Ha! Ads be gone!

Snit explained on 8/19/2020 :
nospam wrote:
In article , Ron
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your
notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t
see that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims
up to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

Rene

I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense.

exactly.

It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into
a corner.
Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from
both corners of his mouth.
More fun!

some of gremlin's posts are crossposted here.


Anyway, back to tech: I still agree with Apple about their Silicon and how
it will not support the virtualization of x86 Windows.

How about you?

I'm wondering if it was not about a small subset of x86-64 bit
instructions which a translator (Rosetta?) would not translate.

On 2020-08-19, Ron wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:21:11 -0500, Rene Lamontagne
wrote:

On 2020-08-19 5:58 p.m., nospam wrote:
In article , Snit
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation
incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see
that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up
to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

Rene

I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense.
It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into
a corner.
Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from
both corners of his mouth.
More fun!



All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html

Oy gevalt!
This guy must be totally ****ing ferschnicket !


--
Nimbus9

On Aug 19, 2020 at 6:26:53 PM MST, "FromTheRafters"
wrote:
....


Anyway, back to tech: I still agree with Apple about their Silicon and how
it will not support the virtualization of x86 Windows.

How about you?

I'm wondering if it was not about a small subset of x86-64 bit
instructions which a translator (Rosetta?) would not translate.

I think with Rosetta they are using a combination of some instructions on the
chip and some translated (not really virtualization). But even with that there
are things they will not do with Rosetta.

What I am HOPING is that they will work with Parallels, VMWare, VirtualBox,
etc. to allow them to emulate it as well as reasonably possible. If the CPUs
are as fast as folks hope then maybe you will get decent speeds.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 20/08/2020 02:26, FromTheRafters wrote:
[....]
I'm wondering if it was not about a small subset of x86-64 bit
instructions which a translator (Rosetta?) would not translate.

Interjecting! :-) Remember the header problem with Aardvark?

Do you think THIS header is forged?

-

Supernews says Wolffan is not one of their customers.

Do you think Wolffan's header has been forged?

Here’s the header of one of his recent posts:-


Path: not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:53:24 -0500
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:53:24 -0400
From: Wolffan
Organization: The Pack
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: s.com
Subject: Apple software uninstall
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
References:
s.com

s.com

Lines: 25
X-Trace:
sv3-s1TQiZfSmoIifY0f6ZKwcV4/Rzql4RL4Ka9u9FyZ6LDkgIAfeX9M0XXMUTIfOu1UV/60yv5+57GVusv!Hxs3s/vcPiO9vvHccEDEybkOlQWmQRxyP/FBYSoTSpi82+YxjcEbx9rj91U0RKNzc/v0h+e1ay+9!xk6yWKJzOXEdpLA2W7ty5yLK
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2076
X-Original-Bytes: 1983
X-Received-Bytes: 2306
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1399128951

On 18 Aug 2020, David_B wrote
(in article ):

On 18/08/2020 19:13, Snit wrote:
On Aug 18, 2020 at 10:17:06 AM MST, "Wolffan"
wrote:

On 17 Aug 2020, David_B wrote
(in article ):

-
David_B.
Group Moderator

You cannot be the moderator, as a.c.w is not a moderated group.
This has
been

pointed out to you before. Nop doubt your high alcohol intake
made you
‘forget’ again, troll-boy.

If you keep saying that he will ban you.

I will! ;-)

you can’t, troll-boy.

Snit
Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:52:54 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

6) The Intro video: again, happy to talk to you about that. Again,
curious as to how you think it was done -- what I used is likely
not what you are thinking, assuming you have any ideas at all. But
would be a good topic.

The videos you've seen on my youtube channel discussing and showing
you my battery powered jacobs ladder was shot using the cell phone
I've written about, previously. And later edited on an old version
of Kdenlive.

Aside from that and a few videos I've edited for a couple of non
profits in this area, I don't do much with video editing. Now,
encoding video without losing too much detail and saving piles of HD
space, or how video is constructed behind the scenes, I can help
you. Otherwise, I cannot. I am not a professional cinematographer -
so my knowledge concerning video isn't how to take the best shot
interpratively speaking, it's limited to the technical aspects of
it, instead.

OK, this has gotten a bit long, but it covers a lot IN BRIEF and
hopefully helps to move toward peace.

If you actually wanted what you claim, you wouldn't have responded
several times now with an attitude towards me. You wouldn't have
continued to claim you had my permission to try and dox me, either.

And the reason you've provided for not doxing me so far has nothing
to do with 'protecting me from my own ignorance' and everything to
do with not causing your entire life to be turned upside down and
you shook until every single penny falls out of your pockets.
(figuratively speaking) just like a child who's being punished for
doing exactly what they were told not to do, specifically not to do.

As you have the mentality of that of a child, it's nothing more than
a matter of time before you do what I'm anticipating and face the
consequences of your actions, for once in your miserable life, you
will be held accountable for what you write and what you do.

I sincerely DO want that

Your actions show me otherwise, snit. It doesn't matter what you
claim, it only matters what you do. And so far, you've made no
indication that you want any sort of peace, or truce, or anything
else along those lines.

You've given me a completely different impression of what you want
and what your intentions are. So much so, my entire upcoming weekend
has been shot to hell due to a meeting I have to attend concerning
you. It was one thing to make your snide threats towards me
specifically; perfectly acceptable considering your maturity level.
It was *****ing stupid on your part* to go and do the same thing to
other individuals associated with myself, either directly because
we're in the same group, or indirectly because we're part of the
same scenes.

Now you might actually be in some rather serious ****sor, well ahead
of schedule and not under my control. Not only that, you might have
****ed up my experiment too. Damn but you can be so ****ing stupid
at times. The things you go and do and write about others can and
often does (even if you don't get confirmation at that time) cause a
ripple effect. It's unavoidable due to the nature of which you make
accusatory remarks, when you aren't making one sided, childish ones
as you 'lash out' (to use your terminology) at the poster you're
interacting with, and I use the term interacting very loosely here.

