence does work. This is how
our domestic animal breeds were developed. For example, a Hereford cow
and a Guernsey cow are definitely not the same. Gordon

Ah, yes. Breed more Gordons, right?

Little retarded Gordons... to pay for all those welfare people. (:

--

I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;

Resolve conflicts the American way :

Rock - Paper - Scissors - Twitter War - Concealed Firearm

.... and I approve this message!

On 14 Mar 2016 14:32:31 GMT, Bucky Breeder
wrote:

Wolf K inquizitated thusly :
On 2016-03-13 08:56, Gordon wrote:
[...]
The most serious "dumbing down of humanity" is the birth rate
differences. The more intelligent human pairs are having very few
children while those of lower intelligence are having many children.
This birth rate difference will lead to a drastic change in the
overall population and this will result in a collapse of the entire
social/economic system. Gordon
[...]

So how come you haven't spread your seed more?

Gordon comes from a big-ass family because even the siblings procreate with
each other... mostly because they cain't figger out "where them babies
comin' from?!?"

I am one of four that my parents produced. One, my youngest sister,
died as a very young child. Two sisters and I matured to the adult
level then married and had children. I had four boys but one died in
his teens in a car wreck. My older sister had two girls and two boys,
but one of her boys died when an open flame heater in his bedroom
failed then released gas that killed him. My younger sister had a boy
and a girl, both of whom are still living. As the family generations
continue the birth rate is down in the range of two to three per
family. And, as far as I know, all of our descendants got an education
then a good job. None are freeloading bums. Gordon

On 3/14/16 6:56 AM, Gordon wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:06:06 -0400, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2016-03-13 21:08, Gary Heston wrote:
In article , Wolf K wrote:
On 2016-03-13 08:56, Gordon wrote:
[...]
The most serious "dumbing down of humanity" is the birth rate
differences. The more intelligent human pairs are having very few
children while those of lower intelligence are having many children.
This birth rate difference will lead to a drastic change in the
overall population and this will result in a collapse of the entire
social/economic system. Gordon
[...]

So how come you haven't spread your seed more?

Part of the problem is rarity of potential mates. For an IQ of 133 or
higher, 98.3551363216% of the US population does not qualify.

(Ref: http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/IQtable.aspx)

Add on to that the usual personality issues affecting all relationships,
and it's difficult to spread it effectively.

Gary

Besides which, IQ is a useless number. It follows normal distribution,
like height or foot size, which means that many different factors are
involved, both environmental and genetic. The notion that breeding with
a high IQ person will result in high IQ children is, um, somewhat dubious.

Have a good day,

Selective breeding guided by human intelligence does work. This is how
our domestic animal breeds were developed. For example, a Hereford cow
and a Guernsey cow are definitely not the same. Gordon

But you are dealing with a much smaller genome.

If you do this with humans, you've opened up yourself to
charges/accusations of "playing God".

I don't have problems with doing this if it's to eradicate genetic based
diseases, but if you do it to get that blue-eyed blonde child, that's
crossed the line, IMO.


--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 44.0
Thunderbird 38.0.1
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"

On 3/14/16 8:42 AM, Gordon wrote:
On 14 Mar 2016 14:37:00 GMT, Bucky Breeder
wrote:

Gordon posted this via
:

I'm old and retired now but throughout my younger days I spent my time
and energy earning enough money to pay enough taxes to support those
who wouldn't work and earn their own way

And ALL the Negroes, Illegal Mexicans, a couple of sex-slaves from Bosnia and
people of all races takin' the food stamps sincerely thank Gordon! We should
have ourselves a national "Thank You Gordon" day for supportin' all those
lower class people. For my contribution, I evade paying taxes EVERY chance I
get!

A much more effective solution to this set of problems would be some
form of reproductive sterilization before those people could be given
any form of support. If they don't want to have their reproductive
system turned off they should flee back to wherever they came from.
Gordon

Ah, the same idea as Nazi Germany had.

Way to go, Gordon! Geez. :-(


--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 44.0
Thunderbird 38.0.1
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"

On 3/14/16 8:49 AM, Gordon wrote:
On 14 Mar 2016 14:32:31 GMT, Bucky Breeder
wrote:

Wolf K inquizitated thusly :
On 2016-03-13 08:56, Gordon wrote:
[...]
The most serious "dumbing down of humanity" is the birth rate
differences. The more intelligent human pairs are having very few
children while those of lower intelligence are having many children.
This birth rate difference will lead to a drastic change in the
overall population and this will result in a collapse of the entire
social/economic system. Gordon
[...]

So how come you haven't spread your seed more?

Gordon comes from a big-ass family because even the siblings procreate with
each other... mostly because they cain't figger out "where them babies
comin' from?!?"

I am one of four that my parents produced. One, my youngest sister,
died as a very young child. Two sisters and I matured to the adult
level then married and had children. I had four boys but one died in
his teens in a car wreck. My older sister had two girls and two boys,
but one of her boys died when an open flame heater in his bedroom
failed then released gas that killed him. My younger sister had a boy
and a girl, both of whom are still living. As the family generations
continue the birth rate is down in the range of two to three per
family.

Actually, in the "western" world, it's less than that. I think
somewhere around 1.5 children per couple IIRC. Which is why western
countries need immigration, in order to have enough members of the
society to keep infrastructure and programs functional.

