If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
On 10/3/2016 at 10:45 AM, Shadow's prodigious digits fired off:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 19:40:00 +1100, Gordon Levi wrote: I have been told that you DON'T have to pay. You can use this https://www.microsoft.com/en-au/accessibility/windows10upgrade. I haven't tried it so I would be interested to hear if you any information that contradicts mine. The site says on the front page that they are not giving away Win 10, only an "upgrade" for people who have already PURCHASED Win 7. So it's not free. With no money changing hands it IS free. If you bought a loaf of bread last month and the grocery gives you one with no money changing hands would you claim that it's not free: Sheesh! -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ When it rains, why don't sheep shrink? |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:48:51 -0400, burfordTjustice
wrote: On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 11:13:11 -0300 Shadow wrote: I'm glad you used your capslock to underline the fact that in the eyes of the law Dustin is NOT a criminal, There is no proof for that. What does he do now, do you know? As far as I know he works. I've never seen him stalking any company or person. He knows people that seed DMCA-prohibited stuff, but then, who doesn't ? I think the law in the US says "innocent until PROVEN guilty" .... for now, anyway. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:58:52 -0400, Ed Mullen
wrote: On 10/3/2016 at 10:45 AM, Shadow's prodigious digits fired off: The site says on the front page that they are not giving away Win 10, only an "upgrade" for people who have already PURCHASED Win 7. So it's not free. With no money changing hands it IS free. There you go .... If you bought a loaf of bread last month and the grocery gives you one with no money changing hands would you claim that it's not free: If I paid the baker for a loaf of brown bread until 2020, and he promised every loaf would be perfectly SAFE to eat, I'd be REALLY annoyed if he advised me to change to white bread, because " the brown bread could easily be poisoned, and we don't care". M$ advising people to "upgrade" because of "security issues" is a scam. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:36:46 -0400, Wolf K
wrote: On 2016-10-03 11:56, Ed Mullen wrote: [...] Well, considering: 1) That's Microsoft Australia so doesn't pertain the the U.S. 2) It's specifically about users of assistive technologies. And, to quote from the first paragraph: "For the general public, the free upgrade offer to Windows 10 ends on 29 July." No problem getting it here (Canada), I just downloaded it. The d/l window says you can decide when to start the upgrade, but as soon as the d/l was verified, it began to Install Windows 10. I'd check my security settings. No downloaded software should EVER run without user intervention. It would be a ransomware paradise. []'s So I stopped the task (Windows 10 Upgrade assistant), and will install W10 later. Maybe. Have a good day, -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
on 10/3/2016, Ed Mullen supposed : On 10/3/2016 at 10:45 AM, Shadow's prodigious digits fired off: On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 19:40:00 +1100, Gordon Levi wrote: I have been told that you DON'T have to pay. You can use this https://www.microsoft.com/en-au/accessibility/windows10upgrade. I haven't tried it so I would be interested to hear if you any information that contradicts mine. The site says on the front page that they are not giving away Win 10, only an "upgrade" for people who have already PURCHASED Win 7. So it's not free. With no money changing hands it IS free. If you bought a loaf of bread last month and the grocery gives you one with no money changing hands would you claim that it's not free: Sheesh! Talk about twisted logic. Okay, how about this? If they had a sale like "two for the price of one" and I got the last one off the shelf and expected to get it for half price, and they said they can't ring it up that way because the register won't accept it, so instead they make me pay full price and they write on the receipt that "Customer deserves the other half of a BOGO deal" so that I can come back later, then yes, I call that not free. When I come back for my already paid for loaf of bread, they make me show them the receipt because they are not in the business of giving away free loaves of bread even if the BOGO is still in effect. Giving me the already paid for loaf, balances their inventory. Before you ask, not so much for loaves of bread, but some products can't be rung up as 'half a deal' because of the register data on some systems being linked to the inventory and/or reordering data. When they sell me the loaf of bread at full price during the sale, two loaves are subtracted from the inventory, so they owe me one. But as I said in another post, you're not really getting a free OS from Microsoft, you are getting an extension (or a transference) on the already paid for product activation key of the authorized Win 7.x or Win 8.x OS version they think that you already have. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
Mark Lloyd has brought this to us :
On 10/02/2016 12:16 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: Rene Lamontagne explained on 10/2/2016 : [...] Well if you really want FREE load Linux and be happy Rene I did, and I am. I would have liked it if Microsoft had offered their free upgrade from Windows Vista to Windows 10 too, but they didn't do that. I never liked Vista. 7 is sort of OK. I think 2000 and XP were the best of their efforts. BTW, the latest Firefox still works on XP. I have Firefox and Chrome on here, and only Chrome says it is not supported anymore. Oh well, their choice to stop supporting it. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
FromTheRafters was thinking very hard :
Apologies for the formatting or lack of same, I had to C&P the whole post because of AIOE and it didn't work correctly. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
Paul Mon, 03
Oct 2016 10:02:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: That requires a qualifying OS. A licensed copy of Win7 SP1 or a licensed copy of Win8.1 . It's the same offer as existed for the one year long free upgrade offer, only the offer has been extended. It's intended for disabled users who would be using Accessibility features. Paul So it wasn't free in the true sense of the word then. Hopefully, that issue is settled. Wishful thinking on my part, though. I know. -- People you encounter every day are fighting battles you know nothing about. Be kind. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