I had intentions of getting this version of my driver circuit to a
functional prototype stage by this weekend. I've got all of the
permanent components soldered to the board now. As well as
connection points for power, the coil, and the much larger mosfet
which is going to be used as a switch. All I have left to do is make
my jumper connections to wire the components up since these boards
are all thru hole with surface mount option on the sides, but no
preset tracing of any kind. It offers you great flexability for
prototyping, but at a cost of your time; you have to make your own
traces with jumper wires.

I'm certainly not thanking you in the least little bit for causing a
delay in my new driver circuit being completed.

I am very close to it being completed and at the live testing stage.
So ****ing close...As you can see he

https://ibb.co/zPfhG0c

That's another homebrew circuit, Snit. I don't even have the
schematics drawn up for it yet. I'll do those before I actually
begin the wiring stage though so that if this circuit works as well
as I expect, I can easily make more of them. The two black rectangle
looking components are a BD139 and BD140 transistor pair.

They will be performing the push pull action on the gate pin of the
IRFP450N Mosfet (oh yea baby!) which is going to do the heavy
lifting. And that's tied into the circuit by using three of the four
block pin you see to the left. This makes it field replaceable in
the event the component fails. I consider this to be one area in
which component failure is not just possible, but likely after so
much use. You'll also notice an 8pin DIP IC socket is present;
that's to make the heart of the circuit, the triple 5, field
replaceable as well. The two block pin you see to the upper left is
the power supply connection point. The fourth pin on the four block
pin you see on the right is the ground connection from the coil to
the circuit.

The heatsink is attached to a dual diode I had to special order for
the purposes of this circuit. rofl, it's a heavy duty SOB (BYQ2BE
part#). And is heatsink friendly; which is important. Especially for
this circuit as I expect some components, this diode and the big fat
mosfet are going to run, shall we say, warm to the touch. rofl.
Still well within operating parameters though. The round blue
component underneath it is actually a 3kilovolt rated high voltage
capacitor (10k pf), and right beside it is a 100k 1/4 watt resistor.
The dual diode as well as that cap and the resistor make up my
snubber circuit, snit.

I'm going to create a gerber file for this one if the testing goes
as planned to have 'professional' silkscreend, already traced boards
sent to me. All I have to do is solder the components in their
proper locations with the correct orientation on the pins. What
presently takes several hours if done correctly (I also have to take
the time to lay the components out on the boards, and make sure I
still have enough room to solder them as well as jumper wires to tie
them into each other in the correct manner. So, it can be quite cosy
as I complete various stages of the process. As for example, my
first driver circuit:

https://ibb.co/BsNKKdk

They have some things in common, but proceed to drive the coil in
different manners. The revised version available with
the first url or by clicking he

https://ibb.co/zPfhG0c

Is not only more energy efficient and uses less components, it's
also taking full advantage of the positive AND negative power rails;
It's a push pull circuit, where as the first one is not. This will
result in a hotter spark on the output of the coil for less consumed
energy for each time the coil hits. More bang for your buck if you
will - when compared to the first circuit I created.

So enough with your projective nonsense towards me. When you do
that, you only show the audience that you're a bit, as nicely as I
can put this, jealous (insanely, let's not kid ourselves here) as
well as a bit more than partially on the slow side, snit. I build
circuits like the above two, for fun, in my spare time, because I
enjoy doing it.

I'm not an idiot, I know how to read, and I do not have problems
comprehending the material I'm reading. That goes from any scifi
novels I've read to blueprints to a building for construction site.

As it stands right now, the second circuit I shared a picture of is
still in my head (well, it's on that board now too), but theres not
even a schematic to it yet! I couldn't just get in there and roll
with it, no schematics, no instruction sheets, no guides, if I
didn't have a solid ****ing grasp on what those components are
capable of being used for, and how to make them do what I want them
to do.

I'm doing this all from my head, too! I could do it in my sleep,
figuratively speaking, snit. So, when you go and write half baked
bull**** about me having reading comprehension issues, or that I
can't troubleshoot, or am otherwise bsing you or anyone else about
something I wrote; just remember this reply and reconsider your
unfounded opinion, before you go and share it and confirm, for us
all, that once again, you're an idiot, a liar, and a stalker.

I work with much more complicated circuits for a living on a daily
basis, anyway so I should ****ing well be able to build these. If
not, I should close up shop and find an employer to kiss ass for a
job. /sarcasm alert for the mentally challenged reader amongst us.

I don't have problems understanding material I read, snit. And that
includes materials which would be considered technical in nature.
Such as schematics, and datasheets for various ICs and transistors -
just two examples of the things I have to know for the types of work
I do. It's just that simple.

and I do not really get why you need me SAY I agree with things I
do not just for you to move that direction. I find it very
immature of you to make such demands.

That's not what's happening, and it's not what I've asked you for.
You went well out of your way to make several false accusations
against me about the usenet flood bot that was doing it's thing
here. (acw). At no time did anything you write concerning my
involvement with the bot ever take place. I never had the bot in
compiled code form, either. You stated I did, in a factual manner as
if to imply we'd already established that to be a fact. Except, we
didn't do any such thing. You intentionally mislead would be readers
with what you wrote, and you did that on purpose.

You concocted a story and tried to pass it off as the truth, going
so far as to try and quote a piece of something I wrote in another
reply to support your claim. Only, it didn't. As Apd told you, as
Ftr told you, as myself and Carroll have all told you. You *LIED*
and you ****ing well know you did.

As of today though, you lied on me, directly, yet again:

MID:

I wrote this:

David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

And you responded with this:

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

Which is a problem, for you:

Message-ID:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try
to not sink to their level.

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.

Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

David and yourself did exactly what I wrote, so there was NO DIRECT
LIE on my part. There was on yours, though, so you owe me an apology
for this now, too, snit. I did tell you I was going to begin
bringing more of your lies up and asking for apologies for them as
well; I'm going to bring up more of them in short order. Maybe you
should create a macro or a script for auto apologizing for all the
lies you wrote about me that I'm going to take the time and nitpick
you about?