And, as far as I know, all of our descendants got an education
then a good job. None are freeloading bums. Gordon



--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 44.0
Thunderbird 38.0.1
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"

On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:06:06 -0400, Wolf K wrote:

On 2016-03-13 21:08, Gary Heston wrote:
In article , Wolf K
wrote:
On 2016-03-13 08:56, Gordon wrote:
[...]
The most serious "dumbing down of humanity" is the birth rate
differences. The more intelligent human pairs are having very few
children while those of lower intelligence are having many children.
This birth rate difference will lead to a drastic change in the
overall population and this will result in a collapse of the entire
social/economic system. Gordon
[...]

So how come you haven't spread your seed more?

Part of the problem is rarity of potential mates. For an IQ of 133 or
higher, 98.3551363216% of the US population does not qualify.

(Ref: http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/IQtable.aspx)

Add on to that the usual personality issues affecting all
relationships,
and it's difficult to spread it effectively.

Gary

Besides which, IQ is a useless number. It follows normal distribution,
like height or foot size, which means that many different factors are
involved, both environmental and genetic. The notion that breeding with
a high IQ person will result in high IQ children is, um, somewhat
dubious.

That reads just like a line spoken by Sheldon Cooper in the pilot
episode of "The Big Bang Theory"... er, a paraphrasing actually. Perhaps
I'm recalling the line from one of the other 189 episodes I've watched so
far. It really does seem *so* Sheldonesque.

--
Johnny B Good

On 3/14/2016 8:14 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 3/14/16 6:56 AM, Gordon wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:06:06 -0400, Wolf K
wrote:

On 2016-03-13 21:08, Gary Heston wrote:
In article , Wolf K
wrote:
On 2016-03-13 08:56, Gordon wrote:
[...]
The most serious "dumbing down of humanity" is the birth rate
differences. The more intelligent human pairs are having very few
children while those of lower intelligence are having many children.
This birth rate difference will lead to a drastic change in the
overall population and this will result in a collapse of the entire
social/economic system. Gordon
[...]

So how come you haven't spread your seed more?

Part of the problem is rarity of potential mates. For an IQ of 133 or
higher, 98.3551363216% of the US population does not qualify.

What's magic about 133??

(Ref: http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/IQtable.aspx)

Add on to that the usual personality issues affecting all
relationships,
especially among high IQ individuals
and it's difficult to spread it effectively.

Gary

Besides which, IQ is a useless number. It follows normal distribution,
like height or foot size, which means that many different factors are
involved, both environmental and genetic. The notion that breeding with
a high IQ person will result in high IQ children is, um, somewhat
dubious.
The size of her shoe is not the first size most guys consider.

Have a good day,

Selective breeding guided by human intelligence does work. This is how
our domestic animal breeds were developed. For example, a Hereford cow
and a Guernsey cow are definitely not the same. Gordon

I used to manage teams of engineers. There was a wide variation in smarts
and capabilities. I wished for a team of ALL top-shelf engineers...
until I got one. Was like herding cats. And I got all scratched up
trying. Be careful what you wish for.

But you are dealing with a much smaller genome.

If you do this with humans, you've opened up yourself to
charges/accusations of "playing God".

I don't have problems with doing this if it's to eradicate genetic based
diseases, but if you do it to get that blue-eyed blonde child, that's
crossed the line, IMO.

On 3/14/2016 8:15 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 3/14/16 8:42 AM, Gordon wrote:
On 14 Mar 2016 14:37:00 GMT, Bucky Breeder
wrote:

Gordon posted this via
:

I'm old and retired now but throughout my younger days I spent my time
and energy earning enough money to pay enough taxes to support those
who wouldn't work and earn their own way

And ALL the Negroes, Illegal Mexicans, a couple of sex-slaves from
Bosnia and
people of all races takin' the food stamps sincerely thank Gordon!
We should
have ourselves a national "Thank You Gordon" day for supportin' all
those
lower class people. For my contribution, I evade paying taxes EVERY
chance I
get!

A much more effective solution to this set of problems would be some
form of reproductive sterilization before those people could be given
any form of support.

That's too late. Reversible sterilization at birth.
You want kids, put up a bond that can pay for their upkeep and
education. If you nip it in the bud, the degradation of
society is a self limiting process.

If you're lazy or stupid or evil and can't put up the bond, you
don't procreate. You have a kid after securing your future and
providing for the kid's future.

What we have now is "I'm so drunk that I forgot the condom."

You don't have to tinker with genes at all. You just have to give
incentives to become contributing members of society. People will
always follow the path of least resistance. Make that path one that
raises kids with good role models and adequate resources.

You get higher quality people if they're planned and cared for.

Notice that I have made no statements about exactly what kids should
be taught, just that it be taught in a stable family where they
are wanted and with adequate financial resources.

I spent a summer internship at a city planning department in the deep south.
Welfare mothers were having babies as fast as they could to up the
welfare payments. If dad lived at home, welfare was reduced.
That's a recipe for failed upbringing.
I think they finally passed legislation to limit
welfare to 10 or so kids.

If they don't want to have their reproductive
system turned off they should flee back to wherever they came from.
Gordon

Ah, the same idea as Nazi Germany had.

Way to go, Gordon! Geez. :-(

Ken Blake wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:02:13 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
wrote:


The problem is obvious existence of back-doors! Viruses are programs
written merely taking advantage of them!!


A minor point, but I'll mention it: a computer virus is simply a
piece of self-replicating code. It doesn't have to do anything bad to
be a virus.

That means that win 10 is a virus because it copies itself to one's
machine (self replicating) and puts in icon in your systray telling you
to upgrade.