Microsoft Auto-Scheduling Windows 10 Updates

In article s
Jack Ryan wrote:

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/win...tes,31802.html

Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade
to it.

Nathan Hale wrote:

In article s
Jack Ryan wrote:

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/win...tes,31802.html

Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade
to it.

And when a dizum coward claims this, one can only conclude that Win10 is
neither solid nor reliable. And that everyone should try to avoid that
"upgrade" as much as possible.

Which is what people do. MS can stuff it only to them via a sneak "upgrade"
or via a new machine

In article , Peter Köhlmann
wrote:


Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade
to it.

And when a dizum coward claims this, one can only conclude that Win10 is
neither solid nor reliable. And that everyone should try to avoid that
"upgrade" as much as possible.

it's more solid and reliable than what came before it.

On 23/05/2016 21:24, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
And when a dizum coward claims this, one can only conclude that Win10
is neither solid nor reliable.

Go try it boy. don't be a coward!!!

Windows 10 Screen Capture
http://content.screencast.com/users/JT19560819/folders/Jing/media/5e6aeb55-bdc3-4e2a-b8a8-467b29ac368d/2016-05-23_2202.png

nospam wrote:

In article , Peter Köhlmann
wrote:


Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade
to it.

And when a dizum coward claims this, one can only conclude that Win10 is
neither solid nor reliable. And that everyone should try to avoid that
"upgrade" as much as possible.

it's more solid and reliable than what came before it.

Really? With every new release of windows we have been promised that "this
time it is stable and secure". And evey time it was neither

Face it: Windows was ****ty from day one. And it still is

On Mon, 23 May 2016 21:02:42 +0100 (BST), Nathan Hale
wrote:


Windows 10 is very solid and reliable.


I agree with that.


Everyone should upgrade to it.


But I disagree with that.

In article , Peter Köhlmann
wrote:

Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade
to it.

And when a dizum coward claims this, one can only conclude that Win10 is
neither solid nor reliable. And that everyone should try to avoid that
"upgrade" as much as possible.

it's more solid and reliable than what came before it.

Really?

really.

With every new release of windows we have been promised that "this
time it is stable and secure". And evey time it was neither

straw man. nothing is fully stable and secure.

Face it: Windows was ****ty from day one. And it still is

maybe so, but win10 is much better than what came before.

On 23/05/2016 21:02, Nathan Hale wrote:
In article s
Jack Ryan wrote:

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/win...tes,31802.html

Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade
to it.


When I upgraded (it was quite a while ago I admit) Oracle VirtualBox,
which I often use, collapsed into a heap of mysterious indecipherable
error messages.

--

Brian Gregory (in the UK).
To email me please remove all the letter vee from my email address.

In article s
Jack Ryan wrote:


http://www.tomshardware.com/news/win...tes,31802.html

Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade
to it.

7 is the perfect number. That is where I am staying.

Nathan Hale wrote:
In article s
Jack Ryan wrote:
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/win...tes,31802.html

Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade
to it.

I run win10 but without internet access because of the keylogger and
spyware.

On 24/05/2016 02:03, Moss Grimmik wrote:


I run win10 but without internet access because of the keylogger and
spyware.

You reckon Microsoft millionaires are interested in you? What is so
special about you? Are you competing against Microsoft? What products
have you released so far?

You say spyware, can you give an example which spyware is embedded in
Windows 10?

If the machine has no internet access, what is it use for? In fact what
is the point of having a dumb machine?

Where do you get these daft ideas about key loggers and spywares? Is it
from that "Canadian Small Boys Abuser" or is it from Stan Brown or PJP?


--

/*This post contains rich text (HTML). if you don't like it then you can
kill-filter the poster without crying about it like a small baby so that
you don't see this poster's posts ever again.*/

/*This message is best read in Mozilla Thunderbird as it uses 21st
century technology.*/

In article
Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?=
wrote:

Nathan Hale wrote:

In article s
Jack Ryan wrote:

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/win...tes,31802.html

Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade
to it.

And when a dizum coward claims this, one can only conclude that Win10 is
neither solid nor reliable. And that everyone should try to avoid that
"upgrade" as much as possible.

Better to use an OS with a thousand different variants and no
quality control, ehh Peter?

Which is what people do. MS can stuff it only to them via a sneak "upgrade"
or via a new machine

When linux can do the same things Windows does maybe it will be
more acceptable.

In article
Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?=
wrote:

nospam wrote:

In article , Peter Köhlmann
wrote:


Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade
to it.

And when a dizum coward claims this, one can only conclude that Win10 is
neither solid nor reliable. And that everyone should try to avoid that
"upgrade" as much as possible.

it's more solid and reliable than what came before it.

Really? With every new release of windows we have been promised that "this
time it is stable and secure". And evey time it was neither

Same things were said about Linux and it has way less
flexibility than Windows.

Face it: Windows was ****ty from day one. And it still is

Jealous much?

On Tue, 24 May 2016 02:40:41 +0100, Cornelis Tromp wrote:

In article
Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?= wrote:

Nathan Hale wrote:

In article s
Jack Ryan wrote:

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/win...uto-schedules-
updates,31802.html

Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade to
it.

And when a dizum coward claims this, one can only conclude that Win10
is neither solid nor reliable. And that everyone should try to avoid
that "upgrade" as much as possible.

Better to use an OS with a thousand different variants and no quality
control, ehh Peter?

Which is what people do. MS can stuff it only to them via a sneak
"upgrade"
or via a new machine

When linux can do the same things Windows does maybe it will be more
acceptable.

It will never happen.
Consistency is not a hallmark of Linux.

On Tue, 24 May 2016 03:42:13 +0200, Malaysian Airlines wrote:

In article
Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?=
wrote:

nospam wrote:

In article , Peter Köhlmann
wrote:


Windows 10 is very solid and reliable. Everyone should upgrade to
it.

And when a dizum coward claims this, one can only conclude that
Win10 is neither solid nor reliable. And that everyone should try to
avoid that "upgrade" as much as possible.

it's more solid and reliable than what came before it.

Really? With every new release of windows we have been promised that
"this time it is stable and secure". And evey time it was neither

Same things were said about Linux and it has way less flexibility than
Windows.

Face it: Windows was ****ty from day one. And it still is

Jealous much?

Peter Kohlmann is a Linux advocate who somehow manages to be wrong about
99 percent of the time. In comp.os.linux.advocacy he is considered a
complete joke who is evidently employed in his German village as a clown
who makes blow up balloon toys for kids.

It's almost impossible to find a post where Peter Kohlmann is correct on
a technical subject.
The guy is an idiot.
A complete idiot in fact.