See, if you weren't such a defensive liar about the bigger stuff you
lied about, I wouldn't be doing this to you now, but hell, why not;
You've been lying your ass off now for a considerable period of
time. It's time I no longer ignore your other lies, and call you out
for them as well. Some are very minor, but they will be included
because it shows your true nature.

So easy to catch you writing this one too. Oh, did you like how I
found those messages of the two of you doing exactly what I wrote
the both of you went and did? Are you still going to play dumb
concerning my ability to hunt down posts now? G Stupid, ****.


I would love to focus on 4 and 5 more than the others

People in hell would love a cup of ice water. I'd very much like an
apology for the lies you've written about me, but you're going to
have to issue more than one now. I've decided to bring them all up,
with evidence to support the fact they are lies, and demand an
apology for each and every one of them. They all go towards proving
that your true nature is not that of an honorable or honest person,
but is that of a dishonest, stalking, lying, cheat.

You should have apologized for the first whopper of one months ago,
instead of dancing around it as you've been doing, it would have
been over and done with and I wouldn't be riding your ass about
additional ones now. Since you want to see if your more stubborn than myself though, here we go.

Now, I'm officially demanding an apology for the bot lies you wrote
as well as the lies you wrote claiming David and yourself didn't do
what I wrote that you both did, concerning phonebooks and a phone
number. I provided the posts of you both doing exactly that, and
they include header data which contains their MIDs if anyone wants
to verify their authenticity with howard or something.

Not to worry, I've got all kinds of saved threads with discussions
involving you. I'll poke around them as time allows so I can find
some additional lies you peddled that I let you slide on previously.
It's time I no longer give you a free pass. One I remember is your
attempt to change your story about what happened concerning your
offer to decode things for David if I continued ****ing with him by
posting material he couldn't read and therefore, couldn't
participate in any discussion concerning.

Yes, I'll hunt down all the related posts to that lie and begin
demanding apology number 3 to cover that one. So, as it stands right
now, you owe me two distinct apologies for two entirely seperate
lies you wrote. Within another day or two, time permitting, you'll
owe me three; the additional one is for the attempt to rewrite the
encode/decode discussion you butted yourself into and offered David
your services for.

When in a hole, as you are, the best thing you can do is continue to
dig...Said, Nobody.

showed in the records... but I am truly not interested in you
denying things I know are facts

I've seen what passes for facts to you. You provided a very nice
example of it when you claimed I wrote a direct lie when I stated
that David asked you to check that phone number against a phonebook;
he asked you to check it against two seperate ones, and you did. But
somehow, when I wrote about you and he doing this, I was 'directly
lying' about it. Except that I didn't.

Side question, but would explain some things you're writing here
quite recently.. Snit, are you doing xanax and mixing alcohol with
it by chance as you hangout on usenet for say the past few days now?

If you are, I will backoff on further discussion of any kind with
you until you pick one or the other and adjust to it. Something is
off with you, and, based on the way in which you're putting zero
effort into a lie you know is easy to show as one, I'm starting to
wonder what you've been doing irl...

The more I consider that particular cocktail of drugs, the more
likely it is that's what you've been upto. It would explain your
erractic behavior, and very strange, even for you, commentary as of
late. You're heavy on the emotional nonsense and light on the facts,
lighter than normal in fact.

It might even explain your very strange response to my asking if you
knew what an .nfo file was, or showing you a demonstration of one
with an actual release that's three years old...

I'm not accusing you of anything in particular, so don't get this
twisted, but I have made some observations and I know various people
irl who do mess with those two particular drugs, and when they do,
their behavior is very close to your recently observed ones. I'm
doing nothing more than taking an educated guess based on being able
to compare how they act with how you've been acting lately. I have
no actual proof one way or the other, so I'm not going to accuse you
of any wrong doing. I'm simply asking if you're doing them. If you
are, we can't chat, you'll remain easily confused. I'll just have to
repeat myself later when you come out of the stupid mode they can
put you in.

in you demanding I pretend to agree with you

I have absolutely no doubt that if I were to ask for an MID to
support your claim, none would be forth coming; because no such MID
exists. I'm not demanding that you pretend to do anything. I'm
demanding at this point what you rightfully owe me; Two apologies
for two very seperate and distinct lies you wrote about me. The most
recent one being that you denied you were asked by David to see if
that number was available in not one, but two! seperate online
phonebooks. I shared the posts with MIDs showing you were both doing
this. So you can't claim it's a direct lie on my part anymore, you
were lying the first time you made that statement though, and you
certainly do owe me an apology for having written it, now.

The first apology I've begun to demand is due to your lie concerning
my involvement with the lame as **** usenet flood bot. You
specifically claimed I was called out and clarified I had the bot in
compiled code form. I want to see the posts calling me out and I
especiallly want to see the post where I clarified I had the bot, in
compiled code form. You went well out of your way to make that story
up, going so far as to quote something I wrote, unrelated to it,
completely out of context to use to support your unfounded
accusations you made against me.


one whit about -- can you focus on tech issues instead as I want
to (even the ones you asked me about... but others are fine,
too... things we BOTH want to talk about).

Tech issues. Sure, thing. What does a snubber circuit as shown in
both of those pictures do? Can you identify the snubber circuit in
both pictures? If so, circle them and upload your results for
review.


--
Cat philosophy: I am, therefore give me tuna.

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:28:04 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin
wrote:

Snit
Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:52:54
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 4:24:15 PM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Wed, 12 Aug 2020
17:20:24 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Snit, as can clearly be shown by the rest of my reply that you
opted to snit out, what you're writing simply isn't the case.

OK, trying AGAIN to make peace with you.

I don't follow you here,

There are many comments you do not "follow"... then you accuse
others of the reading comprehension issues you repeatedly show.

Heh. I was being civil and courteous in my reply; and your response
to that is the ramblings of a child. Not impressed, snit.

Indeed. You have the patience of a saint because just reading this
interactions between that thing and you makes me want to yank him
through the monitor and strangle him.


Snipped your lie about my actions with the floodbot.

I didn't lie about anything. I provided reference material which
supported what I wrote too. And, you did intentionally ignore the
fact I pulled the first of the fourteen MIDs you shared, four out of
five times, in a row. Going so far as to post edit with one.