Shadow
Mon, 03 Oct 2016 14:13:11 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: But his father always was ..... could be the reason ... No doubt in my mind. And, we have no way of knowing what he wrote about his son was infact, true, either. Due to BD's excessive need to lie as often as possible, one could reasonably assume his statement concerning his son wasn't infact, true. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group, or an organization.[1] It may include false accusations, defamation, slander and libel. It may also include monitoring, identity theft, threats, vandalism, solicitation for sex, or gathering information that may be used to threaten, embarrass or harass. Cyberstalking is often accompanied by realtime or offline stalking. [2] Both are criminal offenses.[3] Both are motivated by a desire to control, intimidate or influence a victim.[4] A stalker may be an online stranger or a person whom the target knows. He may be anonymous and solicit involvement of other people online who do not even know the target. That sums the individual you replied to up quite nicely, doesn't it. I suspect he'll continue though, business as usual. His daily mass consumption of alcohol causes memory loss issues. The decision I made to no longer respond to his posts seems to be working quite nicely, too. I dare say it's beginning to **** him off. He's even gone so far as to try and bait me into conversing directly with him: Message-ID: As I continue to demonstrate that I do have the knowledge required to do anything he's ever asked of me. That has to be making his blood boil. At one point, I'm sure he thought I exaggerated my actual abilities and knowledge. I'm confident he now realizes, I didn't. I was candid and honest with him concerning both. He continues to make poor choices. Recently, a fellow brit (whom he thought at one point would be able to put me in my place) got his ass royally handed to him with the Dell discussions. That had to have stung a bit. I found it hillarious, myself. Now, he's stuck relying on end users and for the most part, bull**** artists for his stalking needs and technical explanations. As those who could provide answers to some/all of his questions have gotten wise to him for the most part and won't participate. I did take the time to provide him another technically working copy of a short video I created, but, due to his completely unfounded accusation that I don't speak properly, he's unable to make any use of it. He can't even get the .zip file to hand it's contents over. And, he's gone so far as to recruit a british former crypto specialist (if we're to take his word for it) to assist. They are unable to do so. Only one person aside from myself could give him what he needs to be able to unzip and view it. I gave them the details because they've earned my trust. I'm confident they don't want to break that trust they have with me. As I'm sure you've noticed, once it's lost, you can't ever get it back. Had he left his wiseass remark out of his request, he would have had no trouble with the .zip file. His choice, of course. Be a dick, get treated like one. I suspect he's been hitting the bottle again. You'd think with his excessive alcohol consumption that's been taking place for atleast twenty years, his brain would be royally pickled by now. -- People you encounter every day are fighting battles you know nothing about. Be kind. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
Ed Mullen wrote:
On 10/3/2016 at 4:40 AM, Gordon Levi's prodigious digits fired off: Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/1/2016 at 9:01 PM, Shadow's prodigious digits fired off: On Sat, 1 Oct 2016 20:52:42 -0400, Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/1/2016 at 5:50 PM, Shadow's prodigious digits fired off: On Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:14:38 +0200, Z wrote: Microsoft provide the entire operating system for free. Not any more. They never did, unless you are talking about the Alpha testing stuff. Well, actually, Windows 10 got on to two machines here that could handle it for free via the upgrade process. So, yeah, it's fair to say that they, in large part, gave it away for free. What were you running on the machine, Debian, Mint, Slackware ? Or a purchased version of Windows ? If you paid for it (directly or indirectly), it wasn't free. []'s There was no money outlay. Hence, free. The usual rule in software is free in-version upgrades. i.e., V1 to V1.1. And charge-for upgrade to new version. i.e., V1 to V2. To go from XP to Win 7 I had to pay. To go from W7 to W10 I did not pay. In the grand scheme of things it's accurate to say it was a free upgrade. And, they had a cut-off date. If you waited until after the date you DID have to pay for it. I have been told that you DON'T have to pay. You can use this https://www.microsoft.com/en-au/accessibility/windows10upgrade. I haven't tried it so I would be interested to hear if you any information that contradicts mine. Well, considering: 1) That's Microsoft Australia so doesn't pertain the the U.S. In case others also have trouble using a search engine here is the U.S. site https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/accessibility/windows10upgrade. 2) It's specifically about users of assistive technologies. Most people use assistive technologies of some sort. I don't think that Microsoft check your level of disability. And, to quote from the first paragraph: "For the general public, the free upgrade offer to Windows 10 ends on 29 July." Yes but I was told that being in the general public is voluntary. |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Windows 10: Here's why it beats Windows 7 on security!
Shadow wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 19:40:00 +1100, Gordon Levi wrote: I have been told that you DON'T have to pay. You can use this https://www.microsoft.com/en-au/accessibility/windows10upgrade. I haven't tried it so I would be interested to hear if you any information that contradicts mine. The site says on the front page that they are not giving away Win 10, only an "upgrade" for people who have already PURCHASED Win 7. So it's not free. You snipped the post that I was replying to. I was only raising doubt about the claim that the _upgrade_ was no longer free.. Also, if you read the Win 10 (or whatever they call it, they could have called it Win 7.1) TOS , you will probably decline. If you make a habit of reading TOS documents there will be almost no software or web sites that you would use. Best to ignore them and claim, truthfully, that nobody else reads them and the "reasonable person" would not expect the conditions they impose. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|