That's very dishonest of you, but, that's not surprising. Our issue
started as a result of your dishonesty about me. You went and wrote
a whopper of a lie about me when I had you kf'd. You didn't expect
me to review old posts, but I did, and I found those. I asked why
you lied, and you've been ducking and dodging it ever since.

Rule #1: If snit is speaking, in this case posting, assume everything
he posts is a lie. His lies range from direct, easily disputed lies to
lies by omission which is his preferred method of lying.


The horse is dead.

Oh? Have you issued an apology and I somehow missed it then? If not,
nothing has changed. You lied on me about the bot, you falsely
accused me of having things to do with it that I didn't, as well as
having the bot itself in compile code form, when at no time did I,
nor did I claim to; but you wrote I did. You lied. Repeatedly.

Here comes the semi-apology from snit. Get ready for it because the
classic signs are there. Statements like:

"the horse is dead"
" I'd rather talk about technology"
"Boring"

They are all snit lingo for "I'm cornered, my circus is closing down
and I need to keep my trolling alive in this group".

The next step in the snit process will be a half assed "apology" of
sorts where he suddenly discovered that he has misinterpreted
something the other person wrote or somehow missed a message etc.

It's very important not to fall for this ruse because the next step is
for snit to twist all of this, blame it on you, at least in part, and
then file it away to use against his next victim where he will of
course run his circus against and then when THAT circus reaches it's
end he will refer back to YOUR apology, twisting your words as
required by saying something like "see, Gremlin and I had our
differences but we both realized that we made mistakes and were able
to reach a peaceful agreement".

This is how the snit "apology" works.
Again, don't fall for it.
If you have snit cornered, keep him in the corner and tighten the
screws as tight as you can so he cannot squirm out of it by twisting
context.

Snip--- Many Message-ID where Gremlin provides incontrovertible
evidence to back his claims regarding snit's behavior.

You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit?

Decades of prescription pills mixed with booze has fried snit's
cranium.
He used to blame it on his mother for drinking during pregnancy, fetal
alcohol syndrome of sorts.
He might be right. I don't know nor do I care. What I do know is that
over the years snit has annoyed and caused trouble, either directly or
indirectly, for hundreds if not thousands of people he has come in
contact with and somehow he always seems to slither away and continue
his attacks on innocent people.
--
Mr. Doobie Good

On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:41:08 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin
wrote:

Snit
Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:52:54 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

one whit about -- can you focus on tech issues instead as I want
to (even the ones you asked me about... but others are fine,
too... things we BOTH want to talk about).

Tech issues. Sure, thing. What does a snubber circuit as shown in
both of those pictures do? Can you identify the snubber circuit in
both pictures? If so, circle them and upload your results for
review.

Snit has almost zero knowledge of tech issues other than what he use
his 100 button mouse to Google for.

Snit is best left to embed pictures of his comfort Teddy Bear Toasty
in documents and rotate the image to arbitrary angles.

Snit is also an expert in manipulating recipe files where he can mark
up the file, email corrections and so forth, again using his 100
button mouse to expedite the process.

He used to have videos of Linux vs OSX where he shows useless to most
examples of these types of tasks and slams Linux for not being able to
perform them as well as a Mac can.
A complete lie of course.

Snit got some really good traction on those over in COLA. Some poster
named Peter K ripped snit a new asshole over it but of course snit
wore him down because unlike snit, Peter K doesn't have 24x7x365 to
post to usenet. Snit of course claimed victory.
--
Mr. Doobie Good

In article , Snit
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your
notation incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can1t
see that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims
up to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

not at all. i'm well aware of his antics.

he's *so* over his head he doesn't even know what he's saying.


I am saying I agree with Apple about what Apple is doing with Silicon.

moving the goalposts again, this time so far that it's a complete
change of topic.

And you keep insisting I am wrong.

what you said earlier was contradicted by what apple said, therefore
you were wrong.

now you claim to agree with apple, which means you realized you were
wrong, however, you still won't admit it.

It is rather funny.

it is indeed, but not in the way you think.

But, hey, you did
some research and found other OSs can be run in virtualization ‹ something
that was never in contention. Well done.

clearly it was for you, since you assumed that any fix related to a vm
had to be for windows.

now get off your high horse and stop pretending to know everything.

nospam wrote:
In article , Snit
wrote:

apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your
notation incorrect.

This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS
update:

https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US
-----
Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization
apps
-----

Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows
virtualization.

it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention
windows.

I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can1t
see that or disagree then whatever.

you're moving the goalposts.

the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop.

you are imagining words that do not exist.

A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims
up to try to feel better about by yourself.

not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no
mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word
windows was included when it was not.

if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to
windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it.

this should be good.

the above is about *virtualization* *apps*.

Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like.

here's a clue: those are not windows.

do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware?

Here, to help educate
you:

lose the attitude.


https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software

Below you do your ego boost thing.

that would be you, given your attitude displayed above.

Not interested.

another lie.

the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug
was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your
head.

you ask for tech, then say you don't want it.

the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong.

it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a
simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex
topics.

in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect
any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it.

it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada.

Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-)

not at all. i'm well aware of his antics.

he's *so* over his head he doesn't even know what he's saying.


I am saying I agree with Apple about what Apple is doing with Silicon.

moving the goalposts again, this time so far that it's a complete
change of topic.

And you keep insisting I am wrong.

what you said earlier was contradicted by what apple said, therefore
you were wrong.

now you claim to agree with apple, which means you realized you were
wrong, however, you still won't admit it.

It is rather funny.

it is indeed, but not in the way you think.

But, hey, you did
some research and found other OSs can be run in virtualization ‹ something
that was never in contention. Well done.

clearly it was for you, since you assumed that any fix related to a vm
had to be for windows.

now get off your high horse and stop pretending to know everything.


Another tech free post brought to you by nospam!

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:01:13 +0100, David_B
wrote:

On 20/08/2020 02:26, FromTheRafters wrote:
[....]
I'm wondering if it was not about a small subset of x86-64 bit
instructions which a translator (Rosetta?) would not translate.

Interjecting! :-) Remember the header problem with redacted?

Do you think THIS header is forged?

You've lost it. Must be all the drinking. How is your question
in any way related to win 10? Why cite 2 people, one of which is not
even following the thread?
Why post other people's headers? The thread was about
ad-blocking.
Go and see your psychiatrist(again). He underestimated your
dosage. Either that or you overestimated your alcohol tolerance.
HTH

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

67 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s

--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

Snit
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:16:46 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 20, 2020 at 2:41:08 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:52:54
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

6) The Intro video: again, happy to talk to you about that.
Again, curious as to how you think it was done -- what I used
is likely not what you are thinking, assuming you have any
ideas at all. But would be a good topic.

The videos you've seen on my youtube channel discussing and
showing you my battery powered jacobs ladder was shot using the
cell phone I've written about, previously. And later edited on an
old version of Kdenlive.

Aside from that and a few videos I've edited for a couple of non
profits in this area, I don't do much with video editing. Now,
encoding video without losing too much detail and saving piles of
HD space, or how video is constructed behind the scenes, I can
help you. Otherwise, I cannot. I am not a professional
cinematographer - so my knowledge concerning video isn't how to
take the best shot interpratively speaking, it's limited to the
technical aspects of it, instead.

Had you understood what you read you could have just noted you did
not know.

LOL again. That's a perfect example of how even when no attitude is
displayed to you in any way shape or form, you still respond with an
erroneous condescending reply. But, you want "peace". rofl... so
funny.

If you want I can show videos of the ScreenFlow and Keynote files.

Nah, that's quite alright. I don't have time to read your off the
wall nonsense, snide remarks, and otherwise, dumb as **** snarky
comments you'll no doubt provide more of than the instructions
themselves. As you did right off the jump when you responded already.

As I wrote previously, it doesn't matter how I respond to you, or
when I do so, your reply is going to start out the same way and get
worse from there, as this reply did, as others have, and ones you
haven't even written yet will. You've already made up your mind, you
see me as the enemy and that's how your going to respond each and
every time you do.

If you actually wanted what you claim, you wouldn't have
responded several times now with an attitude towards me.

You have some SERIOUSLY thin skin!

Nah, I don't. If that was the case, you'd have been 0wned already by
me personally, months ago.

I mean, really, that is just silly of you.

I wouldn't use the word silly to describe your erratic behavior,
myself...

Do you think ANY amount of writing is
going to make me look at the phone records and NOT see what is
plainly there?

ROFL. Snit, as has already been established, your video will show
exactly what you want it to, except for the city; you can't very well
go back and change that one now.

You have speculation

No, I don't. I have direct proof you doctored a video and tried to
pass it off as the truth. Where else have I seen you pull ****
exactly like that.. Oh, that's right, the bot thread. When you
directly accused me of not only helping it's owner, and protecting
them too I might add, but that I also had the full blown bot itself,
in compiled code form no less. You owe me several apologies for
having done that, and an additional one for claiming I lied when I
wrote about David asking you to check that number against a phonebook
url. He asked you to do it, twice. And you did.

what I see -- with private info covered, of course:

I do not dispute your ability to edit video, Snit. I've even
congratulated you on your ability to do so. I even commented that you
might have been able to dupe some people, had you selected the
correct city. Of course.

I am being VERY kind to protect you from yourself.

Snit, I'm still voting no against the gameplan for you; because, I
don't agree with it. Yes, you did the things you've been accused of
doing, and yes, under normal circumstances you'd more than deserve
this, but, I'm also taking your family into consideration; they don't
deserve the **** you cause. So, if anyone is protecting anyone from
themselves, I'm the one doing you a solid here, stupid. Not the other
way around.

It is not an obligation.

I can disdain from voting, or vote yes at any time, Snit. It's not a
game, and your efforts to pretend or otherwise act like it is aren't
really helpful to the purpose of preventing what you do deserve, but
the others around you most likely do not. I'm not even sure they are
aware of your online track record with people. I suspect they are
not.

At some point, you're going to get yourself a good spanking and there
will be nothing I can do about it. But for the time being, I can
still delay the inevitable and let you dig a deeper hole as I do.

[snip of technical material, rofl]

So much for wanting to talk tech, eh, snit?

David and yourself did exactly what I wrote, so there was NO
DIRECT LIE on my part. There was on yours, though, so you owe me
an apology for this now, too, snit. I did tell you I was going to
begin bringing more of your lies up and asking for apologies for
them as well; I'm going to bring up more of them in short order.
Maybe you should create a macro or a script for auto apologizing
for all the lies you wrote about me that I'm going to take the
time and nitpick you about?

So, as everyone can see, David did ask you to check the number
against a phonebook url; he actually shared two, and you checked it
against both. So that was NOT a direct lie on my part as you
previously claimed. How about an apology then?

I've seen what passes for facts to you. You provided a very nice
example of it when you claimed I wrote a direct lie when I stated
that David asked you to check that phone number against a
phonebook; he asked you to check it against two seperate ones,
and you did. But somehow, when I wrote about you and he doing
this, I was 'directly lying' about it. Except that I didn't.

Side question, but would explain some things you're writing here
quite recently.. Snit, are you doing xanax and mixing alcohol
with it by chance as you hangout on usenet for say the past few
days now?

Was my question hitting too close to home?

Tech issues. Sure, thing. What does a snubber circuit as shown in
both of those pictures do? Can you identify the snubber circuit
in both pictures? If so, circle them and upload your results for
review.

No response, Snit?

Why did you bother leaving in so much material if you were going to
do what you typically do when overwhelming evidence is presented
against you?

Btw, dumbass, those phonebook entries need to be culled; Hardly ANY
of those computer shops in Kingsport or Johnson City still remain.
They aren't under new management, or new names, they no longer
****ing exist.

To give you a small idea how outdated the material you tried to stalk
me with is, Computer Associated Technologies (Cats as it was known
locally) that's in the Kingsport phonebook you checked shut down
nearly twenty years ago now, it's owner committed suicide in the back
of the shop.

Kingsport Computers has been dead and gone for nearly ten years now
too; one of the two owners is six ft under and has been for several
years now. I knew those guys, too. Dated one of their Daughters.

NAS from Johnson City is a ****hole of a company, they got sued by
the Walmart out here; they are the reason nobody else can sell
unbranded box machines at the local Walmart - NAS had a contract with
them and didn't honor it.

I could easily go on and on about most of the shops from both urls
being long gone and buried, but what's the point; you tried to stalk
me with the information I provided you. And if you think for a second
had you found my shop listing that you wouldn't have responded to
David with more than "Yes, it's in this one", I've got some real nice
oceanfront property for sale, less than a mile from your location.
Interested?


--
A person is just about as big as the things that make them angry.

nospam
Fri, 14 Aug 2020
14:19:05 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

In article , Snit
wrote:
the above quote is about *rosetta*, not virtualization, and
nothing about it is in dispute.

it does not contradict anything anyone has said, which myself,
gremlin and others have been trying to explain to you.

you don't realize that it shows *you* to be wrong, because you
don't fully understand anything about the underlying technologies.

If you read his reply to me when I asked him to explain the
difference between emulation and virtualization in his own words,
you'd have more confirmation that what you've written here is
correct.

He doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground on this subject,
and many more.

My INTRO students, by the end of the class, can tell you that
drag and drop is not the same as copy and paste. You two are so
twisted up in your need to be "right" that you insist they are.

nobody said they were the same. that's pure fabrication.

Yep. Snit is very good for pulling that too. It's one of the entries
on the snitmoves list, infact.

I said literally NOTHING about phones... Gremlin made that up.

we'll see what he will provide about what you said.

I called him from what's mostly a beta dialpad clone, and provided
him a backup cell number that goes to a straighttalk phone. G

Snit is claiming that the voip system I used to contact him provided
him that particular cells number as well as the wrong city for my
location; but he didn't cough up the city right away, it took some
additional questioning to get him to do that, and he guessed the
wrong one.

I've asked how it's possible for voip that knows nothing about me to
be able to give him information on a completely unrelated device, but
his only response to that seems to be that my troubleshooting skills
are terrible. Hardly answers my question, wouldn't you agree?

What's happened here is I hit to close to home with some of my
spotlight questions, so he did a bit of video editing and is now
implying he'll dox me with the infos if I don't stop showing what a
lying piece of **** he is. rofl.

I proceeded to ask if he knew and understood what an .nfo file was,
and I provided an example of what will happen if he makes good on his
implied threat, as silly as it is. His response to that was to file a
report with the kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson
city ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated from.


He's so far in over his head now, he doesn't know which way is up
anymore. When he went off with his half baked threat, he didn't
realize, the entire group is lurking here and has been for weeks now.
His threat was taken as he intended it, against the entire group, not
just me specifically. As a result of that, there's been meetings all
day today, and more are scheduled for the rest of the weekend, as not
one, not two, but FOUR, different professional hacking/ripping groups
are now involved in this. When you threaten one, you threaten us all.

Some of which have absolutely no American members and no official
presence here. All because he wanted to get low down with LE threats.
Despite the fact we're all competitors of each other group wise, we
still look out for our own.. And snit is in way over his ****ing
head; not that he wasn't with me alone, but, now, it's another
****ing ballgame. I wouldn't want to be playing. I've known some of
these people since I was a damn teenager, they are the kinds of
hax0rs that can keep a person like me up when I should be sleeping.
Snit just thinks i'm a badass. He hasn't met some of my friends yet.

I'm a really nice dude by comparison to anyone from RKV. They are
some heavy duty vodka drinking russian hackers. Serious level,
hacking here. That group covers all aspects of hpavc scenes, they
have their hands in all the cookie jars. Snit is going to make an
international spectacle of himself and anyone he knows in real life
that's in any way close to him or anyone else he knows in real life.
No stone is going to be left unturned, hell, the research has been
ongoing (I thought it was about to begin). Snits been a bad little
****head for a very long time now, has left one hell of a digital
paper trail in his wake. I can't think of a more deserving
individual.

in other words, you *did* say something about phones, and what's
worse, you still don't understand his detailed explanation.

He does not. Nor does he understand the implications of his latest
nark threat. And that's only because he's been able to get away with
his bull**** for far too long. It was just a matter of time before he
ran into the wrong person, or, in this case, a ****ing small pile of
wrong persons. I'm not going to waste your time by sharing what a
russian wrote about his threat, only that they found it especially
funny and if he lived in russia, he'd be visited personally for a
'russian skull**** session for narks (I can't prounounce let alone
spell the russian word for snit)'. I don't know what that is, I'm
assuming it's like the American version, but, I don't know for sure,
and I wasn't about to ask. rofl.



--
Among animals, it's eat or be eaten. Among people, it's define or be
defined.

Snit
Tue, 18 Aug 2020 05:00:37 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 17, 2020 at 9:48:57 PM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:
I merely noted I agree with Apple he

Er, no, you didn't.

Yes I do.

Okay, this is easy enough to resolve. Describe in your own words
what Apple wrote about.

But then again you are so lost with tech you think my
phone provider showing your phone number in its records must be
magic.

Heh, snit, I've never said video editing was magic.

Maybe it will. Maybe you will find a way to block it. But

Uhh, snit, I didn't block anything intentionally the first time
around; that's a side effect of the voip system; because it doesn't
know anything about me to provide to your carrier. That's why I
provided you a callback number, dumb ****. You wouldn't have been
able to call me back if I didn't, because your logs provided you no
useful information; which is why you or your wife screened the call
on me.

Now, about your wife.. As I told you, the voice seemed to be an
octave higher or so than yours, with what appeared to me to be a
faked spanish accent. I spent a considerable amount of time in NM
around various legal/illegal persons of a mexican decent, and I've
heard various dialects. Your wifes seemed.. faked. I can also speak
a little spanish, and write as well. I'm not what I'd call fluent,
but I can get by.

So, did you take the call and try to pass yourself off as a spanish
girl, or is your wife spanish with a heavy accent? By the end of the
weekend, I'll already have an answer to this question; atleast in so
far as your wifes nationality by the looks of how the ****storm you
wanted to create is building; so you can duck me if you'd like. when
I find out, I'll let you know what I found.

IF you do the same thing we are likely to get the same results --
the number showing up.

Only when you complete the post production work on the video, Snit.
Otherwise, the results will be the same as the first time around;
unknown caller, no further information available.

To your credit, though, you have admitted you do not know how I
created the TARDIS (TURDIS) video. Not that it is good you do not
know (I don't care if you do or do not) but you not only admitted
you did not know but admitted I know something you do not. That
shows growth on your part.

ROFL! The way in which you wrote this clearly shows you have the
mentality of a child, and the maturity of one to match. Go snit!

I will say I did NO faking in the phone record video nor the
making-of video.

Obviously, you did. No other logical explanation for what took
placed based on the technology used to contact you. It's not an
issue of poor troubleshooting, it's an issue of being ****ing
impossible.

The fact I am open and honest

You are? Let's see:

MID:

I wrote this:

David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

And you responded with this:

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

Which is a problem, for you:

Message-ID:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try
to not sink to their level.

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.

Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

You were saying? Is your memory shot, snit?

See how easy it is to catch you in a direct lie? You lie so much
dude, and forget having done it, that you easily forget having done
so. And allow posts like this to be created, directly showing you as
the liar you are.



--
Moderators are not God. God has mercy.

Gremlin wrote:
Snit
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:16:46 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 20, 2020 at 2:41:08 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:52:54
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

6) The Intro video: again, happy to talk to you about that.
Again, curious as to how you think it was done -- what I used
is likely not what you are thinking, assuming you have any
ideas at all. But would be a good topic.

The videos you've seen on my youtube channel discussing and
showing you my battery powered jacobs ladder was shot using the
cell phone I've written about, previously. And later edited on an
old version of Kdenlive.

Aside from that and a few videos I've edited for a couple of non
profits in this area, I don't do much with video editing. Now,
encoding video without losing too much detail and saving piles of
HD space, or how video is constructed behind the scenes, I can
help you. Otherwise, I cannot. I am not a professional
cinematographer - so my knowledge concerning video isn't how to
take the best shot interpratively speaking, it's limited to the
technical aspects of it, instead.

Had you understood what you read you could have just noted you did
not know.

LOL again. That's a perfect example of how even when no attitude is
displayed to you in any way shape or form, you still respond with an
erroneous condescending reply. But, you want "peace". rofl... so
funny.

If you want I can show videos of the ScreenFlow and Keynote files.

Nah, that's quite alright. I don't have time to read your off the
wall nonsense, snide remarks, and otherwise, dumb as **** snarky
comments you'll no doubt provide more of than the instructions
themselves. As you did right off the jump when you responded already.

As I wrote previously, it doesn't matter how I respond to you, or
when I do so, your reply is going to start out the same way and get
worse from there, as this reply did, as others have, and ones you
haven't even written yet will. You've already made up your mind, you
see me as the enemy and that's how your going to respond each and
every time you do.

If you actually wanted what you claim, you wouldn't have
responded several times now with an attitude towards me.

You have some SERIOUSLY thin skin!

Nah, I don't. If that was the case, you'd have been 0wned already by
me personally, months ago.

I mean, really, that is just silly of you.

I wouldn't use the word silly to describe your erratic behavior,
myself...

Do you think ANY amount of writing is
going to make me look at the phone records and NOT see what is
plainly there?

ROFL. Snit, as has already been established, your video will show
exactly what you want it to, except for the city; you can't very well
go back and change that one now.

You have speculation

No, I don't. I have direct proof you doctored a video and tried to
pass it off as the truth. Where else have I seen you pull ****
exactly like that.. Oh, that's right, the bot thread. When you
directly accused me of not only helping it's owner, and protecting
them too I might add, but that I also had the full blown bot itself,
in compiled code form no less. You owe me several apologies for
having done that, and an additional one for claiming I lied when I
wrote about David asking you to check that number against a phonebook
url. He asked you to do it, twice. And you did.

what I see -- with private info covered, of course:

I do not dispute your ability to edit video, Snit. I've even
congratulated you on your ability to do so. I even commented that you
might have been able to dupe some people, had you selected the
correct city. Of course.

I am being VERY kind to protect you from yourself.

Snit, I'm still voting no against the gameplan for you; because, I
don't agree with it. Yes, you did the things you've been accused of
doing, and yes, under normal circumstances you'd more than deserve
this, but, I'm also taking your family into consideration; they don't
deserve the **** you cause. So, if anyone is protecting anyone from
themselves, I'm the one doing you a solid here, stupid. Not the other
way around.

It is not an obligation.

I can disdain from voting, or vote yes at any time, Snit. It's not a
game, and your efforts to pretend or otherwise act like it is aren't
really helpful to the purpose of preventing what you do deserve, but
the others around you most likely do not. I'm not even sure they are
aware of your online track record with people. I suspect they are
not.

At some point, you're going to get yourself a good spanking and there
will be nothing I can do about it. But for the time being, I can
still delay the inevitable and let you dig a deeper hole as I do.

[snip of technical material, rofl]

So much for wanting to talk tech, eh, snit?

David and yourself did exactly what I wrote, so there was NO
DIRECT LIE on my part. There was on yours, though, so you owe me
an apology for this now, too, snit. I did tell you I was going to
begin bringing more of your lies up and asking for apologies for
them as well; I'm going to bring up more of them in short order.
Maybe you should create a macro or a script for auto apologizing
for all the lies you wrote about me that I'm going to take the
time and nitpick you about?

So, as everyone can see, David did ask you to check the number
against a phonebook url; he actually shared two, and you checked it
against both. So that was NOT a direct lie on my part as you
previously claimed. How about an apology then?

I've seen what passes for facts to you. You provided a very nice
example of it when you claimed I wrote a direct lie when I stated
that David asked you to check that phone number against a
phonebook; he asked you to check it against two seperate ones,
and you did. But somehow, when I wrote about you and he doing
this, I was 'directly lying' about it. Except that I didn't.

Side question, but would explain some things you're writing here
quite recently.. Snit, are you doing xanax and mixing alcohol
with it by chance as you hangout on usenet for say the past few
days now?

Was my question hitting too close to home?

Tech issues. Sure, thing. What does a snubber circuit as shown in
both of those pictures do? Can you identify the snubber circuit
in both pictures? If so, circle them and upload your results for
review.

No response, Snit?

Why did you bother leaving in so much material if you were going to
do what you typically do when overwhelming evidence is presented
against you?

Btw, dumbass, those phonebook entries need to be culled; Hardly ANY
of those computer shops in Kingsport or Johnson City still remain.
They aren't under new management, or new names, they no longer
****ing exist.

To give you a small idea how outdated the material you tried to stalk
me with is, Computer Associated Technologies (Cats as it was known
locally) that's in the Kingsport phonebook you checked shut down
nearly twenty years ago now, it's owner committed suicide in the back
of the shop.

Kingsport Computers has been dead and gone for nearly ten years now
too; one of the two owners is six ft under and has been for several
years now. I knew those guys, too. Dated one of their Daughters.

NAS from Johnson City is a ****hole of a company, they got sued by
the Walmart out here; they are the reason nobody else can sell
unbranded box machines at the local Walmart - NAS had a contract with
them and didn't honor it.

I could easily go on and on about most of the shops from both urls
being long gone and buried, but what's the point; you tried to stalk
me with the information I provided you. And if you think for a second
had you found my shop listing that you wouldn't have responded to
David with more than "Yes, it's in this one", I've got some real nice
oceanfront property for sale, less than a mile from your location.
Interested?



More threats and lying from you — and yet I still protect you from your
ignorant claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple
question.

Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

Gremlin wrote:
nospam
Fri, 14 Aug 2020
14:19:05 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

In article , Snit
wrote:
the above quote is about *rosetta*, not virtualization, and
nothing about it is in dispute.

it does not contradict anything anyone has said, which myself,
gremlin and others have been trying to explain to you.

you don't realize that it shows *you* to be wrong, because you
don't fully understand anything about the underlying technologies.

If you read his reply to me when I asked him to explain the
difference between emulation and virtualization in his own words,
you'd have more confirmation that what you've written here is
correct.

He doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground on this subject,
and many more.

My INTRO students, by the end of the class, can tell you that
drag and drop is not the same as copy and paste. You two are so
twisted up in your need to be "right" that you insist they are.

nobody said they were the same. that's pure fabrication.

Yep. Snit is very good for pulling that too. It's one of the entries
on the snitmoves list, infact.

I said literally NOTHING about phones... Gremlin made that up.

we'll see what he will provide about what you said.

I called him from what's mostly a beta dialpad clone, and provided
him a backup cell number that goes to a straighttalk phone. G

Snit is claiming that the voip system I used to contact him provided
him that particular cells number as well as the wrong city for my
location; but he didn't cough up the city right away, it took some
additional questioning to get him to do that, and he guessed the
wrong one.

I've asked how it's possible for voip that knows nothing about me to
be able to give him information on a completely unrelated device, but
his only response to that seems to be that my troubleshooting skills
are terrible. Hardly answers my question, wouldn't you agree?

What's happened here is I hit to close to home with some of my
spotlight questions, so he did a bit of video editing and is now
implying he'll dox me with the infos if I don't stop showing what a
lying piece of **** he is. rofl.

I proceeded to ask if he knew and understood what an .nfo file was,
and I provided an example of what will happen if he makes good on his
implied threat, as silly as it is. His response to that was to file a
report with the kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson
city ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated from.


He's so far in over his head now, he doesn't know which way is up
anymore. When he went off with his half baked threat, he didn't
realize, the entire group is lurking here and has been for weeks now.
His threat was taken as he intended it, against the entire group, not
just me specifically. As a result of that, there's been meetings all
day today, and more are scheduled for the rest of the weekend, as not
one, not two, but FOUR, different professional hacking/ripping groups
are now involved in this. When you threaten one, you threaten us all.

Some of which have absolutely no American members and no official
presence here. All because he wanted to get low down with LE threats.
Despite the fact we're all competitors of each other group wise, we
still look out for our own.. And snit is in way over his ****ing
head; not that he wasn't with me alone, but, now, it's another
****ing ballgame. I wouldn't want to be playing. I've known some of
these people since I was a damn teenager, they are the kinds of
hax0rs that can keep a person like me up when I should be sleeping.
Snit just thinks i'm a badass. He hasn't met some of my friends yet.

I'm a really nice dude by comparison to anyone from RKV. They are
some heavy duty vodka drinking russian hackers. Serious level,
hacking here. That group covers all aspects of hpavc scenes, they
have their hands in all the cookie jars. Snit is going to make an
international spectacle of himself and anyone he knows in real life
that's in any way close to him or anyone else he knows in real life.
No stone is going to be left unturned, hell, the research has been
ongoing (I thought it was about to begin). Snits been a bad little
****head for a very long time now, has left one hell of a digital
paper trail in his wake. I can't think of a more deserving
individual.

in other words, you *did* say something about phones, and what's
worse, you still don't understand his detailed explanation.

He does not. Nor does he understand the implications of his latest
nark threat. And that's only because he's been able to get away with
his bull**** for far too long. It was just a matter of time before he
ran into the wrong person, or, in this case, a ****ing small pile of
wrong persons. I'm not going to waste your time by sharing what a
russian wrote about his threat, only that they found it especially
funny and if he lived in russia, he'd be visited personally for a
'russian skull**** session for narks (I can't prounounce let alone
spell the russian word for snit)'. I don't know what that is, I'm
assuming it's like the American version, but, I don't know for sure,
and I wasn't about to ask. rofl.




More lies and trolling from you — and yet I still protect you from your
ignorant claims about tech and your inability to troubleshoot a simple
question.

Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone number.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.